Migration path of Y-chromosome Adam 

Thank you so much for your great comment. I also read about Homo sapiens found in Morocco. As you said, the timeline for the birth of Homo sapiens seems to have to be advanced. However, no clear link was found regarding the migration of Homo sapiens. So I made a video based on the existing theory. And I am well aware of the multi-regional origins of modern humans. However, I have adopted this theory because the historical analysis is a little more scientific. Please understand.

@@geonomad1 No, I loved your video. I was just pointing out how fast things change in this field. Keep up the good work.

@@worndown8280 Thank you. I will.

Thank you for your comment. I felt exactly as you did when I saw video on biological Eve. Theories need to be changed along with new evidence and if one is to make video on ancient human movements such new found should be at least mentioned.

@@mikiohirata9627 Id like to say, I dont care IF this "Eve" came from the Rift area or south Africa or Asia or from aliens. It doesnt really matter to me. I just dislike scientific hypothesis often taught as fact. And this is by no means a dig at this videos creator. Science should be ok with saying, we dont have the data. We dont know. It encourages investigation. But instead, we stifle it. Its only once the old group dies that a new group can come in to take its place that change in ideas occur. That sounds more like a cult than science. But I know my view on that is probably in the extreme.

I hope you never stop learning. Thank you for making this world a more beautiful place with your positivity

sorry. For now, I've chosen the best option. Someday I believe I will be able to improve.

@@geonomad1 well text to speech is a big turnoff for many people, I have shared the vid with a few friends but none of them got through it because of the uncanny valley of the t2s. I get that there can be issues with using your own voice and the difficulties it brings, but I think your reach would be much higher

Welcome to the future

@@Panteni87 how do you explain how the aboriginal Australia got to Australia 40 000 years ago

@@brandonsuavekilla2612 Lower sea levels and canoos, what's your point?

👍👍👍👍👍👌

No , it is just the starting place of human genome . No much connection with civilizations which developed elsewhere , with people which were no longer africans . Not even the creators of egyptean civilization were of african origin .

@@TheLionFarm Who is we ? Are those humans still alive , or you are totally dumb ?

@@seaman5705 Everything in africa until invaded was african by definition. Egypt has a clear documented history of when it became ruled by non africans. But it existed far before that and influenced the nations around it to a large degree.

@@LoneWolf-rg8gz Wrong - people of Egypt and their rulers are a clear example of back to Africa , like all North Africa by the way .The talk was about Africa being the mother of civilization , which is crap . Something is to bring knowledge and civilization from elsewhere in Africa and other if it has developed in Africa. But it didn't and the humans migrated out of Africa and advanced on other places and builded those civilizations there . Some returned and brought knowledge with them .

Thank you for understanding

Congolese verbal history also seems to coincide neatly with the patterns of Bantu migration into the Congolian forests

People are finally beginning to trust the reliability of oral history vs that of written. To preserve oral history takes a unbelievable amount of memory, focus and dedication. No wonder they had particular people responsible for the caretaking of such knowledge. I say this not to put down the written word developed thousands of years later, but to stress the validity and importance of oral history as well.

Thank you.

Thank you.

I’d like to see the same thing as well.

Thanks

@@geonomad1 please make a video on Y-DNA: J-M304 (Arabid)

@@kevinpople7828 I will. I am going to make One by One.

@@geonomad1 Welp that will keep you busy for a few decades and with new discovery of subclades...maybe forever

@@vuchaser99 LOL. It takes a lot of time to organize data and display it on a map. thank you.

That's it. There may be more traces of humanity under the sea.

@@geonomad1 of course there is. Sea levels rose 400'. that wiped out all coastal settlements

@@stankfaust814 The inverse is also true. There are a number of coastal cities that are now miles inland. I read somewhere that there is an underwater city ruins off the West Coast of Cuba.

that little grrrr reminded me of Dragon clan sensibilities and I had to look up your name, Ken. Of course you know Ken refers to Kennite or Cainite origin if it wasn't a new-age accidental association that were so common in the 80's. Greets from my Stuart side, ten minutes and we could find out much. My daughter by a Scottish wife has DNA of 6% unknown origin; I wuz blaming the Nephilim King progenitor of the Gaels and the Stuarts' Magdalenian leanings. Get this: Lookup "the Skull of Lord Darnley" in the British Medical Journal and do you think that backhead even has the right sutures? Not bad length for a relative in the mid 1500's, wot? Darn good thing he wasn't the real father of James; James was found walled up in Edinburgh castle with the letter J embroidered on one of Mary's kerchiefs laid across the wee corpse. James was an imposter; they didn't get a real Stuart on the throne of England out of Mary, IMO. Yeah, the hiding Followers of Horus tribes may be some of the lost tribes more than Jewish tribes; the lost Book of King og depicts everyone as ascensionists, and the Kolbrin Bible of the lost tribes clearly depicts an ascension ceremony that certainly wouldn't pass first edit today for a hiding Jew tribe... good day Ken

Thank you.

Are you from Morocco or Egypt or Iberia?

Not possible, only modem white Arabs, white Europeans and all other albinoid have neanderthal.

@@maragolihistory2118 I'm talking about the West African archaic called Iwo Eleru

​@nomaddiaries9790 How can you be so sure about _Iwo Eleru?_ It's just one fossil whose history is shrouded in mystery. Also, when you say that the people of Y-Haplogroup A replaced the archaic population of _Iwo Eleru,_ do you mean that they interbred with them or destroyed them via warfare?

@@SaintFortthe pygmy and twa used to live in central Africa even as far up as Sudan, they were pushed by as fact as southern Western Africa into the more tropical areas. They were basically hunted there is evidence of little inter marriage.

I just started this channel. I will try to reach 1 million subscribers.

@@geonomad1 you will

@@janet7740 Yes I will. Thank You.

Thank you!

It is currently being prepared.

Brother! I’m a R1a from Delhi. Hope you’re having a good life :)

Genetic analysis of ancient people tells us so.

True

DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history

DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history

Thank you

My robot misread 3km. I will train my robot further. 😊😊😊

@@geonomad1You sure you didn’t write “3000km” in the script when you meant to write “3000m”? 😉

That's an interesting story.

This is really interesting

Those Hindu texts were mostly created around 1200-1400 CE. Nothing but imaginary stories without any archeological and scientific proofs/evidences. Even not much details and decoding of Indus velly civilization which spanned from almost near Central Asia (Afghanistan) to most modern discovery (2018) in southern Indian state of Tamilnadu. In India there was no knowledge of even King Asoka and language of that time. Most history of India earlier than 5 - 7 centuary CE, including Indus velly civilization, Asoka stone scriptures(1836) even his name( at Maski stone 1915), various travels of foreigners to India are mostly discovered by Britishers and some others. There is less scientific temper (less willing to uncover truth) but mostly distort findings to help false propaganda. I wish IVC language gets deciphered and actual origin of those people & span of IVC discovered.

yes it's also mentioned mostly men died in the war , and polygamy was prevelant back then , men who were left got to spread their dna much more , i just imagine you died in a war to be a hero only for your dna to be completely erased from the face of the planet leaving no trace of you behind , while an clumsy dude who hid in a cave got all the women and spread his dna , doesn't matter who won both sides would have suffered huge genetic loses , i believe the cowardly ones who hid and refused to fight for some glory actually got more lucky

Thanks.

The bible proves that the black people in western, central, south are are the biblical 12 tribes of the isreal. You need to do your research before talking. The ancient city of Atlantis was in Africa. In the Sahara desert. The Sahara desert was a lush Greenland back then. The biblical Egyptians ancient we're black people. The bible proves that the blacks in Africa are descendants of Adam.

The Amurru/Amorites of the Tarim Basin and Altai are credited for bringing civilization and commencing agriculture in those areas....then the PNW and Northern America...big ruined culture on both sides of the Bering, dikes, harbours and all still there... ...somebody was telling me the difference between ancient Saks and Sachs coz I got the spelling wrong but these are early Scythians, glowing ones....caucasus origin Moors is what they are, much like AKA Indian Mauryans; the'd be kin Aryans, with the red hair maybe even Cainite Aryans....

@@DrCorvid This sounds like mythology, recent research on ancient Tocharians showed that their closest relatives were neolithic southwest Siberians

@@samuelfanning6598 if you mean the Tarim Basin Amorites are the southwest Siberians yes, their Ket language from there and Altai is the root of the Na-Dene/Athapaska, Navajo and Apache language and the Minoan warm age climate for that huge civilization AND the sea level for the dikes we can still see are good for 1200 or so BC to 563 AD. But yeah Minoan warm age and the oral history recorded the invasion as more of a migration and assimilation with a superior culture. Superior? Yeah it looks like ruined cities farms and harbours to me.

It concerns me that the Biden Fraud's gonna allow mutilation of a sizeable ruined culture before we get to study. He's getting drilling started in the right place as if he need it to be right there.

@@DrCorvid That doesn’t check out. Amorites are a semitic people from the Bronze age, Kets are a Yenisean speaking people with dominant haplogroup Q, Na Dene’s dominant Y haplogroup is C and Minoans is J2 or E3b. Tocharians of the Tarim basin were mainly an offshoot of R1b.

생각하는 능력이 다른 호미닌과 차별되는 특징이지요.

I don't think Ethiopian knew or still know how to fish fish , like sea food is mostly asian thing , yes the horners traded , but I don't think it was seafood it's other stuff , like gold , ivory n stuff

@@rediettadesse2828 The migrating Ethiopians learned sailing and fishing, two of important survival strategy that brought them to the Americas and Australia.

The bible proves that the black people in western, central, south are are the biblical 12 tribes of the isreal. You need to do your research before talking. The ancient city of Atlantis was in Africa. In the Sahara desert. The Sahara desert was a lush Greenland back then. The biblical Egyptians ancient we're black people. The bible proves that the blacks in Africa are descendants of Adam.

It an irony to see Africa claim everything in here South east Asia 😂😂😂😂

Africa is the most genetically diverse continent

We are diversed. Even you Kikuyu and us Luhya are not the same. But Europeans will call us "Bantus" because he is dump.

I don't know about rats, but I think cows have something to do with the spread of agriculture. Cows were first domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, the study says. It may have spread to India with the spread of agriculture.

@@geonomad1 I'm not talking about taurine cattle, but zebu cattle!

@@TropicOfCancer1998 As far as I know, the taurine cattle were also domesticated in the Near East. The ancestors of taurine cattle are known as aurochs.

Wrath and wisdom The CAT immigrated from Af' icqa through Egypt and has conquered the whole world. The route of immigration goes straight forward from Italy to the British isles and then across to east and west. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 1970 ?

​@@TropicOfCancer1998 Yes! Indian Zebu cattle ( Indigenous to India ) are considered to be migrated to Africa from India at least before 2000BCE which shows India's influence in Africa and the cross-culture we see today in Africa having so much resemblance to India is astonishing.

👍👍👍

Perhaps they descended from time travelers who went back 34 to 40 million years ago, them there descendents time traveled back to the last 34-40 THOUSAND years ago. 😉

@@mumblesbadly7708 nice theory

Sorry. It is 3 km(3000m). I really apologize my mistake.

@@geonomad1 Thanks great video by the way ! I have just looked it up and, i need to revised my info has well, Groenland ice sheet is on average 1 500 metrers, almost 2000 at is thickest. Thanks again for your timely answer.

Thanks alot. I will do check the video again before uploading.

Interesting. I would like to know more about the story when I write an episode of that period later.

the battle of mahabharata coincidentally clashes with the actual historical battle of ten kings look it up

@@random_shit_online6104 battle of ten kings took place long before Mahabharat. Mahabharat war almost every kingdom was present and huge devastation happened. And only Kshatriya men fought in the war.

@@bapparawal2457 I feel that the battle of ten kings is mahabharata

This is 200000 years ago

Please understand that the dots on the map indicate only the genetic analysis of ancient human remains.

Homo sapiens were like monkeys you expect them to travel military base coastline 🤭😂 its even surprising they moved

Majority of eastern and central africa move from Western african particullarly niger river basin today Nigeria

Thank you.

Thank you.

The Tutsi of Rwanda have over 60% E1b1a, some 20% are B, some have E1b1b but not as much as expected. Your maternal haplogroup is very common in the Horn of Africa, especially Ethiopia. I think men with E1b1a conquered people who were mostly Cushitic (E1b1b) and also some hunter-gatherers (B) and assimilated some of the men while taking wives of the conquered peoples. Or maybe no conquering was done at all, and it was a peaceful assimilation. I myself am E1b1a1 (E-Z6010) and my paternal lineage is from the Fulbe/Fulani people of Gambia. My maternal lineage L1c comes from Congo-Kinshasa in Central Africa, which it is mostly among the BAka and BaKola Pygmies.

@@themostwise1 be blessed keep telling us more I will share this

@@themostwise1 fulbe,fulani look like tutsis and are cattle herders like us

@@aleksej6623 Awesome, your haplogroup is the descendants of the first European farmers and civilization builders, they likely came through Egypt and the Levant first. The First Greeks and Romans had overwhelmingly haplogroup E-V13, as well as many of the Spartans and Southern European dynasties. They say Alexander the Great had this haplogroup too.

Wow! I did not know this information. Modern humans have arrived on the American continent very early. Let's find the thesis and read it. thank you.

Very interessting, the plausible theorie to the arrival of mankind in America is to me, that a group of boat going people may have migrated to the america folowing the pacific coast line setteling on the many fjior and island now underwater, and grinded by the receding ice ≈15 kya. But at the moment, the discovery of Prof. Goodyear is still debated, some say it could be the remain of a wild fire. Anyhow many evidence point out that our species arrived in America earlier than previously thought. Its also a bit farfetch to infer that a large group of people could have traveled between montain and glacier for thoulsand of km What kind of food could they go for along the way, no flor, no fauna on a receding glacier only trecherous moraine and cliff. The water separation line (east-west) is quite inland in canada, I wonder how long it took for the flor to grow back strong enough to sustain animal life and then sustaining hordes of hungry homosapien in a rocky cold coridor inland where ground is around 1100M altitude after 2 millions years of laurentien ice grinding on. Also its a fact now, most of the deglaciation occurred from 11,600 - 9,000 years ago and the oldest human remain found in United state that in not debated, 100%for sure, is around 13 000 years old, story dosent hold up, to bad most of all that ancestral top soil on the coast has been scrapped out. I dont think its a sretch by any means to think that some sapian at that time (50 000 YA) where capable of moderate naval prowess, when we think that homo erectus has colonise flores island thus Homoflorensis, crossing 20 km of ocean at the time to reach it, meaning at on point when crossing they could not see land in any direction, 800 000 year ago.

May I add also that still today human living on ice shelf or polar region do so only by the water, for food reason of course.

@@marcoguerro9975 I think in 2022: the view is they were in North America 30,000 years ago. ""First Americans may have arrived to the continent 30,000 years ago"

@@marcoguerro9975 Not totally true. People live in Antarctica all year round and many away from the ocean. But you have a good point. Humans were just as smart, resilient, creative 30,000 as they are today. Of course humans can cross continent wide glaciers (if they wanted). Or land or thousands of miles of oceans. Because we are smart. I mean there are may ways, but they could store food and then move further and store food and move further and store food etc. Nothing can stop humans (at least on Planet Earth''s surface) from exploring it.

According to the results of Genom research so far, yes.

Yep, R is mongoloid haplogroup(Hallast, 2020) and ANE was around 38-47% eastern Eurosian autosomally according to the research of Wong(2017). Real western Eurosian haplogroups are C and GHIJ.

The oldest P sofar is from Yana RHS and the oldest R from Near Lake Baikal in Southern Siberia. The oldest Y-DNA Haplogroup K in Western Siberia, Ust Ishim. So my guess is Somewhere between Eastern Siberia and the Ural Mountains.

@@vedranpostek2394 And yet you see K2a at Oase in Romania around 35 000 years ago....Mmm...So no I don't think you can really equate all descendants of Haplogroup K with Mongoloid or any other distinct Modern features. Maybe if you mixed up some Polynesians, Australian Aborigines, Native Americans and Uralic peoples you might get some idea how they could have looked like but that is also a long shot....

@@vedranpostek2394 Some modelled Ust Ishim Man found in Western Siberia with Y-DNA Haplogroup K2a* (Basically the Cousin of Haplogroups NO) as looking like an Australian Aborigine. So...

That's nonsense there is no evidence of that, put racist belief aside when you learning human history or you won't learn DUMBO!

@@jjnelson3232 ahhh familytreedna haplogroup cm130, located in sundaland sorry, youre the Dumbo boy go do your homework and thank me later

@@jjnelson3232 you do your homework or what?

I think it is still too early for modern science to know the exact time date. But there is no other alternative.

@@geonomad1 You're spreading false information if you realize it ? None of these archeological evidences are mentioned or totally dismissed according to your theory.

Yes he should stop using false narrative ,we are tired of them .

If we consider that every human wasn’t first a dark skinned variety, the point of the migrations mentioned at 4:33 does not show. When did these people change from an African Lloyd appearance to the variations of racial features. We have today in modern humans. Also, many types of people because of our single specie, can mate, and reproduce very similarly to how modern dogs from a Chihuahua to a great Dane represents a single species of animal. Mini of the later racial types of humans likely blended together with those aboriginal dark skin, phenotypes and produce the variations. We see on earth today from the nearly identical, looking black skinned people throughout south Asia to the now extinct dark skin Australian-Black Sea dark skin, humans that wants populated throughout, Russia, the Picts and Danes who were the first human types throughout Europe, and were likely the actual representatives that fueled many of the legends of giants, dwarves, elves, and such. And science tends to prove this, by looking at the old is human remains, and judging from their skull types, fit this appearance of the earliest humans found on any continent in a fetal, typical sense, looking identical to the archaic Africoid phenotypes while also being true that their DNA could be totally different as traced through the branches that emerged out of African continent in both in the mitochondria Eve, and the Y chromosome atom

6:44 the only particular problem of extrapolating this genetic data with imagined migration patterns is assumptive at best. Many of these studies are based on trying to match how current humanity got to the places where they appear today and ignores both tradition, as well as other archaeological evidence is. Also, it tends to make the mistake that most modern scientist make and trying to fit into a western religious box as well as ignore the fact that many of these people look the way they do not do being unique human types but through human mixtures. It avoids the question that some of the groups that left out of Africa likely looked indistinguishable from the Parenteau genetic group, and it allows for the viewer who isn’t asking these questions to assume that somehow the human populations evolved to their current appearances, without addressing any mechanisms of how they converted from the black skin African time to the visual racial types we have today.

I don’t understand how people are so shocked by how many different physical features people have meanwhile we need our dogs, horse and cats in a small fraction of that time to types you could almost never imagine until you see them. Apparently our species is very malleable like just like other domestic species! Is means nothing in terms of being more or less human or even the realness of race which is a made up concept.

R1 is probably of European origin.

​@@geonomad1no kid r1a is indian originated gene and his ancestor is haplogroup f which also have origin in india

I think there's a lot of potential for that.

This would show up in modern humans genetically, so far it hasn't. Most research point to a single ancestral family as shown in this video. The chances of many different Adams forming at different times in different places across the planet is virtually non existent. The fact that an indigenous person at the tip of South America can procreate with someone from Japan shows just how closely our DNA matches across the globe.

@@Cypher-bo3pb of course we are all related but current finds makes it look like many places started man

This is new discoveries, and bring confirmed by recent discoveries so I don't know where your new discoveries is coming from. And different Adams would result in different humans across-the-glob

@@osvaldoandrade_arquitecto actually different adams explains the different types or races of man.

If you go back to your paternal lineage, that's just the name of the highest human ancestor.

Adam mean man in arabic / hebrew.

Haha, I think maybe the ridiculous idea of evolutionary Adam and Eve was introduced by the first human genome project. They were wrong about Everything. Not how evolution even works and there are No geographical origin indicators on your DNA. Pure fantasy

Heathen 😂

mtDNA is passed from mother to son, but the son's mtDNA is not passed on to the next generation. This is because the mtDNA in the tail of the sperm is cut off during fertilization.

but it didn't affect the women

@@diansc7322 Assuming an actual Noah, Y chromosomes would show 3 sons converging to Noah. Maternal line would trace back to 4 women (wives of Noah and three sons) that do not converge at that time (assuming none of them are sisters).

The bible proves that the black people in western, central, south are are the biblical 12 tribes of the isreal. You need to do your research before talking. The ancient city of Atlantis was in Africa. In the Sahara desert. The Sahara desert was a lush Greenland back then. The biblical Egyptians ancient we're black people. The bible proves that the blacks in Africa are descendants of Adam.

That’s what you call the Middle East in modern times but it was Africa in ancient times ..

Yeah those are just stories they aren’t literally events. This Adam and Eve being discussed in the video is not the same as the abrahamic religions stories. Adam wasn’t the first human nor the only human at the time nor did he live at the same time or locations as mitochondrial Eve.

Correct. MTDNA haplogroups predated Y haplogroups.

Bcoz he is wrong mitochondria is not eve.

The X chromosome comes first the Y chromosome is a mutation of the X chromosome.. female comes first in every aspect

Yes

Not really like that. Its very little amount they have. I dont think the Q jorney route is fully accurate in this video, but yeah some people with that genetic wandered there and then i suppose got absorded in to other later comers. I dont think the Q that is in america natives went from east asia to europe to north asia. More likely from east asia to north asia and then some to west Original Q and R people looked east asian/inuit type but going through all the european female generations the asian appearance dissappeared probably before even migrating through to europe so basically modern europeans are genetically mostly east asian race but that does not show in appearance at all because they have gone through so many europid mothers in east europe/west asia/near east area. Also i notice the N in this video is not accurate. Asian N my ancestors in north europe came from siberia only 4000 years ago not 10 000.

L'haplogroupe C, le premier à arriver en Europe, aurait eu une couleur de peau entre l'ascendance noire et asiatique. La BBC l'a retrouvé et l'a diffusé il y a quelques années.

我将不得不更加努力。 请广而告之。

Thanks! It takes time to make one video.

This video isn't about when modern humans were born; it's about 'out-of-Africa'.

Plus 300k is a small sample still

@@finmarx No no. It refers to the dating on the remains, bringing our species to a new max of 300k years old.

@@vinemp ah damn…gonna watch again

@@finmarx ...or you should know that, for some decades now, it's been bandied about in scientific circles (and in popular media) that we were, perhaps, up to 300k yo. :-P

what?

maybe because of pedigree collapse?

yes the first half of the 20th century was brutal with great wars , pandemics , famines and what not still the sex ratio was only deviated to 5-10% at most , but a difference of 3 magnitudes is really unrealistic as it was even more difficult to kill each other back , because of not so urban population everyone was so far away and weapons were very primitive then they are now