Magnus Carlsen's PRISONER GAMBIT Against Vishy Anand 

█▄░█ █▀█ █ █░▀█ █▄█ ▄

i mean you are also winning tempo while kicking the queen

That's a lot You have a full bishop up and quich development And your opponent lost his capability of castling If you are playing with black, just resign already.

Hikaru "I am a streamer not a chess player" Nakamura

I do that kind of thing all the time

Do you have what it takes to reach Anand's level before he retires? Are you FIDE rated? (I know that you did not say that seriously, bhut still)

@@masterofskills76 it's called a joke

@@windowslogo3577 bro I said that you are not serious, that means I know its a joke...... I just wanna know if you are fide rated....😒

@@masterofskills76 I'm dogshit

@@windowslogo3577 bruh 😑 be positive....

This comment was the best part of this video

Nf3 d5 C4

The queen's gambit is not really a gambit. Gambit is when taking is possible. Dxc4 is not a move, almost ever, unless the other side has a trick. The king's gambit or vienna gambit are really giving up material for positional advantage.

@@dan-us6nknever thought I’d see a chess edgelord but 🤷🏻‍♂️

😊​@@dan-us6nk

sadly not enough with correct play

nope. queen protects rook after knight locks queen in. If you could take those 3 pieces you would be correct.

Everyone says this about gambits as though it makes the line completely bad. It’s one line to play when your opponent accepts. You know what you do if they decline the gambit? Keep developing like normal. That’s the mark of a gambit; you don’t auto lose if they decline

Black falls in the trap after playing Qd4. after that if black play differently than black loses differently. Ofcourse black can decide not to play Qd4 and not fall in the trap, and it will be called gambit declined.

thats why its called a gambit bud

​@shaderu3402 Some gambits are bad that's why Gms don't play them because they end up in a losing position or hard to climb out position. However, your chance of playing a GM is very unlikely so why not.

Thanks to all.

The risk is that your opponent doesn’t throw his queen out

Losing a pawn against a former world champion. It was blitz but still risky

mistake is the Queen d4 move, with correct play white keeps the advantage after this mistake from black, but if black does not play this Qd4 than with correct play black keeps the advantage. But then Qd4 move is very tempting specially if facing first time.

The biggest risk is that we’re not Magnus Carlsen

risk was losing or drawing with perfect play.

Fajarowicz

Queen is guarding the rook. U lose the queen even faster.

@@Scientist19exe You get a rook though instead of a knight

@@Scientist19exe you lost your queen but you captured a pawn, a bishop, and a rook. It's equal.

​@@NamVu-im2xm i believe most people across the rating ladder would rather have a queen for several pieces, since it is more challenging to successfully coordinate multiple minor pieces in a way that equalises the queen's reach

​​@@NamVu-im2xmRooks are almost non factors early in the game. A knight that was already out might be even more dangerous than a rook early in the game. If I had to guess, an engine would not say black is even (9 points with knight,rook,pawn) but probably -5 or more because of how early and developed white already is. For a GM level that is already resigns. Of course Magnus knew this and that's why he played it.

One piece. One of the bishops was traded.

@Soppl yes, but the queen is trapped, so it will take a knight with a desperado capture and then the knight has to be recaptured with a pawn that then cannot possibly be defended. 2 pieces and 2 pawns

This is true. but in the opening rooks are almost non factors and taking a queen early is a huge advantage and almost any GM that takes the queen has won. I'm interested to know what the engine evaluates it after what you said.

Actually I looked at it again and you are wrong. The queen protects the rook after the knight locks the queen in. I get the feeling that it might have been a bigger advantage for black if he got the 3 pieces for the queen even if it was early in the game (not the case here). Because I forgot about black also taking a central pawn. That 12 points for a 9 point queen with whites queen probably not able to do any damage other than probably just wining that central pawn back. If I had to guess an engine would say black has a +2-+3 advantage if you were right.

he sacrificed only a pawn and a bishop, he exchanged the second bishop in the end, of course, the queen will also take the knight, but it is much better than the knight+bishop+pawn, especially at the beginning of the game besides, when Magnus plays against you with a queen, and you without, you definitely have no chance😂😂😂

@@ph0enix901 normally I have no chance against him💀

Sadly, he did

​@@abhidityasingh9444 Oh 😞.

U can trust GM Igor Smirnov

​@@abhidityasingh9444he didn't played it...

​@@9181shreyasbhatti don't he always makes videos against anand which are mostly fake

Any luck? 😛

@@eurotwink9740 So far absolutely zero opponents have opened with d5 2) c5...about 4 or 5 have actually opened with 1) d5 out of over 15 games I have played as white

@@eurotwink9740 Well it took over 30 games but I finally had a player make the actual moves in this video. I was able to win the queen (losing a rook of course) and they resigned a few moves later but I was only up about 3 or 4 points according to the analyzer when they resigned.

if u first play a3 before bishop trades, than black play queen takes bishop, black does lose the queen but whit loses 3 minor pieces. if white trades bishop first and then play a3 than white does lose 3 pieces but black loses queen and a minor piece. so 1 extra minor piece white wins.

and lose

Yeah. With the folks I play, it's about 50/50 regardless...

why queen can move to a.5 and b.6 there are no threaten

@@akagi-the-omnipresent that is what black tried to do in the video, and couldn't move to a5 and lost the queen

​. you are forgetting the knight on c4.

Yeah, I will have to try these moves next time I play against Anand

Satan is Lord

well yes indeed, but you remind me of the man who took his toothbrush to church and cleaned his teeth, and when someone complained he said, 'Nowhere in the bible does it say that I cannot clean my teeth in church'

Ganesh is cool

Ah yes believe that your Lord and almighty god died, amen

EMBERS 10:9 Shut up about religion unless you could give any evidence.