METRO EXODUS Sam's Story All Endings (Good Ending & Bad Ending) 

best american bros :D

Kanka aslında Tom iyiydi, çevresi kötüydü.

@@serdarcan7734 ehhh bence kendisine cok guvenmedim, sanki her an beni oldurecekmis gibi haraketleri vardi

thats because tom was betrayed one his bodyguard the only trusted person would be sam

both ed and tom trusted sam(you) it's just a matter of who you're gonna betray

And then he met the sole survivor and the lone wanderer and was Killin superhumans till they died on a overdose of jet

You guys are about 200 years too early

@@benjaminpimentel4660 and about 40 too early for fallout nuclear war.

LMAO😂😂😂

I was like very "LOL"

It also happens in the other DLC.

Did u even play Metro?

Metro last light DLC did this thought as far as I remember.

@@bushmonsterwilhelm6716 I don't understand why they still keep doing this shit where Artyom doesn't talk then. Makes absolutely no sense.

@@Bloodhurl67 Maybe combat and stealth or even his trauma from losing his mother keep him occupied ? Sometime less talk make you immersive though..

LOOOLL

at least the thieves trying to run out of the stores with bags full of stolen merchandise in the metro world eat lead

not at all

Look, theres less drug users in the metro LOL Maybe the throw rock zombies are a reference to what you will going to see in California xD

HAHAHAHAH good one

xdd

And it's Russian, the guys you're technically still at war with.

@@ivansmirnoff6987 lmfao a sub with a bunch of russians setting up an colony in the heart of san diego. that would be an awesome game honestly.

@@ivansmirnoff6987 war is only still going on, if people keep fighting it. The war ended when everyone nuked themselves. If you want to keep it going, shoot first. and make sure you dont stop shooting. but im not going to do that, i would nuke the world, but once its broken? now it can be fixed.

@Average Leader he’s saying that the old world, it’s leaders, and it’s sometimes bureaucratic way of doing things like ending wars is dead and long gone. Russia and America as they knew no longer exists, so what’s the point in continuing the war? There is none, there is no longer a reason to fight each other. with the going to America ending, the people on the sub are Russians and two Americans and guess what, they’re allies with each other; they no longer feel the need to fight with each other because they witnessed first hand what it did to the earth. The only way the war will continue is if someone shoots first and why in the world would someone shoot first?

your right in my opinion cause Tom doesn't feel like a complete dick and i don't think he would actually use the nukes on settlements but as a scare tactic to get people on his side plus even the settlers in his old settlement didn't make him out to be a cruel ruler but more of an ains ooal gown from the overlord manga type of villain

@@roderickvincent3840 your right in every way and personally the good option is more like the ugly option really since its both good and bad so its right in the middle but hey its better than being stuck in Russia and that ending was sad as well. Sad that the captain dies either way I mean cmon hes so heart like but hey I guess in every metro game at least one good character sadly dies in the end.

@@titanking8755 and also sam could actually kill tom in the next game if he's goes too far and that would be an awesome game sam and his father working together to bring down Tom

@@roderickvincent3840 lol that would and they problaly will work on something like that and I don't doubt for a second that the endings and story line will be good just like the DLC here if u excuse me now though lol I have to do a ton of work in 7 hours

@@titanking8755 be safe out there

The "Smart" ending.

he was stabbed ,unconscious they would've searched him when he was being healed. So that's not a thing... also in real life they would've abandoned him, why would you trust a guy that even has the choice to blow you up, specially after his pawl told him "it's your choice now"

@@lordmorgoth7 Tom made a deal, and could easily say the captain was going senile. That guy just saved Tom's life and took out Klim's Mutiny and had a deal to get you your fuel rods that do actually work. Tom simply could have wanted to keep his word. But yeah if they found the Det on Sam they'd probably have left him behind and destroyed the Detonator.

The charge probably would have blown up when the fuelrod it sat on got hot anyways.

MAN!!! I think like you!!! What do you think happend with Captain? The Tom guys kill him? He accept to bring Sam at home or what... Captain close Tom, many people in the Sub Sympathize to Captain and somebody dont like Tom. Fo now... The last f*cking question you want to get an answer to, THAT HAPPEND WITS GODDAMN CAPTAIN!

Yeah I just finished the DLC today. Finally getting able to stealth to my full capabilities without having to rein myself in for morality points was great.

thats crazy i just played through the entire thing thinking there were moral repercussions oml

@@mikedurkin_ From what I can tell, there's only a few things that will impact the story. Holstering your weapon upon meeting the captain, sparing the sniper, and some other things I can't remember off the top of my head. Aside from that, you can just go hog wild and butcher your way through the DLC lmao

@@heroicryan6257 seems like they did a good job making the game with all this discussion anyway

holy damn I realized that I've played through the entire DLC without using the incendiary rounds...

shame its just you know what

i like it too

Tom is like an ains ooal gown type of villain in my opinion

Go play fallout then.

Kira Well it’s kinda different, fallout is more futuristic and metro is modern

Good point, the man has been shot, punched in the face, and even had Ebola and survived, so really a stab wound should be pretty eash

@@MrBlaster500 in the novels it was sligthly worse. Artyom was kept a slave by the nazis for a few weeks and after that fought to death in a battle royale against some red army prisoners with things like pickaxes, shovels and hammers in a dark tunnel.

@@serjrocks4168 damn,the novel is interesting, might buy it later

@@racersolid9443 it's kinda different from the games, has a lot of weird things on the level of the people praising the catfish like in Exodus. The only one really close to the games was 2033. The narrative focus more on the super natural and power struggles between the factions in the Metro. Artyom is not a super slavic killing machine like in the games XD

@@serjrocks4168 even better,artyom game version is really overpowered, like mad crazy,when anna worried about him in the terminal i was like "wifey he killed big momma and nuked the dark ones with your dad so this one is child's play to him" His deeds in previous game is really crazy.

Yep. I'm still wondering which is good. I also liked this dlc more than the main game.

Why would he use them? If he does he has no more nukes, If a settlement doesnt join him, he can just leave and try it on the next one.

@@rahul-qm9fi i think we'll get our answer in the next metro game if there ever is one and even though Artyom's story is over and depending on what ending of sam's story is canon his story is just beginning

Tom's less likely to use the nukes than the Russian guy you kill at the end of this. Even less so now that he's out of the picture. Hell, he even might reuse the nukes' warheads to powerup a nuclear power plant to revive a whole city.

@@_MaZTeR_ at the same time his sub could be overun by a warmongering faction that ends up using the nukes before we can set up such a power plant.

It did back in 2088

@@kgb1234 it's 2036 so it's before

haha i get the referrence

Hopefully it's a PROPER Frontier.

im pretty sure its nod to the novel Towards the Light . in the novel there is an ekranoplane in Vladivostok

@@Kill4Time255 could you please tell more about this if you can?

@@Kill4Time255 this is likely it, the previous metro game nods to a lot of books and novels.

Ac 130 Angel of death fuck yes

I hope not, sick and tired of these fucking games.

Nuke what though? It's a destroyed world riddled with mutants bandits and small communities

​@@player764nuke the small community then !

he still gets home tho if he blows it up. they show him arriving in san diego just much later with it being all snowy

@@player764I considered the fact that Artyom is already starting a new path to civilization depending on whatever ending you think is the real one, and that I imagine Tom quickly taking it over with the threat of nukes (He did say he was gonna use it more as threats.), besides there is probably more chances of actual civilizations, that have somewhat of a functioning community. In my opinion it is probably best for Sam to blow it up, he even since state he isn’t gonna give up finding a way back home. If there is a working submarine, that means there is probably another way to America with less of the price of allowing nukes to be functional. That’s just my opinion to be honest.

The 7th courier

NCR Soldiers patrolling into walls. Deathclaws disappearing randomly and Ghouls t-posing. Then, The Courier flys by at 356 Mph performing the rocket jump while slowly becoming deformed and says: Welcome to the club, buddy. Sam leaves.

war, war never changes.

Like 245 years too early but alright

San Francisco

I feel like it couldn’t really be called metro at that point though, probably just sams something idk

@@prik9802 they could Call it Subway lmao

Just buy a Fallout game.

Seeing how Sam's Story portrays the American hero in most cheesy over top American action hero way, no way.

that literally fallout

divided? How? I dont understand why would anyone want to blow up the sub considering the Klim was gone and Tom didnt want to use the nukes

That's actually why I think that's so immoral. His dad is dead. It's so improbable that he's still alive that you can say that with a good degree of certainty. He's risking more atrocities on the pipe dream of seeing likely a 70-80 year old man who would've had to have been in the right place at the right time when the bombs fell, in a location where radiation was kept at bay, food/water/medical attention were readily available, and the new leadership wasn't insane or murderously oppressive. He's risking those atrocities in the hopes of seeing a dead man.

​​@@ledumpsterfire6474 but you are forgetting any actual nuclear weapons of today contain tritium a material that decays in 12 years those nukes have gone bad at this point lack of maintenance is also a factor not maintaining nuclear weapons kills the weapon but okay let's say it doesn't use tritium guess what without the electronics you just have a radioactive piece of junk and we'll radiation kills technology

I blew the damn thing up

@@Endlessnutella1 I didn't, what's the point? Even if Tom decided to use nukes he could but, on what? You really think that a single sub with limited range and quite little amount of nukes could really damage whatever is left of the world after thousand of detonations more than said detonations ever did? The worst he could do would be threaten like some coastal villages with less than what? Maybe 10.000 souls? Like walking around the desert with a handful of hand grenades and using them over an ant nest.

yes

I agree having now seen both endings that Sam would have chosen to blow up the sub. However i chose to get Sam home because after all these years in the metro he deserves to get back. Also I like submarines.

@@illliiiiillliii6265 nah Tom is just following what his forefathers did to open up Japan to trade; powerful weapons and a show of force helped open East Asia to the Europeans. They wouldn't actually nuke cities over it, much less his own country

exactly seems to me that the bad ending is the first one hehehe

@@pototokayman considered good ending by the game files

Still far call from CDProjectRed DLC's.

true but very difrent type of games wile i wish the game and dlc were longer this is only a smal studio and qwit frankly day make beter games as big companys like EA and so and wile ther dlc may not be witcher3 like long they are good DLC its not like 1 new wepon but a real story

@@heroruls I agree. That's why i bought the gold edition. On most games i dont even bother with DLC's nowadays.

You MUST be rushing it if you only got 6 hours out of it! I got like double that.

@@ThaSlymes sory to say but I did not try to do it fast but it only took me like 7.5 hours

I'd like to think he was arrested on the sub but not killed, but then without being able to get his ship back to his control knowing that someone might use it for unjust cause he commited suicide. But I guess it's up to player after all

@@yurishakalov6213 theres no arrests in post apocalyptic worlds lol. The captain locked everyone behind a door so you could blow them all up. Kinda fucked up I'm sure they killed him

@@jw3384 Tom told his men to take him alive.

@@cactuslietuva are you sure? I guess I didnt hear it

He probably remained there like how they arranged.

@@jingoinsanity5096 Comrades of Steel, Russianhood of Steel makes no sense.

its not. you have to do certain things to get the option for the "good ending", and thats blowing the sub.

@@TNM001 There is only one good ending for Sam and that is returning home. Anything else is not a good ending. Tom trusts Sam and they are both Americans, they both finally achieve their goals. Everyone else views Sam as a foreigner and there is nobody and nothing that holds him in Russia especially when he travelled on the other side of the continent which clearly means he won't ever meet his old team (with whom he only had professional relations).

He won't be around Sam tho as he will probably go to American soil on his own leaving the sub behind.

@@TheEthereathat last part you said can’t be so far form the truth, did you play metro and did you not hear what he said at the start of the dlc? It wasn’t a professional for him to stay, he stayed because he considered them family and since everyone settled down, everyone decided to do their own thing.

@@gerardocortez135 I recall that he specifically said that Colonel was the person who led him through the hardships of post apocalypse after saving his life, where he would otherwise be killed as an enemy and that was his way to repay Colonel by serving under him until Colonel died. As that journey was over at that point and he could never settle in a land that will forever treat him as an outsider which he mentions a lot of times in main campaign as well, he decides to try his luck and make that journey. Yes they went through a lot with that team but only one person was really important for him.

Tha'ts true. Looks like devs wanted to have some fun - i mean, they can easily name them ending 1/ ending 2. But as some people reported they hadn't have a choice in the end by their playstyle(or just don't paying any attention to Captain asks) and they got automatically ending with going to USA. You see, if it's gonna be "good" ending by default, why would they give players a chance to do something "wrong" and get "bad" ending, doing actually kind things to Captain and helping him? Right, none of them is bad/good or canonical. 4A got some sense of humour.

@xHarux3 that "not bad person" wanted to rob cities, which are close to the sea and his ship got pirate flag. Also that person got nuclear missile to fear everyone who gonna resist and who knows how many people will die if missile would be used once . So is it "good" thing to leave such ship with person on it dooming some usa people to be robbed or even one Day murdered? (May be not by Tom) Are you sure?

@@windywalker4598 Maybe it is not wrong coming from metro 2033 Redux I can say it coud be that him goign back to america is like the dark ones being destroyed in 2033 it is what would be a cnon ending while the alternative ending would be an alternative relaity.

@@windywalker4598 What does happen if yoi dont get the captain's trust? He doesnt give you the detonator so do they search him and find it right before the mutiny?

@@user-sc9oy1kz8g It seems that you will get his trust whatever you do, and in a way you have no way of pissing him off.

go home and let a suspicious guy loose with a submarine and a nuclear warhead just so he can see his 70 year old father whos most likely dead?

I followed the captain

Ahahahahahhahaha.....

That cracked me up🤣🤣🤣

Hahahaha.....mini nuke with explosive gun...🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

😂

That made my sunday, thank you!

Hello Reddit!

I love both studios as well.... and Capcom Dev Team 1! bring on the Resident Evils

Getalt would make fortune in metro universe killing mutants

Eastern Europe is now the "beacon" of proper game development.

oh boy ...cyberbug

Yes bro

And I think that Sam did enough to get retired in San-Diego.

@@Validoleech yes, but not at the cost of innocent lives

@@andygygi5135 Vladivostok either way stays without nuclear reactor, and people on submarine most likely will not die after explosion because they are at least bodyguards of Cat. And his influence on America will stay like it was in Vladivostok, because it's stupid to use warheads against primitivized civilization, as it was stupid to stand against Vladivostok's main source of power.

@@Validoleech Tom has clearly stated he intends to use the nukes to force people to give what he wants. What if they refuse to listen to him?

LoL. Or nuke them

It is an accumulation of 'moral points' from decisions made throughout the game that decides which ending you get. You don't get to choose which when the moment arrives. .

@@profsakharov1191 Yes you do. The main game had moral points but this ending is purely player chosen.

@@Cl0ud5trife Could you give me some idea when the player makes that decision? I went through Sam's Story for the first time yesterday. At no point was I given such a choice. When it came time to take out the remote detonator I wanted to blow the sub. Sadly the game would not let me, and Sam went to America. .

@@profsakharov1191 I finished it two days ago. After the fight with Klim and they ram the sub through the gate and head into the Harbor. Sam is staggering to the edge of the pier like the cutscene but it gave me the option of blowing it or letting it go.

@@Cl0ud5trife Can only think there are things you have to do to be given the choice and I missed one or more of them. The whole thing at the end was cutscene for me, no control at all. That is the one disappointing thing about Exodus and the DLC - far too much time spent with the game taking over and playing your part for you. Still too many invisible walls keeping you out of interesting-looking bits of the maps, too. Though I did get to visit a part of Novosibirsk, in Exodus, that is usually out of bounds - a Blind One caught me just right and knocked me right off the building. I barely survived the fall, landed in a snowy street and, while looking for a way back in, found the Colonel in the vehicle waiting just around the corner to come and scrape me up later. There was no way back in other than reloading. The next installment should be pretty good. If Artyom is going to bring the Moscow Metro masses to Lake Baikal he is going to need more help than his seven squad members, so we're probably going to see the return of the Dark Ones. And Artyom still has a score to settle with Hanza - he didn't kill nearly enough of them, during the escape from Moscow, to pay them back for trying to kill him and Anna and keeping their dirty secrets. .

what an idiot

@@namename-tr8il God damn, you always this friendly?

Same bro

Morro imagine being stuck in Russia's far east coast and your only way to get home is to side with this guy. I mean even if you stuck here (in Russia) without nuclear war, mutants etc. you'll still do this, believe me

@@LaserTractor Lol maybe, but just thinking about Sam's history with the Spartans and how easily he could have just been killed for being a US foreigner who was also a Marine, and the hate people might harbor towards him for this. Instead they just treated him like family.

Morro russian people are hard to deal with. That's what i can say from my 23 years experience. You'll never know will a stranger be kind to you if you're in a bad situation, but I think 40-50% will be nice. Other 50% are so blinded with our tv propaganda that when they hear "americans" they will most likely react like bandits in Metro in "we can use him, then rob him, haha stuped omerecan" way (Bandits and their interactions in metro are somewhat cringe but you get the point). I guess Sam was just lucky to find good company.

@@LaserTractor Fair enough, I mean I grew up in Florida, and that's kind of like Metro except without the snow.

@@LaserTractor same goes for the Russians themselves, lol.

Unless you hit right on most of the 'moral points' that are tied to decisions you make throughout the game you don't get to choose the ending. It is chosen by the game based on your 'moral points' score. .

@@profsakharov1191 Stop spreading misinformation, you literally can choose the ending, this is the one case where you can choose the ending.

@@hugoperez2993 Tell that to my game which did choose the ending. What possible mileage could I get from 'spreading misinformation'? If it hadn't happened to me I would have had absolutely no reason for saying it had. So stop making wild accusations when you have no original knowledge of the matter yourself. .

@@hugoperez2993 It's like the earlier metro games. If you have a really low moral score the game doesn't really let you choose. It's not misinformation at all. You need a decent enough moral score to choose at the end. If you play as a bad guy who kills everything that's when you get those types of ending

@@is0latedplays453 the games before are based solely off your actions over the course of the game, with no choice at all coming at the end. This DLC does not take into account what you do. You automatically get the choice.

Yeah definitely. But it is highly possible that nobody had the knowledge about the nukes. Both Tom and Klim just cared about having it, while Klim wanted to use it as a show of force, Tom was only interested in using it as a force multiplier, as you said. The Captain however, is another story. He should've known about the nukes', considering he was the captain of the sub. Probably an oversight from the devs. Still, it makes total sense that the Captain distrusts Tom, considering his business like attitude, and the fact that they had hostilities before.

I' have picked go home 20 years in the tunnels and 1.5 years on the road 1 chance to get a first class ticked home after all the shit he went through to see his dad yeah I would side with Tom atleast he has a vision for the future

Hydrogen bombs use lithium-6 deuteride. Last time I checked, both deuterium and lithium-6 are stable isotopes, meaning they will never go bad. Now, the plutonium-239 in the fission primary (thermonuclear weapons use a fission bomb to produce the temperatures and pressures needed for fusion) is unstable, but has a half life in excess of 24,000 years. The aluminum the missile is made out of would corrode away before the Pu decayed off. So, assuming they could somehow bypass any safeing mechanisms, those were still viable weapons.

@@ryanpayne9119 Tritium boosting (more correctly deuterium-tritium boosting) is a technique for increasing aspects of the efficiency of fission devices. It is not a full fusion reaction, although a tritium-boosted fission Primary will be more effective in initiating a fusion Secondary. While boosting itself produces only a slight additional amount of blast, it has a major effect on the neutrons produced by the Primary, and indeed may increase explosive yield of other parts of the Primary. When it became apparent that the more neutrons became available from the first fission, however, the idea arose that injecting a small amount of tritium into the fission Primary would not appreciably increase the explosive yield but would greatly increase both the number and speed of neutrons. Tritium boosting has a number of significant technical and military advantages, which explain why it is used in essentially all modern militarized nuclear weapons, including in the UK, US, Russia, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea.These advantages comprise: high efficiency with relatively low compression and thin reflector/tamper; low weight and small size; intrinsic safety capability (zero or negligible yield when the tritium is not in the weapon Tritium is a radioactive isotope with a half-life of 12.355 years. Its main decay product is Helium-3, which is among the nuclides with the largest cross-section for neutron capture. Therefore, periodically the weapon must have its helium waste flushed out and its tritium supply recharged. This is because any helium-3 in the weapon's tritium supply would act as a poison during the weapon's detonation, absorbing neutrons meant to collide with the nuclei of its fission fuel. Thus, any modern thermonuclear weapon, if left un-maintained, will become unusable after about 12 years. Attempting to detonate the fission Primary on the weapon would result in a sub-nuclear explosion, and would fail to initiate the necessary first stages of fusion. You'd get a bigger explosion from a thermobaric weapon or even a large conventional bomb.

Tbh, why would Tom use the nuclear bomb in the first place? There really isn’t any reason to, considering the submarine and soldiers he has is more than enough to show authority to other coastal settlements. Sam even says this during the US ending that there would be no way another nuclear war would kill the world considering the world is already dead. Also, blowing up the submarine could also be destroying one of the last methods of intercontinental travel, which would be a big part in restoring civilisation.

16 times the detail

I rather a Sequel, I want to see Sam’s adventure in the US. He is finally home but now he has to find his family. No doubt there will be plenty of obstacles along the way.

A small dlc, I don't need more than two hours of Sam leaving Tom and finally getting at his home in San Diego and see his father again. Maybe use the moral system of the game to decide if you find his father alive or death.

Sam apparently didn't give a shit about nuking the Dark Ones.

@@fnhatic6694 because the dark ones were alien like creatures that made everyone (except Artyon) who went even near one of them insane, and we're making the metro population kill each other ? They were clearly a treat and at the time no one knew the dark ones were sentient, also they didn't nuke the dark ones, if they did Artyon would've been killed, he was so close to the explosion

Ho is it good ending blowing a sub full of the good guys? If klim got the sub yes that would be the good ending but with him gone? Why?

Two years late but, Klim mentions that the sub would be better in his hands because he already has a few targets and would actually use it, and he said that Tom is only going to use it to scare hostiles away, he said that when he backstabbed him, so it's clear that not blowing it up is the good ending

@@ShoaibKurdi But even so, they are nuclear weapons, their crew is not trustworthy and these weapons are so destructive that in the hands of pirates they would be a danger.

Sam homecoming.

And then we change his name is Sam Bridges

Either that or Artyom saves the people from the metro

he is already at home. i got the good ending bad boy

@@ibrata3389 we get it you beat the game you don't gotta say three time.

Yes. I'm kinda sad now too. Next day I don't blow up.

-Sam can find another way to get home

The Bad ending is that Sam Blows up the Sub for whatever reason.

@@chocolat-kun8689 No, the game files reveal that one is called the ''good'' ending... because even though it's not ideal for Sam, it's generally worse to leave nukes in the hands of someone who literally said "just drop anchor in view of any settlement, open our missile ports, and they will readily give us everything..." That's something a bandit/ tyrant would do. He even uses a pirate flag and blows up a ship on the way.

-Sam still can back to America later,the submarine is not the only choice,Sam didn't even expect to see a submarine in this world, so there's always another way to go back home

What about a metro french edition? Something about what happened in France when the nuclear bomb ravaged the city.

@Peter Mamaev but American subway already got infested, even before the war. Very little chance for human survival.

@@TheREALHugo4 yeah, French had immigration & protest in problem, that troubles itself would bring apocalypse to the society, long before the nuclear war.

@@rizkinadakonveksi8092 And it would be a great idea to make a metro game based on that part of the story.

@@TheREALHugo4 yes, new metro universe, Artyom would go as far as Paris & Berlin! Or maybe the 3rd nuke war which will finally put an end to human civilization (I know that's too much)!

hell yeah he is

and spike from cowboy bebop

Yeah he is

Yup, Steve Blum. Dude is amazing.

@@SilencedHalo is that sub zero?

I knew it.

AKA Tank Dampsy

Jack bartlett for you ace combat homies

Man i was positive, but never checked the name!

Stewart Casey I agree. That shit would be so much better than Fallout.

@@jakebooth658 I think they should since Artyum's story is pretty much over ,and this dlc might be a hint of a spin off

@@guts7958 Agreed, it can forge it's own storyline considering it's never said he found his father. Being the United States, this would allow for all new creatures, weapons and difficulties to exist. Sam might find out his father moved more inland than SF and has to trek across the US a bit. This would allow the US citizens/military remnants to tell their side of what happened. Plus...many of us want to see how America looks after the bombs.

@@pessimismwithsaltforflavor9141 I really feel like that's what they are setting this dlc for a spin off game set in america, but Sam probably wouldn't be the main character, he'd play a part in it I'm sure, but even so we won't see that game for a few more years lol

As much as id love a metro game set in America i feel they should rename it to something else since the Metro franchise is id say Russian

Alex Wycc I kinda have a question, why can’t he go back home AND THEN blow up the sub, it’s not like Tom’s henchman are smart enough to find it.

@@wolfheardt4169 Good point, another question is: why didn't the Captain just take his launch key (before his ship was taken over by Tom) and stash it somewhere? No need to destroy the sub since nuclear launches need two keys turned essentially simultaneously to authorize the launch.

@@wolfheardt4169 bro why would he destroy the sub after reaching home it would be like using a bicycle and then blowing it it prevent others to use it

Rajani Singh well, he is not a pirate, he has a clear conscience and moral ground, he served under Melnik, protected Moscow metro for 20 years and was a good guy, now tell me, bro, why in the hell person like that would let a dangerous people obtain and use nukes to be pirates and bandits?

stryker214 true as well, could be that he did hide them, but took them back when he tried stealthily leave with his crew before Tom took over. Or maybe Metro exodus just has ALOT of plot joke throughout its campaigns and DLCs XD

Would be another war after the one Minutemen tried to give the Russians 1000 side quests for Minutemen settlements

"It's not the only nuclear submarine in the world" and " do something so stupid especially he is soo much of a peaceful character". Those two sentences together can explain how a nuclear war start. Its like going around carrying a gun. Why wouldn't you want to use it at least once if you think it's worthy ? Also, what is stopping him from using it, aside from his moral compass, which could spin around wildly in a post apocaliptic world where no one really have the autority to stop him ? Also if you read the first metro 2033 it clearly stated that most of the surviving sub went crazy and started raiding/launching nukes on former enemy objectives/ failed to keep an jncredibli complex mechanism like a nuclear sub afloat in a nice environment such as the post nuclear apocalypse.

SCP 096 I think just like Sam says, you are thinking about this too negatively, first off Tom is a diplomat, he uses fear and control so that he doesn't use violence, exact same fucking thing that any country uses so that you don't break the law, and also I don't think that Tom's plans to rebuild civilization include any further nuking, just my take on it

@SCP 096 i agree with the first part, but not with the second. He sell gun ( formerly ) so he trives on conflict. Also going around for all the pacific seems an awful and a time consuming idea.

@SCP 096 yeah but toK is always the guy who would want other options the nuclear one might be a last option left but still who would fire him no one

@@blackjack8296 "Its like going around carrying a gun. Why wouldn't you want to use it at least once if you think it's worthy ?" That says more about you than about people who carry guns. It's a tool. An inanimate object. A tool that responsible people use to protect themselves and others. Also there are other ways to use a gun than shooting a person. Competition or training.

So you have no common sense ok

@@podroznikzpustkowi4805 the world ended in nuclear war, and you try to rebuild it with nuclear weapons power lead by a man that wasn't chosen by the people. Your "common sense" is wonderful!

@@JaySilva88 that's how it works in the apocalypse scenario, strong rule when weak are being ruled, there is nothing wrong in what Tom is trying to achieve

What if they do rebuild civilization though? Even if they did by threat of force, is that so much worse than destroying a submarine full of people that have yet to do anything wrong?

But Tom said he won't use the nukes. Besides Sam is in the sub so I think he won't let Sam do that.

And thats why sams story is the best dlc in the entire metro franchise

I know right

Shit he should of been the voice of Marcus feinx son in the new gears of war games it really sucks those sequels failed and that Steve Blum was never casted.

his name was ed not ted idiot

Well what I want to know is why people assume exodus takes place 5-6 years after last light. I mean the game is based of 2035 and last light took place in 2034 while the 2034 book artyom(not 2033 or 2035 artyom) was doing his shit. And since it is based on 2035 that means that it must take place somewhere in 2034-2035 so let's just say 2033's story since in Artyom's time only lasted a week and a few days and was in winter then it must have been early in the year 2033 for it to still be winter. Then a year later last light takes place and it's still winter so possibly the beginning of the year 2034 and the exodus starts out in winter. Late 2034 maybe and ends in winter(at least for when you control artyom) so possibly late 2035 and the epilogue is 2036's spring. Thus making Artyoms full journey take 3 years to pass. Making him 22-24 remember he was an infant when the books fell so he cant be older then that. He was 20 in 2033, 21 in LL and possibly 22 in exodus. But if he was 1-2 which is considered a toddler he'd be 21 or 22 in 2033 but its literally said that he had just turned 20 so hes around 22 years old. And now let's take into account Anna. They both fell in love with eachother during Last light and got married in between LL and Exodus which they wouldn't need to date or be engaged first because in Metro you could die at any time cause of the dangers. So there is my theory

Think Tom is really going to use nukes that probably don't work anymore anyway to destroy some boats or some tiny towns besides Tom is American I don't think he wants to nuke his own people.

@@WouldYouKindlyGWAR Could be! This is why I think the ending(s) are all awesome and makes us ponder on what to actually do ^_^ Now this is good writing in a Story and Video Game ^_^ PS: Thank you for the reply, much appreciated!

I heard shoots at the end, maybe they will bring us a new dlc in the next Metro.

Hit me right in the anus :'(

choosing to side with tom(maybe it isnt a choice sam would make) is a better option in my opinion. even though sam was said to be a brutal leader in terms of his treatment with those who wouldnt cooperate with him, he was still praised or atleast forgiven by the people of vladivostock as you hear them in some conversations talking about how even though hes harsh, he still brought order and greater levels of cooperation to the city. yeah maybe tom might use a nuke or two(which is unlikely considering how klim turned against him because he didnt want to really use any nukes), siding with tom still gives humanity, or atleast some parts of the earth a chance to rebuild society through greater levels of order and cooperation brought by tom. after hearing about how unbelievably harsh and chaotic vladivostock was(like the rest of USSR and probably USA plus europe too) before tom arrived while hearing some of the inhabitants talking, id say tom did a pretty good job at bringing order and cooperation to the city which looked impossible considering the odds. just my take on the matter

Potato Aim I wanna know too I’ve looked everywhere but nothing I really want it so bad

Yawn... People still making Detroit jokes in 2020

I'm just happy the developers captured what Cali actually looks like

@@irlplugg7391 Wich is even more sad the older we get. Wonder if in 50 years Detroit will still be the rat hole that is is compared to other places.

@@sirweebs2914 Maybe, maybe not... Still doing better than most states, like backwater ass Alabama and Virginia.

@@irlplugg7391 No it defenetly is not doing better then those places. Its insane to even say something ridiculous like that.

Disagree, it goes against the character of Sam and everything he fought for with the Spartan Order. They can always find another way. Vladivostok is not that far from Alaska, and from there he can make his way to CA along the coast or through Canada or something.

@@hugoperez2993 it makes no sense lore wise but business wise it makes a lot of sense, easy set up for another metro without Arytom or just a spin off

@@phillynation2906I don't buy it because they could always find another way to America. I'm certain at some point some sort of spinoff would come out, but the game is still very successful where it is right now in Russia.

@@hugoperez2993 ik, I’m just saying, you gotta look at it both ways

I agree. It's different enough to feel fresh but they can keep the gameplay and story components we love. No need to stay in Russia for a fourth game. They could also tie in Tom and create more morally gray situations with the nuke. Personally, I blew up the sub but I can see that NOT being the canon ending.

The only issue that is the MAD theory doesn’t apply here. During the Cold War, Russia didn’t nuke the US because if they did, the US would have nuked Russia, and vice versa. In this case, what is preventing Tom from using the warheads? He has all the power.

@@andygygi5135 Pretty sure MAD is still in effect and will always be from now on.

@@thepsychocat7911 How? It isn’t mutually assured destruction. Tom would not be destroyed no matter what. Only the people without the nukes.