Little Women (1994) - Introducing Mrs. Laurence Scene (9/10) | Movieclips

Подписаться 62 млн

Просмотров 558 тыс.

50% 1

Little Women - Introducing Mrs. Laurence: Jo (Winona Ryder) gets a welcomed surprise visit from Laurie (Christian Bale).
BUY THE MOVIE: www.fandangonow.com/details/m...
Watch the best Little Women scenes & clips:
• Little Women (1994) | ...
FILM DESCRIPTION:
In this 1994 adaptation of Louisa May Alcott's classic, the March sisters confront growing pains, financial shortages, family tragedies and romantic rivalries in mid-19th-century Massachusetts. Jo (Winona Ryder) struggles for independence and sometimes clashes with her beloved mother and her sisters Meg, Amy and Beth. She also contends with their cranky Aunt March, their impulsive neighbor Laurie (Christian Bale) and kindly linguistics professor Friedrich Bhaer (Gabriel Byrne).
CREDITS:
TM & © Sony (1994)
Cast: Christian Bale, Eric Stoltz, Samantha Mathis, Trini Alvarado
Director: Gillian Armstrong
Watch More:
► Fresh New Clips: bit.ly/2taDWqW
► Classic Trailers: bit.ly/2qTCxHF
► Hot New Trailers: bit.ly/2qThrsF
► Clips From Movies Coming Soon: bit.ly/2FrP8VL
► Indie Movie Clips: bit.ly/2qTZMRE
► Deleted Scenes: bit.ly/2ARbLPJ
► Bloopers: bit.ly/2qYmBnc
► Celebrity Interviews: bit.ly/2D4tzw4
Fuel Your Movie Obsession:
► Subscribe to MOVIECLIPS: bit.ly/2CZa490
► Watch Movieclips ORIGINALS: bit.ly/2D3sipV
► Like us on FACEBOOK: bit.ly/2DikvkY
► Follow us on TWITTER: bit.ly/2mgkaHb
► Follow us on INSTAGRAM: bit.ly/2mg0VNU
The MOVIECLIPS channel is the largest collection of licensed movie clips on the web. Here you will find unforgettable moments, scenes, and lines from all your favorite films. Made by movie fans, for movie fans.

Кино

Опубликовано:

1 окт 2019

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 231

@MsSonnencreme 4 года назад

I think the problem is Winona and Christian have ‚unintentional‘ chemistry, which makes Jo and Laurie seem more like lovers.

@gabzd 4 года назад

Saoirse and Timmy have great chemistry, too, but Florence and Timmy's just made sense too.

@binhn.c.7003 4 года назад

I think Greta did a great job casting Saoirse and Timmy because they have that “friendship” chemistry irl too!

@MsSonnencreme 4 года назад

@@gabzd Saiorse and Timothee have natural chemistry and seem kind of like two sides of the same coin, Florence and Timothee have old fashioned, golden era romantic tension , so they are perfect for their roles

@MsSonnencreme 4 года назад

@@binhn.c.7003 yes exactly!

@myytchanneldinakoha8498 4 года назад

The writer and the producer admitted as much, saying Bale was too dreamy it didn’t make sense to say no to him.

@kanyaanindita4461 4 года назад

The chemistry between Laurie and Amy in the new movie is stronger and Laurie's love for Amy is more convincing

@myytchanneldinakoha8498 4 года назад

Kanya Anindita Credit Gerwig for that.

@Nazaba09 4 года назад

I don’t think that’s true. Amy is more developed in the new version, yes, but to me that just makes her more cold and calculating. We know her intentions. She’s more of a cynic, while this Amy, while always knowing she’d marry rich, isn’t doing it because she’s thinking about how men are superior to women and blah blah blah. Plus I think in this version they do a better job of Amy putting Laurie in his place and he has to come back and repent.

@myytchanneldinakoha8498 4 года назад

Natalie Zayas-Bazan This Amy is ultimately kind whereas Gerwig’s maintains her childhood meanness and cynicism. Just different interpretations.

@Chuchutrain806 4 года назад

He doesn’t love her.. he married her because he couldn’t have jo but he wanted to stay in her family..

@Nazaba09 4 года назад

Akeno Chu not true. I don’t think he would have promised to kiss her before she died if he didn’t love her in some way, even if she was a child. And even if you look at it like ‘they had to get married for Amy to come home and see her sisters’, that is still love. He loved Amy enough to do her that favor, if you want to think about it that way.

@victoriacastillo9484 3 года назад

The ONE flaw i see in this movie is the way they handled Laurie's and Amy's relationship...making it seem so creepy and i don't know...wrong. But in the book they develop feelings for each other in such a natural way, they grow and mature and in the process become so perfect for one another. So props to the new version cause i feel they nailed it on that.

@OdiiAriwodo 2 года назад

It's been about two decades since I read the book, but the 2019 version made me feel like I finally understood it. It made Amy almost my favorite (if I don't count Meg, she would have been my absolute favorite) March girl. And I loved the portrayal of Laurie too. Beautiful characters both.

@KylaGrace 4 года назад

In the new film version that just came out, Amy is much more personable in my opinion and the chemistry between her an Laurie is definitely there. That pairing makes a lot more sense

@louisenich 4 года назад

Kyla Grace agreed! Just saw it and was so happy it ended that way. Though now I don’t want to read the book cause I heard it reads sadder how him and jo don’t end up together...

@sims2lovealot 4 года назад

Yeah definitely! They grew the relationship more and you can see how Amy's level-headedness and persona is a better match for Laurie than Jo was. They would have driven each other mad.

@LuisMartinez-rw2lj 4 года назад

Also I prefer the new version because the way the story is set up and the directing is much more enjoyable and creative to watch then the this version.

@danielamedivi1 4 года назад

I hope I can write this properly . This isn't my language. For me it's funny, because I find the new version a bit unbalanced and disrespectful. I mean, it is good that they painted Amy in a better way, but it had to be done by putting the other sisters on the background like props? The magic of this book for me is that it shows different women issues at that time. Not just the one that looks more like and has the ideology of whats expected of modern women. And the problems are still relevant. There are women that are juged for wanting to be housewifes or women that sacrifice having a family to focus on their dreams and at some point end up feeling worried and lonely about it, there are the ones that don't find their place in the world. Not that there isn't improvements in acting, scenery, etc. But... I don't know. Something is missing. And Emma Watson had mayor issues with her accent. That being said, I never liked Laurie with Jo. But I don't see how the man who loved you to alcoholism marring your sister could have been healthy for the sisters relationship when it already was adversarial.

@gee2541 4 года назад

Luis Martinez Interesting because I found the directing in the new one very disorienting and unorganized as a whole. I felt like it made the story disjointed and we didn’t properly get to become attached to the characters or watch them have arcs because of the weird directing style that went back and forth. Personally was not a fan of the choices Gerwig made.

@celeste2025 3 года назад

I wish they'd kept Jo's reaction for the new adaptation. This was more so like the vibe I got from her in the book, shocked and surprised but happy with their marriage

@12classics39 Год назад

Exactly the new movie makes it look like she had a Scarlett O’Hara moment of realizing she was in love with him too late. Which is absurd because she NEVER has romantic feelings for Laurie in the book and is immediately happy and approving of him & Amy.

@Silverznight 4 месяца назад

@@12classics39 I interpreted her unhappiness with the marriage between Laurie and Amy, not because of a "Scarlett O'Hara" moment, but because she was seeing that the last person that she thought would always be with her, as a friend, also was getting married - and to her sister nonetheless. The scene prior to this, she had her monologue about how she was sick of women being told that love is all that they were fit for, HOWEVER, she was so lonely. Therefore, it wasn't meant as sad because she had romantic feelings for him, but similar to her being sad when Meg was getting married. Another person was essentially leaving her.

@coffeetea8577 4 года назад

jo is all of us when our friends get married, like a proud mother. it's adorable!

@zoefang4563 Год назад

Jo eventually gets her own happy ending with Professor Bhaer too..

@Miselayneous 4 года назад

The issue for me was that Kirsten Dunst played a point perfect Amy and the 4 girls indeed FELT like sisters. By switching the actresses later on, Samantha Mathis feels like a total stranger. Samantha was so reserved, for me, there was nothing that connected the 2 performances. And the only way we know who she is is because of the name. There is no chemistry between her and the sisters. So when they come home and Laurie’s like, here’s my wife, it’s like he’s introducing somebody new, as oppose to someone they should know.

@arthippie333 4 года назад

Yes. I totally agree. She lacked the chemistry and she do not have much screen space.

@darthslayder6904 4 года назад

yeah also the way Laurie is portrayed in this movie is just awful. he seems so creepy for some reason.

@susanalopez5052 3 года назад

This is why I hate when they double cast Amy, I rather them age Amy up a bit (like in the 1933,2017,2019 versions) or them to just switch Amy and Beth’s ages (1949). Double casting just does not work on film

@blahblahblahaha 3 года назад

I completely agree. The first time watching I was so confused but maybe they were going for the interpretation that she matured and they hadn’t seen her in so long so it was as if she was a completely different person coming home. They could justify it that way but nonetheless I didn’t like it. Kirsten Dunst is so talented so it just felt like a waste with the new Amy actress.

@yespls4184 3 года назад

The older Amy is a bad actress

@gee2541 4 года назад

Honestly I don’t get people who ship Jo and Laurie. Maybe it’s because in every adaptation they emphasize the fact that their bond is solely based around friendship and I never see romantic chemistry between the leads but also.....she just doesn’t love that man? Like why would anyone root for them to be together romantically when Jo is always appalled at the idea of them being more than friends in every single film. She doesn’t love him. No one could change that. I still think it’s weird he ended up marrying her little sister but their marriage would have been a disaster and would have tainted their relationship forever. You can’t just force someone to have feelings for you.

@lorieurschel7438 Год назад

When Jo asks Amy to always live close by because she couldn't bear to lose another sister brings me to tears every time.

@heathervelasco5159 4 года назад

Amy seems jealous when he says its good to hear u call me Teddy again. Lolol

@LilyZerep 4 года назад

She called him Teddy once in the book when they were abroad and Laurie angrily said something like "No! That's her name for me." 🤔 I think this was when Amy and Laurie had just reunited and he was still getting over Jo.

@lushiousification 4 года назад

I never understood Amy and Laurie in this movie but then I watched the 2019 version and it was like a light bulb went off.

@ei5859 3 года назад

i actaully love this scene more, more than the 2019 one. it looks like jo really is proud of any and happy=. in the 2019 one she looks like she depise amy and have the face "bear with it, it's ur sister that always have everything in her way" but 2019 movie is still much more good for my opninion

@user-ld3bp6ht5h 4 года назад

The reason we all believe he still loves Jo is the incredible chemistry between those two actors!!

@mariaefstratiou7427 3 года назад

i have to asmit, this movie did more justice to jo in this specific scene. She seems genuinely happy for them, while in the 2019 shes a little more upset. BUT the phenomenal performance of florence paugh in the newest movie doesnt compare with ANY other amy adaptation. So in conclusion the 90s version portraeyd jo the best but the 2019 one had the best amylaurie arc[ and amy as an individual ]

@scifiseductress 2 года назад

Love how Samantha Mathis and Christian Bale also starred in American Psycho together. Their relationships are so different in both movies. Treats her like gold in this one, like crap in the other 😂

@luditebreaker5065 3 года назад

Wynonna was amazing as Jo

@zoefang4563 2 года назад

Amy has blossomed into an elegant young lady

@dianamorales8239 4 года назад

I still really like this version

@zoefang4563 2 года назад

Samme

@natyinthehouse 4 года назад

There could be a Jo’s Boys movie with this cast.

@myytchanneldinakoha8498 4 года назад

Sophia M. Netflix, call Winona-Now!

@kicklayoutfosse7009 4 года назад

Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes pleassssseeeee!!

@Hop3fulRomantic Год назад

This will forever be my favourite version. As much as I ADORE the casting for the new version...Florence Pugh did such an amazing job as Amy and Timothee Chamelet was soo good as Laurie. They really brought amazing chemistry to their characters. And that was probably the highlight of the new version for me. But I honestly felt the relationship between Amy and Jo suffered in the new version. It wasn't nearly as warm as it was in this version. In this version, Jo and Amy clashed a lot but ultimately loved one another so dearly that nothing could ever break them apart and I far prefer Jo's reaction of being surprised and happy at Laurie and Amy getting married. Now he truly is part of the family...and it was exactly how it should be. There was no confusion on Jo's part about whether she should have accepted Laurie's proposal. She knew her own mind and heart that she didn't feel romantically towards him and therefore could be happy that he'd found love and could be happy whilst still being a part of their family. It just felt warmer and more...right. What's more, as dearly as Laurie loved Jo, he didn't and couldn't understand her passion, her NEED to be a writer and to write, for it to be her work...he saw it only as her 'hobby'. Something that she wouldn't need to do, only if she wanted. But that's not how it was for Jo. Whereas Frederick understood Jo completely and their chemistry was wonderful. They were perfect. Here, Jo's loneliness is clear but it's her sister, her family, she wants and needs.

@hayls1075 Год назад

Yes, I found the fact that the new version wasn't chronological confusing and hard to follow even though I know the story line and have watched this original movie.

@lukamilic 4 года назад

I dont care about the movie, i am just here to say Oh look, its Batman with a pornstache !

@AB-om2te 4 года назад

🤣

@aditisk99 3 года назад

He looks like young Shakespeare 😁

@mitza420 3 года назад

lol

@sajedakhahmad4172 Год назад

😂 this is the best comment around here

@carloshernandes 4 года назад

I prefer this version they seem so genuine like real friends (who in real life were) and not acting

@susanalopez5052 3 года назад

Double casting rarely ever works on film, Kirsten was such a wonderful young Amy but old Amy feels so stilted, and has no chemistry with any of the cast. I just don’t thing that’s double casting Amy is ever believable, the actresses never feel like they are the same person. I rather them age Amy up a bit (like in the 1933,2017,2019 versions) or them to just switch Amy and Beth’s ages (like in the 1949 version). I don’t care that it’s not book accurate, I just know that this is not it, and it really is my only issue with this version.

@laurend9829 3 года назад

Double casting never works? For certain roles, it is required, even if challenging. Any role where you follow the lifetime of a character, you can't effectively have 1 person playing the exact same role at wildly different ages - except in very rare circumstances. I understand not liking the actress switch, however. I'm in agreement that Kirsten was so personable and fiery that to have her replaced by a more sombre take on Amy as a grown up feels slightly weird. However, the weakness in this film highlights the weakness of the 2019 film: I do not believe Florence Puege (sp?) as a 12 year child, played by a 24 year old actress! Having adults play children isn't really effective. The golden scenario would be that both actors play their roles perfectly and are a great fit.

@susanalopez5052 3 года назад

@@laurend9829 the thing is it’s way easier for me to suspend my disbelief and believe that Florence’s Amy is around the same age as her sisters (let’s say 14), or he’ll maybe Older than Beth, because that’s already what most little women adaptations do. I enjoy Florence’s performance as both a bratty teen and a refined adult, but I really dislike older Amy’s performance in the 90s adaptation. And I certainly feel like specifically in film double casting rarely works unless it’s like a 5 minute scene of the character as a child, but double casting to tell two complete narratives?? It’s a no from me. It lends itself way better for TV but it’s still very hard to achieve, and not every show is good at it

@shouvikghosh8946 2 года назад

Little Women has actor from The Greatest Marvel Trilogy (Kirsten Dunst) and actor from Greatest DC Trilogy (Christian Bale).. What a moment..

@Tatertots98 4 года назад

All these comments trying to prove they know THE MOST about these books...omfg

@thedifferenttraveller5684 3 года назад

Best version ever ! The new version is emptied of spirituality.

@stephaniesimpson1150 3 года назад

I noticed that and was disappointed with the 2019 version...I guess they didnt care or know enough about history to include that....No singing or references to the Unitarian hymns they all would have sung or listened to during that time...Unitarianism is closely aligned with Transcendentialism of that time and a decent producer would have known that...Gerwig was pretty ignorant of that., I guess...During Meg's wedding in the 94 version , they sing a UU hymn that is exackly what they would have sung during that time..There was so many correct details of this film which made it so great and a timeless classic..The dumbing down of history in the 2019 version and none of the fans care either..

@inkkvibe 3 года назад

The 2019 one lacks the soul of the story, the christmas spirit, and is mostly focused on the cinematic effects. I hated the 2019 version. This one was great, the 40s one and the BBC series are all acceptable, they all capture the spirit of the story. The 2019 one is bad, but the worst one was the 2018 modernized version, they turned Jo into a spoiled disrespectful brat who was rude to everyone.

@pbcat16 3 года назад

As much as I enjoyed the 2019 version, it felt forgettable compared to this adaptation

@amysill3815 7 месяцев назад

I agree. The new one isn’t true to the book.

@Dianimations_ 3 года назад

I mainly dislike going through the comments under any scene of this movie cuz I will see Timothee's stans spamming about how Christian wasn't that good and the new ver is way better than the old ver. They're both fine! They can co-exist! you think the new ver is much better, and I think the old ver is way more timeless. Have your pick..

@ameeraamy8777 2 года назад

Agree

@rehilememmedzade1207 3 года назад

He totally looks like Hvitserk from Vikings in this scene😍 especially his mouthache

@malinhessedahl 4 года назад

Love this movie❤

@rosea2350 2 года назад

I love this version and the 1949 one, I also read the book every year.

@westminster860 2 года назад

I really like both versions and both ways that Amy was played. I do think that the 1994 version was a bit more in keeping with Victorian sensibilities. I didn't think I would like Timotè Chalemet as Lory, but boy did he knock it out of the park in the latest version! As he always does

@Tonycillian5 2 года назад

Impressive, very nice. Let’s see Paul Allen’s introduction

@federicarizzo385 4 года назад

😍❤️😢 I love this movie!!

@malinhessedahl 4 года назад

Me too❤📷🎥🎬

@apieceoflife2732 3 года назад

Only jo that I liked amongst all versions

@maddysdiaries 4 года назад

ahhh little women (1994) aka the best little women version

@usagist4r377 4 года назад

wonho - 😧 That’s not fair. I’m sure Louisa May Alcott would like everyone to give the new movie a chance.

@yazmorales9015 4 года назад

wonho indeed, because it respects the spirit of the book

@stephaniejones2565 4 года назад

I totally agree. I just saw the new one and liked it fine, but the 1994 will always be my favorite!

@maddysdiaries 4 года назад

@@stephaniejones2565 omg i just saw it yesterday too and i still stand with my og post!!!

@susannestein3955 4 года назад

The 1994 version is my favorite as well.

@xoxo-dr8df 4 года назад

Laurie wanted to be part of the March family so bad. He obviously still loves Jo though.

@kathrynorozco5416 4 года назад

xoxo no he doesn’t

@lovetteidk5150 3 года назад

i think he said it more clearly in the letter tho, he didn't meant it that way

@elmamataki3662 4 года назад

I remember watching this movie and it was really good. The ending was just so. It was just a big plot twist

@DianaGonzalez-fv4yh 4 года назад

Hermoso y emotivo video de Mujercitas !!!!! ❤❤

@zoefang4563 2 года назад

@heatherh6027 2 года назад

i have crush on laurie

@lanternhillramblings9170 2 года назад

if we could have the 1994 movie, but have Florence Pugh as Amy, it would be the PERFECT adaptation.

@ethandenton3393 2 года назад

She’s too strong a prescence. Too much of a modern woman to be set in his time period.

@extremelyreligiousdolphin750 Год назад

Hmmmmmm…no.

@maryezell4474 Год назад

What's interesting to see is how the "new" Little Women adaptation always seems to portray Laurie and Amy a little bit better than the past one. The 50s adaptation barely put any effort into Laurie and Amy, to the point that it's awkward. This one took it a step further and did a much better job, but now that the 2019 is here, it pales in comparison to Florence and Timothy's interpretation.

@Tatertots98 4 года назад

I'm not sure if they meant it this way but the way Laurie looks at Jo...I think he's still in love with her and it makes me so uncomfortable for Amy. I'm gonna add some stuff here: I really think they could've done this sequence differently and gotten the point the book is trying to get across more efficiently. The awkward dialogue and the terrible stilted acting by adult Amy (and lack of chemistry) here was what convinced me that Laurie and Jo should have given romance a try. I'm older now and I went to see the 2019 version...much more satisfying. My point is you can't be mad at the people who still are rooting for Jo and Laurie when a scene like this exists. This is what they were given to work with. The look Amy gives Laurie at 1:38 to me reeks of INSECURITY. It's almost like she's still not sure if he loves Jo in a schoolboy crush way. Trying to reconcile this version of the movie to the book...is conflicting

@kathrynorozco5416 4 года назад

Elita Lewis disagree

@Liv-hx9xx 4 года назад

Same

@janetofilau4244 4 года назад

It's true - even the book hints at it.. At this point.. Jo was driven to so much despair at Beth's death that had Laurie proposed to her again.. She would have accepted it - and Laurie still had strong feelings for Jo even then 😊

@LilyZerep 4 года назад

I think in some small way he still loves her but even in the book, he knew Amy was the only other woman who he could love, and replace Jo. Though, he'd never let Amy call him Teddy. I like Amy and Laurie❤ 😊

@L.Spencer 4 года назад

It's all a little strange, actually. Didn't really happen, maybe that's why it doesn't seem right.

@m.h.1593 4 года назад

I’ve never read the book, and I just finished watching this movie. Could someone please tell me if they elaborated on Amy and Laurie’s relationship in the book? How did they become so close? In the movie I didn’t sense they were close except for that kiss conversation. Did the relationship develop as they grew older or did Laurie always care for Amy?

@ABC1233393 4 года назад

Amy and Laurie’s relationship developed more when they ran into each other in Europe. The book describes their growing relationship much better than the movie!

@amberfranke5970 4 года назад

Beth Michael absolutely. Because in the movie it sounds like the relationship never developed like it was always there.

@m.h.1593 4 года назад

Beth Michael thank you! I’ll try yo bet ahold of the book. It did seem more condensed for run-time purposes.

@gabzd 4 года назад

This is why a lot loves the 2019 version of Amy and Laurie. It outlined how the relationship grew between them.

@suebob16 4 года назад

In an interesting aporoach in the 2019 film, Jo first meets Laurie at the dance, and later Amy directly introduces herself to him when he brings Jo and Meg home from the dance. Then when Amy gets in trouble at school, she goes to Laurie for help. Amy actually becomes the first March sister to enter the Laurence home. In the book Jo is the first to visit the Laurence home when she learns that Laurie is sick and feeling lonely.

@isabelled.7732 4 года назад

Laurie still loves Jo, it’s so obvious.

@christinamendonca6185 4 года назад

Yessss

@MayumiSaegusaShiba 4 года назад

no wth

@kathrynorozco5416 4 года назад

Isabelle D. No he doesn’t

@Ivy285 4 года назад

He will never love another as he loved Jo.

@20sm32 4 года назад

I still prefer this version than the new one

@narayani1505 Год назад

I'm here for Mr. Bale 👀❤️❤️

@CATDHD 3 года назад

Very nice. Now, let's see Paul Allen's awkward wife introduction.

@familyentertainmenttelevis8327 3 года назад

Gorgeous

@zoefang4563 2 года назад

@ Dana Miller: Couldn't agree more

@inkkvibe 4 года назад

Still the best version, the new ones won't beat it.

@Thecuriousincident1 4 года назад

I bet people who grew up watching the ones from the 40's thought that about this one too.

@inkkvibe 4 года назад

@Jewel Joy I loved the 40s one too actually, some scenes were even more emotional in the 40s one than the 94 one.

@yespls4184 3 года назад

The actress who plays adult Amy is awful. You're nuts for thinking this one is better

@inkkvibe 3 года назад

@@yespls4184 She has much less screen time than the rest, the new one is more focused on the sisters' adult lives while this one is more focused on their childhood. Amy's character changes/develops when she gets older, so she isn't the same spoiled brat Dunst was playing.

@fadiladewi8343 4 года назад

That was quite upsetting

@djunited9522 4 года назад

Omg its viana ryder aka Joyce byers from sranger things

@b8787 4 года назад

*Winona

@ricecakes8635 4 года назад

If thats the only thing you know her from..... 😒

@waitsx4028 4 года назад

Winona* Ryder, from literally the biggest classics of the 80s/90s...

@taniamejia5359 3 года назад

Winona from Lucas, Beetlejuice, Edward Scissor hands, Girl interrupted to name a few.

@initiatinreallife 2 года назад

I hate how all the comments are just about the new movie.

@malinhessedahl 4 года назад

❤❤❤❤❤❤

@EdgarSan1427 4 года назад

Smoke weed everyday...

@kittykattopaz9315 3 года назад

I've been looking for stills of this dress Amy is wearing... in absolute love with that shawl, trying to figure out how it's worn... wish there were more shots of it

@zoefang4563 2 года назад

@ Kathryn: Sameee here omg. Amy is the elegant one

@kayogar4040 Месяц назад

I just realised amy is played by the same actress as courtney in american psycho 💀💀😭😭

@arthippie333 4 года назад

I think Laurie still loves Jo like most of us still love our lost lovers. It will be there. And Amy knows it and she accept him along with his love for Jo. Teddy deserves to be loved just like all of us. Its complicated I know. But lets leave him like he is. A small portion of him will still love Jo. Its alright.

@tracys169 3 года назад

I like this opinion. He may love Amy tremendously but there's always a small part of him that still have some feeling for Jo. I'm not saying that it'll grow or that he'll cheat on Amy. It is what it is.

@robnewman6101 2 года назад

The 1860s were the darkest decade of the Victorians era.

@bbhtastic2148 3 года назад

pain

@brigitteh8295 4 года назад

When I read the book I always wanted Laurie and Amy to end up together and I loved this movie do not care to see the new one🙄.

@ereagan4 4 года назад

Brigitte H: I was skeptical about the new version too, but ended up really liking it.

@kathryngaoa3998 4 года назад

Brigitte H I highly recommend the new one it’s just as magical as this version if not more

@lizzyhehehewaefsd4232 4 года назад

I totally ended up shipping Laurie and Amy in the new one I would 100% recommend seeing it

@L.Spencer 4 года назад

I didn't like it. Very jumbled, overly boisterous, and Amy's deep voice is jarring. The constant flashbacks are annoying and confusing.

@laravio 4 года назад

Loraine Spencer I don’t think you can hate on the movie because one of the actors voices is deep, not like squeaky and girly like characters are in the older ones.

@Openedsore 3 месяца назад

This hurt me. I would start crying if I found out my sister married a dude I loved lmao

@heatherparisi6686 3 года назад

way better then the 2019 version in my opinion

@departamentobenavides 3 месяца назад

Miscasting in older Amy.

@rosemorrison6663 4 года назад

I started crying of anger when Teddy introduced Amy as his wife I still want Jo and Teddy together

@Liv-hx9xx 4 года назад

YESSSSSS

@teodoraene7116 4 года назад

Me TOOOO

@alexandrakimbink3198 3 года назад

Jo was the one who rejected him

@eilyn510 2 года назад

I love this movie version for so many reasons and I never thought I'd like the 2019 movie but Timothèe Chalamet is just a wonderful actor and I just fell in love with Amy and Laurie's story in a special way. And Saoirsi Ronan is a good actress but I don't know why I can't seem to like her as Jo.

@zocaprocopio4588 3 года назад

POSTAR FILMES EM PORTUGUÊS OU CASTELHANO VCS PODEM PERDER SEGUIDORES .

@NavinKumar-ie5ye 3 года назад

Wife Vs lover girl Apne same🙄🙄🙄

@amysill3815 7 месяцев назад

Marriage is the strongest relationship, or should be…

@Faye-Jane 6 месяцев назад

No family is!

@PrincessOverDoesIt 3 года назад

Amy asking Jo if she minded was just a tad too late yeah?? Like, thanks for thinking of me.

@charlesderosas5577 19 дней назад

American psycho reunion

@morganophelia5963 3 года назад

That wasn't the only movie they were in together .... I mean him and Sam ....she was his other gf in American psycho ...I hate that movie ....

@deepz513 4 года назад

Greta' adaptation of this movie is more realistic and relatable.

@cinnemations3240 4 года назад

Third

@md.foysalahmed8086 4 года назад

First comment

@moi45able 4 года назад

freaks

@samrajnikundu5773 2 года назад

In this version....amy looks a bit too happy despite losing beth

@suebob16 11 месяцев назад

In fairness to Amy, in this scene she is still wearing dark colors when she comes home. She wore black and was grieving for Beth while sitting at a bench earlier when she was still overseas. As described in the book, she and Laurie married in a quiet civil ceremony, not a fancy wedding to be respectful to Beth's passing. I'm not sure where you felt that Adult Amy looked happy after Beth's death except for when she is reunited here with her family which is an appropriate reaction.

@user-sq4bh8kd1p 2 года назад

I still think it was selfish of Amy to go after Laurie. Although Jo does have a happy ending, there will always be a conenction between herself and Laurie. Though it took her time to figure that she was in love with him.

@kariola123 4 года назад

I hate this until today. Makes me feel so uncomfortable. I mean, Jo reaction is really the one you have when you don't have a romantic interest in another person? Like, really? I'm sorry, but Little woman has so many mistakes to me. Makes me so mad.

@kariola123 4 года назад

And I don't quite buy the "I'm in love with your sister now" and how can you be happy knowing your sister was the greatest love of your husband??? Are you kidding me??? So mad!

@millaray9912 4 года назад

Kari Ola That’s not the story, though. Jo was right when she said she and Laurie weren’t suited, and Jo does not love Laurie as a wife should. She talks about accepting his proposal because she is lonely and lost after Beth’s death. Laurie sees Amy as a little girl until they are in Europe together, at which point he falls in love with her. He even says that he feels something different for Amy than he ever did for Jo. Amy is who helps Laurie to grow up, and Jo also needs someone who is less like her.

@fredfred-kt9vw 4 года назад

Amy burnt Jo's book. She doesn't deserve Laurie 😑

@monmothma3358 4 года назад

They were kids... Also she was played by Kirsten Dunst at that point, why should Sam Mathis take responsibility for what Kirsten did lol

@Liv-hx9xx 4 года назад

Facts

@vilwarin5635 4 года назад

And Jo wrote it again better, and sold it for real money. Sometimes, s*it may happen to obtain a better result

@zeehuss7275 4 года назад

Jo was mean to her, Amy was just a kid.

@msairs 4 года назад

@@monmothma3358 LOL.

@AAC4808 4 года назад

I’m eternally bitter about this. Beth and Laurie are such an ill-fitted match. It should have been Jo!

@sadikbashir4361 4 года назад

Allison C it's amy and laurie

@kennyotoole1492 4 года назад

Beth died that’s amy

@bluefire9147 4 года назад

They never would have worked. Laurie hated books, didn’t care much for Jo’s literature. They both were also too headstrong. Jo needed needed someone quiet, and Laurie needed someone to put him in his place one and a while.

@springlady8337 4 года назад

Jo didn’t love Teddy the way she felt was right. She did have a love for Teddy, but she knew they weren’t meant to be. She found a real love and Teddy got what he wanted. Everyone was happy. It ended perfectly.

@choosekindness613 4 года назад

This resentment girls have about Amy marrying Laurie is nothing more than jealousy, because anyone with half a brain can see Jo and Laurie were NOT suited to each other, I mean come ON!! I've been hearing girls whine about this forever , did you even read the book? (Probably not, since you just called Amy "Beth".) Jo herself said it would never work. Stop being so shallow and petty!

@user-sv7fd6es6s 3 месяца назад

Mrs. Laurence is the most boring woman on the planet, Jo was more exciting.

@flavarz 2 года назад

I just didn't like Christian Bale as Teddy at all... yep. No.

@user-sq4bh8kd1p 2 года назад

I truly believe Amy is the TRUE antagonist in this novel. I understand she was always 2nd best to Jo, but to go after her in such a manner. After burning her book, always wanting the spotlight and marrying Laurie. She KNEW how hard it was for Jo to reject Laurie, nevertheless, persists to marry him and 'show him off' in this scene.