Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso to form a confederation 

Good. GroundNews is a front for SleptStein.

Hi, I hope you are aware of BetterHelp not guaranteeing licenced professionals to be the "psychologist". I understand you need sponsors to have a stable income but I suggest distancing yourself from unnesecary drama. Anyway, love your videos, Ive been a long time fan and I just want to see you succeed. Keep at it.

Also, to add to my comment above, they have been caught sharing sensitive and "confidential" private information like sexual orientation etc. Not a good look.

STOP TAKING SPONSORSHIPS FROM THIS B*LLSHIT COMPANY

I refuse to watch a video which receives money on account of this disgusting company, I know creators need money but this is where I draw the line sorry. Consider getting rid of this sponsor

not the first time they've taken money from shady sponsors

As usual Caspian Report sells his soul to criminal sponsors. Nothing new here.

go watch Good Times Bad Times, much better guy than this moneygrabber

Masterworks sponsorship was just 🤢 . Thankfully people make expose vids on these shady businesses

@@ayyygfym8245 def my fav polish channel

An alliance of tin-pot republics.

🍑

Bad ASS 🌬🍑🫢😵

"Alliance of Sahel States, but you may also call us.." "ASS!" "No no, the Sahel Confederacy" "Isn't that kinda negative?"

still better than having countries named Chad or Niger

I can't think of a single sponsor that isn't basically a scam with extra steps. These companies all rely on influencers to shill their garbage for them.

I wonder who doesn't. ((:

Its also Israeli company so boycott it

​@@Tribuneoftheplebsall I need to know to sign up. SWAMP GAZA!!!

@@ryansauchuk7290 oy vey

Good thing I have reVanced that came with a built in SponsorBlock. That said, it is an out of touch, distasteful sponsorship for a company that sells your private information to advertisers. He should know better than this.

What the? Now he's deleting comments too??

I joined I’m tired of these big RU-vidrs using such trash sponsers

@@thelibertyking6735I doubt it. RU-vid has been very weird with deleting and shadowbanning posts for years now.

@@cy-one Yeah I guess so. Anyways here the response I had (if you want a read): Good thing I had revanced that has a built in Sponsorblock. That said, it is an out of touch, distasteful sponsorship for a company that sells your private information to advertisers. He should know better than this. Is it that hard to lookup your sponsor and their history?

Are they even connected to Morocco?

@@funghi2606 only through Mauritania and Algeria. I don't see why those countries wouldn't want to be connected though

Morocco is often a little too desperate.

Sounds like a publicity statement for political clout, Morocco is somewhat geopolitically close to France and I doubt they'll seriously act on it.

@@rmmvwmauritania will but Algeria won’t. Kinda defeats the purpose though as they can use Mauritanias deep water port

can you send a video link of their purported scam?

@@wambugugichuki Don't think we can post links in comments but if you Google "BetterHelp vs FTC" it covers what they did and how much they got fined for the violation. "The Federal Trade Commission finalized an order requiring online counseling service BetterHelp to pay $7.8 million and prohibiting it from sharing consumers' health data for advertising, resolving allegations the firm shared consumers' sensitive health data with third parties such as Facebook and Snapchat"

I know...

Morals don't pay the bills

Please sponsor them brody

That meme is so Western

@@royalroyal2210If you know, you know 😏

It's hilarious!

Insert Myanmar dancing girl with coup in the background.

Good times bad times don't take such sponsorships, I'd go and watch them

​@@MiSt3300 GTBT makes good content, but he has also had sponsors like this

You mean he was sponsored by them. I doubt he sponsored them in return, that would be weird.

​@@VVayVVardhe did shout out to them. Not cool.

We cannot expect a Turk to talk truthfully about Africa

Yeah......that seems to be an "important omission?"

Via western Sahara...

The atlantic via an airport ? 😂😂

​@junsuaiiim998 He's Azerbai

Real. History doesn't always repeat but it certainly rhymes.

Scholars may know that but that means nothing. There is no nationality in the region, only tribes. 2/3 of the people there can't even read. And that is why the region will always fail.

Absolutely OP, and these empires were some of the wealthiest and most learned of the era. Despite initial impressions of the Sahara Desert, it's trade routes were a link to North Africa, the Mediterranean and the rest of the world. Obviously, the age of the camel is long past for trade, but it will be interesting to see what the long-term adaptive strategies of this Confederacy become.

Exactly. An empire is it's true & stable form. Proven by time and power and was only upended in 1893. The most powerful thing to do is revert to true form. Painfully and immediately. The longer they take the less likely they'll ever do it.

@@andremiller1566 that's a little misleading, the empire itself was destroyed in 1591, it just survived as a small rump state around a place called dendi until 1901. Rump states can actually survive quite a while in the right conditions.

Wagner got fired by Mozambique. How comical. russians are proving to be incapable of anything these days.

Yep, macron wants to go full Napoleon, but it won't work

more likely that were going to witness the rise of madmax environment as this goes on... the world is almost on the brink of another dark age,. the bronze age collapsed, and the most recent dark age , was preceded by mass migration , andits happening again..

You say this but this one is pretty likely to collapse under insurgency fighting and the East African Federation just keeps becoming less and less likely every time they add a new member to the negotiating table before even getting anywhere. I’d be surprised if we saw one in Latin America although I could see some countries integrating more through their already existing economic blocs. MERCOSUR and the Pacific Alliance both have potential although the latter hasn’t really done anything at all in recent years with Mexico more focused on North American integration and most members being in the CPTPP anyways. MERCOSUR on the other hand could always work closer together but with 2 major poles in Buenos Aires and Brazilia, I highly doubt they’d look towards confederation. I do think expansion to Chile and Bolivia would benefit them a lot though. They should be making moves towards improving free trade, mutual market regulations, and a common currency. I don’t think they can implement a common market until they’ve solved several internal security problems but I do think they have a point to start at for a regional economic bloc developing similar to the successes of the EU or ASEAN.

Nah, you underestimate people's greed and corruption, do you remember the arab union? How long it lasted and why it collapsed? It's like when people say kosovo and albania or modlova and romania will unite, i always laugh at that, as i know how politics works in reality, have seen it from the inside. Do you know all those ministers, and all imployed in their departments, all clerks employed in national assembliea, all national agencies and organisations, constitutional/supreme courts judges and justices and all employed there. And besides just the financial and power benefits for those that rule the country, there's also the question of sovereingty, yoi are taking someone to rule upon you. So it never works out, it could in some union where everone is equal like the eu, but you never the less give up on a part of your sovereingty, for that you need to have very strong administration and legistlature, so very stable countries, and the benefits from it to outweight the negatives, so it rarely works like that.

There is one famous confederacy on "South America" that is bound to come back one day

Also countries in South America are doing just fine theres no real need to go back to the old borders because we simply dont have any enemies. So we are free to just do things at our own time and not worry about combining strength or whatever.

Either this video was recorded earlier or they didn't do their research properly

from 71 iq lore? 10:32

@lloyd9500 Thankfully I was never subscribed. Just came across it in my feed haha. Also, the reporter comes across as biased and doesn't tell the complete story. There are definitely better pages out there.

Gone downhill from the start of the Russo-Ukrainian war ​@@lloyd9500

@@Kassiem_42got some recommendations for me?

Yes

not free but at a lower price

No doubt. Scale it up and you get the American dollar sucking off the whole world.

And have an almost monopolistic power on their trade

@@ugwuanyicollins6136 does this video does this video seem to have a western bias I just don’t know what conclusions to draw on any of these major conflicts right now I like this channel and real life lore but are there any sources any of y’all recommend?

They speak frensh, it's probably SSA or something, but it's still funny none the less

It's the AES in French

@@elpito9326 but in English it's ASS lol

@@biggiebagelit could just as easily be SAS or SSA, so it’s not a big deal. You’re just choosing a weird one.

@@gabrielonibudo5566it is, the oroginsl is french snd you are just translating

So he could say the sky is green but that doesn't matter so long as he picks the right sponsors

That's not really the same thing

@5C2WMedia Oh, you're spouting false equivalencies instead of asking questions or debating in good faith. Let me do that too. So someone speaking falsehoods doesn't diminish their trustworthiness? You'll continue believing anyone no matter how many lies they tell? We should believe everything someone tells us when they're motivated by money? Why would you say and advocate for all those things? You sure aren't smart if you genuinely believe all that, which I've decided that you do.

@@Inoffensive_name 👍

I aint reading allat​@@Inoffensive_name

Exactly, borders they themselves have formed and not colonists from 300 years ago

@@topiheimola69 Try 130 years ago, but yeah. It wouldn't even say its the colonists fault. Since no african state was centralized.

@@celdur4635 Africa has literally had its own empires. The Songhai, Ghana and Mali empires in the region covered here.

@@ArawnOfAnnwn So? they were not comparable on their centralization levels with the processes in other continents

@@celdur4635 false, there are examples of centralised African states and even empires, even other than the few exceptions that weren't fully colonised

I watched same topic from real life

sleeping with each other *

When?

@@dunkcsa9780 True!

Inshallah

More like the Mali Federation

Yes, it appears so. It is important to note that this is what the populations of this countries want. I've been there.

They can use French as a de facto language They share the same ethnicities... so why not give it a shot

Warlords? STOP watching CNN. They are military juntas supported by the populations and overthrew dictators who have been ruling since independence

@@uviweboyana8936 A bunch of dictators won't share power even if it means they will be stronger overall. If they tried it, it would break into civil war almost immediately once somebody asks who will lead us "before the people have an election" that probably won't ever come?

​@@uviweboyana8936 they don't even remotely share ethnicity, wtf are you talking about

They're not "warlords". What war have they waged? You seem very uninformed.

Why?

@@MusicForHourssthey’ve been caught stealing and selling personal data

@@MusicForHourss they recently settled with the FTC for selling their customers' personal health data (including mental health questionnaires) to Facebook, Snapchat, Criteo and Pinterest, despite telling customers and their support agents that it was private. They also had a HIPAA logo on their website with no matching compliance process in place.

@@MusicForHourssshitty company that has been exposed 6 years ago for employing unlicenced therapists and other quackers, and more recently for selling their customers private (mental health) data while explicitly stating they wouldn't.

​@@ymtzlgnah, just like google and others.

Maybe they have a European western bias, but at least we know it's france that's the source

And more Zionist

Gooder*

More gooder

its AI.

Goodist

Don't these three countries still use the cfa franc? Regardless of their issues with France isn't it still profiting from them even now?

@@DanM-pw9nl they are doing everything they can to decouple from the currency. It's worth mentioning that using the currency does not mean that the host country is profiting by default. That said France still retains some strongholds like the currency and uranium mines in Niger.

More like how utterly long it took. France has been continuing colonial practices WELL after the norm

its the hand of russia behind... weakening the Euro so they lower their contribution to ukraine...

Nah songhai empire

It looks like the Songhai

Let's hope morroco doesn't invade it again for gold, oh wait, too late, morroco already got there

*and let China construct loads of trainlines inland.

@@johnsinclair4621 Hahahah, they probably would. Though that would just be exchanging bad for worse.

Lol good luck with Guinea. Guineas leader use to be in the French foreign legion and his wife use to be a French police officer.

@@hans7856 How so?

They've already signed an agreement with Morocco and Mauritania.

Chad and Guinea and even Senegal are on the bubble. Now, there's BRICs + and her New Bank. The global South is about to be free. Nkrumah is giddy right now. The BSR is here!

It's named about Lake Chad, so we would still have a Chad don't worry.

😂

@@salakast But we'd lose the Chad shape.

This entire endeavor is incredibly unsustainable. These nations will only thrive if they find ways of dealing with corruption, jihadism, infrastructure problems and being very landlocked in a region that is experiencing desertification.

its africa, you expect it to work out? 😂😂

@@ansumanc Yeah

Maybe I should go into politics to make it even more beneficial to my country

​@@minestar2247Best of luck to you

Bruh, Tanzania was the equivalent of merging Saudi Arabia & Bahrain. Little difference whatsoever.

@@nellym46664 In territorial extent, that may be. However, they were considered equal constituent parts to such an extent that the country derived its name from Tan + Zan + ia. That is, the Zanzibar part is given equal weight in the name with the Tanganyika part.

Take that as an example

He's using AI to change his accent to be less noticeable, that's why the bass is blown out in the voiceover audio

Would you support a confederacy with Eritrea, Djibouti, and Somalia?

​@@wzuppppyes

How is the war on your oen population going? lol

​@@wzupppp The Cushitic Empire. That would be a dream come true.

@@wzupppp under Ethiopian authority, except with Somalia yes.

The tuareg probably also would have wanted Republics, but europeans suck

The eu exists, don't forget that. And no, cause austria Hungaria started as an Austrian empire, so there's a big difference

Please not that one please not that one

@@taffingtonboathouse5754 yeah that term's been tainted.... from a certain time

@RealWatch1 Only from tbe View of Black Americans and Bourgeois White Liberals.

The EAF?

Yeah, desert land great for agriculture

@@bolsa3136go look up how independent organisations and food banks are working with local populations in the sahel to transform the region into an agriculturally productive area, you will be surprised how much the sahel can be developed if resources and well intentioned people pool together

@@bolsa3136 There is a demand for agriculture. Railroads can meet that demand from what little land is arable. It's a different question if the people can pay for that service.

The Sahel receives 8 to 32 inches of rain per year. I admit that 8 inches is desert, but 32 inches of rain is farmable agriculture in the good years. Farmers always hope for the good year. I have great hopes for the Sahel.

would be a good video had it not had a BetterHelp scam sponsorship

Putin will help them succeed

Don't bet the house

😅those are military dictators who came to power through coups😅haven't you people learnt from Sudan?

Better chose one man Dictatorship first before form republic

​@@davianoinglesias5030I'm pretty sure OP was being sarcastic

Yay, long live the king Mohamed the 6th

Based

Not literally because that empire had access to the ocean.

@@MalevolentBite all they need is Senegal

@@WLH3eLiTe Now that would be great literal Songhai empire lol.

Larger countries make things worse. Why do you think there are so many independence movements around the world? The area with the resources becomes resentful of the central government taking its wealth. Ethnic groups are forced to compromise on major issues. The religion or race of the current ruler will always receive preferential treatment. Europe is in better shape than Africa yet has much smaller countries. The answer for Africa isn't making even larger countries. Africa is already on the right track, it will simply have inevitable growing pains like all regions do as they develop. China lost millions of people to starvation under Mao. Russia had to suffer through civil war. So did the US. Africa isn't perfect but it will continue to progress

The last time someone "unites a contitent" all of europe plunged into war, twice

@@asscheeks3212 ...until they tried again by this time asking nicely and now we have the European Union.

@@DanM-pw9nl "larger countries make things worse" Say that to the United States of America. Or the European Union (yes, I know it's not a country). Or India. What other alternatives are there? Everyone criticises the current borders as those drawn by out-of-touch white aristocrats nearly 100 years ago. Africa is positively a shithole, the few places that aren't could become just as bad at any given moment, because a general decided it's coup time. Go smaller, down to the tribal/ethnic level? Good luck with that, you would end up with literally thousands of small tribes with absolutely no potential to have proper economies, build infrastructure or engage in trade, but plenty of potential to fight each other. There would be chaos and anarchy on a whole new level. The only way forward is to unite. As long as one ethnic group is strong enough to bully the others without oversight, there will never be peace. These are not European nation states with relatively large, well-defined populations of national identities. A large enough federal union of nations is the least bad way forward, I'm not saying it would be perfect, but what other alternative is there? Let the Africans fight each other for another 2 centuries? Until the continent stabilises, there will be no investment, no prosperity, no peace.

@@jabloko992 lmao nobody really treats the EU seriously.

Who not? At least they are honest in their goals, and they 're fighting imperialist domination

What would hold those nations together? People need a reason to tolerate their tax dollars/francs/dinars being spent to the benefit of strangers hundreds of kilometres away. You either need some sort of common identity, so people are willing do that, or you need an enlightened despot who is so much more powerful than any of his rivals that he can force people to do this for long enough that they develop a shared identity. The large states of Asia and Europe (e.g. France, China, Russia) can rely on the efforts of emperors past to (often forcibly) homogenize their people, while the large states of the New World (e.g. US, Brazil) are new enough that their regional identities haven't drifted too far away from their common roots. But Africa is a mess of different tribes and nations, each with their own language, customs, history, and grievances. Moreover, there is no African version of the Roman Empire, Qin Dynasty, or Abbasid Caliphate that might give them a historical/legendary base on which to build a common identity. Any commonality has to be built up from scratch, either with agonizing slowness and constant (re)negotiation, or with brutal repression and forcible assimilation. Notably, the two major African countries (Nigeria and Ethiopia) are in a near constant state of turmoil and civil strife, specifically because their governments cannot balance the priorities of all of their constituent tribes against each other.

Larger countries make things worse. Why do you think there are so many independence movements around the world? The area with the resources becomes resentful of the central government taking its wealth. Ethnic groups are forced to compromise on major issues. The religion or race of the current ruler will always receive preferential treatment. Europe is in better shape than Africa yet has much smaller countries. The answer for Africa isn't making even larger countries. Africa is already on the right track, it will simply have inevitable growing pains like all regions do as they develop. China lost millions of people to starvation under Mao. Russia had to suffer through civil war. So did the US. Africa isn't perfect but it will continue to progress

are those thousands of nigerian kids kidnapped every other week by isss lah mist mobs aware that their governement is "winning" at this? who are you kidding? smh

Hey, maybe that African union project can actually work one day, sooon

@@minestar2247 red and green africa cannot unite. Nigeria nad ethiopia must split based in who is green and who is red.

@@ricardoxavier827 what do you mean? What is red or green Africa? And why do you want to split them away?

It is waiting for other ecowas countries to join the group once ttheir respective countries will kick french puppet out of their countries as well so it is just matter of time when they wont be landlocked anymore..

They have neighbors that are also at risk of coup d'état, so it's a problem for now, but not in the future

@@minestar2247 yeah that seems like a very stable enterprise..

@@Trodpint-A capitalism is unstable by nature, yet the us follows it blindly

ru-vid.comvFmXtXeJdoA?si=CkhvNFCbr3rUHDgp

Reds and greens cannot live under the same nation. This break away from ecowas, are made by only greens nations. West africa will never be united as whiles reds be included.

😂😂 any attempt on that will warrant a direct military intervention mainly from Nigeria, which alone is more than enough to deal with the entire Confederacy, this is backed with solid fact. And these juntas knows that

They would go bankrupt instantly trying to invade and occupy one of their neighbors. They can’t even keep control of their own borders.

If Niger is attacked it would be war with north of Nigeria with is mostly Hausa people

@@Vista_victorptolemy Nigeria cant even provide security to its own citizens. I believe ECOWAS (with the almighty NIGERIA leading the way) gave an ultimatum but nothing so far...🤔

​@Nigeriananalyst The proud puppet state of Nigeria can't even deal with boko haram in their own borders. How do you expect them to deal with a logistical challenge outside of their borders? And you think declaring war on a group of anti-imperialists is going to gain any African leader some support. That will most likely spread the coup domino to Nigeria. There's also an ethnic group that lives on the Nigeria-Niger border (can't recall their name) who don't exactly feel like they're Nigerians first. Nigeriananalyst? 😂😂😂 I think not. Change your name

Adding Mauritania benefits more

Or Senegal or Mauritania

The coastal west African nations have been on the rise, economically and in human development. Guinea is among one of the highest. They almost certainly want nothing to with these sahel states's instability. ECOWAS actually seems to have been working, all in all.

@@RobespierreThePoofthen why is the human rights and development of these countries still been terrible? Also, these Sahel states were *also* a part of ECOWAS, but have have little actual benefits.

Three poor, landlocked countries join forces to become... one poor, landlocked country... but bigger.... Okay.

@@douglassun8456 And they're all led by military juntas after a hostile takeover. It won't lead to any infighting at all!

​@@douglassun8456but free not a france slave

​@@azahel542peabrain

​@@douglassun8456they have largest gold and uranium reserve

Nomadic pastoralists by definition can't have an independent country. They have 'traditional lands' that will always be at the mercy of the sedentary, agrarian and urban peoples. They will eke out an existence from what little resources they have and remain a thorn in the ass of any country they live in until they integrate and abandon that lifestyle. Great music though.

They won't, Algeria is still too desert greedy and that desert is useless because of the lack of water

There is also the magrebi union but it's old and failed. Africa is on the road of unionising

They did pretty well during the 2013 intervention, for 1.

Just like the US then right?

@@sans_hw187 And Russia. These powerful countries rely mostly on their armament, but their forces are not as motivated as those who are fighting for their country's survival.

”You sing the song of whose bread you are eating” - Finnish proverb

The idf? Ok, here is another guy I can bully

You mean monkeys $hit in trees? What could ever go wrong with 3 warlords with no shared cultural heritage forming a nation-state with no economy, Islamic war bands roving the countryside, growing desertifaction, and must import food to support desertification, *checks notes* A bigger failed state.

@@craftsmanceramics8653western bleached demon

@@craftsmanceramics8653typical western caveman comment

@tbphillips9649 caveman where?!?! You have the west to thank for our industrial age. There is a reason why sub-saharian Africa is a smathering of failed states...

@@craftsmanceramics8653 you are the caveman are dumb

Yes make it one united continent called " Great Wakanda " 🐒🦧🐪🐘🦒🦓

@@larsstougaard7097 obsessed racist