LOKI: KANG is a Descendant of TONY STARK | Marvel Theory BREAKDOWN | MCU Revealed 

Yes!

Hank Pym and BruceBanner created immortality and eternal youth but only scott knows.

Kang could easily be wakandan.

No, otherwise, Ironman would have been part of Kang Coucil. Ironman can never be alone in a citadel for years together all alone. Kang did that.

Screencrush my man, do better, Kang is our introduction to the Richards family line, not the stark, why would marvel link us to the past with stark(nostalgia/fan service)?, when they can set up the marvels first family, and ya know it's actually comic accurate

That actually makes alot of sense.

except Stark used navigation through the quantum realm as the basis for his time travel and that required Pym Particles because you have to shrink to enter and exit the quantum realm. The TVA does not utilize shrinking of any kind so it likely achieves time travel through different means. The Time Doors used in Loki bear much more resemblance to Dr.Doom's Time Platform (merely vertical instead of horizontal) and considering Kang is a descendant of Reed and Sue, that connection makes more sense.

@@jahnybravo2168 agreed. It's likely MARVEL will maintain the origin of Kang as Nathaniel Richards. While they could "explain away" differences in methodology as he was inspired by Iron Man's work; they could also have something else in store for fans. I so very much hope it is Dr. Doom but we'll have to wait & see!

Brilliant!

@@jahnybravo2168 that's like saying they didn't use the same technology for a house light and car light because you do different things to turn it on?

You are right checked that :)

Same thing happened in Avengers Assemble's predecessor show, "Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes."

Yes that's what i wanted to say

Yes because he found starks tech in a library since creating time travel was a big deal, and he modified it with 31st century then used it to conquer the timeline...he is related to reed richards

Basically cause there's a little bit of Stark technology in every piece of gadget in modern era.

How do you know when something is fully evolved? Is that a thing?

Minute by minute until it gets to Friday than more minutes and you'll get to Ms minutes. That's because she accumulated minutes enough.

@@Sailorjerry46 look at sharks, they've been the same for literally millions of years, so yes we do know the pinnicle of a species evolution

@@Bustuhh how do you know they aren’t evolving now because of us changing the environment?

Damn, tony's influence in the mcu is so big despite being a human. jarvis evolved so much, he is an ancestor of kang and also possibly even friday lol

Morgan arguably could end up smarter

tony discover time travel . his father just discovered how to inject artificial muscle to people. smart person, not a smart choice. lol

don't forget he also discovered a new element.

Well Howard didn't create a super soldier

@@hassanrazali4517 nope, Howard only provided the tech to help make a super soldier, the formula was the key, without the formula, Howard only made a vertical bath tub

Ha. Nice.

Not after a thousand years.

Lmaoooooooo

That's not how that works

@@Hoopergames its a joke mate, lighten up

Love is Love so if Tony and Reed getting together created Kang, then I'm okay with that. 🤣

Plus Victor Doom

@@dr.braxygilkeycruises1460 ...and a triumph over genetics.

He could descend from Shuri or one of the Wakandan Royal Family.

@@dr.braxygilkeycruises1460 you call yourself a doctor?

The time heist also caused loki to become a variant and to kill the one who remains which pretty much freed kang

If he discovers time travel, doesn’t that mean that he can be from any point in time? 1000 years old does not have to mean he was born 1000 years ago relative to the current timeline. He could very well be from the future at any point in time. Just a thought.

So your saying that trunk and killary are both 16th cousins and every president even obummer was related to a 16th century King of England?

wow

@@Melcavic42 could be

@@Melcavic42 Do you even know how many black slaves Thomas Jefferson and other slave owners graped, look up Shannon LaNier, Who descends from former slave Sally Hemings owned by Jefferson....similarly how so many people on this earth is related to Ghengis Khan(that a bit misinfo, actually it refers to mongoloid DNA, but u get the idea), beyond 7 generations, it's hard to trace lineage

True, but I still hope the MCU will retain aspects of Reed Richard's character that haven't already been taken up by Tony, as Reed is a really complex character in his own right, as he feels never-ending internal guilt over what happened to his team that turned them into the Fantastic Four (especially Ben), chose to make his family beloved to the public in hopes of finding forgiveness from them, yet they forgave him long ago and love him for helping them find purpose, questions his purpose in the universe and knows that he can solve every problem in the universe, but chooses to not leave his family behind and attempts to fix those problems one step at a time not to mention being the smartest man in the Universe.

@@milkiassamuel780 Preaching to the converted, Milkias. I collected FFs from the early 70s through the mid 1990s, and frankly I'm still a little ticked at how they've been cinematically hacked to pieces over the years. They will always be the first family of Marvel, and need to be done right once and for all...but I still think making Kang a Starkson makes more sense with the way this MCU is built. ;)

I see what you mean but Tony has always been genius level, they didnt make him smarter for the MCU

@@JacobHJones Yes, he was always brilliant, but Richards was other-level genius. If they had the rights to the FF from the outset, they probably would have leaned much more into Stark's troubled playboy billionaire arc than his guy-who-figures-everything-out arc. Richards was the consensus big brain of the Marvel comics universe from the 60s well into the 80s (along with Doom).

@@MD-cn1nt Agreed. We know however that Marvel changes many things from the comics. Just like Reed was the inspiration in the comics, I think Stark will be in the MCU. It also makes Tony's legacy immortalized even after his death

It would be something if he and Bezos try their hand at an Ironman suit next. Go up for the first test ride and then realize they haven't solved the 'icing problem'.

I got a krispy kreme teevee snacks ad

My ad was Trump asking for something funny how ads work

Blended smoothies. Well, it ain't targeted, I haven't had a smoothie in like 15 years

Thank you. Connections like this are so unnecessary and lazy to be honest.

@Fresh Sounds Florida It doesn't make them any less interesting .🤷🏽‍♂️

@@darkcyborgsuperman9521 I second this. Kang being a descendant of Tony could really bring in on how dangerous the stark bloodline can be.

@Librallion in the comics he is.. The mcu changes comic lore alot so don't be surprised if he is of stark lineage like how they completely changed ultrons origins.

@Librallion Spiderman No Way Home will introduce Sinister Six i.e. Sinistet Six will lose and seek help from Dr. Doom ! To fight against Dr. Doom, Fantastic 4 comes and then Silver Surfer can be introduced ! Everything is setup but we can't be sure about anything !

What a gift to connect diffrent things!

every other youtuber is just copying n pasting one another and giving away PS4, while ScreenCrush is making us think.

Don't forget he's a von Doom, as well. An absolute diabolical trinity of egomaniacal genius. 😂

This would be cool. Great mind inheritance from both sides of the family. Awesome theory!

There's no way his daughter would take on someone's name

Yea Iron Lad was possibly a descendant of Richards AND VonDoom 🧐

If I would marry a girl whose name is stark. I aint letting her change that shit and our kinds are gonna have her name😂😂

Reed isn't even an established character in the MCU, so I doubt they'll hinge it on a guy that's movie wont even happen until after we learn Kang's backstory

Same with Rey and Star Wars. Can't Rey just be Rey without having some bloodline connection to a previously established character? It's ok for characters to be their own independent people without excess lore or baggage.

Well good because he's neither of those things

You are missing the foundation. Much like without Tony Stark we would have no MCU, his theory has logic.

Kang = Rick .

He literally studied all time periods. He may have just realized Tony did it 1000 years before he figures it out and uses aspects of Tony's theories. But Kang obviously improves on Tony's technology and makes it his own. Everything is inspired by something

If Morgan Stark has kids and her kids have kids and her grandkids have kids, etc... then there's a pretty solid chance that Tony Stark is blood-related to literally EVERY HUMAN BEING ON EARTH in Kang's time. That's not comic book coincidence, that's just math. I mean, it's estimated that there are 16 million direct descendants of Genghis Khan alive today and he died a mere 8 centuries ago. Every century that goes by that number increases exponentially. Ten centuries separate Tony and Kang. So... it would be kinda weird if he was not Tony's direct descendant, or at the very least a cousin many times removed. Unless the line of Stark dies out with Morgan or somewhere shortly after that.

@@nooneofconsequence1251 yeah but Khan historically fathered hundreds of sons and many more daughters.

@@VonJay I know. But if you assume the length of a generation to be 25 years and a growing population it doesn't take very long to work up to those numbers.

@@nooneofconsequence1251 That's just math? If you understood anything about math, you'd under stand that 16 million is nowhere near the current population.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

That's actually from the episode!

Wasn't that just in concept art?

@@AbjectPermanence If it’s in a concept art, somehow it’s still connected bc why else put it in a concept art?

@@IceCold_Carter If concept art doesn’t make it to the final product, it isn’t canon. Simple logic.

@@hellodumplings8564 look up what concept art is. It’s to help writers and etc to progress the story & among other things. It’s a reason why it was put there before the final product. Removing it just means they decided to go a different route and tell the story a much more different way, with the same idea in mind

@@hellodumplings8564 simple logic

I think it would be way weirder but also cooler if he was Peter Parker's descendant because it would just be so weird and shocking if that would be a reveal...of course that wouldn't happen unless Disney owned Spider-Man

How does a movie not connected to the comics make the comics better

Doubtful. This is a coincidence since futurist is a term that describes Tony Stark already

THIS * Also I'm not down for Tony to be another reason we have a villain.

YES ABSOLUTELY it makes sense 💯💯💯💯💯

I am thinking Kang will be of both. It would make a great reason why the Fox Universe and the MCU didn't touch until now. Something along the lines of Tony's daughter and Reeds son get together now that the universes are mixing and the Multiverse exists.

@@TheCiroth Then they would have to explain how did he become black? Since both of them are white families ... Even if someone from their descendants married black people shouldn't Kang look like mixed race? So I'm thinking it's not Tony Stark he's connected to He's connected to Reed Richards descendants and somebody from Wakanda.

@@Azarath_Metrion_Zinthos Who cares how he became black? A thousand years is a LONG time. It doesn't mater how he became black, I find the question itself to be ignorant and frankly white centric.

Thanos was talking about himself being cursed with knowledge...

@@alexandertaves2730 “I know that already sir” now your saying what again?

@@KatDaddy313 that’s kind of a stupid question considering that you just responded to what I was saying... Also, it’s “You’re” and not “Your”. Take a seat kiddo

@@KatDaddy313 also, why exactly are you quoting yourself?

@@alexandertaves2730 has much deeper meaning than you think.

I'm Kang... Kang Skywalker

Unless they are

I mean, ideally you're correct. But as both are owned by and overseen by Disney now, I'm not holding out much hope.

Uh true but it's not unreasonable. If you did a little study into DNA instead of going off the normal idea that "Hey for plot reasons they'd do that" If we go back 1000 years me and you will have common ancestors and I don't even know you. The reason that is simply because every person backwards has 2 grand parents and then after next person it doubles to the point that it expresses everyone is related in some way shape or form. If I'm related to 1 million people and you are also 600 years ago and Earths population was even smaller back then, it increases the chances. The father you go back in time, the higher amount of ancestors and smaller the population. Many Presidents or political people are cousins, even Bush Jr and Obama are for example and that happens simply because someone in their family has a common ancestor to them. All it takes is 1 person. On top of this you must understand travel was limited the further you go back into the past so people were closer together in proximity to build families back then as well as cheating goes on, adopting and things such as slavery or migration to a different country and mixing with those people there. Kang is from the 31st Centaury, Tony Stark is from the 21st, that's nearly a 1000 years between them, they will have millions of common ancestors between them. If you did a DNA test right now, you'll have ancestors from across the planet in places you wouldn't even imagine. There ain't no pure race person in existence. We have this illusion based on looks and country of residence that this is the case but it's not true at all. Think I'm lying? Go do a DNA test or better yet speak to a geneticist, they see this stuff everyday. Kang could be closely related to Tony stark or further away like a distant cousin IF they wanted to do that.

Omg that's what i thought. its kinda strange to introduce riri williams out of nowhere 😐

That’s a brilliant prediction and also a great idea for the MCU. Ironheart is a wonderful character and I can’t wait to see Williams bring her to life

Ok, that’s a new idea I haven’t heard, and sounds awesome

I mean he black she black Mcus history of changing stuff up So I mean its plausible

I also think that. I think since "apparently " Kang is black, I think Riri Williams will be the descendent of Kang, and somehow also a descendent of Morgan Stark.

But wouldnt that be the opposite, since it implies that timeline was trashed?

@@joaodosanjos9060 I think it was from a pruned timeline caused in the future by a kang variant.

Not really because in the comics Kang buys Stark tower when he’s another variant so why is the tower having that name mean he’s related to Stark. People buy buildings lol

Positive he meant Kang. Hes probably been visited by him in the past

We're going to get a flashback scene later. It'll be set during Endgame, the night Tony Stark invented time travel. RDJ will come back to meet Kang, and that meeting will motivate him to invent time travel.

@@AbjectPermanence Yes! He could meet the version of Kang from 31st century that has figured out time travel, then Kang goes back to see the moment his ancestor Tony discovers it and help Tony with those tempad bracelets he has in Endgame. Like the one He Who Remains wore in Loki finale. Making the loop complete

They left the groundwork that Tony knew more.

@Mc Lovin both have same design so I think yeah

Kang is a descendent of Doug if we're basing it on inherited super-intelligence.

Who is Doug ?

@@k.akshithasahadevudu1697 another day, another Doug

why would his descendant from 1000s of years in the future look identical to him? makes no sense

That theory still makes me laugh!

I’m guessing this is sarcasm?

@Gabriel Olszyk He who remains is from the 31st century, about a thousand years from now, in 3 generations about 25 years each, If Morgan has a child by a black dude and the child has a child with another black dude the bloodline would be completely black by then that's just 3 generations a thousand years has about 40 generations a lot could happen

@Gabriel Olszyk imagine being this stupid

@@polaroidd1306 "things you shouldn't have to explain but here we are"

If by "a Richards" you mean just in name

We already know his name was Nathaniel Richards. He could still be a descendant of Reed while still using Tony's time travel tech as inspiration for his own

And also it cant hinge on a guy that isn't even established in the MCU yet...

Kang is being introduced in an ant-man and wasp movie. Therefore it stands to reason that big reveal will be that he's Pym/Van Dyne/Lang. The same theories that screencrush applied to Tony Stark also apply to the ant-man characters.

@@dabeerdsgamer7763 You mean related to Pym/Van Dyne/ Lang instead of Tony? It could work

It wouldn't really be a retcon ..

@@intothefrayyo It would be a retcon of the Marvel Comics storyline

@@subliminalproductions6902 which story line would that be friend?

I always thought that Kang was a descendant of Doctor Doom in the comics.

He's way better than New Rockstars IMHO.

Thank you! 👏👏

His name is Nathaniel Richards

@@iamchicca- you can have the same last name without being related to someone, think about the number of people with the last name “Smith”

@@aciinonyx while true, his comics origin is directly that he was from the 30th century, as a descendant specifically from reed richards. Hopefully marvel does this and not shoehorn tony stark once a-fucking-gain. It’ll hopefully allow them to introduce the fantastic four properly into the Mcu

Naw there was probably a ww3 and that's like a version of a pop control I mean that would be awesome ww3 people survive the war and kang rules the leftovers

@@MOMOFCJ6 I believe there was a video on numberphile describing how every human alive today is a descendant of Charles le magne. I would suppose in 1000 years in the mcu every human alive would be a descendant of tony stark

lol

Regardless of who he ends up being related to, a family could have more than enough time change races in one thousand years

lmao

@@RHR199X Exactly. You can change races in four generations, so in a thousand years, anything could happen.

😂😂😂 okay that was a good one

Thank you ! Ruined all the spiderman movies for me. Nobody hated Peter all wanted to get revenge on Tony

Funny comment. Not sure how it relates to atheists though lol

I think this is exactly what’s going to happen and I’m about 90% sure on it. One thing that the MCU likes is simple when it comes to introducing new characters and Ironheart and Iron Lad would be a bit to clutter and clunky.

why not both? stark has a daughter which would make sense why his last name is richards

Litreally thought the same thing

No. Because it doesn't

Look like modos

icwutudidthar

How do you mean?

@@milkiassamuel780 One if his ancestors is Reed Richards, another of his ancestors is Tony Stark. Maybe his dad is a Richards and his mom is a stark.

Or one is his ancestors had a Richards dad and a Stark mom

@@danielkimoto1008 That could actually work, who's to say Kang can't be related to both Reed and Tony?

HWR but yes I saw it. :)

😅

I understood that reference 😁😆

EDITV Even in death I am the villain 😅