Major airlines cut flights over Boeing troubles 

So true, one sided majority of business in Aviation.

Boeing has milarty contracts ..They will neve go out of busness. Ths is just specific to a series of planes in one part of the comapny. The stock price is still solid.

Boeing and Airbus dont advertise have you ever seen an ad for them? They both have military contracts and government contracts, they also work for space agencies, none of them is ever going out of business. Comment rating 0/10

@@kimiraikkonen4226 they don't advertise, but they genuinely do approaches to their customers for orders even sometimes with hefty discounts.

Airbus is staying quiet because they have similar issues. The difference is that no one cares about Airbus. But many of the A320Neos have already been suffering groundings due to in-air engine failures over the last 2 years.

?? 🤦🏽‍♂️ They merged with Boeing! Many accounts say that's when Boeing began shifting its emphasis from engineering excellence to higher annual profits.

@@dexterpoindexter3583The near-sighted ex-MD executives shifted the emphasis not to annual but QUARTERLY profits, and here they are.

@@dexterpoindexter3583 I believe Boeing bought out MD. Boeing was doing just fine with commercial and govt long term contracts that MD didn't have. Besides the culture had shifted away from building quality aircraft to profits at ANY cost when the MD boys arrived. That culture was one of the reasons MD lost out. That's when they opened a SC plant. Quality was being pushed aside in the need for speed and profits. Google search the SC plant. Al Jazeera did a great undercover story complete with drug abuse. Last nights National news had a whistleblower committing suicide from the SC plant. His mental health state was excellent before he died. Do the math.

@@dexterpoindexter3583 When Boeing merged with McD, Stonecipher (McD CEO at the time) took over Condit's (The residing CEO) position.

@@timkono5645that’s so crazy they actually swapped CEOs? No wonder Boeings culture went downhill. Even if the B culture wasn’t one of safety-the fact it’s an MD as CEO means he could’ve easily cultivated a new culture of prioritizing stock price and bean counters over QC engineers and safety just like at MD when they went under. What a terrible deal in retrospect.

lol i thought i heard that too

😅😅

SAME

Look into mcas

Making*

🎯

you are expecting too much from the media

@@aerohk Haha, that's unfortunately true.

​@@zacharydeangelis These are the same people who couldn't be bothered to check their sources for their information. What were you expecting?😂😂

737 Max only.

The left leaning media is sloppy as hell because their side does not care about standards, just the appearance of them. These are the same people pushing DEI. Who is going to stop them they are the fact checkers.

Not when you want to maximize profits and cut corners. I will always filter out boeing planes moving forward.

Exactly right. For a generation now, much of 4th Estate prefers lazy easy narratives that will get ratings, subscriptions, or clicks, etc. They are deliberately exploiting any incident that barely has a cursory affiliation with a Boeing aircraft as an excuse to talk about the aircraft manufacturer and their legitimate failures with the 737 MAX MCAS disasters awhile back, the apparent suicide of a former Boeing QA whistle blower, a decompression incident where an aircraft was delivered without bolts installed in a door plug, and recent airline fallout from production delivery delays (particularly 737 MAX 10). None of these are an excuse for irresponsible reporting. One news outlet used the United flight which experienced a hydraulic failure and safely returned to SFO, as an excuse to focus most of the report on *Boeing,* ...despite the fact that the incident aircraft was an Airbus A320. That report didn't even mention the word, _'Airbus,'_ however the word _'Boeing'_ was explicitly stated four times. This neglect is journalistic malpractice.

Agree.. a 20 year old plane that looses a wheel/tire ... whats the odds that wasnt the one boeing put on at factory... 100%???

I agree. This was incredibly sloppy and irresponsible. to conflate separate but parallel issues, is doing those serious circumstances a major disservice.

The media loves sensationalism and they're relying on viewers to not look at the full data b/c this is what gets them ratings. People are fundamentall lazy, its much easier for them to see a story like this and chant "If its Boeing, I ain't going" than it is to look at the data and form their own conclusions...

Fearmongering 101. Media will never change

Peak American capitalism.

You're telling me !

And let’s not forget that these are machines, and parts on machines sometime break prior to the end of their normal service life. Sometimes it’s not anyone’s fault. It’s the manufacturers responsibility to design an aircraft that doesn’t fail catastrophically when a single component fails, and that’s what happened here.

@@USAFA00 - but a hydrolic leak? that could be a mechanic that didnt tighen a hose properly that works for airline

maybe it was a new part?

@@Neuzahnstein - and if it was it could have been from rolls royce engine/ ge etc.. and even if it was from boeing .. Boeing didnt install part..

What about the 757 Neo ?

@@mro9466 ...or the re-designed 2-engined 747?

Cessna 777 neo

AB350787737757747320380 Neo max

Well, it isn't like the airlines are giving up on them.

But the common theme is it’s always US companies it’s as if all that matters in the us is c suite share option packages. Remember made in the USA now means inferior quality junk.

Mcas ?

all the fear...... the media owns you...... I flew on five Max last month.. back to back... fell asleep and enjoyed every flight.....

@@stopspewinshit7878Good for you. That doesn't mean others are willing to risk their lives. You do what you want, and others will do what they want. Pretty simple.

@@stopspewinshit7878 you are literally retarded.

Fuck your cruise trip.

@@marcd1981It’s still safer to fly on a Boeing plane today than to fly on an kind of aircraft 20 or 30 years ago. It’s still safer to fly on a Max plane than to drive your car to the coffeeshop. I’m not defending Boeing, what they’ve been doing is absolutely criminal, but it’s not exactly a reckless decision to fly on their planes.

100 % agree with you!

united didnt make the plane you fucking idiot

Heck, they've had issues with Airbus airplanes too. Their brand new A321 NEO just had an engine failure resulting in an emergency landing a few weeks ago, but nobody wants to focus on that. It's just Boeing...

Cough cough Duversity is our strength

@@ZzXZ636 ? What is "Duversity"? And if you are referring to diversity, what do you mean especially in relationship to this specific issue? Boeing went from a company about transparency quality and safety believing rightfully so that monetary profit would follow a good company and a good product. Then it went to a company that encouraged constant attention to the bottom line with other things secondary leading predictably to a company that is now failing in the public eye if not literally. So I must ask what do you mean?

I am referring to the statement by our Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg. upon accepting his appointment from President Biden . His statement about the our Aviation Industry .

I can't believe there are people DEFENDING them!! WTF???

Any evidence to support that claim? Or just your feelings.

Then you're an idiot. The Max fleet has 2M flight miles and only 3 incidents. Statically this means that if you fly on a Max, there's a 99.999%+ chance that your flight will be incident free....

But you may be forced onto a Boeing plane if your flight has a last-minute equipment change or cancellation.

Europe has more stringent oversight than the USA.

Can't you even understand why? They are not American Company.

because the are made in France/Germany/Spain and UK .....and those workers are well trained and the quality-checks are better.

Can’t believe this is a question.🤦🏾‍♀️

are you fucking kidding me???

It's how they make even more money. Enrich the shareholders, which enriches the executives.

And you're aware that you could be forced onto a Boeing plane if your flight has an equipment change or is cancelled, no?

@@aycc-nbh7289 I said what I said

Hard to believe big-network reporting can be this bad. Hrmmmm… what are the chances …this reporter just magically received a VIP pass for one year’s first class travel ….from a certain airline ….that starts with “U”…??

Because the pressure controller CAUTION had nothing to do with a door plug. The pressure controller can be MEL'ed as there are backups and the flight can continue flying with no issues. Please educate yourself about the 737 systems and that the NTSB has already concluded over two months ago that the pressure controller had NOTHING to do with the door plug.

So would a pressure dome issue/leak possibly cause this to trigger as well? Spirit Aero Also had a “Vendor Issue” w/its pressure dome. Right after you have a pressure issue but that Can Be Mel’ as well? Here’s another weird one a friend who flys AirBus JUST HAD a engine failure and safely landed in Denver and NOTHING was reported on news. Tires falling off maintenance, panel’s flying off on older plane maintenance . Boeing need to get it together no doubt BUT some of this is just too goofy

@@bettycrocker3425 No. The two aren't related. Yes, Airbus has the same issues, but are going unreported. Heck, I saw one news report about a United A319 doing a "emergency landing" in Tampa due to a cargo door indicating open. The news reported it as a Boeing A319...

Do what your heart says.

Everything is fine... The news is sensationalizing non-issues. A hydraulic leak on a 777 or a tire falling off IS NOT a Boeing issue, that's an airline issue. If a tire pops on a 30+ year old vehicle, you wouldn't then blame the manufacturer and demand a recall, would you?

Do you know anything about those planes? Or just listen to inaccurate sensationalist news stories? If you do your research and check then you Will see that dreamliners have had zero crashes in all of their operational history. A clean safety record and some of the safest planes out there

Exactly. Boeing is done. Everyone needs to stop flying it; they will never change. only cares about stock buy back.

2:00

Evidence please instead of feelings

Why are you feeding into conspiracies about the already misinformed issue

wow you are an FAA auditor? do you know what levels of compliance are in place? pretty sure they were "findings" not total failures. the media owns the brains (or lack there of ) of people like you.

Unlikely. His own family came out and said his mental health had been deteriorating for years...

Do you have information that it wasn't a suicide?

Delta had a tire come off of one of their 757 airplanes a few weeks ago before takeoff in Atlanta...

Well, their stock price today only went down by about 1%.

jetBlue or Spirit

Highly dependent on the route. Their short hops are a mix of Boeing and Airbus but almost all of their long haul flights are Boeing.

@@x808drifter so the A330NEOS and A350s aren't widebodies?

You say that but when your Destination only has Boeing You have no option 😢😢

Many airlines have Airbus aircraft. Would you fly on Spirit Airlines because they fly only Airbus aircraft?

You do know Airbus is having similar issues with their airplanes and engines right now?