Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos ru-vid.com/group/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Japanese Systems videos ru-vid.com/group/PLEMWqyRZP_LoGHZpbX_LShNT-UxMLomZJ Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Sea videos ru-vid.com/group/PLEMWqyRZP_Lr1-xIzFrM6xUHCOgetdkmp
The mast is tall yet its smaller signature or thin bullet encasement hides a bevy of antenna and electronics within a somewhat stealthy structure whereas many other naval ships have antenna and domes dotted about the upper structures and higher visibility on radars.
The need for FFMs for the Maritime Self-Defence Force is due to a shortage in the number of naval vessels. The reason lies in the rapidly increasing number of Chinese naval vessels. The situation is that old wooden minesweepers are chasing and monitoring the Chinese fleet. The Maritime Self-Defence Force (MSDF) has no desire to fight a fleet war against the latest Chinese ship, Type 054A, by means of the FFM; the main purpose of the FFM is to rush anywhere in the Indo-Pacific region and bring its influence. It has a long range for a frigate, can berth in relatively small ports thanks to its side thrusters, and can handle any mission with just one ship. It is unlikely that the MSDF seriously envisages anti-ship missile fire by naval vessels. Rather, anti-ship warfare has historically been the job of the submarine fleet, with the 22 modern submarines being the mainstay of the fleet.
Japan has always been a leader in new ship design and battle strategy. They showed the world how to use aircraft carriers in combined operations at Pearl Harbor. I’m glad they are allies. Their proximity to China must weigh heavily on their minds.
If you had some common sense about China's thousands of years of history, you wouldn't say such ridiculous things. As a South Korean under the colonial rule of the United States, and as a puppet president like your idiot, you should be more worried about whether Seoul will be destroyed by the atomic bomb destroyed by Kim Sam Pang. . .@user-ye6zk3ud3k
@@user-xl9qw7yk7c Yes! Then, along with the spawning ability, the minesweeping function is used to destroy impurities on the seabed. In that case, in addition to sea mines, it does not discriminate against the sinking and concealment of the Kilo-class submarine and its siblings.
The Mogamis are named after rivers, a naming convention previously assigned to cruisers; in fact, the first Mogamis shared names with the last two cruiser classes of the Imperial Japanese Navy, the Mogami-class heavy cruisers and the Agano-class light cruisers.
@@farrasnfl830 yeah people hugely underestimate Chinese and Japanese weapons becouse of Chinese coping nature thinking their weapon systems are inferior to the west counter part and Japanese becouse of their pessimistic nature forgetting that they one of the most technologically advanced nation even more so then America ( purely my opinion).
Let me tell you the fact that Japanese people want to know about Japanese missiles as well. The reason is that the Japanese Ministry of Defense does not publish any accurate figures on the range, which is an important aspect of the missile's performance. In some cases, the range of the latest missiles is the same as that of missiles that are decades old. (Of course, this cannot be true. This is not only because of the need to maintain classified information, but also because of the fear that Japan might possess an invasion capability reminiscent of the Imperial Japanese Army that prevailed in the postwar era. Recently, the public's desire to have a deterrent to the expansion of China's military has gradually, but gradually, become less and less of a traditional political consideration. However, the trend toward not disclosing much of the performance of sensitive weapons such as anti-ship missiles, or at least understating their performance, has continued. The fact that Japan has not exported missiles is one of the reasons why it has not been willing to publish figures, as there is no need to advertise their performance.
As a Chinese, I really hope Japan's military power could grow fast enough before the conflict in west pacific comes true. As a normal contary, Japan may stop the disaster from happen.
maybe you're the first chinese I met who has that kind of opinion and wisdom when either side gains superior military power, the balance of power crumbles and war happens. If both sides becomes strong equally, each other thinks again about starting an invasion, considering the amount of damage. And mostly how the countries surround them will react when BOTH collapse.
Once Japan breaks free of US's shackles and actually fight for its own interest or the interest of Asia like it touted before WWII, then the conflict with China is gone. They can prosper together to overcome the West's exploitive international order. They need to remember it was the US and the West that put the breaks on 70s Japanese economic miracle and sunk it and same way they are treating China right now.
i am japanese. sorry, my english is poor. China has undergone a tremendous military buildup over the last few decades. We have to deal with that reality. However, China says that we, Japan, are expanding our military. We say it over and over again. Our Japanese constitution, which is the supreme law of the nation, "We will not solve problems between nations with war." wrote. repeat. "We will not solve problems between nations with war." However, it is a different story if it is invaded. oppose vigorously.
There is something about the non agis ships of JMSDF that just makes them beautiful. Almost like a thought process that resulted in the Pagoda masts of imperial Japan have been given modern design language.
Beautifully engineered ships built with typical Japanese reliability and flair. They do however. badly need their VLS installed given the current regional geo-political tensions.
This Mogami class ship may become the style of new Japanese destroyers in the future by inheriting the armament of the Akizuki, Asahi, and other destroyers and its own features of its stealth capabilities and minimal number of crew members. This ship is a frigate multipurpose/flagship (FFM) planned to commission 22 ships in service, and exported to Indonesian Navy in upcoming years. However, it lacks an anti-aircraft missile armament, (VLS only 16 cells ) which is a concern as a deterrent against the Chinese navy.
@@Frost-01 However, the JMSDF must consider a successor to the destroyer Murasame class in the each escort fleet. I believe that the Mogami class will replace the Abukuma and Asagiri class destroyers that are comissioned under the District Forces. In the process of creating a new destroyer to replace the Murasame class, I feel that the design of the Mogami class will be taken over and the equipment such as from the Asahi and Akizuki will be inherited as well. Although, this is my speculation so don't mind that much.
That role can easily be filled in by the Asahi/Atago/Mogami classes quite easily although the Mogami's might suffer due to lower vls count but other wise the Atago's would be centerline for that role
Well, I'll once again make this suggestion. Even more relevant this time since we're talking about a frigate. A video on the italo-french FREMM class frigate would be welcome considering how present it is in the Mediterranean and that the US is adopting a version of it for its next frigate class, which will probably make it one of the most ubiquitous vessels in the sea.
11:50 it's actually realistic for a 5500t ship to be a destroyer. An existing example is the 5750t Sachsen-class. It's just Mogami was designed as a frigate. Even 4400t Belharras (even 3200t Formidables) has 32 Sylver VLS. Thus had the goal was destroyer, Mogami would've been easily designed & built as one
They should bring back older classifications. JMSDF's 8 Kongo/Maya destroyers along with USN's ill-fated Zumwalts should be called cruisers by their displacement alone, on top of their ability to act as command centers in flotilla operations. JMSDF's Akizuki-class destroyer "escorts" are more in line with what destroyers are supposed to do.
Seems they are combining what the UK is doing in 3 frigate types into one. Will be interesting how it all works out, I believe type 32 will be doing the mine role for us. I wonder how good the Mogami's will be in CV protection role?
It only has 16 VLS so it's definitely more ASW as Japan, unlike the UK, has plenty of destroyers to use for air defence. That said, 16 Mark 41 cells with quadpacked ESSM is a lot compared to the pitiful Type 31
軍事マニアの外国人は起工から進水まで１年で建造、その後１年半で艤装＋公試を経て就役に驚かないのかな？（２年半で完成） 他国のフリゲートは、起工して就役（完成）までに４年～１０年かかるのに・・ Wouldn't a foreigner who is a military enthusiast be surprised that it takes one year from Laid down to launched , followed by a year and a half for ship trials and then commissioning? (Completed in 2.5 years) Frigates from other countries take 4 to 10 years from Laid down to commissioning (completion)... （DeepL Translation）
Simply explain, like a Frigate version of F-35, stealth, AESA with EA & ES(also called as RF sensor), 360 monitor, network systems, and controls drone too.
With their Rifles now getting modernized, Joint projects with the British for a new Fighter and with new Warships, they need to start Upgrading their Ground Forces equalling their Capabilities with the US Military.
I mean, it’s a bit less of a worry there. They’re an island nation, and so the ground forces can take a back seat (relative to air and sea power). Definitely wouldn’t hurt to have it, but they have a budget, and if you can keep enemies from being able to sail over or parachute in, then it’s not as necessary to have that much investment in tanks or whatnot.
Seem like a big expensive ship to build, just as a weapons platform for one 5" gun, and a couple of torpedo tubes 🤔 You would think a 400' ship could easily mount two, three gun batteries of 5" or 6" or even 8" guns...A very big ship for one measly pea shooter of a gun.
日本は金持ち国なのでフリゲート艦が約470億円（３億4216万ドル）は安い。高いのは通常の護衛艦で７００億円。 Japan is a rich country, so frigates are cheap at about 47 billion yen ($342.16 million). The expensive one is a regular destroyer at 70 billion yen.（DeepL Translation）
Perhaps you should watch the video where they mention several times the soon to be installed VLS missile launch system. Gun batteries? LOL No...they went out with WW2
Who th hell comparing mogami to LCS. How good is LCS' radar capability? Now compared that to mogami ...... And that'll be a big difference when mogami add VLS.
They’re not allowed to by their constitution, but good news! They have those COMPLETELY UNRELATED multi-purpose destroyers that just so happen to be in retrofit plans to be capable of fielding F-35s
But i think this frigatr still need more fire power . Suppose to be the installed 32 vls and 4 four quadrople ships to ships missle and rolling airframe missile to make it more powerful warship.
Japan has to decide what it's future naval strategy will be. A well armed frigate can be as effective and any destroyer and cost less to operate with todays modern missiles. I would consider a missile drone under it's own power that can be tethered to the frigate for missions designed to thwart the Chinese. Since the Japanese do not have to travel far to see the enemy since it's China, a drone under its own power with the missiles targeted and launched from Frigate instructions would be a formidable duo.
Para sa akin redundant na dahil may corvette tayo gagawin ng Korea, na mas armado sa anti air at anti surface na puede dumepensa sa flotila, Ang weapon spec ng Mogami ang anti air nya limited lang at purely anti surmarine st anti mines warfare. Dapat kumuha ng Frigate na 150 meters at may VLS na 64 anti air, ship, at surface missles at 8 anti surmarine missiles at ang anti mines at mines counter measure assigned na lang sa opshore patrol vessels 94 meters o kaya sa jose rizal class 107 meters na ang Mogami class frigate 133 meters...
The reduction of 22 order down to 12 is undermining it's use case. Take a page from RN experience with their Leanders, build OPVs for EEZ and FON work. Japan is going to need alooot of them, and they are going to get banged up.
Japan puts quality,safety and survivabilty first in its Military Programs and it shows. World Class Engineering and a Great and Valued Asset for Nato and the US,Japanese, Australian contingent around Taiwan.
You know what Japan's known for? Low births and jobless parasite adults who still live off their parents' money, NEET. Search what that acronym means. Japan has its own social issues. If JSDF recruit most of the lost generation, Japan would rival China in terms of manpower and perhaps become the largest military in the world. Plus Japan is into automation these days and so are other advanced nations like the US.
I believe this ship is overrated. Weapon Detective, you definitely exaggerated Mogami's capabilities. It does not have the proper weaponry. Chinese Type 054A class is much superior.
Yeah just estimated it. 30FFM 16 VLS: 8×4(32) ESSM medium SAM or 8 A-SAM Long range SAM + 8 07VLA ASROC VS 054 32 VLS: 24 HQ-16 medium range SAM + 8 YU-8 ASROC. This just because the chinese doesn't have quadpack MRSAMs in their inventory, although they still developing today. So 30FFM wins😀
@@Judau69Haman 한국에서만…그건 일본이 잘 숨기고 잘 왜곡해 왔었기 때문. 그런다고 전범기란 사실이 사라지지 않음. 나찌의 하켄크로이츠와 전범기가 뭐가 다른가? 일본은 저 깃발을 예전부터 써왔던 것이라는 말도 안되는 변명을 하지만……일본군은 저 깃발을 앞세워 아시아를 침략했으며, 부녀자를 끌고가 성노예로 삼았으며, 무고한 시민들 목을 잘랐으며, 731부대를 통해 사람으로선 할 수 없는 잔인한 실험들을 해왔지. 과거인 일본이 힘이 있고 다른 아시아 국가들은 힘이 없었기에 일본은 그걸 숨길 수 있었던 것일뿐.
@@valiant8730 ㅎㅎㅎ세상은 바뀌고 있지. 예전에는 일본의 잔악한 행위를 숨기고 예의바른 사람들로 포장할 수 있었지만 지금도 그게 가능할까? 일본애들이 얼마나 잔인했느냐 하면 '백인참'으로 검색하면 일본신문에 실린 기사를 검새할 수 있을거야. 백인참은 백명의 머리를 자른다는 뜻이지. 일본 장교 두 명이 시합을 하는거지. 누가 중국인을 더 많이 참수하는가. 그걸 일본신문은 중계하듯이 실적을 보도 했고... 이건 잔인한 일본의 한 단면에 불과해. 그런 잔혹한 행위를 할 때 앞세운 깃발 중에 하나가 욱일기라 부르는 전범기. 일본 니들이 지금껏 잘 숨겨왔는지 모른지만 앞으로는 숨기기 어려울거다. 니가 비웃는다고 숨겨지는게 아니란거다.
