- Follow Daniel on Twitter at / gmnaroditsky - Daniel streams regularly on Twitch at / gmnaroditsky - Daniels Discord / discord #speedrun #grandmaster #naroditsky
@@Hamppzah Not a shame. It was stockfish. Then he confused his calculating, probably neglected to put in the latest move, or skipped to the next move, got the order confused, which is what led to the queen sack. He probably thought there was compensation for doing so, as the computer was instructing him to make the knight move, and he would've been right had he gotten the order right, but that's where human error comes in.
@@RagingBlast2Fan Yeah way more possible than that 1500 elo can put together some solid midgame moves on his own. Maybe you should switch to 3D chess since in your head you are already playing it.
@@SoundAndFuryy Yeah, he just blundered the queen for no reason. He didn't mix up the move order on his computer. You should learn not to speak on matters on which you know very little. I have some qualifications and my intuition told me he was cheating, and Daniel's did, too. But because you're snarky and stupid, I then looked at the game and this player's profile. I concluded that the deviation between his other games and this one most likely points to having received help. There are many other reasons why this player was clearly cheating in this instance, but he doesn't strike me as a habitual cheater, either, otherwise he wouldn't have made such an obvious mistake. He most likely started cheating on the spot, because he thought, seeing Daniel take unusually long on obvious moves, that he was cheating himself. He had no way of knowing Daniel was explaining his moves without watching the stream, or looking at his profile. You don't deserve this explanation or my time.
just curious, has there ever been a case where the opponent wasn't cheating, BUT had Danya's stream on(streamsniping), and thus played all the best moves?
7:40 After ...Rd8, it seems the rook is not actually preventing Bd6 because 1.Bd6, ...Rxd6 2. Nxd6, ...Qxd6 - white now has 3. c4, with the knight pinned to the queen. Of course, Danya does not have to take in the first place but the idea of getting two pieces for the Rook doesn’t seem to work Edit: Danya mentions this directly after maybe I should just shut up and watch
This is what I was thinking, lol. Danya said "I'm worried if he exchanges everything, then plays Ne5 at the end of it". The guy must have heard it, and exchanged on g6, thinking that was "the end of it", completely hanging his Qeen 😂😂😂
hi, Danya! i hope it`s ok to make a suggestion)) as a total newbie in chess lurking through the content on youtube i find that one topic is missed by creator. what do you think about a series about getting out of bad positions? like review of your own competitive games where you made a mistake, got yourself in bad position and gor out of it (or may be even not or just got a draw)?
If it's the same picture that was in the background of a different speedrun video, it's a picture of him resigning to Spassky. By the sound of it, Danya was really humbled and honored that he even got to play Spassky.
13:28 actually I wouldn’t have thought I‘m a GM with less than 1400 but that were exactly my thoughts and the reason why I didn’t like the whole idea of Kh8
The way you explain lines (as you play people my level), and then show proper play in the game recap REALLY helps my mind connect the strategic dots. Out of all the chess streamers, I feel like I practically learn the most from you 👍👍👍
It's good but not that good. At depth 47, Stockfish 13+NNUE gives it +0.4. And when I limit the depth search on chess.com to 16 plies, it only gives a +0.16 advantage. I think that means it's good but also fairly difficult to play well. Since d4 and c3 are also good alternatives, c4 ends up being played less often than you might expect for such a good opening. I think it's similar to why the Caro-Kann isn't played all the time. It's a great opening, but it's competing with e5 and the Sicilian, which are also fantastic choices.
Hey Daniel can you consider doing a video on the accelerated dragon please. But instead go in depth on possible moves? For example at 1:01 my opponent would most likely take the knight. Thank you for the videos!
I think this "Taking a piece that moved once with a piece that moved twice" is a little bit misleading. You will recapture with a pawn, so you've developed equally pretty much. It's different however when your piece recaptures because you're doing two things at once - developing and recapturing.
Well that pawn recapture allowed him to open up the bishop so he did gain a tempo. Otherwise he would have had to play d6 or d5 to open the bishop. By recapturing he played two tempos with one move.
@@Kokurorokuko I was talking about Danya's decision to go with the capture dxc6 (2:22). Had he captured with bxc6, that would have cleared the path for the bishop to deploy to a6. What moment were you talking about?
I just found this channel, and I am so glad I did listening to him. Explain everything has helped me develop. Went from 900 to 1100 now it’s time for me to start studying some openings to get to the next level
Ty very much for these lessons Daniel! I play these opening often and have gotten better and better at it in both bullet and blitz. I do have a question about 4. … g6 5. Nxc6… should I take the knight with the b pawn or d pawn. I usually take with the b pawn but have gotten into the immediate 6. Qd4 not allowing my bishop to fianchetto. What to do in this situation as I usually stall and tend to move the f pawn to block the diagonal ruining my king side. Thanks again!
At 23:01 there's Knight takes c3 to take the pawn back, then he probably checks, rook f7 etc. It looks like you retain the extra pawn, and his c3 pawn becomes weak if he captures the knight. Or maybe i miss something.
I heard Levy Rozman say at least 2000, but if I see Daniel play, it's alright to play it when your around 1400 I think. The accelerated dragon at least.
You can play the Sicilian at 800 if you want to. I gained 200 elo very fast after playing the Sicilian instead of just e5 playing into my opponent's game.
Like any opening, it‘s fine to learn even if you‘re beginning. But don‘t expect instant results if you‘re not aware of the plans in the different Sicilians or only have very limited theory knowledge. The Sicilian is very heavy on theory, move orders matter a lot, and the ideas aren‘t always very clear cut like in the Najdorf for example. The dragon is much more straightforward.
@@brucewayne2184 It's only wrong if you consider the English pronounciation right. That's perfectly valid of course, but English and French are so mangled that their pronounciations of foreign words should never be trusted. Except Japanese for some reason, Japanese words are pronounced pretty accurately by English speakers
I've been studying up and stringing wins together, but I'm massively under rated right now and I'm still playing at least one blunder per game, usually in the end game and still plagued by missed wins and mistakes I wonder how I would fair in one of these games
@@ubchnfhnbh2278 Well I'm 1300 on one site and 1700 on another, I get games where I'm under rated, I win in 12 moves but the analysis still says 1 mistake or 1 blunder, missed mate in 4 stuff like that
