If he was innocent why didn’t he wait for the police to get there instead of attack a man with a gun? Arbery could have kept “jogging” instead he tried to take a gun away from a person trying to make a legal citizens arrest. What do you think would have happened if he didn’t try to take the gun? I don’t think he would have been shot. Travis mcMichaels didn’t fire until after he was attacked.
Yup, he was a known burglar and yet people are buying the narrative that he was just out there jogging. Your typical mainstream "blaques can do no wrong" b.s.
@@_whatnext_9319 Ahmaud Arbery was not a "known burglar." He was caught shoplifting, once. He was out jogging, look at his clothes compared to the McMichaels' clothes. The defense is not disputing that he was out jogging, BTW.
There has been no evidence presented at the trial that he was out jogging. The evidence presented at the trial even in the prosecutors case in chief I’ll suggest that he’s running from the home once again. Whenever your thoughts on the defendants, quit reporting incorrect facts.
Fortunately for the Arbery family. They don't need to prove Ahmad was out jogging. The only evidence that matters is the evidence of Ahmad committing a crime...and there is none.
@@jerometruitt2731 yes there is; he was acting suspicious and trespassing, they had 100% probable cause to follow him: not a crime. He dead for grabbing the gun. Good.
There were several witnesses that said he was jogging and he actually jogs around there often. Some even had videos. besides jogging or not is irrelevant.
@@jesuschatline5820 Running from the house he broke into, you mean? I am a runner, not a jogger, but my running never involves me going into other people's homes without permission, and I have never even thought of doing such a thing. Imagine that.
@@nealm6764 It wasn't someone's home. It was a building that was under construction. And if you watched the trial, you'd have seen that other people entered the site to check it out as well. Arbery didn't leave with anything, making it a pretty poor attempt at stealing. And even if he DID break into someone's actual home, and actually stole things, these self-important, gun toting vigilantes had no business stopping him in the street and threatening him with a gun.
Don't attack a man with a gun, unless you want to catch a bullet. Don't break into other people's homes if you don't want to get "chased down and confronted". Simple rules to live by. Not guilty.
Kyle was NOT a shooter! Was found “not guilty” of having no regard for human life. A shooter would not have had any regard for human life! So maybe refer to this trial as “The self defence case of Kyle Rittenhouse!” Js
He attacked a man and tried to take his gun away. What do you think he would have done once he had the gun? You only need to look at statistics to figure that out.
@@taylorbug9 because they attempted to police their community from a habitual thief after the cops proved to be completely useless themselves. If you read actual fact instead of hyperbole you’d realize Arbery only get shot after Arbery attacked them and attempted to grab the gun from them.
