Origins: Adam & Eve Genetics 

But the similarity of the genes is not the point, its a bit more involved. The genes are not just similar, but are distributed in the natural world in a way that shows a pattern called a nested hierarchy. That pattern arises from branching processes. Railing against similarity is irrelevant - you need to explain the pattern that is a hallmark of evolution.

teddansonLA Even the fossil record doesn’t show any evolutionary changes over time. You only find fossils in their already complete state. Any change in dna is an actual lack of information not an addition to the already dna that’s there. There’s something about the differences in us now that’s important. You don’t see any results of current t evolutionary things happening either. Humans are humans and dogs are dogs and cats are cats.........the list goes on and on. God made everything according to its “kind”, and God saw that it was very good. Last week I spent a few days in the woods and we are so much more then animals, we are supreme beyond the animals. Human intelligence is so beyond an animal that it’s plain to see with the naked eye. We were definitely made in God’s image.

Raymond Palmer You are also correct that Jesus was there during creation. For by him and through him all things were made. “And God said” (Genesis 1)that’s the Word (Christ) making the creation. However, he never lost dominion. And his coming into the world was not to get power back. His coming into the world was to atone for our sins and to lay his life down as a ransom for many. He exercised his power over Satan the second he didn’t give into Satan in the desert. About the other stuff you mentioned, I have not read that in the scriptures and I am curious where you got that from.

@@globalcoupledances the assertions that this species of “ape” is related to humans is absurd. They are claiming it as fact when there’s no traceable way to connect those dots. The best attempt would be a theory and people believe this is the truth. They choose to believe a lie and live under a delusion.

@@globalcoupledances no, humans and apes are separate. Just like today. There may be many similarities but never have they been related. Humans were made in God’s image and animals were not.

🌹🌹🌹

It's like present-day "journalism."

Air Nomad false prophets, just like Jesus predicted.

Scientific Evidence would say otherwise

Romans 18-32 is my favorite and most eye opening as a former atheist now in the glory of God.

@@cartertran270 Amen to that. Romans 1:18-32 😉

The great devastating thing and ignorant of all kind theologians and believers don’t understand the the very simple and wise logic ‘ if god is perfect and omnipresent is there any space or room for sin?

@@mannanserviceholder nope

Steven Jones its good having a spiritual father to learn from also it’s a loving thing and men were meant to be in a relationship with their father from the start like Adam. Self worth is a valuable moral concept foundationally to help rationalize threw love for fellow man and God threw out life as well people not recognizing this is a big part of the problem now days . N it beats studying blindly by a long shot lol

How can one have "historical science" without first making some guesses at history? That's the thing about historical science, it's truly meaningless without assumptions.

@@All-shall-say-Jesus-is-Lord "How can one have "historical science" without first making some guesses at history? " By looking at the evidence over time. "it's truly meaningless without assumptions."" Assuming that evidence is a valid thing to use it supported by the success of those assumptions. As opposed to believing in a long disproved because you told you should believe it. The same sort of people that lied to you about how science works. Fossils ARE observations. Dating is supported by testing and evidence. IF the dating techniques were as faulty as Creationists lie, then fusion bombs would have failed to go BOOM because the same science is in use for both. Oh and fusion bombs do go boom, life does evolve, the Earth is old, the universe older and there was no Great Flood. Ethelred Hardrede

@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv I seriously doubt dating techniques and the bombs going boom had anything to do with each other. In the same field of science? Yes, but that's meaningless unless there's a real connection. Could you point one out for me? You said the dating techniques have been proven to be solid. How exactly? I don't think it's possible without first assuming something was ridiculously old. Fossils are evidence, yeah, evidence for a global flood. Fossils don't form unless something dies and is buried rapidly.

@@All-shall-say-Jesus-is-Lord "I seriously doubt dating techniques and the bombs going boom had anything to do with each other. " Your doubts are not relevant to reality. Nuclear cross sections, stability and decay rates are all involved. "You said the dating techniques have been proven to be solid. How exactly?" By testing them. That is how the decay are determined. " I don't think it's possible without first assuming something was ridiculously old. " You are not thinking because that is not needed at all. The testing can be done without any assumptions. Just a know decay rate and a measurement of the relevant isotopes in the sample. "Fossils are evidence, yeah, evidence for a global flood. There was no such flood so they are not from one. Nor do the sediments and fossils fit such a thing. " Fossils don't form unless something dies and is buried rapidly."" Gee really it has to die? It doesn't have to be buried immediately, just before the bones decay and some fossils show degradation before being covered. There is no need for a global flood for bodies to be covered. That is just plain silly. Floods happen every year. All that is needed is a LOCAL flood and not even that as some fossils are found in desert sandstone. You are arguing from your ignorance on the subject to retain your ignorance. The Great Flood was disproved long ago, by Christians in the 1800's who were looking for evidence of the flood. No college, producing working geologists, has even one class in Flood theory. By NOT using it do the needed jobs for their employers. IF there had been such a flood they would have to take that into and they do not. You just plain ignorant on the subject and you will stay that way as long as you only go on Creationist nonsense. Get a real education on the subject. Ethelred Hardrede

I am not an evolution preacher but just for fun pretend to just leave God out of the equation like a scientist that only uses the natural world to explain things. Then come up with the best explanation for how things came to be. Just a thought. See what i am getting at ?

Adam Lived for 932 years and Noah lived generations after and was also 900 years ... abraham was after this ! hmm ... her years are not correct according to the bible.... The original sin was to be awake .. as we was in adream period for many generations until one day we ate fruits on the trees which changed them and they began to think and even make clothes and name things and rememebr other things even defy things and people.... the pre time period... the genetic changes of the human genome did not take place in 6,000 years ... the races of humankind took perhaps 180,000 years..

Patricia - It's not a matter of "wanting to believe". I was raised evangelical but as I matured and gained knowledge it came down to (1) the BIble was true and all scientists and historians are wrong or (2) the Bible is an ancient manuscript of letters, poems, songs, biographies and some history. At its core it's the story of a tribe who became convinced they were chosen by their particular god. Scientific or historical truth never figured since they knew nothing of science or (real) history. The Israeli=Moab war (2 Kings) has Israel winning. But Moabite stone carving found in Jordan records the same war with a different outcome! LOL This was the standard practice - "history" favors those in power at the moment. Even today we pick and choose. We ignore teachings that rainbows, floods, earthquakes, storms, disease and deformity are divine signs because we know the natural causes. It doesn't make the stories less interesting. We ignore the fact that not a single piece of evidence of millions of Jewish slaves in Egypt has been found because the whole point is the story (I prefer the original Ten Commandments)

Nupuqi Om-Re Khonectics Chamber 45 plus degree The Generations of ADAM Atom ( ADAM , Axim ) from the Exosphere 9 cipher Sperm ( SETH ) from the Thermosphere and Heliosphere 9 cipher Nitrogen Oxygen Argon Helium (Noah) from the Mesosphere 9 cipher Hydra O gene Hydrogen ( ABRAHAM , Alpha and Beta particles ) from the Mesosphere 9 cipher 2 atoms of Hydra gene testicles ( Ishmael , Isaac )( Rivers and Creeks ) from the Ionosphere 9 cipher Water channel ( Musa , Moses ) from the Ozone ( Azim ) 9 cipher Universal radiation RAIN ( Gabriel ) 9 cipher Oceans ( Mari , Mare , Mary ) 9 cipher Clouds ( Tri stage of Ion , Isa , Jesus , Ieous ) .

Scientists are the first to say that miracles are not scientific. God performed miracles that the human mind can’t understand. This world is beyond our human understanding.

I actually know Dr. Purdom's daughter and her by extent

"So far I went for a test to a place that said mitochondria DNA comes from both the father and mother." In general that is false. There seem to have a few cases where some mDNA came from the father. The people this happens to are not healthy and thus get selected out of the gene pool. " Supposedly a reputable company but I now have some serious doubts."" So do I based on that claim but you might want to see if you can find out their reputation.

Maybe you can Google for reviews of some or something. I've heard that DNA normally comes from the mother and, really rarely from the father, a process which isn't understood yet (if, I didn't read it, could be known, idk).

No.

Yes Adam was made out of dust

@Truth Dat 666?

My turtle also turned to dust after it died last year.

"I don't know if Adam was made out of dust " I do, he was made out of the imagination of ignorant men. "but I know when we die we become dust " Sometimes, some bodies have been mummified, some fossilized but none have become normal dust as most dust is mostly made of inorganic material. In any case, Genesis got nearly everything wrong. Ethelred Hardrede

"By the sweat of your brow will you have food to eat until you return to the ground from which you were made. FOR YOU WERE MADE FROM DUST AND TO DUST YOU WILL RETURN.” Genesis 3:19

Bella Eva - Humans are animals. There is no doubt we evolved from 1 celled organism 4 billion years ago. There may be a God that created that first cell of life...but after that it's evolution. You may not have any issues except your living in a world where you can't have your reality questions so you choose to blind fold yourself and stick cotton wool in your ears.

@@creativesource3514 How do we know that god doesn't keep an eye on evolution and adjust it to keep the balance or do what he can without upsetting the order. Maybe it must keep in.order to work ?

@@truethinker221 So you believe in evolution but also a God as a creator? That may work. But also evolution without a creator also works.

@@creativesource3514 Certain aspects that i understand are things God uses to keep the balance of nature . How it all works out is a bit of a mystery but the separation of biological science and religion must be kept separate for the good of both . Other than the origin of modern man in regards to the ability to use reason and consciousness of the possibility of a god we must allow science to discover as much about how the natural environment works. I am not blood thirsty to convince anyone either way, just want to keep the playing field level by exposing misrepresentations of each side by educating the people to examine the subjects with proper critical thinking skills. I enjoy people that know what they are talking about concerning evolution or theology. I hate religion even though i am a theist and Christian .Many don't think so (me a Christian ?). I am at the raw end from both sides . But i love to argue so it's OK.

@@truethinker221 I respect your position and attitude my friend. I'm an atheist but open to be convinced otherwise.

Amen.

I’m glad I followed science and left evolution! Praise Jesus 🙏

" God’s WORD is Truth." If only you had the word of god. Since there was no Great Flood it obvious that you have the words of men not a god. Indeed you have only give us YOUR word that you have the word of a god. Ethelred Hardrede

Well you can still believe that, but we are related to all primates and we have descended from apes and ape like humans.

Erm did you watch the video above? It kinda very concisely knocked out that claim

And we have your word for that and not a thing that supports your word.

@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv same goes for evolution nobody seeing it happen and still you believe it cause ''people' say it dead is dead it cannot come alive by itself like evolution claims.

4 molecules with only 2 possible combinations is not a word or a authored script dude. Don't learn science from religious people.

@@nicky158 and then he didnt reply anymore.haha he's now ranting on my post.hahaha thought he could make a dent with his proud stagnant wits.😂😂😂

i think the word is just a god's message that he is whatever he chooses to be. and os he sent this messenger jesus to speak for him

Very dishonest as well since the real science has the last common female common ancestor about 100,000 years agon and last male common ancestor about 200,000 years ago.

@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv Maybe you should elaborate if you know so much. What did she say that is wrong, scientifically? What makes her science bad compared to others? Simply the fact that she starts with the Bible and takes a look at some problems with mainstream scientific assumptions/methodologies, etc? Criticism is fine, but if that's all you do without saying why, you don't come across as being very credible yourself.

@@rubenbehnke2283 Where did the dust come from ? Five days should not be enough time for dust to occur or settle. .

I applaud parents like you who speak up against what some teachers teach. I heard the story of here in my area that a teacher gave the students an assignment to take pictures of themselves as if they were getting married in a gay marriage. One student said it was against their beliefs and didn't do it so they got an F. I wondered, why didn't the parents get that teacher fired.

@@2fast2block This is just another example of the prejudice that Christians are now experiencing in our country that was founded by christians

@@senseijuan3230, agreed. I get sick of milk toast, gutless, wimpy "Christians" that don't stand up for God. God told US to be bold and strong, and yet so many of the "believers" just want to fit in and not rock the boat. It's disgusting because they are disgusting.

@@2fast2block Jesus spoke very v clearly about right and wrong, the apostles face persecution, God told us to praise him openly and yet we see Christian who water down his message just not to offend anyone.

lol, very sad to see people fight for 'god'. There are many questions that you cannot simply reply. Holding a book which is written 2k years ago is difficult to explain now.

The Bible is literal, the Bible also has a deeper meaning. Usually we refer to this as shadow and types

Ya it, Bible, literally says what it means . What it means is the part we don't agree on.

We need to translate and interpret the Bible. The Holy Spirit of Truth needs to be our guide and our Teacher. Man can only speak to our ears what God is showing us.

That'a what all the money grabbing false teachers say. Sorry we need to know how to read first . And like everything else it takes skill to glean out and interpret with the correct understanding concerning the details for correct understanding of the bible . That is why our teachers Go to biblical studies departments in University's Seminaries around the world. So my point is it depends on what school of thought has influenced you . Whether you know it or not these things are influencing us. Even the translation has an hidden agenda and message they are promoting. This is why the teaching of man is very important . Without it we would not even be able to read. The study of Hermunitics is very important. So is Church history, . Ancient language studies, The History of Western Civilization, Greek Philosophy. Just things that help our mind see and look at the world through the eyes of the time being spoken of. The bible comes to life and makes it fun to read the more we understand the culture the better equipped to give a ready answer for our faith and counter the scepters with our understanding . This should not be neglected . Some times people use excuses for not doing the work concerning biblical studies. . Sometimes boring but pays off . . . In my opinion.

Jesus said "my sheep hear my voice" Are we literally sheep? How do you interpret what he said here?

JÓ LENNE ÉBREDEZNED, OLVASNI UJ DOLGOKAT ---

he was lony after seeing every created pair God had made. Naming them as he was presented. As he saw the pairs of like creatures bonding he grew lonely. And then finally seeing his pair he was justified in his proclamation, "at long last!" that is a saying, a figure of speech. He could have said "Finally, thank goodness. I have my match!"

Thank You You Too ✝️!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dude you are getting a" Cell"

Are you trying to astound with your observational skill, or prowess with a pause button? Congratulations either way.

Yes, please to spread more ignorance and nonsense to the Muslim world that already has way too much of both.

@Tim Webb " Lord Jesus Christ I am an American, lords are not legal in the US. He can run for office just as soon as he comes back from the dead. Which was supposed to happen nearly 2000 years ago. Didn't happen. Failed prophecy. Ethelred Hardrede

@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv calm down Ethel.

@@vulgarresponse7080 I am calm, you must be projecting your anger at my well reasoned fact based posts. How about you deal with what I really wrote instead of lying about me to assuage your anger at being exposed to reality.

You don't need to. Arabs and Muslims have The Qur'an.

MoodyMami #1 so what do you believe to be truth?

MoodyMami #1 if you seek the truth, you will find it. You have NOT found it. That’s obvious by what you say AND the spirit in which you say it.

Jesus was only a apostle of god not God why God is need to born from a women Why God made Adam and eve Jesus was descendant of Adam and eve not biological son of god or self God He didn't claim he is God or son of God

@@rixgamer5748 John 8:58 “Jesus answered them: 'I solemnly declare it: before Abraham came to be, I AM.” [This was the name God gave himself when he first communicated with Moses, Exodus 3:14 “God replied, 'I am who am. ' Then he added, 'This is what you shall tell the Israelites: I AM sent me to you. '”]

You left too soon... she presented accepted, albeit inconvenient facts.

That's precisely the Creationist creed. At the "Discovery Institute" they actually have to sign a disclaimer that they will accept the Bible and deny anything that contradicts.

@@MrWeezer55 It doesn't matter what anyone's creed is. Or what they have to sign to keep a job. The only thing that really matters are facts. And the fact is Science does not disprove God... ID does not PROVE God... but the last 20 years of scientific discoveries have made the existence of God more and more likely.

@@bruce3102 The "last 20 years of scientific discovery" have NOT made the existence of God more likely. This is exactly the kind of thing the nematode brains at the Discovery Institute say. Creeds and signatures DO matter because they plainly state that they will deny any facts that don't agree with their "view". Balderdash.

@@MrWeezer55 YOU JUST PROVED THAT YOU HAVE BEEN PAYING NO ATTENTION... SUCH THAT, AT EAST ON THIS SUBJECT YOU HAVE EVINCED A PROFOUND DEGREE OF IGNORANCE.

It's not the atheist community that says it. It's the scientific community.

There are over 200,000 science books in the Harvard Library that goes to detail to show Genesis chapter one. The first 31 verses in the Bible. There are a total of 31,000 verses in the Bible.

It really doesn't.

@@andrewoliver8930 For well over 100 years people have been using Science to show that the Bible is accurate and true. Esp Archaeology has time and again shown the historical accuracy of the Bible.

@@JohnR77 really? It's a shame that geology, physics, biology doesn't show the Bible to be true.

@@andrewoliver8930 Talk is cheap, show me your evidence. I have never found any conflict between true science and a true understanding of the Bible. Most of the Bible is History and 100 years worth of archaeological evidence shows the Bible to be very accurate and true. As Gerald Schroeder points out there are over 200,000 science books in the Harvard University Library that shows us that the first 31 verses in Genesis are accurate and true. As well as the science books at his school MIT. Remember Elliot Gould the Harvard professor that tired to prove the Bible wrong and died young from cancer after he miserably failed to prove his claim. Then there was Hawking who like Gould failed to prove that there is no God. Again he had sever health problems and even lost the ability to be able to talk. It does not seem to go well with the men of Science that want to fight against God. Although even Hawking raises interesting questions. Which maybe why he defied the odds to live as long as he did in his condition. He says: "Most sets of values would give rise to universes that, although they might be very beautiful, would contain no one able to wonder at that beauty." So why would there be so much beauty in a universe if God did not create us to appreciate the beauty of His Creation? "The Anthropic Principle," contends that the universe was brought into existence intentionally for the sake of producing mankind. Neil deGrasse even takes the finely tuned universe one step further. He tells us that "one second of time had passed" from the beginning of the Universe. "Without Billion-and-one imbalance to one Billion between matter and antimatter, all mass in the universe would have self-annihilated". If this is not enough for you. We are told that all matter was created in a "Planck era" The length of a Planck era is "ten-million-trillion-trillion-trillionths of a second". Not much time for evolution to take place there. Tyson does not fight against God they way Gould and Hawking did. But he clearly is not tainted with creationist bias. So is the The Anthropic Principle and the extremely precise finely turned universe evidence for God? Francis Collins would say yes. Although some men of science would say we do not have enough evidence one way or the other so we can say with certainty. Because Atheist Scientist do not have a very good track record when it comes to their health and longevity so it does not seem to be advisable to fight against God. Science in general can say that belief in God is beneficial. For example people that are a part of a community religious group tend to live five to ten years longer and they tend to have higher levels of empathy. So even if we can not prove that there is a God, we can still provide Scientific evidence to follow the Bible and believe in the God of the Bible. We should also mention Sir Fred and his predictions: "Hoyle found that there were numerous "fortunate" one-time occurrences which seemed to indicate that purposeful "adjustments" had been made in the laws of physics and chemistry in order to produce the necessary carbon." So do we consider this evidence for God or do we just say there is a very high probability that there is a God as described in the Bible. A God that watches over His word and makes the necessary adjustment so that His Word Accomplishes His plan and His purpose. Now I realize this is just a intro to a few of the "evidences" for God.

jamie glatz sorry it’s a proven fact there were never an Adam and Eve this garbage is Christian bias. Therefore everything they claim is automatically bullshit. They say and make up anything to defend their beliefs.

@@user-none-of-your-business666 Please provide some links to "the proof".

Julia Moon and when it acmes to ripping off another religion they obviously just can’t used it for word for word or people would be worshipping the god or gods of the religion they stole nit from . So what they do is they Change a few details like names obviously and places. And a few other details. Because if it a book like Harry Potter and if someone took everything except changing the name to Henry tinderperry they would so be sued for plagiarism.

@@JuliaMoonChannel DNA is a great reason

"trengthen you in your faith in these final days. Paul said the same thing. He was wrong and others have been wrong ever since. You are just one more person make false prophecies.

In a single sentence you said FIVE words you don't even know what etimologically means.

@@g.mano.1320 No I didn't.

Of course not. Science book in high school teaches evolution and the earth is 4.54 billion yr old

Em, we didn't come from chimps. No-one has ever said we did. But I do wonder how your stupidity trait was passed down

HA A CSIMPÁNZBOL LENNÉNK SZÁRMAZVA, DARWIN ...AKKOR MÁR NEM LENNE MAJOM, EMBERRÉ FEJLÖDÖTT VOLNA-

He separated land from water

@@janiecekeys4765 then how do we have a body

@@blackaspades807 you're comparing yourself to land and water? Cuz I'm not

Mark Clearly seen yet never seen? What a load of childish bullshit!

Ten to the Negative 33 a part of your observation is spot on... As in it is so simple that even a child can understand it. You have to go through years of higher education to unsee the obvious: miracles don't do themselves. Was Mt Rushmore created by wind erosion? No? Well, then THE WORLD and all that live in it wasn't either. Even the simplest one cell organism is more sophisticated than a space shuttle. Let alone Mt Rushmore. So no. Some more translations of the same simple statement from a man whose education amounted to the equivalent of a minimum of 3 university degrees: For from the creation of the world His invisible qualities, both His eternal power and divinity, are clearly seen, being understood by the things made, for them to be without excuse. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse. For his invisible qualities, namely his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. Because His invisible attributes, namely His eternal power and divine nature, are clearly seen from the creation of the world, being understood from what has been made, so that they are inexcusable; And the translator's note to this last one: All scientific experiment and true human knowledge is based on the principle of cause and effect-we observe an effect and try to isolate its cause. As a logical corollary, the cause must be as great or greater than the effect, otherwise it could not produce it. Any human being who is both honest and intelligent, confronted with the observable universe, with its incredible order and complexity, must conclude that there has to be a CAUSE who is both incredibly intelligent and powerful-to refuse to do so is perverse. Since we have personality, He must as well. So Paul’s argument is precisely correct.The science of physics tells us that the entire known universe, taking only what is inorganic (not part of any living system), can be described using perhaps 250 bits of information. To describe the smallest protein molecule (unable to live alone, but part of a living system) requires some 1,500 bits of information (the ecoli bacterium some 7 million; one human cell some 20 billion). Now just where could chance plus nothing find 1,250 bits of new information (to produce the simplest protein), if in the whole universe there was only 250? The evolutionary hypothesis as an explanation for the origin of life is ridiculously, stupidly impossible!The science of genetics, with its genome projects, has discovered that a change of just 3 nucleotides is usually fatal to the organism. The genetic difference between a human being and a chimpanzee (closest relative) is at least 1.6%-this represents a gap of some 48 million nucleotide differences. Since a random change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal to an animal, and a dead animal can’t reproduce, there is no possible way that a chimp could evolve into a human. Each individual species had to be assembled separately, just like Genesis says. The ‘geologic column’ is a fiction, since there are multistrate tree fossils. Symbiotic plants and insects could not possibly evolve. And so on.

Yudon Ituno Awe, butthurt? I would be too. You are comparing erosion on the my Rushmore to the creation of life. These are false equivalencies and the same childish understanding of most things that lend your narrow mind to thoughts of supernatural skydaddies. You are sadly mistaken, and proud to be

Ten to the Negative 33 why exactly "false equivalencies"? Please elaborate instead of name calling. Who knows, you may be smarter than me and I may learn something!

Yudon Ituno Comparing an unknown event to erosion, which we know everything about is a false equivalency. False equivalencies and logical fallacies are at the heart of all arguments for religion. And your not out to learn if you immediately go to such a lame argument. That only tells me you like to preach but care little for what your arguments mean, you know, follow them to their logical conclusion before you try it on a stranger. You can use shallow arguments on ur family whom already believe, but not those who are serious bud

You know this is entirely bullshit.

Logically explained? You obviously failed basic biology

So is HIV.

Truth is knowledge that reflects reality, unlike the Bible.

Gatsby Light meaning the truth is... your blood is contaminated because of your sins?

@@harshcalls - Just because a person _believes_ that something is in their blood, doesn't mean that it's a good thing (or that it's actually true).

@@harshcalls "meaning the truth is... your blood is contaminated because of your sins?" I think he was trying to point out that blood is not where the Truth is. Truth should only be capitalized at the start of a sentence. When it is treated as a proper noun, it invariably involves either lying or just plain nonsense. The latter is the case with the OP. The truth is in DNA which does not remotely support Genesis on ANYTHING. It disproves both Adam and Eve and that silly flood story. Ethelred Hardrede

Maybe they expected something more scientifically accurate

@@daijirokatoh3769 More philosophically acceptable. In my travels, scientific accuracy trails far behind "coz it does".

@@voiceofreason162 you just can't take scientific findings and ignore half of it because it doesn't fit your opinion. This is the difference between a thinker and a believer, the thinker can change opinion according to scientific discoveries, the believer only accept whatever fits his beliefs and deny all the rest, and this is what is shown in this video

@@daijirokatoh3769 thanks, I'll pass on your comment to Richard Dawkins. A philosophical precursor is the normal starting point for most. Using an acceptability filter is par for the course. Evaluating the science is what I do. You don't know how entrenced you are until you do. That is why Scientific debates end up in mud wrestling matches. Whoever drowns first loses.

@@voiceofreason162 someone who believes just can't have a scientific debate, because his mind is all set even before the debate start. If religious people could think by themselves they could easily understand that stories like Noah's Ark, flat earth or Adam and Eve are technically impossible but it just won't happen because they don't have this ability

Ever wonder why Cain is not in the generations of Adam?

So you claiming that Molly is a liar?

The rib regrows.

And that's why woman has always been a pain in his side ever since

This is a joke right ?

Creation started with the Big Bang 13.7 billion yrs ago when God said, "Let there be light." Adam and Eve were not created until about 6000 yrs ago. Hominids predated Adam and Eve. So there were man-like creatures prior to Adam and Eve, but they were not people who were made in God's image. Then God said, "Let us make man in Our image," and He created Adam and Eve.

@@timg1770 Proof please

@@timg1770 No, proof of creation. I would love some

@@eliasjakemoran6434 Open your eyes.

@@timg1770 My god you're not good at this. Magic and "Look around you" is not a valid argument. Anything else? Intelligent design isn't true either, so don't bother with that. Unless you wanna debate on it.

Huh?

@@sabcam2000 you have to pick the red letters over the black or be like most everyone else and choose black over red..

Thanks for watching! God Bless!

Found out already, Ken Ham makes his living pushing a disproved religion as there was no Great Flood. Hardly the only major error in the Bible.

@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv the waters are rising

@@lancecarter100 That is BS not water. Thank you for that fact free reply. I am not you. I can support myself with verifiable facts. Something that Ken Ham cannot manage either. I just love his fake ark. No gopher wood was involved in its making. Lots of steal and they rarely show the other side. Because its a regular building. A geological disproof of the Great Flood. Here have one of many disproofs of the Flood. Please note that dating is NOT relevant nor needed in this so the usual ignorant rants about dating are not relevant to this disproof. Yes I BLEEPING know that there is dating in this post but its not needed for the disproof. Ranting about the dating will not change the disproof which is based on layering. Here you go Creationists, disproof of the Bible all based on well understood and undeniable science. The layers, even without any dating of any kind, fully disprove the Great Flood that never happened. They simply cannot be laid down the way they are in a dozen floods much less one. No Creationist has ever shown an error this. Few have even tried to deal what I am actually posting. The data is from: GRAND CANYON Explorer kaibab org The same layer structure can be on on nearly any site about the Grand Canyon. Most of the writing is mine except some of the specifics on the layers. So far no one has shown any real error in this and I have posted it many times. IF the Flood was a real as you claim then the over 30,000 geologists in the US alone would HAVE to use Flood theory to do their job. They don't, and the do their job anyway. No mining or oil company would hire someone that used a theory that was that far off from reality. IF the Bible was a source of special knowledge, that is from a god, there would be clear evidence of the Great Flood. There is none. Yes there are fish fossils on mountains, from around 200 million years ago. The ones in question are often those first discovered by Charles Darwin. They are evidence that the world is old that moutains can rise from the ocean floor. The mountains to the north of me have risen about twenty feet in two earthquakes in my lifetime alone. I do not have to know everything to know that there was no such flood. I only have to be sure about what can be tested. Life evolved and all the evidence supports that. The nonsense Creationists push is disproved by the utter lack of evidence for the Flood. And no, ancient flooding cannot prove a recent flood. Nor can multi million year old fossils prove a flood from 4400 years ago. In REAL science a theory is checked against reality. You look at the theory and see what should be if the theory is real. Evolution is supported by evidence so lets look at the Flood. By using internal evidence in the Bible it can be dated. The usual date is around 4400 years ago. That is disproved by actual written history. However this is about the geology as Creationist just deny known history. The dating for the layers is irrelevant for this as the layers themselves, and the meanders cut into them, could not have formed this way in a whopping great flood. This can be seen by anyone that goes to the Grand Canyon. ANYONE. IF there was flood there should be sediment sorted by density vs cross section as that is how suspended matter settles out of a water column. That is actual physics that anyone can test with dirt and glass of water. But that is not what we find at the Grand Canyon. The Grand Canyon would have this order of sediment. Lime Dust Fine sand Sand Gravel Boulders Granite base as there wasn't enough time or flooding to have a major sediment base under the flood boulders. Unless you think Jehovah made the Earth as lie. In which case why not the Bible as the lie instead of simply being the result of ignorance as it is. A god that deceives in geology is a god that would deceive in writing. What you actually get is: Limestone - water based both of those layers formed over millions of years not in a flood. More limestone different color - water based then: Sandstone - from sandunes which means NOT from water and thus not from the Flood. Shale which is finer grained than sandstone and is from water and that shows the Flood didn't occur right there But wait there is more as there is sandstone that is on top of top of mixed shale and limestone. Does not fit flood either. Next: Redwall Limestone - marine limestone - hmm how could that be below the sandstone if it was formed in the Flood instead of millions of years ago as real science shows. Can't happen the Creationist way. Temple Butte Limestone - Fresh water - Can't have the fresh below the salt in Flood Nonsense. But reality shows there was no flood in yet another layer. Muav Limestone - composed primarily of limestone that is separated by beds of sandstone and shale. Again can't have formed in single whopping great flood. s not have much in the way of fossils, some trilobites and brachiopods. Which means marine again and now below fresh water limestone. Bright Angel Shale - marine animals such as trilobites and brachiopods. Which somehow aren't in the higher limestone. Again not fitting Flood Nonsense. And not one fish among them as would be the case if the Bible was true. Tapeats Sandstone - this a marine sandstone. Then the really old stuff. Sixtymile Formation - This tan colored layer is composed primarily of sandstone with some small sections of shale. Kwagunt Formation - This layer is composed primarily of shale and mudstone with some limestone- Fossils to be found in this layer are those of stromatolites, the oldest fossils to be found anywhere in the Grand Canyon. Which form near the surface yet are the bottom. And no trilobites. Which all fits reals and evolution and completely fails Flood Nonsense again. And again no fish as should be there as ALL life that exists now should have existed at the beginning of the flood. Galeros Formation - This layer is composed of interbedded sandstone, limestone and shale. Impossible in a single whopping great flood. Again Fossil stromatolites also exist in this layer and no trilobites nor fish nor whales nor any fossils that we know evolved much later. Nankoweap Formation - This layer averages about 1,050 million years old and is composed of a coarse-grained sandstone. Well at least is below limestone. Cardenas Lavas - not exactly a flood thing. Can't form as it exists there while underwater. You would have pillow lava. Dox Sandstone - This layer averages about 1,190 million years old, is composed of sandstone interbedded with shale. Shinumo Quartzite - This layer averages about 1,200 million years old and is composed of sandstone Hakatai Shale - This layer averages about 1,200 million years old and is composed primarily of shale with some sandstone. Bass Formation - This layer averages about 1,250 million years old and is composed primarily of limestone with some interbedded shale Woops now the sandstones in Nankoweap ARE above limestone. None of this fits Flood Nonsense. Vishnu Schist and Zoroaster Granite - This layer averages about 1,700 to 2,000 million years old and consists of mica schist. These were originally sediments of sandstone, limestone and shale that were metamorphosed and combined with metamorphosed lava flows to form the schist. Which does not fit a world that was just 1600 years old or a whopping great flood. Nor can the entrenched meanders of the flood form in whopping great flood. Nor could the river flow ACROSS the slope of the land as it does instead of downhill in multiple rivers to the Gulf of Mexico as it would have if there had been a whopping great flood. So the Grand Canyon fits real science and Henry Morris and Dr. Brown just plain LIED about such things fitting Flood Nonsense. So with the Bible's Flood fitting right in the middle of the Egyptian Pyramid building era just how does ANYTHING fit the Flood? Start dealing WITH reality instead of telling silly lies about it. Ethelred Hardrede

@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv Well thats quite a lot of evidence and fact in order to disprove the flood. Seems like a lot of work. It doesnt have to be that hard. I dont need it because i never said that i beleive in the flood the way you are used to hearing about it. So yeah lots of BS to float that boat on. What i dont understand is that you are striving to disprove the bible by geological science. But you dont have to. Thats way too much work.

@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv honestly with everything you know, you should be a professor. But seriously, the bible has nothing to do with the science of geology. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Now we know that a man wrote this. This implies that this man whoever he is, understands the nature of God, because he just said, " God created". So he knows God creates. So Creation happens to be part of a cycle. Im sure you already know what this is. This cycle consist of many laws of nature. All of which are attribute of G.o.d. and the rest of the book elaborates on these laws as they pertain to the healthy outlookof the developing and civil man.

Only micro evolution has been observed within a species. No evidence of one species turning in to another species exist

+ *Donald* Evolution doesn't change one species into a different species. It branches out. In 100 million years, we humans will look completely different, but we'll still be the same species.

@@donaldceronio4870 You are idiot who has no understanding of evolution. You are talking nonsense. And this woman is a dishonest charlatan who is doing extreme cherry picking. Evolution is an established science.

I know I do these scientists be tripping. If they haven't figured out by now God is the creator they seriously are blinded. By the lies of the devil. Or just dont wanna admit that there is a God who created everything even us.

Leah Chalmers You’re an idiot

AMEN to that!

Could you please cite your evidence for a 'soul' please??

Charles Hendrick I got to meet you in person I would gladly show you

@@kevin12553 That sounds kind of scary. I'd much rather you just present your sources, thanks anyways.

@@charleshendrick7266 I was joking sorry , read ur BIBLE

@@kevin12553 I have, many times. I must admit, I do enjoy the evil deity portrayed in its collection of fables from a primitive people attempting to fabricate a history of themselves. Murder, rape, incest, genocide, etc.. always makes for a good read.