@Berserk14 I think the hobbit would have been better if after the director change they gave Jackson and his crew a fresh start for him to do what he wanted. Not work on the previous directors work. Money hungry rather than giving Jackson time like they gave for LOTR. I still like them but they did Jackson dirty
@@ParadeTheGospel the hobbit trilogy was a pretty clear nostalgia cash grab in the sense that the lotrs could have been more films the hobbit should have been less. I enjoyed the hobbit it was fun and silly and something a 10 year old could watch and not miss a beat but to me a prime example of how media is just not the same as it was a few decades ago. A good movie is a dime a thousand and a good trilogy! Hell I'm not sure has been
When you're checking out something cool and find that a RU-vidr you watch all the time is also commenting . . . sort of like seeing a teacher outside of school when you're in elementary school. :)
These movies have no equal. The amount of passion, dedication and care poured into them will always ensure that the Lord of the Rings will forever be counted as one of the greatest movie of all time.
@@tomg9550 Open your mind a bit, friend - talent and passion are not mutually exclusive characteristics. Both - along with many other qualities - combined in an extraodinary way to make this trilogy one of the best (if not the VERY best) ever made. Especially groundbreaking for it's time ... the very essence of spectacle and movie magic.
What's really tragic is that Peter Jackson was only given 3 months for pre-production on The Hobbit while he had 3 whole years to flesh out the LOTR trilogy with miniatures, battle sequences and manufacturing armour way in advance. This is why there is a huge contrast in enthusiasm and joy between the behind the scenes footage of LOTR where everything was meticulously planned and that of The Hobbit where they were laying the tracks right in front of a moving train.
Definitely. The more practical effects the better. CGI certainly has its uses but on some level it lacks a certain authentic visual quality. I think that real effects are just so much more satisfying.
@@displaychicken Exactly. I think this trilogy proves that the way to achieve the most realistic look, it's good to use as much practical efffects as possible and only use the CGI for things that absolutely can't be made any other way. LotR really has a perfect balance of those two.
@@Eris_Norregard yes! And that’s one of the many reasons why the hobbit movies were so disappointing. It felt like they just got lazy and used CGI for everything.
I'd say it depends. When it comes to locations and objects miniatures and models prove to be a better way but when it comes to creatures? I dunno To me miniatures/models look lifeless when used to depict creatures.
@@HateshWarkio Creatures are something else of course, especially if they are larger than human, like dragons or something, that's one of the cases where CGI is necessary. And for creatures that are the same size as human, I think it's best when they use actors in masks and then "add" CGI to make them look more realistic. Don't know if you saw it but a great example of this was the "Jangly Man" from "The scary stories to tell in the dark", they actually used a contortionist to play those weirdass movements and CGI was only used on ther creature's face.
I think the height difference for the dwarfs and hobbits is the most mind blowing. They shot all three movies having to make it work the whole time, and it never felt off. Especially funny because Gimli's actor, John Rhys-Davies, is actually 6'1" and would've been taller than most of the cast.
I think the work they did with JRD/Gimli was the best of the bunch. Maybe his 'proportions' were perfectly suited to being a 'Dwarf', aided by wearing fairly bulky and shape-hiding armor/mail. But I never once thought I was looking at anything other then Gimli, and he was exactly the size he was supposed to be relative to everyone else. More so then the Hobbits much of the time. Amazingly done.
@@mkaleborn In the "making of" they said JRD's height was perfectly proportional to that of the hobbit actors which worked out really well for the scene in Rivendell when they're all standing together as the 9.
totally! and that's why i've walked out of (finished watching) the hobbit 1 with the stupid 3d glasses and never ever went back to watch the rest of it
Basically, the three Lord of the Rings movies were a whole lot of practical effects and techniques requiring a true artisan of a Director and actors of immense skill to maintain the sense of realism. They were truly absolutely amazing! There's no reason to ever remake the movies and I think they will make their mark on history as forever classics. I am certain people will be able to watch these movies centuries from now. How amazing it must feel for all actors to know this!
@@ValWillKay also, The Lord Of The Rings is an indie film. Hollywood was inherently designed to retell old stories. When movies were first being made they were based on books and plays. Apocalypse, Now! is based on a book written in 1899!!!.. I bet the last movie you thought was original is based on something that came before it... especially if it came out of Hollywood.
I think one of the most impressive things is that the actors were able to make the forced perspective work. They're staring into empty space while the person they're talking to is several feet away, but you can't tell.
I mean you kinda can tell, but only if you know about it. And actors staring into nothing isn't anything new, what do you think happens when a character looks into the distance on a green screen set?
imagine the cast of avengers fighting of nothing because they are fighting aliens and robots hahah... all of them are all CGI. Most of the movies today are made on CGI, so it's up to the actors to make it believable
The LOTR trilogy is still one of the most visually impressive movies I've ever seen, and it's amazing how much work went into the practical effects. I was pretty impressed with that whole forced perspective trick where the entire table is rotating; it's not even an action scene - it's just two characters talking to each other, but they still went all out to maintain that illusion.
That’s why this movie looks incredible! It’s the perfect marriage between reality and CGI work. When Peter’s team used CGI as a tool, it came across as more so a creative choice rather than a corrective one. Fantastic work to all departments.
@@Glamosapien Screwing up a mustache removal for Superman or blowing everything up in a Transformers movie isn't about creativity. There is a reason they've built the rigs for Fury Road instead of going the lazy way and shoot the full movie on green screen. Technically a movie is a creative product, you aren't inherently wrong, but only using CGI when _necessary_ is the real creative work, for good reasons. I usually don't mind it, but when something like LotR (or Rise of the Planet of the Apes) comes out, it kinda makes almost every other CGI-heavy production look a lot more like teletubbies, and I wonder why studios force it if they can't deliver in quality.
LOTR was so successful because Peter was a nerd through and through. He knew what we all wanted, and produced the best series we will probably ever see. I recently rewatched the original trilogy extended versions and they're phenomenal. I feel like I've rediscovered them again. The way he fused miniatures, with CGI and extreme attention to detail will probably never be beat. They simply will never make a movie like this again due to greenscreens and CGI.
It has to be said, that a large amount of praise should be given to the people that approved all 3 movies in one go, and also let him use far longer to produce the movies. In addition to that he was given an unusual amount of money to make them, while also being fairly green at the time. If not for the trust they had in Jackson, this could've been a very forget-able trilogy, or if Weinstein got his way: 1 movie...
This trilogy stunned me as a child. My dad and I would watch LOTR every Sunday and make homemade crepes. It was our tradition that I will cherish forever.
@@laurenlewis5233 a classic but nowhere near Lotr trilogy. and after Lotr, there barely any movies that can top the trilogy, i dont think any can top it at all.
Ray Harryhausen was once asked why his creatures looked so real, and he replied: "Because they are real. They're really there." And LOTR is a brilliant examply of why miniatures, forced perspective and different-sized doubles work so much better than CGI. They only used CGI when they couldn't help it, and it blends in seamlessly. Well, except in those scenes where Legolas does a 360° turn around a horse's neck just to get in the saddle. That one was ridiculous :D
CG is way way way better today than when Lord of the Rings was made. If you are an exceptionally talented artist, you can achieve realism in 3D softwares like Maya, Houdini, Cinema4D, etc. My choice is Blender which is a FREE open source software. You CAN achieve realism in Blender. It is just a matter of finding the best artists for creating 3D props, textures, VFX, etc. I am at home self-studying Blender, also mathematics for creation physics simulations in CG animation.
what have particle simulators to do with anything in this case? also there might be a more CG than you think in LOTR. But maybe it was better used. Gollum in the the 1st film is only kept in shadow, for helm's deep, countless uruk-hai, but only in the background, etc.
@@zarrowthehorse Just Watch jemini men, and look at the horrible cgi used in some fights Just to make them faster, yes lotr still holds up and teaches some lessons to modern movies cg speaking
I think it's just the fact they chose to find physical solutions more than many movies these days, so with fewer CGI scenes involved, the movie overall looks more natural
Well some parts looks obviously old. But what's great is that they use so little of cgi for this type of film. As it has been shown here, most of the creature and nearly all of the landscapes and constructions were handmade. The orcs are flawless, more credible that those who were made 100% cgi ten years later.
It breaks my heart to think that films like this -- especially in the scope of a colossal fantasy epic like the Lord of the Rings -- will never be made again with such artisanry and craftsmanship. But just the same, it lifts up my spirit in thinking back having lived through such a titanic undertaking in theaters so many years ago. Truly a high watermark in moviemaking and film culture.
Why do you think that? It clearly works great even if it's very costly to set up. I'm sure some directors are going to keep putting this much passion into their works. Dont be such a pessimist
@@olisk-jy9rzMovies have been around for over a century, there’s plenty of time for great movie series to be made with the same craftsmanship and care again even if has been less common over the past several years. This is such a short-sighted reactionary take.
@@jordandwiggins1026 the world has changed. 99% of the "art" in media produced is contractual work by streaming services with short deadlines and quantity over quality in regard. Studios value diversity quotas and engagement metrics to show for the investors more than talent and artistic vision, and inserting political agenda into everything has become commonplace, replacing real art. If we see another masterpiece like this it will be by some miracle, and it will happen despite the current trends, not in alignment with them. The times of great cinema are gone. I don't think there will be a return journey, mr. Frodo.
@@FadexplHave you seen the new TV show Shogun? I was pleasantly surprised with it. 10 episode miniseries that apparently took 5 years to make. Bucks much of the modern cinema trends. Great script and very well made, with lots of effort in the costume and set design to accurately portray 16th century Japan. They even brought in experts from Japan to train the cast in all the proper period accurate mannerisms, movements, and language. Best thing I've seen in a while, worth a watch if you haven't yet.
Agreed. It's aged so well that it moved up the ranks of mine, and many others best lists of all time. They've lost this today. Army of the dead is the best example I can give. Tripe.
I remember Ian McKellen being so sad during parts of the filming though, or maybe it was to film The Hobbit, because he spent most of his time alone with green screens rather than interact with other actors and he lamented in tears that this wasn't what he'd studied in theater for. I think the LotR crew came in to cheer him up but he was still pretty depressed at the state of cinema and how heavily it relied on green screens and CG to the detriment of actors.
@@mewberthildimew9037 that was during the Hobbit, where they used much more cgi and less of the great Tricks they came up with in lotr were. He had much more opportunity to act with his coworkers I believe, like in the table and wagon scene. This cool forced perspective stuff is probably also more fascinating to be around than only green screen...
@@mewberthildimew9037 Ian the Gandalf should be renamed Gandalf the Pussy for crying about green screen wahhhh muh theater wahhh nobody forced me to do this I wanted the paycheck wahhh
The scene with Gandalf and Bilbo at the front door of Bag End really blew my mind with how insignificant it looked versus how really difficult it was to accomplish. I mean I never paid any attention to how Bilbo took Gandalf's hat and staff and they changed perspective according to the sizes of Gandalf & Bilbo. Truly mind blowing how the production team paid attention to detail & realism. Bravo!
What's really interesting is only once you really think about the force perspective whilst watching that scene, only then can you see the imperfections of the where the characters are in relation to each other. Otherwise its totally unnoticeable. Truly fantastic
20 years later , and this still not only holds up but still surpasses anything made in this day and age. Truly a timeless classic that will be enjoyed by many generations to come.
The films are a masterpiece, no doubt about that. But when you start going into the details of it, it's no wonder it's so good. It's hand crafted with a painstaking eye to details, with dedication, love and respect for Tolkien's original work. It's good to get these perspectives in the light, just to show how much thought and consideration went into every shot.
Literally everyone who was involved in this trilogy were very passionate and incredibly hard working people from the start. A lot was done in the planning stage and some people took real sacrifices in order to be able to do their part.
Exactly. This film trilogy wasn't good because it used practical effects over CGI (and there was a LOT of CGI in these films), it was good because of a massive budget and a huge team of skilled, hardworking, and clever people who cared enough about the project to spend over a decade on it. That's the magic here. I get sick of people blaming modern special effects on movies being bad.
@@SynchronizorVideos Yeap, there's a difference between doing something cuz u get money for it, and doing something because you LOVE it. The former makes u work from 9 to 5 and then do other stuff, the latter can make you do something from morning till evening 7 days of the week pursuing perfection.
CGI is great in many ways, but it still cannot hold up to real life realism. All of these 'tricks' used enabled them to have real-world shots, and thus the best possible setup. Modern-day movies seem to just push everything to CGI which is always just a little bit off.
Yup. Been rewatching all the Marvel movies in chronological order. If you pay attention you can see how "off" the faces are in the helmets. Still looks good of course, but once you see it you can't unsee it lol
CGI is cookie cutter and hard to damage. That makes it incredibly more profitable. I'd be surprised if we don't start seeing reused CGI assets being pushed in future films in another decade or two.
I love that, while with cgi you can tell that it's fake, with practical effects you're just there, scratching your head asking yourself how the hell they did it XD
I never would have been able to fully appreciate some of the effects of these movies without this video. As a kid the illusion was so believable that it never even would've crossed my mind how much innovation and effort it took to create something so immersive.
@@jakovmatosic4890 yes, we're thankful to Tolkien for creating languages, a timeline, and mythologies, and the whole legendarium. But Jackson did more than just retell the story. From using every trick available at the time, making 1,000 skulls then making 79,000 more when it wasn't aesthetically pleasing enough, to editing the film last minute They're both the overprepation DM we love. Ofc Tolkien inspired the jackson but both worked hard for our entertainment
@@jakovmatosic4890 That's wrong though. You have to appreciate that these are two different mediums entirely. Tolkiens books and Jacksons films are two separate finished products. The films are not a complete or 100% accurate retelling in what they portray. They are rewritten to fit Cinema. And everything is visually designed by people, BUILT by people. A writer can imagine anything and without any cost just throw it into their story without any physical effort. A Movie set and workers have to design and build every single thing in shot and actually figure out the engineering of shots, effects etc. Different mediums. Movies take more effort by more people and would be impossible to create by a single person. A book can be written by a single persons efforts within reasonable time, which is why it's such a popular medium. So obviously Movies require more effort by more people to work. But without a good idea or story all that effort is useless and Cinema is filled with examples like that.
@@PandemoniumPirateRadio ehich of my comments are you replying to, the module one or the first onr about him being a player? Cause I think the second one fits your narrative.
"Hugely underdocumented" The Extended editions has pretty much the most extensive and exhaustive behind the scenes content of any DVD or Blu-ray release.
Ever since seeing that making of I have been hugely disappointed and even angry at the low informational "how it was made" or "behind the scenes" offerings from other films. It isn't a "making of" if you mostly interview actors on their character insights and how much they enjoyed the stuff, and give like 3 min on casting, and 1 minute on how one scene was done.
@@markfox1545 "I literally had no idea" is a phrase that people born in english speaking countries use so i dont see anything wrong whit it. Maybe you shoud check your vocabulary its a bit lacking.
All these years later and with all the advancements, I still think the forced perspective trickery was one of the best effects I've ever seen in a movie. It was done so perfectly and my mind absolutely believes it. Just like Citizen Kane, this trilogy is a masterclass in filmmaking techniques. One of those rare times when everything just came together so well: the right time, the right story, the right people, and the right amount of passion for the project.
I feel realy bad, star wars is my favorite 6 film saga but LOTR is so absolutely flawless that it just about replaces it as my favorite series of movies.
It takes 11.5 hours and is a great way to spend a day. This, the Bourne movies and Back To The Future are the only trilogies that I see as one long film that need to be viewed in one sitting.
The Hobbit Trilogy overdid the CGI-Stuff. It was too artificial in so many cases. But LotR was just perfect. Lord of the Rings is still the best movie trilogy by far.
@@richardgomez1151 i wouldn‘t say so. Jurassic World and Star Wars are also good, but Lotr is simply superb. No other trilogy or movie series has such a constant high quality in each aspect, like cinematography, acting, vfx, screenplay and so on. Because of that i‘d argue that the trilogy as a whole is the best made yet.
Not just the cgi, so many other things were done more poorly on the hobbit. Even jackson himself said that he "winged it" with the hobbit. With the lord of the rings, he said in the extras that he practically made the movie several times before starting filming, starting with storyboards, then filming themselves doing the scenes to see what worked or didn't etc. So it was super planned, that's why so much of it is so good. And of course making lord of the rings seemed like a passion project for him, you can tell he wanted it to be the best it could, and with the hobbit it seemed more like a paid job even though he likes the subject matter.
Some of the below comments say what I want to say, but I'll say it anyways. The attention to detail makes me want to cry. This is such a masterpiece already, but seeing behind the scenes stuff like this makes me appreciate it even more. I'm sure we'll never quite known all of the countless hours of hard work and meticulous thought that was put into these amazing films.
@@ahandsomefridge i have the extended versions but not the box set. I agree with you. I think it would be a wonderful investment. A must have for a collector.
@@ahandsomefridge yeah I have the 3 boxes with the 6 CDS. I never watched the normal version so I don't know how much the extended version adds that the normal didn't. But nevertheless, it's an experience to behold
@@leif4698 I can't watch the theatre versions anymore. The extended just adds more flavor and it feels weird not having that. Especially with The Two Towers, where Sarumans entire death scene has been left out.
Every once in awhile I imagine myself being a movie director, than immediately get a headache because it seems like too much work, stress, pressure, and variables
One of my favorite effects is when Gandalf releases King Théoden from Saruman's influence and his face slowly comes back to normal, it's amazing, totally beliavable!
Yes, because they needed to basically create new makeup each "layer", shoot them separately and then carefully put them together. As a fellow actor myself I can't imagine how difficult it was for Theoden's actor to stand still for I God knows how long, but it was worth it 100%
Okay. The fact that they did all this in 1999 is absolutely brilliant. I feel really nostalgic to that era. The movie came at the perfect time when the combination of practical effects and CGI was optimal. But the most important contribution of lord of the rings and Peter Jackson is that they created a software which can replicate a 3d object to million scales and all those replicas will behave and move individually. Fuzzy maths, computer graphics and AI was used to create that technology. Otherwise before that you need to hire thousands of extras and need to allocate costumes for them too. It was way more expensive
I was very interested to see how they did the ring fall at the Prancing Pony, which is the thumbnail for this video but is not included here. Did I miss it?
No, you didn't miss it - I clicked on this video for the same reason. The thumbnail basically answers the question - they filmed the scene in slo-mo with green screen actors holding and manipulating the ring so that it would fall directly onto Elijah's finger. I mean, I KNEW that but clicked on this because I had hoped to SEE it, lol!!
I missed out on the first two because I didn’t want to give up a secure staff position in Hollywood. Then my company abruptly closed our location and I immediately flew to Wellington to work on ROTK. We were short-handed and working insane hours to get it done, but each and every artist was in love with the film. I’ve never experienced anything like it since.
My friends daughter was a personal photographer for some of the cast, what was your role there? No IMDb credits? Unless you’re the one who worked on Watchmen.
They should've given Peter Jackson free hand, and time to do the Hobbit films his way. For a start he initially planned only 2 movies. The studio wanted 3 again...
Yes, it was a bit of a mess wasn't it? There was something like 6 producers. One of them was Harvey Weinstein. That might explain some stuff. But at least it resembled the book in many ways and I enjoyed it for the most part nonetheless. I don't have high hopes for the series (or any amazon production). Amazon make cheap uninspiring copies of other people's creations. When I say 'cheap' I mean like lesser, mundane quality of story telling, no matter how much they say they spend. I think the Hobbit movies will be considered as masterpieces when the show comes out. The Tolkien society wants nothing to do with it. Says a lot.
@@sallybalkin8507 Because LOTR original movies were meant to be legendary, amazon (and other subscription services) just uses up franchises to make a quick buck. They know even if they f it up, ppl will still watch next reboot.
@@sallybalkin8507 I could not disagree more with this. So far amazon has been delivering and improving on quite a lot of original material they've been adapting (The Boys, Invincible) and are really pouring a lot of effort into the fantasy side with WoT and LOTR. Given the budget and people's expectations the last thing they'd want is to make a quick cash grab. Besides that, the hobbit movies will not be remembered as masterpieces lol they're the actual cash grab here and are not very good films
@@luthien47 i sorry but the changes they have already made to their “WoT adaptation” literally break important plot lines that take place later in the series
@@animeproblem1070 I don't know I haven't read WoT yet so I can't say on that regard, I noticed I sounded too pro amazon like tho lol, just guess we'll have to see what they do with it before piling up negativity ig
In short. The LotR trilogy is a master piece on numerous levels, down to sheer physics. And this is the reason why its imagery still holds up today; nay, it still outpasses most of nowadays assembly line render-farm CGI crap.
@@lintangmuktiprabowo3993 And a maniac, who is in love with miniatures. Had they chosen another producer, none of this would have tourned out the way it did. He is the reason this trilogy is such a masterpiece.
Are you saved? If you died tonight would you go to heaven or hell? The Gospel, which means the Good News is the news that God Almighty, the Creator came in the flesh as Jesus Christ to take away the sin of the world. The one God is a trinity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The Son came and laid down his own life to save ours. His sacrifice on the cross paid the price for our redemption with his own blood. On the third day he rose from dead and offers the gift of salvation and forgiveness to those that repent and trust in him. Although God's creation was created perfect, having no death, sickness and disease, the creation became corrupted through Adam and Eve in them disobeying God. In this rebellion the creation became fallen through the curse of sin and mankind became separated from God. This world is fallen, but God offers reconciliation to him through his provision at the cross. Ultimately God will restore his creation to perfection when he returns but those that who reject his offer of redemption will remain condemned by their sins and go to hell. John 1:1,14 KJV In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and THE WORD WAS GOD. [14] And THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH , and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
The scene with the moving camera while maintaining the forced perspective illusion is mind blowing. Imagine how much time and effort went into that one.
My favourite is that they built an entire tree, a life size oak that sits on top of Bag End as they couldn't get a real one put there. They literally made a giant fibre glass tree with tens of thousands of individual leaves attached by hand. It was in a shot for about 1 second.
The sheer level of dedication, from costumes to cinematography for LOTR is unbelievable. No wonder these movies easily beat the crap CGI of modern movies.
@@zarrowthehorse It sure does look iffy in some areas, but at least the way it's all shot and composed makes it far less likely to have an immersion break type moment happen than how it is with most modern movies. Not to say it's perfect of course, but y'know, the big thing is that it's impressive as all hell *for it's time*.
@@zarrowthehorse You're wrong the CGI now a days are not used a lot or a lot of it used more like incorrectly used meaning the CGI ending up looking ugly and bad if not done properly
That's why these movies are so damn great and special. And also a reason why the Hobbit just didn't hit the same for me. As Sir Ian McKellen said the Hobbit lacked the heart. The Lord of the Rings Trilogy is just so good because so much of it is practical effect instead of CGI, the amount of thought put into all of this and the detail work is just so breath taking.
The Hobbit should never have been made a trilogy, it's as simple as that. Fan cuts exist trimming the original ~9 hours down to like ~4 hours and this makes it so much more enjoyable to watch.
@@SweBeach2023 Yes, the 4 hour trimmed down version is SO good. Still looks a bit wonky but cutting down on extra fluff makes it much more cohesive and well paced. Makes me sad that the producers messed the movies up and that they made it into a trilogy just to make more money (we all know that's why they did it). Could've been amazing like LOTR but turned out pretty damn awful.
it was good for its time and its aging now. I loved and still love them, they are a great story telling on the screen, but the affects are clearly again. No i am not talking about CGI but the suits peope wore for the orcs, you can see they do not look real close up and look like a man in a suit. That is why Jackson turned to CGI for the hobbits, the CGI in them are far superior to the lord of the rings movies.
The thing about REAL models over CGI - CGI lighting is excruciatingly difficult, and one of the first aspects of a scene that we notice is "out of whack". Models allow for real world depth and real-time rendering of light as it should perform, and it makes total sense as to why the sense of realism in the way the material reflects light, not to mention the way they break and crumble. All because it's physically there and real. Just astounding.
Good example of the difference is LotR vs the hobbit. Made by the same director, but used different techniques. A lot of people will say lord of the rings looked better and the hobbit had some terrible cgi sequences that just looked off/fake.
i still think we're going to get closer to the point of CGI being indistinguishable from real models. It's just a matter of time. And don't get me wrong, i appreciate real models and they might be superior in some aspects. But for how long will it remain like that?
@@ggfdd5925 I mean, CGI can already be made indistinguishable. It often depends on the budget/time, and whether you're recreating humans, animals, or just environment.
@@jacobshirley3457 Often I think it comes down to the higher-ups completely failing to understand the amount of time necessary to do a good job with cgi. A friend of mine works in 3d modelling, and the amount of clients he has who ask him to change something at the last minute, completely failing to understand how much time is required to make something high quality.
@@Fredreegz But even if we give them the benefit of the doubt, there's still a difference between "looks pretty good", "this will fool most people", and "wait, this movie used CGI?" And many people may be fine with the first two.
This level of detail makes the LOTR timeless. I remember being astonished watching movies like the Star Wars prequels, Matrix and many other CGI based movies. But today all of those seem rather "old fashion" or in other words, you see that they have aged. This is something that will never happen with the LOTR movies. I really think I could show those films to my grandchildren and see them being excited about it like I am.
@@annakakurtz7593 To be fair, OP said "the Star Wars prequels," not classic Star Wars. Well... by "classic Star Wars" you mean the OT, right? The OT is certainly timeless, just like the LOTR trilogy. The prequels are more akin to The Hobbit trilogy.
@@Brotried97 It's not just that it's not futuristic. If you compare LOTR's to the Hobbit, LOTR's look better because there was mix of practical with CGI, many of the places look real in LOFR because they were made as miniatures CGI as a top coat along with taking a page out of Jurassic Park's(1993) book and using lighting and the environment to there advantage to make the all CGI look better, while the hobbit was mostly CGI so while it looks good it still looks fake. The same can be about the other movies mentioned.
@@wp12mv He had very little time to make it. Still don't know if every film he's made is good though as I haven't seen all of them. Apparently he has an annoying tendency to have parts of the story be over-explained.
@@piotr4198 and i thought adults are telling things and children need to be shown things. Easy as that, pick any marvel movie. Maybe you should sit arround in the basement a bit longer if your afraid from the light.
Still incredible 20 years later. And yes, I did hear your closing message. Please keep up this style of video, very informative and entertaining. Cheers.
20 years, thanks for making me feel old. I'm only 31 but I remember watching all of them in theater. Still watch them every now and then, they never get old.
Are you saved? If you died tonight would you go to heaven or hell? The Gospel, which means the Good News is the news that God Almighty, the Creator came in the flesh as Jesus Christ to take away the sin of the world. The one God is a trinity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The Son came and laid down his own life to save ours. His sacrifice on the cross paid the price for our redemption with his own blood. On the third day he rose from dead and offers the gift of salvation and forgiveness to those that repent and trust in him. Although God's creation was created perfect, having no death, sickness and disease, the creation became corrupted through Adam and Eve in them disobeying God. In this rebellion the creation became fallen through the curse of sin and mankind became separated from God. This world is fallen, but God offers reconciliation to him through his provision at the cross. Ultimately God will restore his creation to perfection when he returns but those that who reject his offer of redemption will remain condemned by their sins and go to hell. John 1:1,14 KJV In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and THE WORD WAS GOD. [14] And THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH , and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
I can't believe it's been 20 years. My god I remember going to see the first film in theaters and just being absolutely awestruck at the whole thing. Fellowship is probably my favorite film of all time, there certainly hasn't been anything quite like it ever since.
This was brilliantly done. I used to watch these movies obsessively and this video just shows why. Peter Jackson truly mastered his craft and all who worked on this trilogy must be very proud to have taken part in such a wonderful and beautiful experience. Well done to all involved!
agreed, but the video itself has good content. granted, if they used any other thumbnail, they probably get half as many views or less, even though the vid was good.
@@ValdemarDeMatos No, it's not a joke, that's how they shot the scene. Green screen actors manipulated the ring while they filmed it in super slo-mo so that the ring would "fall" directly onto Elijah's finger, then were edited out like they did with the "hat swapping" scene in Bag End.
Man...film production is amazing! There's nothing you can't do with the right mindset. The amount of work that went into this franchise must have been insane! Very clever and talented people.
This boggles my mind. How does anybody have the patience and dedication to follow through with a project of this magnitude? I can't even finish a simple project without getting bored or frustrated and just giving up.
The perspective shots still blow my mind. The creativity of the set pieces and the unity of the actors that made the illusion seamless is incredible! The work done on this trilogy is pure passion and commitment.
@blu menthal It has always been about money. Sometimes the people involved are just better/more motivated than usual at it, and perhaps given bit more freedom.
This is absolutely insane.... also wow it's amazing how the actors can collaborate with all this extremely complex (and lets be honest, kind of silly looking) set-up and staging and STILL stay in character and act well and immersively
