Meeting Allaah as a Deobandi / Barelvi / Sufi / Shi'aa | Clip | Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari 

Same 💯

Alhamdulilah

Alhamdulilah.

@@Therebelliousprince001 we're all born muslims so technically we were all salafis when we were little. I was raised as a barelwi and some may be raised as jews or christians etc

@@Therebelliousprince001 may Allah guide us and our parents brother

As a habashi (ethnically) it’s so disappointing they’ve hijacked our name

Can you tell me who are these habashis? At first I thought Ethiopians, but I guess I am wrong.

@@DigitalWaqf their founder was thrown out of Al Habasha because of how bad his Deen was. Have pride in the fact you were the first line of defense.

@@PSNloversalu The founder Abdullah Al Habashi made takfeer of Salafis in Ethiopia and started spreading hatred and even violently trying to get rid of them. Other Ash'aris disagreed with his methods so he made takfeer of them too saying they were doing Muwalat Al Kuffar against the Muslims. This caused him to get thrown out of Ethiopia. He went to Makkah before getting thrown out of there aswell after Sheikh Ibn Baz made a fatwa against him. He later went to Syria where Salafi imams like Shouayb Al Arna'uut and even Ash'aris like Osama Al Rifaii (current mufti) advised people not to sit with him or even speak to him. So he went to Lebanon which was still under the rule of the Syrian Regime and started praising Hafith Al Asad. This made the regime like him so they started presenting him as an İmam to the Lebanese people. His followers started assassinating some of the Salafi sheikhs in Lebanon so that his word will be the only one heard and Ash'aris scared of getting assassinated showed great support of him until he was considered the greatest Sunni İmam ( Sunni as in not Shia). Now his students have the Lebanese dar Al Iftaa under their rule.

@@sadollahabousaleh26 fair point 😂

To those that say one shan't call them self Salafi/Ahlul Sunnah etc Link to his short clip a few mins is here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YnvKPhwSpyc.html

The Salaf were people!

Do you think that their aren't opinions of the Salaf to conform their opinions as well as hadith and ayah. Or are you just plain ignorant Also just to confirm have you ever read any mainstream book of Aqeedah on what constitutes the people of Islam.

But the so called Salafis are not actually Salafis, they are rejecting all the Salaf and follow the Khalaf who appeared in the past century.

@@jonsnow2791 Can you explain what do you mean by mainstream and examples of mainstream aqidah books you've read please?

Its not a great reminder, its an average reminder. It brings determination to my heart to stick to certain scholars and a group. What innovations are you discussing, please state with group name.

we call ourself "salafis" to disguish ourselves from the ahlul bidah and the "true muslims" are the followers of sahaba and the best 3 generations who were free from bidah and problems in aqidah

@@Therebelliousprince001 all the salafis agree on the correct aqidah they may have disagreement regarding fiqh but we all believe in the sahih aqeedah of islam and that cannot be denied

@@Therebelliousprince001 from the time of sahaba till now, there has been terms other than Muslims to distinguish themself from corupted deviant Muslims. Sunni, AhluSunnah, AhluSunnah wal Jama'ah, Ahlul Hadith, Salafi, Athari etc. No sahaba, no taba'een, or any of the salaf opposed such labels. We are Muslims only, the term salafi is used only in select places.

@@user-ue4fh5mv9s On what right? From what ground or basis? Did Allah and His Rasool asked you to do that? Do you think in the 1, 2, and 3 generations of Muslims, there wasn't people of Bid'a and errors? Still, did the Sahaabas or Tabeen called themselves Ahlus Sunnah or Salafiys? Why do you claim to follow the Salaf, but won't follow them in this case? Again, on what basis?

@@HealmaTech The word "salaf" means "the predesesors" or "the pervious generations" and the prophet commanded us to follow them Narrated `Abdullah: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "The best people are those of my generation, and then those who will come after them (the next generation), and then those who will come after them (i.e. the next generation), and then after them, there will come people whose witness will precede their oaths, and whose oaths will precede their witness." حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدَانُ، عَنْ أَبِي حَمْزَةَ، عَنِ الأَعْمَشِ، عَنْ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، عَنْ عَبِيدَةَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ ‏ "‏ خَيْرُ النَّاسِ قَرْنِي، ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ يَلُونَهُمْ، ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ يَلُونَهُمْ، ثُمَّ يَجِيءُ مِنْ بَعْدِهِمْ قَوْمٌ تَسْبِقُ شَهَادَتُهُمْ أَيْمَانَهُمْ وَأَيْمَانُهُمْ شَهَادَتَهُمْ ‏"‏‏.‏ Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 6429 In-book reference : Book 81, Hadith 18

In the description, baaraka Allaahu feek

1. Narrated Aisha (RadhiAllahu Anha) that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said, ‘“But this year he reviewed it with me twice, and therefore I think that my time of death has approached. So, be afraid of Allah, and be patient, for I am the best SALAF (PREDECESSOR) for you (in the Hereafter).”’ [Sahih Bukhari, - The Book of Asking Permission, Hadeeth no. 5885] 2. Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) (d. 150H) said: “Adhere to the aathaar (narration) and the tareeqah (way) of the Salaf (Pious Predecessors) and beware of newly invented matters for all of it is innovation” [Reported by as-Suyootee (Rahimahullah) in Sawn al Mantaq wal-Kalaam p.32] 3. Imaam al-Awzaee (Rahimahullah) (d.157H) said: “Hold fast to the narrations of the salaf, even if people were to abandon you. Beware of the opinions of the people, no matter how much they beautify it with their speech.” [Related by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadee (Rahimahullah) in his excellent book Sharafu Ashaabul-Hadeeth (p.7)] 4. Imaam al-Asbahaanee (Rahimahullah) (d.535H) said: “The sign of Ahlus-Sunnah is that they follow the Salafus-Saalih and abandon all that is innovated and newly introduced into the Deen.” [Al-Hujjah fee Bayaanil Mahajjah 1/364] 5. As-Sam’aanee (Rahimahullah) (d.562H) said in al-lnsaab (3/273): “As-Salafi: this is an ascription to the Salaf and following their ways, in that which is related from them.” 6. lbn al-Atheer (Rahimahullah) (d.630H) said in al-Lubaab fee Tahdheebul-lnsaab (2/162), commenting upon the previous saying of as-Sam’aanee: “And a group were known by this ascription (salafi).” 7. lbn Taymiyyah (Rahimahullah) (d.728H) said: “There is no criticism for the one who proclaims the way (madhdhab) of the Salaf, who attaches himself to it and refers to it. Rather, it is obligatory to accept that from him by unanimous agreement (Ittifaaq) because the way (madhdhab) of the Salaf is nothing but the Truth (Haqq).” [Majmoo al-Fataawaa 4:149] 8. Imaam adh-Dhahabee (Rahimahullah) (d.748H) said: “It is authentically related from ad-Daaraqutnee (Rahimahullah) (d. 995 C.E., 385 A.H.) that he said: There is nothing more despised by me than ‘ilmul-kalaam (innovated speech and rhetorics). I say: He never entered into ‘ilmul-kalaam, nor argumentation. Rather, he was a Salafee (a follower of the Salaf).”[Siyar 16/457] 9. Also, Imam al-Dhahabee (Rahimahullah) described Ibn al-Salah (Rahimahullah), a prominent hadith specialist of the sixth century (577-643 AH), as: “Firm in his religiosity, salafi in his generality and correct in his denomination. [He] refrained from falling into common pitfalls, believed in Allah and in what Allah has informed us of from His names and description.” 10. In another of his works, Tadhkirat al-huffaz, Imam al-Dhahabi (Rahimahullah) said of Ibn al-Salah (Rahimahullah): “I say: He was salafi, of sound creed, abstaining from the interpretations of the scholars of rhetoric, believing in what has been textually established, without recourse to unjustified interpretation or elaboration. 11. Haafidh Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani (Rahimahullah) also used the term, salafi to describe Muhammad ibn al-Qaasim ibn Sufyan al-Misri al-Maliki (Rahimahullah) (d. 966 C.E., 355 A.H.) He said that al-Malaiki was: “Salafi al-madh’hab - salafi in his school of thought.” 12. In his book, Tabsir al-Muntabih, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani (Rahimahullah) mentioned the ascription al-Salafi and named Abd al-Rahman ibn Abdillah ibn Ahmad Al-Sarkhasi al-Salafi (Rahimahullah) as an example of its usage. Ibn Hajar then said: “And, likewise, the one ascribing to the salaf.”

Na'am jazakumllahu khayra. One thing I have realised is that these youtubers who are parading themselves as "scholars" use the same books of hadith but they only select what they want their audience to know. Maybe its high time we keep bringing those authorities from the same books for their audiences to know that those they are blindlyfollowing are actually selecting the kinds of hadith they use to keep them in their trap. If they could believe an hadith used by that "scholar" then it means they believe the authenticity of the book from where those authorities are taken then we read those ahaadith on aqeedah and manhaj and the warnings of the prophet against misguided scholars from the same book while the refutation continues. I think if this should go on for some time, they will begin to see how these guys are misguided.

"Sheikh"?....Go to your local scholar, brother.

@@ii-op1ic yes he is a Sheikh, when I have questions I ask him and not the people of bidda, you go to your local scholar, don't tell me what to do!!

youtube.com/@AlIslamProductions

Tell your shaykh to stop hiding and start responding to al islam production Watch their videos and realise how big this shaykh is loo😂😂😂😂😂

@@ceefyahmed361 halwa Eating 😂😂😂😂 may Allah guide us all

So why are we assuming that "deobandis" are misguided. Why are we labelling deobandis when "deobandis" don't label themselves with that title. Why are people obsessed with "scholars" on yt? fast track to Jannah on yt? 👏👏👏🤦🤣😭

Fun Fact : Reported By Imam Suyuti Imam Suyuti is Ashari in Aqeeda.

@@gogetta3567 Jalal ad din as-Suyuti Rahimahullah a sufi, The Ashari, but still he spoke against the ignorant who ask help from the dead. He even wrote a refutation on taqleed. 😉

بارك الله فيكم

Got no idea who ibn al salah is, but im glad he is pious.

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم A Refutation Of The Deviant Group Jamaa’at-ut-Tableegh Ash-Shaykh Ahmad Ibn Yahyaa An-Najmee, may Allaah have mercy upon him "They are a people that follow Muhammad Ilyaas, the founder of this Jamaa’ah. A biography of the founder: Muhammad Ilyaas was born in 1302H. He memorized the Quraan and read the Six Collections of Hadeeth. He was upon the Deobandi methodology, taking the Hanafee madhhab, the Ash’aree and Mastureedee Creed and the Sufi way. They have four Sufi orders amongst them: 1. The Naqshabandees 2. The Sahruurdees 3. The Qaadirees 4. The Jishtees Shaikh Muhammad Ilyaas gave the Sufi bay’ah (oath of allegiance) to Shaikh Rasheed Al-Kankuuhee, who later became Shaikh Rasheed As-Saharanpuree. Then he renewed it with Shaikh Ahmad As-Saharanpuree who certified him to take oaths of allegiance. Muhammad Ilyaas would sit in detached isolation (khalwah) by the grave of Shaikh Nur Muhammad Al-Badaayunee, in what is known as the Jishtee Muraaqabah (self meditation). And he would go out to the grave of ‘Abdul-Quduus Al-Kankuuhee, the one who forced the ideology of wahdat-ul-wujuud [belief that Allaah and the Creation is one existence.] on him. He resided and taught in Delhi and passed away in 1363H. Circumstances that brought about the start of the movement: Shaikh Abul-Hasan An-Nadwee saw that Muhammad Ilyaas took refuge in this way of giving Da’wah when the ways of blind-following failed to rectify the people of his region. Shaikh Miyaan Muhammad Aslam quotes one of Ilyaas’ sayings that he received kashf (mystic disclosure) to follow this way through a dream in which he was inspired with a new tafseer (interpretation) of Allaah’s saying: 'You are the best of people ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma‘rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allaah.' [Al-Quraan 3:110] And it was that going out (khuruuj) to call people to the way of Allaah cannot be realized by staying in one place based on Allaah’s word 'brought out' and that one’s eemaan increases by going out in this khuruuj based on Allaah’s saying: 'and believing in Allaah' after having said: 'brought out for mankind.' The following can be noted from what has just been mentioned: 1. The Quraan is not interpreted by makshoofaat (mystical disclosures), and by Sufi dreams, of which the majority of them, rather all of them come from the inspirations of the devil. 2. It is apparent from what was stated previously that the founder of this jamaa’ah was engrossed in Sufism from head to toe. This is because he gave two oaths of allegiance on it and was tested by its false beliefs and because he would spend his time sitting by the graves of Sufis. 3. The founder of this jamaa’ah was a qubuuree (grave worshipper) and a khuraafee. This is clear from his saying: '…and he would sit in detached isolation (khalwah) by the grave of Shaikh Nur Muhammad Al-Badaayunee.' And concerning the second person, he mentioned that he forced the ideology of wahdat-ul-wujuud on him. So his being attached to the grave of the one who forced the ideology of wahdat-ul-wujuud on him is without doubt a clear proof that he held that same belief. 4. Those who believe in wahdat-ul-wujuud claim that Allaah embodies Himself inside the attractive woman - and refuge is sought from Allaah! This is a matter that has reached the highest level of repulsiveness. May Allaah give them what they deserve of His curses and wrath! The methodology of the Jamaa’at-ut-Tableegh can be summarized in six issues or six principles or six characteristics: 1. Actualizing the statement of Tawheed: “Laa Ilaaha Illallaah Muhammadur Rasuulullaah” (There is no deity worthy of worship except Allaah and Muhammad is His Messenger) 2. Praying with full submissiveness and humility 3. Knowledge of the virtues (fadaa’il) and not the fiqh issues (masaa’il) along with knowledge of dhikr 4. Showing generosity to the Muslim 5. Correcting the intention 6. Calling to Allaah (i.e. da’wah) and going out (i.e. khuruuj) for that purpose in the way of Allaah upon the tablighi manhaj. There is an objective behind each of these six principles or characteristics as well as a virtue to be attained. So for example the objective behind (Laa Ilaaha Illallaah) is to: 'Eradicate the corrupted yaqeen (certainty) from the heart while placing the correct and valid yaqeen into the essence (dhaat) of Allaah.' They really intend the belief of wahdat-ul-wujuud with this. Point to be noted about Jamaa’at-ut-Tableegh: 1. The founder of this jamaa’ah was raised upon Sufism and gave two oaths of allegiance on it. 2. He would position himself by graves, waiting to receive Kashf (Sufi mystical disclosure) and meditative ideas from the deceased inside them. 3. He would perform the Jishtee Muraaqabah (self meditation) at the gravesite of ‘Abdul-Qudduus Al-Kankuuhee, who used to believe in wahadat-ul-wujuud. 4. The Jishtee Muraaqabah is to sit by a grave for half an hour of every week, covering the face and reciting this dhikr: 'Allaahu Haadiree, Allaahu Naadhiree' [This has something with the meaning of 'Allaah is my ever-Present Accompanier, Allaah is my Watcher']. This statement or this action if done sincerely for Allaah is an innovation. And if it is done for the person in the grave then it is committing Shirk with Allaah. And the last of the two is what is most evident. 5. They have four of their graves located in the masjid from where their da’wah emerged. 6. The founder of this jamaa’ah believed in Kashf. 7. The founder of this jamaa’ah was a grave worshipper. 8. The Tablighis perform their worship with an innovated form of dhikr, done in the way of the Sufis. This is by splitting up the statement of Tawheed (Laa Ilaaha Illallaah). 9. Whoever cuts off the negation part of the statement of Tawheed from its affirmation part intentionally, by saying “Laa Ilaaha” (only), then this necessitates the fact that he has committed disbelief. Shaikh Hamuud At-Tuwayjiree stated this, quoting it from the scholars. 10. They make it permissible to wear amulets that have on them mystical writings and names of unknown people, which probably are names of devils! And this is not permissible. [Al-Fataawaa Al-Jaliyyah ‘Anil-Manaahij Ad-Da’wiyyah, Pgs. 54-56] Join the telegram channel: t.me/FruitsOfKnowledge

MashaAllah - absolutely

Subhanallah, may Allah protect us and guide us

Aqida of sahana was simple. They worshipped at night not like salafis who argue about word descent instead of following hadith aim

@@stadiamak692 Indeed Aqidah of Sahaabah RadhiAllahu Anhum was simple. However deviants like you are doing Iblīs's work to destroy and misguide Muslims. Therefore Salafis refute your pollution of Islam. May Allah protect us from you. Imam adh-Dhahabi Rahimahullah is Salafi, astaghfirullah you insult him saying he argues and is a trouble maker.

Yes, noted. Thank you for the advice.

@Juleybib Sorry brother, did you mean teachers?

Lmao you literally don't even know what salaf means. Just because the prophet mentions the word "salaf" you think he's talking about your deviated misguided pseudo-salafi aqeedah of modern day. The prophet is of course the best Salaf for this Ummah. Those who actually follow the salaf can differentiate between the real Aqeedah of the Salaf as-salihoon and todays pseudo-salafi rubbish that are the literally enemies of the Muslims.

Good timing for the video. I think its good to keep your followers linked to yourself. Especially know more than before as Ustaad Abu Musab arabic faults come to light,

If you google Mufti Yusuf Sacha, another Deobandi elder arrested because of rape and sexual crimes on children. This isn't some laymen, he's had status like their elders like Moulana Yusuf Motala, Mufti Ebrahim Desai, he's from their kibaar ulema that is committing these evil crimes.

@@ExtremeShez That's disgusting.

بارك الله فيكم

This still doesn't prove that he's talking about the aqeedah that you have today, but i still want to ask, you have no evidence for these claims, give us the full sanad of these sayings. The entire chain.

What are you on about? Im really confused now!

To those that say one shan't call them self Salafi/Ahlul Sunnah etc Link to his short clip a few mins is here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YnvKPhwSpyc.html

As a mou'min better In Shaa Allah

A Muslim and a Mumin is what is mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah

@@Rywane Aameen

Every sect claims they have the best understanding of islam, so brother we are forced to call ourselves sunnis/salafis to show what understanding we are holding. Remember the hadith of the 73 sects? Only one will be the one,so to know it go and gain knowledge and see by yourself brother. May Allah Guide every Muslim and protect them.

​@@SuperGulamali 1. Narrated Aisha (RadhiAllahu Anha) that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said, ‘“But this year he reviewed it with me twice, and therefore I think that my time of death has approached. So, be afraid of Allah, and be patient, for I am the best SALAF (PREDECESSOR) for you (in the Hereafter).”’ [Sahih Bukhari, - The Book of Asking Permission, Hadeeth no. 5885] 2. Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) (d. 150H) said: “Adhere to the aathaar (narration) and the tareeqah (way) of the Salaf (Pious Predecessors) and beware of newly invented matters for all of it is innovation” [Reported by as-Suyootee (Rahimahullah) in Sawn al Mantaq wal-Kalaam p.32] 3. Imaam al-Awzaee (Rahimahullah) (d.157H) said: “Hold fast to the narrations of the salaf, even if people were to abandon you. Beware of the opinions of the people, no matter how much they beautify it with their speech.” [Related by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadee (Rahimahullah) in his excellent book Sharafu Ashaabul-Hadeeth (p.7)] 4. Imaam al-Asbahaanee (Rahimahullah) (d.535H) said: “The sign of Ahlus-Sunnah is that they follow the Salafus-Saalih and abandon all that is innovated and newly introduced into the Deen.” [Al-Hujjah fee Bayaanil Mahajjah 1/364] 5. As-Sam’aanee (Rahimahullah) (d.562H) said in al-lnsaab (3/273): “As-Salafi: this is an ascription to the Salaf and following their ways, in that which is related from them.” 6. lbn al-Atheer (Rahimahullah) (d.630H) said in al-Lubaab fee Tahdheebul-lnsaab (2/162), commenting upon the previous saying of as-Sam’aanee: “And a group were known by this ascription (salafi).” 7. lbn Taymiyyah (Rahimahullah) (d.728H) said: “There is no criticism for the one who proclaims the way (madhdhab) of the Salaf, who attaches himself to it and refers to it. Rather, it is obligatory to accept that from him by unanimous agreement (Ittifaaq) because the way (madhdhab) of the Salaf is nothing but the Truth (Haqq).” [Majmoo al-Fataawaa 4:149] 8. Imaam adh-Dhahabee (Rahimahullah) (d.748H) said: “It is authentically related from ad-Daaraqutnee (Rahimahullah) (d. 995 C.E., 385 A.H.) that he said: There is nothing more despised by me than ‘ilmul-kalaam (innovated speech and rhetorics). I say: He never entered into ‘ilmul-kalaam, nor argumentation. Rather, he was a Salafee (a follower of the Salaf).”[Siyar 16/457] 9. Also, Imam al-Dhahabee (Rahimahullah) described Ibn al-Salah (Rahimahullah), a prominent hadith specialist of the sixth century (577-643 AH), as: “Firm in his religiosity, salafi in his generality and correct in his denomination. [He] refrained from falling into common pitfalls, believed in Allah and in what Allah has informed us of from His names and description.” 10. In another of his works, Tadhkirat al-huffaz, Imam al-Dhahabi (Rahimahullah) said of Ibn al-Salah (Rahimahullah): “I say: He was salafi, of sound creed, abstaining from the interpretations of the scholars of rhetoric, believing in what has been textually established, without recourse to unjustified interpretation or elaboration. 11. Haafidh Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani (Rahimahullah) also used the term, salafi to describe Muhammad ibn al-Qaasim ibn Sufyan al-Misri al-Maliki (Rahimahullah) (d. 966 C.E., 355 A.H.) He said that al-Malaiki was: “Salafi al-madh’hab - salafi in his school of thought.” 12. In his book, Tabsir al-Muntabih, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani (Rahimahullah) mentioned the ascription al-Salafi and named Abd al-Rahman ibn Abdillah ibn Ahmad Al-Sarkhasi al-Salafi (Rahimahullah) as an example of its usage. Ibn Hajar then said: “And, likewise, the one ascribing to the salaf.”

If you google Mufti Yusuf Sacha, another Deobandi elder arrested because of rape and sexual crimes on children. This isn't some laymen, he's had status like their elders like Moulana Yusuf Motala, Mufti Ebrahim Desai, he's from their kibaar ulema that is committing these evil crimes.

Wa Alaykum Assalaam, Who is Muhammad?

What is the real Salaf way akhi?

@@Ryan-lf6ds what is that, can you clarify please?

@@Ryan-lf6ds Wahhabism is a term used by those who reject the Quran and Sunnah(if they even know it) and follow their whims and desires. Abu Bakr As-Siddiq (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: "O you people! You recite this Verse: 'O you who believe! Take care of your ownselves. If you follow the (right) guidance [and enjoin what is right (Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do) and forbid what is wrong (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islam has forbidden)] no hurt can come to you from those who are in error.' (5: 105) But I have heard Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) saying: "When people see an oppressor but do not prevent him from (doing evil), it is likely that Allah will punish them all." [Abu Dawud and At-Tirmidhi]. Riyad as-Salihin 197

That's incorrect my brother. They are a sect from sects Sufism. *Who are the Deobandis?* The term, Deobandi, is used to describe all those who follow the way of the Darul-Uloom Deoband, the institution founded by Moulana Qasim Nanotwi in 1868. Qari Mohammed Tayyib (the rector of the Darul-Uloom, Deoband) describes the Deobandis as, “Religiously, the Ulema of Deoband are Muslims. As a sect, they belong to the Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaah. By Madhhab they are Hanafee. In conduct, they are Sufis. Scholastically, they are Maturidi. And Sulook, they are Chishti - rather they combine all Sufi orders. (Chishtiyyah, Naqshbandiya, Qadriyah and Soharwardiyah tareeqahs) And in nisbat, they are Deobandi .” Mufti Abdur-Rahim Lajpuri in Fatawa Rahimiyyah, (Eng. Trans.), vol.1, p.9-10 from Ulama-e-Deoband ka Maslak. See. Also Muhannad alal-Mufannad p.29

*YOUR FIRST HUGE MISTAKE:YOU TOOK KNOWLEDGE FROM SOME OF THE WORST SNEAKY DEOBANDI INNOVATORS WHO HIDE THEIR SHIRK & THEIR AKAABIREEN IN THEIR BOOKS WITHOUT PREACHING THEM OPENLY🔥🔥🔥Deobandi ULAMA WERE & ARE BLATANT SUFI PANTHEIST MUSHRIKS LIKE1️⃣IMDADULLAH MUHAJIR MAKKI2️⃣ASHRAF ALI TANWI3️⃣THE HOMOSEXUAL RASHEED AHMAD GANGOHI4️⃣HIS DREAMWIFE QASIM NANOTWI5️⃣MOLANA ZIKRIYA FAZAEL AMAL WRITER WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH6️⃣ELIAS DEOBANDI FOUNDER OF TABLEEGHI JAMAT ALL WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH THEMSELVES PANTHEIST MUSHRIKEEN!*

Can you explain where your scholars get this aqida from. Read their quotes from their own books. Deobandi Scholars unanimously support the theory of Wahdat al-Wajood Following are some quotes from the books of Deobandis… 1. Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi says about his Pir (spiritual guide), “Haji Sahib (Haji Imdadullah Muhajir Makki) was greatly over-powered by Tawheed[1]… As for Wahdat al-Wajood, it seemed as if he was an eyewitness to it. Once, he was listening to Soorah Ta-Ha, a condition overcame him when he heard the verse: “Allah! There is no God but He, to Him belong the Best Names (al-Asma al-Husna).” He said in the explanation (Tafseer) of this verse: “A question may be raised from the first part of this verse that since there is none other than Allah, (then) what are these Hawatith?[2] The answer is thus, (as in the next part of the verse), ‘Lahul Asma al-Husna’ meaning that all are the Madhahar[3] (manifestations) of Him (Allah). Someone has said (in a poem): “In the garden, I saw every flower. Neither does it have Your color nor Your fragrance.” Haji Sahib (Imdadullah Muhajir Makki) said: “This poet is a Dhahiri (only aware of the outward matters). If he were an Aarif[4], he would have said: “In the garden I saw every flower. They all have Your color, they all have Your fragrance.” However, expressing such sayings or relating them is not for everyone.”[5] Imdadullah Muhajir Makki has also written a book on Wahdat al-Wajood.[6] 2. Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi said, “He (Imdadullah Muhajir Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”[7] (click to view the scanned image of this quote) 3. Once, Moulvi Muhammad Ahsan, a resident of Mecca, expressed his skepticism on the issue of Wahdat al-Wajood to Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi. He (Moulvi Ahsan) remarked that this issue seems to oppose Eemaan. Ashraf Ali Thanvi replied: “Someday listen to my lecture on this issue, then you will yourself say that Eemaan cannot be complete without the belief in this (i.e. Wahdat al-Wajood).” Then, Ashraf Ali Thanvi gave a speech of two hours on a Friday morning. After the lecture, Moulvi Ahsan could not help saying: “Belief in this (Wahdat al-Wajood) is so crucial that without it Eemaan cannot be understood.” The biographer of Ashraf Ali Thanvi comments, “Ashraf Ali Thanvi declared the belief of Wahdat al-Wajood as the completion of Eemaan. But Muhammad Ahsan went much further by saying that Eemaan rests on the belief in Wahdat al-Wajood.”[8] 4. Ashraf Ali Thanvi says: “You are amazed at people who claim Prophet-hood… People have claimed Lordship. However, nobody must think that Hussain bin Mansoor (al-Hallaj) in his saying, ‘Aanal-Haqq’ [I am the Haqq (Truth meaning Allah)] claimed Lordship (i.e. claimed to be God). Because upon him was a condition, otherwise he also believed in Abdiyaah (the state of being a worshiper) and therefore he offered Salaah. Someone asked him (al-Hallaj): “Since you are Allah, to whom do you prostrate?” He (al-Hallaj) answered: “I have two states, one outward and the other inward. My outward self prostrates to my inward self.”[9] 5. Moulana Zakariyah says: “Hazrat Shaikhul Islam, Moulana Madani said that the same kaifiyat (spiritual state) which constrained Mansoor al-Hallaj to proclaim: “Anal Haqq (I am the Truth i.e. Allah) prevailed for six months on Hazrat Mainji (Nur Muhammad) [who was the Pir (Shaikh) of Imdadullah Muhajir Makki].”[10] 6. In Shamaaim-e-Imdadiyah, a story of a Fakir (hermit) who believed in Wahdat al-Wajood is mentioned. After approving the Aqeedah of the Faqir, the author says: “It is Shirk to differentiate between the worshiper (Aabid) and the Worshiped (Ma'bud)… To summarize, based upon the explanations of our predecessors, we understand that this position is Haqq (true) and there is no doubt about it. However, its reality is experienced only when a disciple becomes distant from his own self by striving hard and ignoring every danger. Because when a person becomes unaware of his self, he is unaware of everything. Nothing remains in his thoughts or his sight except Allah. Therefore, all concentration of the disciple is upon Allah. When nothing distracts his attention and he meditates his mind on Allah; then when he opens his eyes, he sees nothing but Allah. (At this stage) the Dhikr of Hu Hu (He He) turns to Ana Ana (Me Me). This stage is called Fanah der Fanah … (Similarly) from the special Ummah, Ba Yazid Bastami[11] said: ‘Subhaani maa Aadhaam-Shaani (Glory be to me, Far removed am I from all imperfections, how great is my state) and Mansoor Hallaj said: ‘Anal-Haqq’ (I am the Truth).[12] Comment: The Religion of Islam, as taught by the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alaihi wa-sallam) rejects the pagan claim of Allah having a son or a daughter, let alone the claim of someone to be Allah.“That is because Allah, He is the Truth, and it is He Who gives life to the dead, and it is He Who is Able to do all things.”[13] 7. From Shamaaim-e-Imdadiyah, “In the stage of Uboodiyyah (The state of being Abd or worshiper), there are three meanings of the Kalimah - “Laa ilaha illa Allah” Laa Ma’bood (Nobody is worthy of worship) Laa Matloob (Nobody is desired) and Laa Mowjood (None exists), the last being the loftiest stage.”[14] 8. In the book Irshaadul-Mulook, a letter written by Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Pir, Imdadullah Muhajir Makki, has been mentioned in which Rasheed Ahmad Gungohi writes at the end, “In reality I am nothing. It is only Your Shadow - only Your existence (i.e. Allah’s existence). What am I? I am nothing. Only He is. You and me are Shirk upon Shirk.”[15] Comment: In this letter, Rasheed Ahmad Gungohi informs his Pir, Imdadullah Muhajir Makki of his well being, and then says that in reality neither he, nor his Pir exists. And to differentiate between the Creator and the created is Shirk. Creation is only the Shadow of Allah. So, then who is writing the letter to whom? Sufism is full of self-contradictions!! Shaikh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah) mentions a story in relation to the theory of Wahdat al-Wajood in his book, ‘Al-Furqaan bayna Awliya ar-Rahmaa wa-Awliya ash-Shaytaan’ on page. 101, “The book, ‘Essence of Wisdom’ of Ibn Arabee was read to at-Talmasani and said: “This book of yours goes against the Qur’aan.” To which he replied: ‘The whole Qur’aan is associationism (Shirk), Tawheed is only found in our writings.” Then it was said to him: “If all existence is only one, why is a wife Halaal to a man while his sister is Haraam?” He said: “Both of them to us are Halaal, but he who is veiled says, Haraam! And so we say Haraam for you.’ The Shaikh further mentions, ‘This person, aside from his blatant belief (Kufr), has also contradicted himself! If all existence is one, who is the veiled one and who is the one who veils? Thus, one of their Shaikhs said to one of his followers: ‘Whoever tells you that there is anything other than Allah in the Universe has lied.’ The student then asked him: ‘Who then is the one who lied?’ They said to another student: ‘These are nothing but appearances.’ He said to them: ‘Are these appearances other than that, you have introduced relativity (no unity of existence!) and if they are the same, then it is as I said.’ [1] The type of Tawheed that calls for the negation of the existance of all of Allaah’s creation. [2] Hawatith : Things that do not exist originally, but come into existence later. [3] Madhahar : The point of manifestation. Here it means (according to the explanation of Haji Imdadullah Muhajir Makki) that the creatures are nothing but the visible manifestations of Allaah. Just like Allaah’s Asmaa al-Husnaa (Beautiful Names) are not other than Him, similarly these Hawadith are not other than Him. [4] Aarif: a Soofi who has reached the stage of Ma’rifah, i.e. has gained knowledge through mystical means. [5] Malfoodhat Hakeem al-Ummat (a biography of Ashraf Ali Thanvi by Muhammed Iqbal Quraishi) vol.1, p.244 [6] Mashaikh-e-Chist (Eng. Trans.) p.225. This book has been compiled in Kuliyate-Imdaadiyah (Chapter 10) Daar al-Ishaat [7] Imdadul-Mushtaq ila Ashraful-akhlaq (Urdu) saying no.74, p.62. [8] Maqtoobat wa-Malfoozaat Ashrafeeyah (Writings and Sayings of Ashraf Ali Thanvi), a biography by one of Thanvi’s Khaleefahs, Moulana Muhammed Shareef p.185-186. [9] Malfoozat Hakim al-Ummat (a biography of Ashraf Ali Thanvi by Muhammad Iqbal Qurayshi), vol.1, p.251. The same belief is found in the poem of Ibn al-Faridh, which he entitled, Nudhum As-Suluuk. [10] Mashaikh-e-Chist (Eng. Trans.) p.213. [11] Abu Yazld bin Tayfur bin ‘Isa al-Bistami, one of the founders of Soofism hailed from Bistam, a town in the Iranian province of Khamis. [12] Shamaaim-e-Imdaadiyah, p.35 and 36. Sai Baba used to make similar statements such as, “I am Parwardigar (Persian for God)” [The Life and Teachings of Sai Baba, p.4.] [13] Soorah al-Hajj (22): 6. [14] Shamaaim-e-Imdaadiyah, p.43. [15] Irshaadul-Mulook, (Eng. Trans.) p.11.

*YOUR FIRST HUGE MISTAKE:YOU TOOK KNOWLEDGE FROM SOME OF THE WORST SNEAKY DEOBANDI INNOVATORS WHO HIDE THEIR SHIRK & THEIR AKAABIREEN IN THEIR BOOKS WITHOUT PREACHING THEM OPENLY🔥🔥🔥Deobandi ULAMA WERE & ARE BLATANT SUFI PANTHEIST MUSHRIKS LIKE1️⃣IMDADULLAH MUHAJIR MAKKI2️⃣ASHRAF ALI TANWI3️⃣THE HOMOSEXUAL RASHEED AHMAD GANGOHI4️⃣HIS DREAMWIFE QASIM NANOTWI5️⃣MOLANA ZIKRIYA FAZAEL AMAL WRITER WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH6️⃣ELIAS DEOBANDI FOUNDER OF TABLEEGHI JAMAT ALL WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH THEMSELVES PANTHEIST MUSHRIKEEN!*

​@@muhammadsalafiahlulhadith he seems to have gone silent.

I get what you say but still didn't answer my question. But thank you, jizak Allahu khayran for your honesty. What about meeting Allah in the state of being a Salafi Cult? Remember Salafi Cults - that upon which you call it foolish.

40 hadith class #9

@@OneWayToParadise thanks

Many Deobandis I personally know are good people. I might not agree with them on certain aspects but I love them as my Muslim brothers

@@brothersman524 what is the point in being "good" when you fail to own your mistakes and deny the reality, There are non-muslims in this world who do very good things and are the best of people in the eyes of the people but will they go to jannah ? NO ! beacuse there are conditions to meet and deobandis lack the most essential condition which is knowledge.

@@Therebelliousprince001 if you read their books you will know why we consider them as kaafir and they will deny the truth because they have something called as "taqqiya" which was used historically to hide their believes because they were seen as hertics and yeah an average shia may not be aware of this but a learned shia knows the truth

@@user-ue4fh5mv9s My original post did say I might not agree with their ways. Only Allah (swt) knows who will go to Jannah or not. We need to look at ourselves first before judging other people's mistakes brother - something that many muslims lack whether they are from Barelwi, Salafi or Deobandi

@@brothersman524 i am NOT judging them for their personal mistakes because like everyone i also make mistakes but this is about somehting very serious which is The creed of islam which cannot be taken as a "silly little mistake" and they are not willing to learn which is a problem

What was Salman al-Farsi's journey to Islam?

Exactly

There is difference of opinion on participating in elections as far as I know

@@muhammadhamzabakhtkhan7357 it's not a political election. Basically there it has become a group like all others . You hear Ahle Hadith from their mouths but not Muslim unlike all other areas of world. Maybe I am not able to explain properly. But you can understand what I meant.

@@servantofthemerciful3511 then leave them

​​@@servantofthemerciful3511 if what you say is true, their behaviour is rejected.

Daniel was right unlike your terribly I'll mannered juhal of a "shuyukh" were, uthman is an extreme jahil who doesn't even know how to read Arabic or EVEN the Qur'an.

It's just people of those region. We don't have to know any groups. Just we need to focus on being Muslim.

@@servantofthemerciful3511 I’m sorry but that doesn’t explain anything. Habashi is an ethnic group nothing to do Islam. It’s like saying we shouldn’t take Islamic advice from sir Lankas .

@@fatimahassan72 we can take Islamic advice from a person on right path the path of righteousness as stated by Allah Azzawajal no matter where the person belongs. After all we are Muslims and on top of that sons and daughters of Adam Alaihisalam and Hawa Alaihisalam.

@@fatimahassan72 The aqidah of habasha (from islamqa : islamqa.info/en/answers/8571/jamaaat-al-ahbaash-the-habashis) During the last quarter of the fourteenth century AH there emerged a group led by ‘Abd-Allaah al-Habashi, who moved from Ethiopia to Syria, taking his miguidance with him, and he moved about in that region until he settled in Lebanon, where he started to call people to his way. His number of followers increased and his ideas - which are a mixture of the ideas of the Jahamiyyah [a group which misinterpreted the attributes of Allaah], the Mu’tazilah [a philosophical group many of whose ideas differ from those of Ahl al-Sunnah], grave-worshippers and Sufis - began to spread. He fanatically supported his ideas by engaging in debates and printing books and leaflets which propagate them. (summary of their devient believes) 1.With regard to the issue of faith, they follow the school of thought of al-Irjaa’ [those who believe that sin does not matter so long as one is a believer] which is condemned in Islam. 2.They allow seeking help from and seeking refuge with the dead, and praying to them instead of to Allaah. This is shirk akbar (major shirk) according to the texts of the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and the consensus (ijmaa’) of the Muslims. 3.In their view, the Qur’aan is not the Word of Allaah in the true sense. 4. They think that it is obligatory to interpret the texts of the Qur’aan and Sunnah which speak of the attributes of Allaah 5.Among their false beliefs, they deny that Allaah is above His creation. 6. They speak of some of the Companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in a manner that is not appropriate.

@@user-ue4fh5mv9s thank you very helpful

That's deobandis

Where did he say that he determines who goes to paradise?

@@kylemunroe2133 bootlicker of a bootlicker....wow

​@@irfansheikh3046 Still abusing people in Ramadan.

It's a deviant group in Lebanon. It has nothing to do with Ethiopians (in this context).

Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab*

He was a great scholar of his time.

We use the term Salafi as an adjective and not a pronoun like the rest of the groups. Wahhabi is your invention. Get a grip.

@OneWayToParadise All the terms you mentioned are used as adjectives including Salafi. Can you explain how the word Salafi is a pronoun??? The term Wahābi stems from the eponym of the sect you follow which wad only invented (a bid'ah) about 300 years ago. Just like the term Ash'ari and Maturidi stem from their eponyms who incidentally were much closer to the Salaf than Muhammed Ibn Abd al Wahāb.

​@@OneWayToParadise In the subcontinent Salafi and ahle hadith have a registered organisation with elections for ameer post and all. It's a proper jamaat. What do you have to say about them?

​​@@LowlierThanThow let the terms aside... Ibn Mas'ud reported God’s Messenger as saying, “The best of men are my generation, then those who come next to them, then those who come next to them. (Bukhari and Muslim.) I urge you to stick to this hadeeth and read books of these generations and don't go against them especially in Akeedah (Belief) and may Allah guide us all.

@ahmed el haddad OK, please go ahead and name any books from these generations.

More lies.

@@ExtremeShez did the prophet not perform 20 rakats of taraweeh with the sahabas in masjid nabwi and what was the reson of stopping it and praying in the homes ?

@@moses9051 They pray twenty rakats in Masjid al-Haram al-Makki and Masjid an-Nabawi. So why lie when Saudis haven't rejected it.

@@ExtremeShez how many rakkats did they pray last year ramadhan I was there

@@moses9051 20 rakats.

​@Master ROSHI what is your proof that I did not watch this video?

Salafis are there everywhere, it's not the case that Abu Mussab is the only person to tell them about Salafi aqeedah. If they want guidance they should be behaving in that way. So giving da'wah to them is waste of time. Wallahu'alam. Nextly for the common folks, debates are not generally the way you reach the haqq. You get da'wah towards the Haqq from Ahlu Sunnah and Muslims, and you get da'wah to baatil ahlul bid'ah and from the shayateen. You need to look for yourself and ask Allah to guide to reach the haqq. If debate is the way to go, then you'll have to become deobandi one day, atheist another day, then hindu, etc etc, because debate can be won by the one who knows to debate more, not necessarily the one who is upon the haqq. And moreover in debates, many common folks will be exposed with many shubhat and waswas which has to be avoided completely. So there are many conditions for debtes to take place and debates is not the right way and means to guidance, Wallahu'alam.

@@abcdzxcd No, debate or dialouge in an amicable manner, with respect between two people with knowledge on the subject matter is allowed. This was done in Islamic history. Abu Mussab and the 2 Deobandi guys are pulling off shots in public. Therefore, it would be ideal for them to have a face to face dialouge on the matters they dispute. Both seem like they have the Truth so why hide away when they're asking him by challenging Abu Mussab to address their points of differences. And you say it's a waste of time but both parties keep making videos against each other. They are already debating one another but not face to face, they're doing it in a different way. Hide and seek debate. That's why it would be better for both parties to speak with respect face to face on the issues they both dispute.

@@Irffan-J Do you have Salafi scholars and students of knowledge in your locality? Go and ask them if you are confused. And it's so clear. Whenever there is an argument between ahlu sunnah and ahlul bidah, it's not the best way to wait for a debate, considering the matters I already mentioned in first comment. If you are a true Muslim upon the way of Salaf, in which matter you got confused who has truth return it back to Allah and His Messenger, with Qur'an and Sunnah. And the best way to understand Qur'an and Sunnah is from the Sahaba. Contact scholars and ask the issue you have doubts and you get the answers with evidence, if it's indeed a scholar. done.

@@abcdzxcd Jzk Allah Khaiyr. I didn't say I have a doubt.

Daesh are criminals and terrorists. You need to learn how to understand first.

May Allah curse you deobandi slanderers

Is that the only word in your vocabulary? Or did you just learn it and are trigger happy repeating in every comment. The day I will get a single intelligent deviant to comment is a day I await.

U sufis are the real wobblers *YOUR FIRST HUGE MISTAKE:YOU TOOK KNOWLEDGE FROM SOME OF THE WORST SNEAKY DEOBANDI INNOVATORS WHO HIDE THEIR SHIRK & THEIR AKAABIREEN IN THEIR BOOKS WITHOUT PREACHING THEM OPENLY🔥🔥🔥Deobandi ULAMA WERE & ARE BLATANT SUFI PANTHEIST MUSHRIKS LIKE1️⃣IMDADULLAH MUHAJIR MAKKI2️⃣ASHRAF ALI TANWI3️⃣THE HOMOSEXUAL RASHEED AHMAD GANGOHI4️⃣HIS DREAMWIFE QASIM NANOTWI5️⃣MOLANA ZIKRIYA FAZAEL AMAL WRITER WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH6️⃣ELIAS DEOBANDI FOUNDER OF TABLEEGHI JAMAT ALL WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH THEMSELVES PANTHEIST MUSHRIKEEN!*

@@OneWayToParadise akhi 😂 who are u shaykhul hadith mufti where did u study are u even a hufaz to talk about these imams with the disrespect u deviant wahabi u talk so much garbage about halwa eating maulanas Lool ur own Shaikh refuted u and u can’t fend it yikes make a video how u say they lied against Allah and his rassool (saw) ur ignorance is not bliss it’s a fitnah my dude u have no qualifications u made up ur name from the streets or jail or something that’s probably where u got ur disrespectful deen from u disrespect and hold hate in ur heart there’s no hate in Islam buddy the ppl u follow raged war on the muslims why don’t u talk about that how isis follows the same ppl. Who’s the deviant 😂 ur too scared and emotional brother u can’t handle the truth u think ur on ijmah? 1400 years of scholars u go against based on not even 5 scholars u hold such dear that been refuted over n over why don’t u look at ur own self why would someone even call u a wobbler dude cuz u are wahabi u don’t even know me and ur calling me a deviant😂😂😂😂 I wouldn’t care if u weren’t on here disrespecting everyone trying to act like ur the only person on the haq buddy u can’t even read Arabic when it’s right in front of u aren’t u an Arab 😂😂😂 jahiliyah at its finest fix up my brother if u noticed the same brothers u keep mocking dissing making fun of are the ones praying for u to realize they are calling u their brother in Islam in return u talk garbage out ur mouth. U give dawah with the same tongue? Does ur mom knows about the hate and fisat u spread within the ummah my guy? U takfiri wobbler 😂 it should be us against the problem not us vs each other u idiot ur actually dumb idk how u have clout or followers all u do is spread hate akhi u should really revise ur priorities in life one way to paradise but jannah is a perfect place no hate how are u here spreading hate thinking ur on the true path to jannah 🤢

@@OneWayToParadise what up bro why u here talking smack go fend ur things 😂😂😂 everyone thinks u left RU-vid because ur being quiet not responded why would u call SH fowzan a major sinner ? U don’t even think before u open ur mouth no research these guys are presenting to u academic research quote from YOUR OWN books that u follow. Ur Islam makes no sense based on lies and hate maybe u should go learn how to read Arabic first 😂 before making takfir 🤦🏻‍♂️ guefffffff I’m waiting for ur video u replied to me 2 days ago but they been posting videos responding to ur hate for weeks!! Are u scared? They say only when the fear of Allah swt the creator is not there that’s when u start to fear the creation😂 man’s are presenting to u your OWN ACADEMIC BOOKS AS EVIDENCE and ur telling me 2 days ago the day I will get a single intelligent deviant to comment is a day I await…. Akhi al Islam is giving u video after video u can’t even hold a single book as evidence they’re giving u ur OWN books to show u ur refuting urself why don’t u prove them wrong?? Say something why u here fighting me bro post a video and show everyone they are lying if ur so confident 😂😂😂 we know ur the liar give up the act u prob work for cia my guy what a sketchy name

@@OneWayToParadise You've had many people comment to you, most were respectful and kind. Very arrogant to assume every single person that opposes you, O' Abu Mussab is stupid and less intelligent than you. In the mean time, take some Arabic classes. Maybe once you get back you can respond to Uthaymeen believing that Allah literally sits on the throne (Astaghfirullah)

Lol lol lol lol lol lol

Lol lol lol lol lol lol

*YOUR FIRST HUGE MISTAKE:YOU TOOK KNOWLEDGE FROM SOME OF THE WORST SNEAKY DEOBANDI INNOVATORS WHO HIDE THEIR SHIRK & THEIR AKAABIREEN IN THEIR BOOKS WITHOUT PREACHING THEM OPENLY🔥🔥🔥Deobandi ULAMA WERE & ARE BLATANT SUFI PANTHEIST MUSHRIKS LIKE1️⃣IMDADULLAH MUHAJIR MAKKI2️⃣ASHRAF ALI TANWI3️⃣THE HOMOSEXUAL RASHEED AHMAD GANGOHI4️⃣HIS DREAMWIFE QASIM NANOTWI5️⃣MOLANA ZIKRIYA FAZAEL AMAL WRITER WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH6️⃣ELIAS DEOBANDI FOUNDER OF TABLEEGHI JAMAT ALL WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH THEMSELVES PANTHEIST MUSHRIKEEN!*

Why you don’t answer on the sitting on the thrown ?

@@decemberrain95 throne*

No one has a guarantee. However the truth is known and clear. What group do you follow?

@@OneWayToParadise I follow the group that is on Haq. Video scholars and picture takers. I don't follow. Screamers and ranters I don't follower. And below part scholars that can't read text properly are danger. I don't think you even know what Iman is.

​@@deenshabier7204what point are you even trying to make? Explain whats wrong, or state your questions clearly!

@@deenshabier7204 be afraid of Allah making such statement, you dont know the level of eeman in anyone heart.

@@bioshellzone I judge by what is apparent. This Cult is giving the impression that only they are going to JANNAH.

We don't believe there is such a thing as Wahhabi... Please wake up.

​@@OneWayToParadise Brother where does the "wahabi" title come from?

@@OneWayToParadise so why are you saying Barelvis? If they dont call themselfs Barelvis wtf, stop being hypocrite, you doing the same as others LOL. Only Deobandis call themselfs as deobandis

@@MuhammadSohailArif Sufi's made it up. If they were sincere they would have called it "Muhammadi", instead they picked the name of Allah ﷻ to use as a slander and turned that in to a non existing sect. Now the West has adopted that and made a Wikipedia page and funny enough it states that *no one calls themselves as Wahhabi* . Sufi's know this as well, it's a slander to anyone who 1. Calls to Tawhid 2. Refutes shirk 3. Refutes bid'ah If you have these 3 qualities, you are a wahhabi to them.

​@@MuhammadSohailArif The British.

The diffrences sahaba had were fiqh related but the shia believe in imams and that they have superpowers and can control the world which is blatened kufr and the sufis too have serious issues in aqidah

Don't equate Deobandiya, Barelviya, Nawasib and Rawafid with the iktilaaf among the companions. Sahaba didn't make thier followers read qalimah's with thier own name instead of Rasuallah like those Deobani and Barelvi "Scholars" or didn't curse the companions like the rafidah or have disease in thier hearts for Ahlul bait Alaihumasalam. I still believe they are Muslim's that's good enough. Don't expect anything more after what these people have done!

@@SuperGulamali Just to be clear, my aim isn't to compare ikhtilaf to innovation or kufr. The point is that differences are acceptable and to be expected in the Ummah, so long as they're within the bounds. Your last statement is along these lines. People from among these groups, and "ahl-sunnah" as we all should be, do things that are flat-out wrong and may take them out of Islam (and ahl-sunnah by definition). However, most people in these groups, including even the Shia to a lesser extent, aren't doing such extreme things. You have "Salafi's" pronouncing takfir on practicing Muslims, but I wouldn't classify all Salafi's as misguided innovators or worse, kafirs just because of the actions of some salafis. Now, groups like Ahmadi's, 5 percenters, Nation of Islam, etc are actually completely out of the fold of Islam. You can freely address them as you would a non-Muslim without blame. Just don't lump real Muslims who might ascribe to the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Ijma slightly differently than you as heretical innovators. That's against the sunnah, of poor etiquette, is ignorant, and only harms the proclaimer.

​@@Someguy1357 which Salafi ulema are making takfir on practicing Muslims?

No Shi'a are not following The companions including the Chaliphs. In fact they make Takfir of them all except for Ali رضي الله عنه. Also they follow what their Shi'a scholars opinions not Quran or Sunnah . You're so misinformed.

Shaikh Muhammad `Hamid Al-Fiqqi, leader of Jama`at Ansar As-Sunnah Al-Mu`hammadiyyah and one of the scholars of Al-Azhar University, wrote these words about Imam Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab. ----- “Wahhabiyyah was called as such after the reformer and imam Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab the mujaddid (who renewed aspects of Islam) of the twelfth century (AH [18th century CE]). However, it is not correct to use this description (meaning, wahhabiyyah) according to the proper usage of Arabi. It should have been called, muhammadiyyah, because the name of the founder of this Da`wah is Muhammad, not Abdul Wahhab. … [Ibn Abdul Wahhab and those who followed him] firmly abide by minor rulings in the `Hanbali Madhhab, just like followers of other madhahib. They do not claim, whether by statement or in their writings, that Ibn Abdul Wahhab brought a new madhhab; he did not have stances that As-Salaf As-Sali`h disagreed with. Rather, his effort and jihad were about resurrecting practices established in the correct religion. He sought to return the people to Quranic ordainments regarding Tau`heed Al-Uluhiyyah, that being, to worship Allah Alone in humility and humbleness, and to dedicating invocation, vowing, making oaths, giving trust and obedience [to Allah Alone] in accordance to the law Allah ordained. Regarding Tau`heed Al-Asmaa was-Sifat, Ibn Abdul Wahhab believed in the ayat that mention [Allah’s names and attributes] in accordance with their apparent meaning, without alteration, distortion, equating them with attributes of creation, or ascribing a specific nature for them. He believed in Allah’s names and attributes according to the apparent, clear meaning of the Arabi language, as explained by relevant reports collected from the Messenger, salla allahu alaihi wa-sallam. Regarding all these aspects, Ibn Abdul Wahhab emulated the way of the companions, and those who followed their guidance: the rightly guided Imams from among the Salaf (righteous ancestors of Muslims) and the Khalaf, (righteous successive generations) may Allah be pleased with all of them. He stated that true implementation of the Testimony stating that none has the right to be worshipped, except Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, can only be correctly fulfilled through all this that he called to (Judge Ahmad Al-Butami, Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab, Pg., 119-20).’ ----- Footnote: Abu Dawud narrated that Allah’s Prophet, salla allahu alaihi wa-sallam, said, ‘At the turn of every hundred years, Allah sends someone for this Ummah who would renew (or reform) for it matters of its religion (Al-Albani. Sahih Sunan Abi Dawud, and, Silsilat Al-A`hadeeth As-Sahihah).’” ………. (Jalal Abualrub. Biography and Mission of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab, pg. 401-3)

Imam al-Shawkani (d. 1250H) on the Writings, Da'wah and Adversaries of Shaykh Muhammad Bin Abd Al-Wahhaab He is Muhammad bin Ali bin Muhammad bin Abd Allaah al-Shawkani, then al-San'ani. He was born in 1173H. He memorized the Qur'an and many other texts at a young age, before he reached ten years of age. He then sought knowledge from the scholars and also showed great interest in history and literature. By the time he reached twenty, he was giving fatwa and was also involved in thirteen lessons daily, either taking knowledge from Mashayikh, or delivering to students. In 1209H, the most senior muftee passed away as a result of which al-Shawkani was offered the position by the ruler, however he excused himself because he was occupied with knowledge. However, the ruler said that being involved with both things (knowledge and iftaa) is possible. Al-Shawkani took up the position and this led to truth and justice, and he tackled oppression, removed bribery, and countered the bigotry and partisanship that was found amongst the people, and invited them to follow the Qur'an and the Sunnah. He authored numerous works in fiqh, tafsir, and siyar (biographies). He passed away in 1250H (1834CE). We are going to take a look here at a short passage in one of his works, al-Badr al-Tali' (Cairo, 1348H) in which he makes some remarks about receiving the writings of Shaykh Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab and what he thinks of them and of the adversaries and disputants to Shaykh Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab. He said (2/7): And in the year 1215H I received from the aforementioned person from Najd two light volumes which he sent to our respected leader, the Imaam (may Allaah preserve him). One of them contained the treatises of Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab, all of them were about directing to sincerity in Tawhid and warning from Shirk which is practised by those believing in the graves. And these are beneficial treatises, filled with evidences from the Book and the Sunnah. And the other volume comprised a refutation of a group of negligent ones from the jurists of San'aa and Sa'dah, they corresponded on some issues with him (Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab) connected to the foundations of the religion (aqidah) and a group from the Companions, so he responded to them with detailed, corroborating, verified responses indicating that the one responding is from the bona fide Scholars, knowledgeable of the Book and the Sunnah, and he destroyed everything they constructed (in argument) and invalidate everything they compiled, because they are negligent, biased partisans, and thus what they did became a humiliation for them and upon the people of San'aa and Sa'dah. Thus is the case of whoever put himself forward and did not know the true worth of his own self.... The reality is that Shaykh Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab brought nothing new from himself. All he did was to start calling and inviting the people to the Tawhid of the Messengers and he was preceded by many others in the matter of preventing the soliciting of intercession from others besides Allaah through direct invocation of them, and preventing the worshipping and veneration of the graves for that same reason. This as we have established is spoken of by the likes of Ibn Aqil al-Hanbali (d. 513H), and Ibn al-Jawzee (d. 597H), and Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (d. 606H), and al-Maqrizi (d. 845H), centuries before Ibn Abd al-Wahhaab was even born.

Shaykh Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab responded to the claims of his adversaries that he makes takfir of the Muslim masses in many of the letters and treatises he sent to those claimants and to others in order to dispel the false notions being spread about him as a means to hinder others from his reform movement. Here we will present some excerpts from some of these letters for the purpose of documentation and record. These can be found in the seventh volume of the collection of his works (مجموع مؤلفات الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب), which contains all of his personal letters and correspondences. Shaykh Ibn Abd al-Wahhaab said (7/25) in his letter to Muhammad bin 'Eed: وأما ما ذكر الأعداء عني: أني أكفّر بالظن، وبالموالاة، أو أكفّر الجاهل الذي لم تقم عليه الحجة، فهذا بهتان عظيم، يريدون به تنفير الناس عن دين الله ورسوله. As for what the enemies have mentioned about me: That I make takfir on the basis of presumption, and on the basis of loyalty, or that I make takfir of the ignorant person upon whom the proof has not been established, then this is a mighty slander. They desire to make the people flee from the deen of Allaah and His Messenger by it. Notes Here Ibn Abd al-Wahhaab rejects the three claims that he makes takfir a) on the basis of mere presumption, and absence of certainty, b) on the basis of (the mere absence of) loyalty to himself, and c) of the ignorant person upon whom the proof has not been established (by showing him that he is opposing the deen which the Messenger came with). He explains prior to this statement: تكفير من بان له أن التوحيد هو دين الله ورسوله، ثم أبغضه ونفّر الناس عنه وجاهد من صدق الرسول فيه، Which means that takfir is made after it becomes clear to a person that this Tawhid is the deen that Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) came with, then hated it, and drove people away from it, and fights against those who believed Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) regarding it.

Shaykh Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab said (7/11-12) in a letter he wrote to the people of al-Qaseem who requested him to explain his creed and what he is upon: ثم لا يخفى عليكم، أنه بلغني أن رسالة سليمان بن سحيم قد وصلت إليكم، وأنه قبلها وصدقها بعض المنتمين للعلم في جهتكم؛ والله يعلم أن الرجل افترى عليَّ أموراً لم أقلها، ولم يأت أكثرها على بالي. فمنها: قوله: إني مبطل كتب المذاهب الأربعة، وإني أقول: إن الناس من ستمائة سنة ليسوا على شيء، وإني أدعي الاجتهاد، وإني خارج عن التقليد، وإني أقول: إن اختلاف العلماء نقمة، وإني أكفّر من توسل بالصالحين، وإني أكفّر البوصيري لقوله: يا أكرم الخلق، وإني أقول: لو أقدر على هدم قبة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لهدمتها، ولو أقدر على الكعبة لأخذت ميزابها وجعلت لها ميزاباً من خشب، وإني أحرم زيارة قبر النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم، وإني أنكر زيارة قبر الوالدين وغيرهما، وإني أكفّر من حلف بغير الله، وإني أكفّر ابن الفارض وابن عربي، وإني أحرق دلائل الخيرات وروض الرياحين وأسميه روض الشياطين. جوابي عن هذه المسائل، أن أقول: سبحانك هذا بهتان عظيم! وقبله من بهت محمداً صلى الله عليه وسلم أنه يسب عيسى بن مريم ويسب الصالحين، فتشابهت قلوبهم بافتراء الكذب وقول الزور. It should not be hidden to you that it has reached me that the letter of Sulayman bin Saheem (an adversary) has reached you and that some of those ascribing to knowledge in your direction have accepted it and believed it. And Allaah knows that the man has fabricated many affairs against me which I have never expressed, and which most of them have never come to my mind. From them: His saying that I invalidate the books of the four schools of thought. And that I say the people have not been upon any (deen) since six-hundred years. And that I claim independent ijtihaad and that I have departed from taqleed (of the schools) and that I say the differing of the Scholars (in jurisprudence) is a punishment, vengeance. And that I make takfir of those who make tawassul through the righteous. And that I make takfir of al-Buwaysiree due to his saying, "O most-noble of the creation..." And that I say if I was able to destroy to the dome of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), I would have destroyed it, and that if I was able I would have taken its lining and replace it with lining of wood. And that I prohibit visiting the grave of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and that I prohibit visiting the graves of [ones] parents and others. And that I make takfir of the one who swears by other than Allaah. And that I make takfir of Ibn al-Faarid and Ibn Arabi, and that I burn the book Dalaa'il al-Khayraat and Rawd al-Riyaaheen and that I label it as Rawd al-Shayaateen. My answer to all these matters is: Sublime are you (O Lord), this is a mighty slander! But before this, Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) was slandered with the claim that he reviles Eesaa bin Maryam, and that he reviles the righteous (dead). So their hearts resemble each other with fabrication of lies and false witness. Notes There is one particular matter that needs commenting on which is that Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah distinguish between judging a belief, saying or act of disbelief and between judging a person who might fall into such a belief, saying or act to be a disbeliever (this is referred to as takfir bil-'ayn). This is from the firmly established Shariah principles which Ahl al-Sunnah adhere to, and Shaykh Ibn Abd al-Wahhaab is upon the same methodology. Thus, while a scholar may write and explain that certain affairs constitute disbelief with Shariah evidences, this does not necessitate that everyone who falls into them becomes an automatic disbeliever. Rather, no one becomes a disbeliever except after the establishment of the proof. This is because there are many plausible scenarios that prevent the judgement of disbelief being applied to a person from them a) misunderstanding, faulty interpretation b) ignorance c) compulsion d) pure, genuine error. These matters themselves require separate study and this is not the place to elaborate. Once this is clear, then when Shaykh Ibn Abd al-Wahhaab began to clarify the same matters that those before him had clarified with respect to the Tawhid of the Messengers, and rightfully described many of the beliefs and practices as constituting disbelief, many of the bigoted partisans and those whose interests where threatened began to spread lies that he makes takfir of the Muslim masses and of specific figures that were dear to them, such as al-Buwaysiree and others. This was a type of intellectual terrorism employed to scare the Muslim masses away from learning the reality of the Tawhid of the Messengers, because none of these people were able to find fault with the actual teaching of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, and his evidences and his arguments. As for the common masses, then Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhaab did not make takfir of them. He made takfir of the one to whom the reality of the Tawhid of the Messengers became clear and apparent, then hated it, drove others away from it and fought against its adherents

Muhammad Bin Abd Al-Wahhaab and the Claim of Takfir of the Muslim Masses - Part 3: Takfir Based Upon Mere Absence of Obedience Shaykh Ibn Abd al-Wahhaab said (7/60): وكذلك تمويهه على الطغام بأن ابن عبد الوهاب يقول: الذي ما يدخل تحت طاعتي كافر، ونقول: سبحانك هذا بهتان عظيم! بل نشهد الله على ما يعلمه من قلوبنا، بأن من عمل بالتوحيد، وتبرأ من الشرك وأهله، فهو المسلم في أي زمان وأي مكان. وإنما نكفّر مَن أشرك بالله في إلهيته، بعد ما نبين له الحجة على بطلان الشرك. And likewise, his distortion upon the common people that Ibn Abd al-Wahhaab says, "Whoever does not come under my obedience is a disbeliever." And we say: Sublime are you (O Lord), this is a mighty slander! Rather, we call Allaah to witness over what he knows from our hearts that whoever acts upon Tawhid and frees himself from Shirk and its people, then he is a Muslim in whatever time and place (he maybe in). But we make takfir of the one who associates partners with Allaah in his Ilaayhiyyah, after we have made clear to him the proof for the futility of Shirk. Notes From the claims spread by his adversaries was that Ibn Abd al-Wahhaab demands obedience to himself and whoever falls outside of his obedience is a disbeliever. He clarified this and in other places that worship is only for Allaah alone, and loyalty is to Allah and His Messenger and any person in any time or place, who is upon this, is a Muslim and the only obedience due upon him is what Allah and His Messenger have obligated, such as to the Messenger (sallallaahy alayhi wasallam) and to one's parents, and to the ruler in that which is good. But they spread this claim because they wanted to make it appear to the common people that he was trying to demand loyalty to himself. This type of intellectual terrorism was used because they could not find fault with what he actually called to, which is singling out Allaah with worship, relying upon Him alone, and soliciting benefit, repulsion of harm and intercession from Him alone.

Stop lying, your lies about Allah Subhana wa Ta'ala sitting on the Mighty Throne have been refuted you liar. Why is your misguided sect full of liars.

​@Juleybib because in their diseased hearts they picture Allah as a man like the Christians do with Isa Alayhis Salaam.

Thank you, but i feel you are too deep.

@@sadeeqali8068 Truth hurts. Not my fault. Increase in beneficial and you may actually understand. Until then it's your fault you're steeped in ignorance.