Mapping the Brain with UC Berkeley Psychology Jack Gallant 

Thank you Professor Gallant for your great presentation...

i wanna be a part of ur lab so badly! auditory sensory system is my holy cow n i got lots of approvals of my research by watchin this talk, pr Gallant!

44:14 45:53 “This scanner I should probably mention will probably never pay for itself because it’s always gonna be a kind of an MRI physics experiment.”

Any new advancements with digital output?

Would it be possible to do this to someone/ remotely monitor their brain and influence one's thoughts? I have checked off everything else but I know what I am experiencing is real. When it starts I cannot control my crazy dark thoughts and I can hear distinct voices react to the psycho thoughts. It feels like someone has somehow monitored my every thought and no one else can hear what they say besides me. It's ruined my life and I just want to know if it's possible.

There is a difference between decoding the brain and using various cameras to record a persons daily activity- from washing their hands to what they see as soon as they wake up in the morning and, using AI or computers to put those images together like pieces from a puzzle . This research is misleading . In regards to “ mapping the brain “: do you mean In reference to the left side of the brain controls the right side of the body, neurons (etc ) , the right side of the body control the left side of the body neurons ( etc ) , data collected form a body in motion ( which would be pretty obvious data wise ) or are we talking about actual brain waves/ data on an EEG and data which is collected and then “ programed back “ to a human with various methods like deep brain stimulation?Get enough people to claim to have experienced the same feelings and symptoms while stimulating various parts of the brain - we can say what you claim is true, although all the data is false, simply fabricated so that you get the results you want . Jose Delgados experiments with making a moneys eyes move and making a monkey lose its appetite for example : you are stimulating an actual organ that is connected to the body part that serves a specific function like the desire to eat: anyone once trained would have the ability to do the same thing, even to someone like you, your brain is made up of the same material that most human or animal brains are made up of. The question is do you know when your brain is being stimulated in an attempt to cause you to lose your appetite, or do you base those symptoms purely off the thousands of others who have engaged in this particular experiment and look for those same symptoms within yourself? If so, your own colleges have allowed you to willingly program your own brain data and symptoms based off of the thousands of peoples brains you have fabricated to share the same symptoms: who’s to say if you challenged your own data going through the same experiments: the data you gathered would be different: despite what the EEG says. What about brain data in comparison to kindness? How can it be the same if someone makes a choice to be kind, or if someone is simply being kind because it’s the right thing to do? What would make that data appear different ? You can’t effectively answer that question without basing stats on data taken from other men and women. A person making a choice based on specifics would mean that that data would be different for each individual. If Infor example decides to be kind to someone because I knew they were being controlled to do evil, but I didn’t have to think about my reason for why I made the decision, compared to someone knowing they participated in a challenge which requires them to be kind with a reward of winning $500 is different . Even still in both situations each could do be kind without thinking about why: more or less especially for the person making a decision to be kind because they know the person they are giving the kindness to is being influenced or controlled by something they are unaware of. That act could be as routine as knowing you have to move your legs to walk ( in this case you get the body in motion and not much thought of any ) where as an act of kindness that is encouraged based on a reward . Still the act it’s self of administering the kindness may look very similar if not the same on an EEG- and I would reject it. Not enough people think deeply enough which is why I would Encourage each and every person to challenge their own data. Years of experience diving into the depths of the brain will not answer all our questions . If we do not challenge our own data- we give this ability to people like Jack gallant who will analyze and then program that data to mean whatever they would like it to me- thus programming you which isn’t far even to someone like Jack . My kindness doesn’t look like your kindness data wise . I can say this with 100% confidence and accuracy because My reasoning for being Kind cannot be found on an EEG or MRI- you don’t have and will never have any technology capable of measuring it and because of that- I challenge it all. After the discover of many scientific feats like deep brown stimulation and AI mixed with the blood stream- you lose the ability to gather any authentic data completely . Everything else for the most part loses its shape or changes when you combine it with any other foreign entity and you mean to tell me that blood, nureons, electrons, etc does not? I do not believe it .

People around the world are still messing up the whole thing. Brain isn't impossible to figure out. It's just an organ with the similar configuration of that of a musical instrument. Just like we play several notes to form a chord, the brain's STATES need to be captured PARAMETRICALLY in order to point out the operators. There is no particular maya or external operating system. Brain is a chemical circuit. People are unnecessarily overthinking ONLY to make it a topic of entertainment. Nobody's seriously interested in the truth and hard work of writing down every combination that builds up a something in the circuitry. It will create a large dictionary of combinational parameters one day. That's the thing. Everybody's being lazy and trying to make money by turning this topic into a source of entertainment. There is no external force controlling it, other than food, medicine and other stimuli. The only neuroscientist who still makes sense, is Jack Gallant. There is no philosophy in the construction of the technical aspect of the brain. Consciousness is a combination of chemical parameters. So is Philosophy. So is Physics. So is Music. And so on. These are all parametric combinations of chemical levels at any given point in time. I am saying this from an intuitive feeling. Well, what is intuition then? That's again a combination of parameters which helps in the prediction of other combinational parameters. It is not "complex". It is pure hard work. A lot of tracking. A lot of writing. And a lot of headstrong effort to plotting them all down on paper. It's ten times larger in pure length than differential and Integral Calculus combined. And people are simply looking for an automation, namely "soul", "maya", "kaya", "chhaya" and all, because they're afraid of the deglamorised hard work! However, Kaya and Chhaya are now explained with Physics. The other settings will be disclosed soon one day. Think of a 64 channel audio mixer with analog faders. How many combinations can you have? Infinite? Eh? Hahah! That's why it looks complex, when it's not. Professor Gallant is the only person that makes sense in the whole world right now.