Mazda CX-30 CKD [Fuel Consumption Test] - The Effect of SKYACTIV Technology | YS Khong Driving 

Thanks for your input. Good to hear some independant views

Your Welcome Mr.YS Khong 🙏🏼 How come u can get fc like that? My daily driving fc around 10.5km/l 😅

I am a fairly tall person @180cm, my sister's cross is very comfortable for me, how's cx30?

I like the design of the CX30 but the black wheel arch cover turn me off

Hahaha yes, it was a radio inteeview.

Definitely!

With a heavy load, consumption does suffer a bit.

Muaaah i´m driving in Germany an CX-30 Skyactive-X with 186HP and 6MT and FWD. I drive so between 5,1L up to 5,5L for 100km.

It'a down to your budget. CX3 is 1 size smaller. Book through shop.yskhongdriving.com and get a free gift.

We did not pump up the tyres. Our fc tests are meant to check out the typical fc that anybody cam achieve using the standard vehicle, no tricks.

My 2016 jazz can get 13-14km / liter. 100% urban driving in Miri

I think the Cross will have better econimy, but CX30 will have higher quality build and more power

Yes, this is a very nice vehicle. This would be the 2.0 High

@@YSKhongDriving uncle, thanks for vote of confidence

I would think so.

Sure.

Stay tuned.

@@YSKhongDriving thats great!

@@YSKhongDriving Still waiting!

Why dont you see for ypurself? Must be SA from some other company.

Yes. Even the sides some of it are more plasticky compare to cbu leather soft touch. If u haven't sat on a cbu u cant tell the difference. But if u do, u can tell

See if can get a car

Yes, it is a nice vehicle.

Not for me

yeah SA said all variant will increase by RM3.5k

I have not heard.

Yes, it is tuned for RON95

i can see 3 things mazda can do to further improve their engine. 1 - use pre chamber ignition = higher compression ratio.maybe can go upward 15-18 : 1 2 - use valvetronic = 100 - 110% volumetric efficiency. 0 pumping losses. 3 - use ZF tranny = whenever a gear engaged , only 2 gears spinning along instead of spinning all sets of gear altogether. once done, then we can see ultimate ICE for maximum fuel efficiency !

x70 does 800km+ full tank

Add solar panel at bonet depan kereta and add hybrid engine

Hybrid for city drive okay, but long journey highway drive became a liability. Regardless of its technology like Skyactiv, ultimately this Mazda is a 2.0L. Is there a way to have fuel consumption of low cc car like 1.2L while having high torque at low rpm, for example 230Nm at 1750rpm, so powerful that C segment SUV and van also use this 1.2L, I think there is.

@@piol91 how you did that ?

Should be ok. The CX30 is a C segment SUV.

I am just sharing the results of my test..

Driving style, road conditions.

ITS just a gas guzzler

Hahaha. Sorry.

@@YSKhongDriving Hope one of the car will be my choices

There's always the Kona available for consideration

Not sure what you mean, but this design seems to appeal more to the younger set.

@@YSKhongDriving I meant no offense, just curious if anyone else thinks Mazda's CX-30 CKD (rm155k) is a more compelling offer when compared to Proton's X70 (rm128k), Honda's CR-V (rm176k), or even Mazada's own CX-5 (rm137k), since this segment really heating up in Malaysia.

Locally assembled or Completely Knocked Down

I think the fuel economy was not achieved at the expense of stripping away features to save weight, although weight saving is one of the ways. It was the SKYATIV trchnology in the engine design, which runs a 13:1 compression ratio, amd the SKYACTIV transmission which is xompact, and has a lockup system that operates from as low as 8 kmh onwards to eliminate slip and the i.e.loop that contribute towards better overall fuel consumption, plus diligent use of high tensile steel in the right places to save weight that all work together, so it is rather unfair for you to make a sweeping statement that may confuse other viewers.

@@YSKhongDriving Mazda asks almost 40k for this car that has torsion beam suspension, stamped control arms, hardly gives 7l/100km, not very fast(non-turbocharged version), simple mcpherson front suspension, not a very dynamic car. The fact that you have to nurse the car to get anywhere near 7l/100km tells you where Mazda have arrived. Don't get me wrong, I love Mazda, my favorite brand, but for less than 40k I can get golf GTI, the new Honda Civic, Audi A3&A4, toyota corolla, Skoda Octavia, Seat leon for the same amount or even less... I'd say Mazda 3 is a great car only if it was 20k-25k instead of nearly 40k. It might sound unfair, but that's purely my unbiased opinion.

Different conditions, I suppose.

@@YSKhongDriving kuantan area, every 2km got traffic light

Its the right reading.

Hahaha, Myvi is king.

Hahaha, yes.