What a stretch from the defense. The grandiosity from this defense team and this pos defendant is disgusting. To think this case is any more special than any other large profile murder is a farce and a waste of time by these annoying defense attorneys
To say people would "hunt him down and kill him" if found innocent or they "burn the courthouse down" is just absolutely ridiculous thing to say to try and persuade the change of venue
It’s been two years and they’re still talking about where to have the trial😂👌🤷♂️ what a gimmick, this guys going to end up having five birthdays by the time this thing even starts😂
That’s the best idea - then it would be convenient for the families of the victims to attend the trial. Busing in jurors was done in the Casey Anthony trial. In Moscow, with most college students at home during the summer, jurors could be sequestered in a hotel or guarded college dorm.
Change of venue should be a no brainer. Esp w/ the experts on stand today. Data shows that factually for a fair trial it needs to not be in that small town. Change the venue. I think Judge Judge will acknowledge this after the hearing today. Clearly he will not get a non biased jury there and it needs to be changed. The high profile and mass media coverage has polluted any juror they could get there.
Yes, thank you. Everyone keeps talking about how 'high profile' this case it. It's just not. Maybe within the small town it still is, but on a national level most people sadly forgot about it a few months after it dropped from national headlines. No disrespect to the victims becuase it's a very important case, but it's not high-profile. All this delay has contributed even more to this fact. Having to wait 2+ years with gag orders in a 24 hout news cycle world, unfortunately pushes you out out of the headlines and into the archives.
@@deltaanthropos5259 By that logic there is no such thing as a high profile cases. All high profile cases are forgotten about until the trial begins. Which is almost always 2+ years later.
So, all those innocent people who have been in jail, for years and years, you have no problem with? Take my advice, put better locks on your homes doors....
This shouldn’t be a hard decision at all. Goes without saying the trial venue needs to be changed. The survey results and expert testimony further support it. There’s no reason to keep it in that county and every reason to move it. Peer pressure from the community, fear of consequences, mob mentality, personal investment, direct and indirect connections, too much influence from local authorities and the university, small jury pool, logistical issues and so on. It’s a no brainer. Media and social media have caused so much bias with all the fake info they’ve been spewing. Prosecution being against the move just shows they feel like they need biased jurors.
@@ZodiacBoi42That has nothing to do with the audio. 😅 I live nearby and we have fiber optic internet speeds in a town of 900. Has nothing to do with the audio. They need better recording equipment
Prosecution did a great job using defense witnesses with margin of error information to support not moving trial. And she was concise in her presentation regarding how to deal with bias using established practice instead of very old data from research that defense used. AT is so rude in how she talks to judge. She whined that they did not survey a closer county but it is her surveyors fault they did not survey a closer area. She wants the trial moved as far away from Moscow as possible.
The fact that many low profile cases have had the trial moved but this high profile case in a small biased community with a high volume of media coverage filled with prejudicial misinformation might not be is a travesty.
So basically the defense’s expert says that anywhere in the entire state that has anyone with a half a brain or common sense believes Bryan is guilty? 😅
If the judge doesn’t allow a change in venue, this trial will definitely be overturned which is worse than inconveniencing the prosecution. Doing the trial twice is more expensive in the end. Prosecution is beyond lazy. They didn’t question the witnesses or prepare any information. I’m worried. Bryan’s lawyer is running circles around them.
@@guitarista67 interesting, innocent until proven guilty. Either way, seeing how terrible the prosecution is so far, even with overwhelming evidence that he’s guilty, I still think they could lose
. This is going to be huge trial. Prosecution is doing a great job. To me the defense was trying to dely the trial, but now we finally have a trial date. The prosecution has evidence we don't know about., the defense too. We don't know everything single thing that will come out in the trial. I'm going to watch the whole trial when it comes out. So people need to stop going after the prosecutors.
@@DeonneDuplechain evidence collection is the police not the prosecution. How is the prosecution doing a great job so far? People are going after the prosecution because they are slacking. Hopefully that changes.
I wish they could let the prosecutor that did the Daybell case in Ada county do this one. It's Idaho, do they really think the whole state hasn't been paying attention to this national news coverage?
His DNA was found at the crime scene, literally right underneath one of the victims dead body. While I'm still willing to consider him innocent until proven guilty, that is incredibly damning evidence all by itself.
@@LoraD-oo9xz I think the DNA is the most incriminating no matter what angle you look at it. There are many explanations for the other stuff. I think the cell tracking is very weak and proves nothing. I think the convenience store video footage is too blurry to even use as evidence. I think the case against him would be barely admissible if it were not for that DNA on the knife sheath. Which is the only DNA we as observers know of at this point. But the odds that the knife sheath is the only DNA of his they found at the scene is practically zero. If they found his DNA & blood on all the victims and all over the house too, he is done. Is he going to claim he had an intimate relationship no one knew about with all 4 of the victims? And I think that is exactly what all the stalling is about. It's very obvious he had no social connection to any of the Moscow students and he's going to have to come up with a doozy of an expanation as to why his DNA and blood are all over those dead kids and their house. If he had no other DNA found in the house then he could get this over with pretty quickly and provide a reasonable explanation for it being on the sheath. But that's not happening. They are dragging it out becuase they need time to explain something much more incriminating than cell records, a grainy convenience store video and a single fingerprint.
