Magnus Carlsen vs Daniil Dubov Titled Tuesday 1 february 2023 credits : / maskenissen Don't forget to subscribe to my channel chess openings, chess game
@@puucca Okay but being a crybaby isn't always literal, it means somebody who cant take blame and blames everyone around him vor his failure. Thats something totaly different to crying when you lose at the one thing you literaly dedicate your life to. Him crying isn't a sign of him being weak but rather shows how dedicated he is to his passion
@@minddtrixxter4983 Naka is pretty quick to accuse opponents of cheating when he can't handle losing. Not just with Supi, but also Andrew Tang, Akshat Chandra, etc. There's nothing wrong with being frustrated, but taking it out on your opponents is crossing the line. Naka has cursed opponents out over the board after getting a result he wasn't satisifed with - that's not excusable behavior no matter how dedicated to chess you are
@@joddle23 sheesh you sound like every Eric Hansen's fanboy cause he's definitely past that life. I don't justify any of his toxic behavior especially in his rough past and funnily, he admitted that he regrets them and almost always acknowledge his mistakes. Yet you acting like he's a serial killer whose sins can't be forgiven 😂 His tournament recaps have always been him praising his opponents if they played better than him bro, even when he lost badly. Plus his peers which are super GMs like Duda, Anish, Carlsen himself, etc show mutual respect.
@Sexy Ἀλκιβιάδης Sorry. Never seen anyone ever on the internet asking sincere question about this. Here is the answer: there are no elo that equals respectful players. You can play the dumbest and most toxic humans who are actually GM level players. Humans are humans for better or for worse, no matter the ELO they may have. That is the hard truth.
@@NicolaBarbaro956 Yeah for bantz, when its a genuine attack on his character he made a clear statement on how he feels about it. Wouldn't have been a statement if he didn't read out the comment now would it?
When he plays other people: "Knight G6 - that looks like a bad move!" When he plays Dubov: "I feel like that's not the most popular move but probably it's a decent one."
2:22 if dubov takes the knight with the bishop instead of the queen, wont that force magnus to either take the bishop and lose his queen or not take bishop and all? Leaving dubov up 1 bishop. Im bad at chess so i must be missing something
Magnus had just captured dubovs knight…so dubov could’ve recaptured with a bishop or queen, both would be equalizing. He wanted to take the queens off so he captured with the queen
can someone explain to me at 2:28 ... Dubov could have captured the knight with the bishop and if magnus tries to recapture with the queen he loses his queen??
Всем Мира, Здоровья И Добра! 🙏🙏🙏❤🕊🌎🌍🌏 Peace, Health And All The Best To Everyone! 🙏🙏🙏❤🕊🌎🌍🌏 Всех с Новым Годом и Рождеством! ❤❤❤ Merry Christmas And Happy New Year! ❤❤❤
It's called pre moving. He's playing his moves before his opponent plays, then when his opponent moves his moves get instantly and automatically played where he put them
There's magnus the chess champion I like to see. Defending someone else showing champion behavior moverlious bravo, wish u do that on the chessboard 😉 jk 😜
