I think there should be a cookbook called “beans and thyme,” which discusses the beanhood of beans from an ontological standpoint in order to establish the existential being in the world of beans and of thyme before presenting any actual recipes in a projected second volume the author decides to abandon.
if the beans and thyme are not grown in your own kitchen garden, in soil nourished by yourself, your fathers, and will not be nourished by your sons, they are not beans or thyme, but cosmopolitan products, inauthentic and perverting and should not be put into the pot to make nourishing soup but thrust into the fire and cleansed from our presence here.
I enjoyed this part, seeing things exactly as they are without projecting our nature on it,. When things announce their presence, that is simply an announcement, our experience of it deeply depends on the nature of the entity announced and our nature as human.
@@anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858 May it be possible, perhaps, that only the brightest understood that the anxiety of being-toward-death IS a semantical hell?
50:00-1:00:00 the “thinghood” of something comes from our a-theoretical relations to it in the current of our processes arising from our living with it (using it, etc.)
