Brothers flabbergast me with the battle-rap suppositions they have about everything from talking points, to who the originator of something was/is... "Okay... Cool Brother... U hit it first... U were the first person to wear you clothes like that... U were the first person to ever think or say that... Congratulations Fam... Everyone who reads this is clapping for you Sir..."
BGS Laying it down, the gauntlet. Whoever wants it can get it. Just because they see some in our community are Treasonous, reprobate they try to label us all as such.
This is akin to Latinos and non- FBA's claiming they had a hand in creating hip hop. They had so much to say about its success, yet they couldn't prove they were the ones who made things happen.
@DapperDonzX The point is one person wants to lay claim to what someone else has done because it became successful without them being directly involved. How you cannot see that is beyond me, SMH.
@@pervertedalchemist9944 people nitpick low priority nuances and miss the overall point in order to try and use that to build a smart sounding counter-argument because they can't build one any other way (overlook the main point, exploit low tier nuances for advantage. Fishing for flaws essentially).
BGS I GOT A GOOD ONE. Lynn Toller lost her husband. Did an interview on Hardly Initiated saying I'm not a FEMININW WOMAN. Love to get your perspective. Starts at 21:55.
🤔....I am not sure who's who when it comes to this conversation. What I will say, though, is if there is to be a battle between the two, meaning, 1.0vs 2.0, the game should be played on a neutral court. Pick your BiG 3. Choose a neutral court WITH a neutral Moderator. Then, the game can really begin to help us all gain an understanding of the conversation. GoldProfessor
