Master Car Design in Blender: Discover the Game-Changing Tool! - Bevel Weight 

So real

That still is a manual operation, compared to the automatic nature of modifiers

yes

Thank you!

Hi, I don't go deep onto UV editing, I show it for how to make the Tire. Not for whole car. It's tricky I agree :)

Soon! :)

as long as it doesn't affect your reflections in a horrible way, triangles and ngons are fine :) sometimes it's not worth to try to convert them into quads. I have more tips on my advanced course :) you can see more details here: www.berkkaplan.com

I understand if you followed different youtube tutorials you may get confused. Did you enroll to my course? There I start from zero and develop a car. Please check it on my website: www.berkkaplan.com . Sounds like you need a step by step guide for full car modelling process :)

@@BerkKaplanDesigner That won't help me, unless the video is about the exact same car I'm modeling and I can't afford your course unfortunately

Same

I use crease for setting up the design, but use bevels when collaborating with maya or c4d users. Crease is much faster, but requires high subdivision, bevel is more precise for setting up product design radii.

crease does not add more geometry near the edge, hence it has a little worse resolution

I'm waiting some Vizcom updates, then I will finalize it :) Thanks for the interest! Shouldn't be later than May..

Free kurslarınla yola devam :)

I use it only at the end of designing the cars. I know what you mean and I don't like to mess up with "guide mesh" and limit my design at the beginning :) you can learn the way I approach it on my course. The Alfa Romeo is only 5 hours in the course 🤙😄

Here's my two cents on it after seeing a lot of questions about it. I developed the Guide Mesh technique, and many swear by it, but some don't like it at all. Like with any technique, if you know the proper way to use it, and especially when to use it, it can do nothing but help your workflow and give you greater control over the final topology and surface quality of your model. It's not useful in every situation though, and knowing how to apply it is important to it being useful at all. There's also a learning curve, and there are specific rules to follow because shrinkwrapping subsurfed geometry can complicate things. And like Berk mentions, for an actual design process it'll be more helpful in later stages so it doesn't limit your editing freedom. One problem I see though, is as the technique gets more popular and more videos pop up using it, a lot of critical information on the technique is left out, including the most recent updates to it. This might leave people frustrated when trying to apply the technique themselves, and that's not going to help build confidence in it. Some people also mistake the technique for a crutch that can bypass needing good topology, so they see it as a lazy approach, but this isn't fully the case. You'll still need perfect topology for your guide mesh, but you do have more freedom with your final mesh's topology, within reason. Though this freedom works both ways. Your final mesh doesn't need perfect topology to still look perfect, but you'll also have the ability to more easily achieve perfect topology if you need to. All artists have their preferences and the technique won't click with everyone, but after 23 years of modeling I haven't seen a more effective method for quality control when it comes to polygon modeling. Even beyond the general usefulness of the technique, there are many unique tricks you can pull off with it that would just be a massive headache any other way.