@@tonypederson4952 You really think he is a Racist ? How ? In which way ? Gandhiji made A concept Non - Violence and understand and trusted truth . Do yo really think he is a man with negatives , He really said His life is his message . *I have a dream* that every one accept the truth not the dark which is covering the truth
i like this intelligent man. if only he could've kept his sexual passions in check and not cheat on his wife at every opportunity i believe he could've been a really GREAT person. but king's wrong about "anarchy." anarchy is a society where police-force or the state is no longer needed to keep order or protect people. anarchists understand anarchy isn't desirable UNTIL humanity has reached that level of empathy, compassion and cooperation in their world-view, mindsets and daily lives. we anarchists are trying to get humanity to that point. but we're always met with resistance, violence and hatred from the fascists who rule our planet.
What Ghandi ment by " the only alternative to fear is violence " if you are afraid then violence is your only alternative. If you are not fearful then you possess the inner strength to be resolve conflicts nonviolently. Dr. King said that just differently. Dr. King is and has been the greatest American ever to have lived.
@Bruce Trahan...perfect..that is what Gandhi actually implied when he made that statement. He wanted to emphasize the inner strength through that statement.
I wonder how many people had to suffer and die so that he could stay non-violent. Was he capable of anything else? You people tend to think that history is made by only one person. There was a movement and many died, but his name is the only thing that lives on.
@@genki2705 well i don't think you will understand from the perspective of that time. You should know that British attack on non-violent protest ignite a flame against them in international level. There were many within and outside of British who were against this colonial rule. It was a diplomatic attack. His non-violence attacked the image of Britian and this was seen on how much outrageous churchil was on someone who didn't even kill their men. He cannot even punish him for protesting peacefully.
MIllenium kings see the realms. Intelligent use for the police force requires civility tolerance and seamless integration . Bi-partisan participation is essential.
@Rahul yes he was young. During that time he had grown up in UK culture and it reflected his early view. That's how you change stuff tho. You go from being racist to understanding its folly and then change you view. People nowadays don't belive in forgiveness or changing hearts and minds, they just want to punish people sadistically.
when did this happen? where is there a gandhi statue in d.c. in fact, its illegal to erect a statue of a foreigner on federal property. it has to do with discouraging aliegence to foreign govts and so forth.
@@vladimirprotein3275 ... i agree. there should be no statues erected in honor of conferderate traitors. but general lee wasn't a foreigner. he was a traitor. there's a difference.
Gandhi said some extremely, extremely racist stuff about black people though (even demanded segregation in hospitals or something), but I think it was in his 20s, not too sure. It's a stain and them talking would have really shown what a man Gandhi is.
@@njux1871 it was BEFORE he became a great soul. HE LEARNT he was wrong..that's what whitewashing is called. Education was taught by white folks. Are u forgetting ?! He later changed his ignorant views.
@Arid yes and the biggest gandhian in BJP is pragya thakur and her love for non voilence also the joint celebration of the life of nathu ram godse you little BHAKT shit
@@Baisla10 FYI nonviolence doesn't work when you being attacked fool, all of these are fool to suggest that well we had many legends to look after not only gandhi and gandhi did some foolish things which was against his character first read gandhi carefully then talk about it and as far as pragya is concerned then why didn't goverment are able to prove that charges against her even the goverment was of opposition so your limited knowledge isn't fruitful at all and godse killed gandhi everyone knows that and he also told why he did that so you people doesn't have any argument supported with facts to counter and calling names to people so Stfu. And lastly if you have any doubts about me being a bhakt or anything whatever you may call it sorry to disappoint you I'm neither of them but I am a hardcore sanatani and follower of sanatan dharm I have many people to look after and in our culture there are many and they too was violent when needed. The quote of ahinsa which people say gandhi told them but it is from gita gandhi said Ahinsa Parmo Dharma but it's is incomplete and it's full version is "ahimsa paramo dharma, dharma himsa tathev cha" which means "nonviolence is ultimate dharma, so too is violence in service of dharma." And judging from your rant towards him shows how much you people are filled with hate and talking about gandhian values you should manifest those Gandhian values into your life then lecture others dumbo.
Ashish Thakur look I know and acknowledge that violence in order to protect yourself is a natural right of any human or that to say even every animal . But there are two things to understand , I also understand some decisions that Gandhi took were not good for us but when you show ur sef as as a sanaatni dharam rakshak first of all I have no idea what that means second of all when you use religion to try to justify voilence then u have no difference between you and a jihadi who does the same thing , now second of all you are trying to justify the killer of Mahatma Gandhi shows exactly how much you loved or admired the life and message of the life of Mahatma Gandhi. Even if he had a reason , it’s not justified as the ISIS terrorists and the Kashmiri militants also have a cause and a reason to assassinate people even if u have studied study the struggle of IRA against the British or the struggle of Hagana against the British and Arabs to establish Israel. How on earth can you justify the killing of the most peaceful human being ever born on the face of this earth and if ur actually and admirer of Indian history and culture then see for yourself what it was not what you wanted it be Ashoka was Ashoka the tyrant when he killed more than 300,000 thousand people in kalinga battle , but he became Ashoka the great when he gave up violence. We should be ready and prepared to defend ourselves at all times but greatness comes from benevolence and only hatred comes from tyranny.
@@skd2697 Gandhi was greatest advocate of " Ahimsa" or non- violence. It is his leadership that led to freedom of India, because his non- violence technique was so novel the the British government in India just didn't have a weapon do deal with non- violent method which not only galvanised the whole of India but had many followers outside, the British lady Mira Behn, Herman Kallenbach ,Rev Henry Pollock, later Martin Luther king Jr & many more, violence is a very limited weapon ,& violence produces more of violence only. Just as hate will end in hate. It is because Gandhi identified with India 's poorest of the poor, methods that he applied were Satyagaha ,non- cooperation ,Spinning of Kadi, using vernacular so that those who that those who had studied in native language could understand, & also he wrote in English so that the international community could also become acquainted with his unique thoughts, ideas, & innovative techniques. He always looked at a bigger picture or adopted the way which was more sustainable not a narrow approach, violence or fear itself is destructive & shall not lead any constructive gain. The assassination of Gandhi gave Nathram Godse nothing at all, today also the name of Gandhi is known through out the world, biographies are written on him all over the world, Institutes of Gandhian thought pervade, while men like Godse have no name ,he shall only be cursed by all peace loving generations to come. There is not even a statue of Godse in Maharastra but Gandhi's statues are found all over the world. Godse was hanged to death and Gandhi was given the title of the father of India. All presidents ,Prime ministers of the world visit" Raj Ghat" ,to pay tributes to this giant, but Godse name shall always besmirched by his act. Gandhi's name ,acts, paths shown by him, his sacrifice shall remain immortal, but no one gives a hoot to who Godse was. It was because Godse feared, that's why he was promted to violence, while Gandhi showed no fear at all in his dealing with the Colonial government so that the Viceroy Lord Louis Mountbatten not only agreed with Gandh but became his friend & admirer. People can't be led by violence but through love & simplicity.
@@skd2697 My simbple answer to this explanation is that you also read the three books ,highly researcher (refering to archives ) by Dr. Ram Chandra Guha, 1Gandhi before India 2 India after Gandhi 3 The years that changed the world: 1914 to 1948. Also if you defend Godse you demean some of Indian great leaders who were really the backbone of our independence movement such Gokhale ,Patel ,Nehru,Abdul Kalam Azad. You know that if I read Godse's " why I killed Gandhi" then like fool I would have to read Adolf Hitler's"Mein Kampf "( My life), That man how was responsible for the death of 6 million Jews in cold blood, started the WW II which led to the death of 50 million people. So far as possible I prefer reading who canbe judged by actions & thoughts that they are truthful.
@@skd2697 I am also not so gullible to base my judgement British PM Attlee opinion, though I respect him. Again have suggested you those books because they tell the story of umpteen sacrifice. Mr.Bose , navy rebels , Godse had never tranquility & patience with incidents around them & therefore they reacted remember spirituality begins with respect each & every thing even flora & fauna,rivers. It is the Hindu dharma itself. Hindu dharma itself preach pantheism that is love for all. But all religions get distorted. You must question yourself whether Gandhi was a man of God or Godse, & if you still are in doubt, then even Hinduism with its great expanse & secular outlook won't help you.
@@anuradhainamdar8967 don't spread fake news like congress there was no freedom fight they gave us freedom because they have looted all our resources and we are just a waste left for them if we use violence then India would be more prosperous they move from India with full honour
Advitya Sharma That doesn't explain anything. And the quote doesn't stand at all, even if we are talking about revenge. The original "eye for an eye" is pretty good for what it stands for. It's "eye for an eye" not "eye for a leg" or whatever else. Though, honestly, I personally see nothing wrong with revenge conducted by the wronged party as long as they are within the bounds of "eye for an eye". That doesn't leave the world blind; that's exacting justice.
Gandhi was inspired and appreciated the teachings of Jesus so much that he himself followed Non violent and 40days fastings. Such teachings should be remembered and followed from generations to generations for overcoming hatreds and violence.
@@Rohan122 babasaheb ki speech or theory ko padho ....wo ek great personality the magar wo gandhi ya martin Luther King ki tarah nahi the ...unhone ne Dalits ko justice dilaya magar wo Brahmins se hate karte the ....aap unki book bhi padh sakte ho jaha wo baar baar brahmins ke against bol rahe hai ...no doubt brahmins ne galat kaam kiye the but wo illiterate the just like white people in those days ...martin Luther King ko whites se problem nhi thi wo blacks ko apna haq dilana chahte the
@@ShivamSharma-ek3yo babasaheb never hated the brahmin creed.He was against the brahinism and all the evil practices.There were many brahmins who supported him.Ye nai padha kya tumne?
@Jancy Varghese you knw I'm indian in our country everybody hates gandhi because the real heroes of the independence were subhash Chander Bose, bhagat singh but these britisher mentioned them as a terrorists in our history and their agent gandhi as a freedom fighter.
Indian subcontinent was/is phenomenal in its philosophical field.. Gandhi influenced many in Africa and the west. Buddha's teachings spread throughout Asia. Sikhisim, Jainism were all product of indian philosophy and experience. Even Ashoka the great stands alone and great among the kings of the world.
Martin Luther King Gandhi Nelson Mandela Three nonviolent leaders who fought for rights and injustice for people and wants people to have equal rights and equal opportunity
Nelson Mandela was not non-violent. In fact he was a bomb maker, a bomb thrower, and a terrorist. Some may say freedom fighter, but he used violence, terrorism, and sabotage to achieve his political goals.
Gandhi a man who never think about his self a man who taught us to win ourselves A man who told us the truth A man who gave the feeling of being indian A man who gives us power of non violence A man who lived his life with simplicity Now I have no words I said only one thing We never seen another gandhi
Night King Yeah except in this case this isn’t a rumor based thing. It’s one of those things that are true but history decides to ignore. Dude literally slept on beds next next to naked young girls, one of which happened to be his own niece. Shit’s disgusting. I’m telling you to look up everything because they’re not rumors at all. So no brains washing happening here or whatever bullshit. The media doesn’t even portray the horrible things he did
Gandhi & MLK love peace & freedom. Gandhi wants non violence in his native India. MLK wants seggregation, non violence, Black & White People come together as one. I admire Gandhi & MLK as well Admiring The Obamas
I adore MLK as much as gandhi . American people are very luck to have MLK . Now, comparing obama with MLK and gandhi is not appropriate. He literally bombed marriages, innocent civilians in my neighbouring country.
@@anthonynorman7545 I mean, I don't support any brutality but the best way to make the police effective is to put the best policemen out there, same with teachers, doctors, and other jobs tackling life and or death situation. If the police is poorly funded then the police will be less qualified therefore more violent in some cases.
@@markrebollido5551 I didn't say anything about brutality Do you think the police have more power and influence now than they did during the civil rights movement?
This interview took place Oct 27, 1957 at Dexter Ave Church in Montgomery, AL. It was an interview for the NBC show "Look Here." The main topic was on the Little Rock crisis. There's a full transcript at the MLK Papers at Stanford.
@Archana Achu when he was young And mind it Gandhi is from a really early time in which all races were not considered equal It was the mentality of the whole globe at that time So u can't blame him for that Greats like Churchill , Darwin were all racist at a level higher But u can't cancel their achievements to fit your propaganda By today's standards many 20th century greats are racists but by their standards it was normal
Churchill was racist I agree with that He has told lots of bad things about indians but u should consider the age he was in He was born in 1874 the Victorian age Where racism as per today's standards were everywhere When the law itself treated other races with inequality you don't expect the ppl of the age to do the same You need a revolution to do that which was the great civil rights movement and all other great movements And there were almost no groups which demanded equal rights for blacks
He was religious person. He was influenced by philosophy of indian dharma like hinduism and Jainism. You can search on google he was big fan of book name 'bhagawad geeta'. Try to read it if you want to understand how gandhi become gandhi.
I'm watching this on Oct 1st 2020😊... Those are the precious days where ppl run behind inventions and standing up for others. Sadly now ppl run behind money 😓
When you realised They both stood up for non violance. Ended up being the victims of voilent assasination.gandhi 1948.martin luther 1968.(assasination).
Martin Luther King is a person who is sand by Lord, God For all people , Both black and white to live a good peaceful life . Right now we need another one . From India with Love and Respect .
Put "violence" in this context of protecting ones self, and that's exactly what it is - Protecting yourself. Society will try to tell you by showing pride and protecting yourself, your somehow not patriotic. So bow to the racism to show your patriotism! It's not racism, it's reacting to racism. Non violence doesn't work.
The purpose of this message is to request authorization to modify instructional audiovisual material to include captioning for deaf and hard of hearing students attending California State University Monterey Bay. The video will be used solely for educational purposes. If captions cannot be provided, we would like to request permission to modify the video by adding captions. Thank you in advance for your assistance, CSUMB DHOH Services
