Тёмный

MOR101 - The Analysis of Words 

The Virtual Linguistics Campus
Подписаться 120 тыс.
Просмотров 64 тыс.
50% 1

How can we analyze words into their component parts? What are the basic building blocks of words? These and other questions are taken up in this short clip. On the basis of a simple example from Present-Day English and an additional analysis using Latin, the fundamental principles of morphological analysis are demonstrated. The clip is used in all classes on the Virtual Linguistics Campus that deal with the basic concepts in morphology.

Опубликовано:

 

23 фев 2012

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 23   
@Rockersoul77
@Rockersoul77 12 лет назад
Great explanation. Thank you very much!
@palomasrk
@palomasrk 12 лет назад
this was very well explained, thank you so much!
@stellasubash7823
@stellasubash7823 2 года назад
Great explanation sir. Very well understood.
@iwasbornpurple
@iwasbornpurple 10 лет назад
Classifying "if" as invariable seems a little iffy to me
@stevenmonash624
@stevenmonash624 9 лет назад
Mybrainhasproblems Perhaps it is an acronym or too idiomatic.
@bonbonpony
@bonbonpony 5 лет назад
Same here: "No buts or ifs" :) Or, being a programmer: "I have two ifs in my function" (two "if" instructions).
@bonbonpony
@bonbonpony 4 года назад
@@wezzuh2482 In what way is it an "entirely different word"? It's spelled the same, it's pronounced the same, it has the same meaning, just a different function in a sentence.
@david5ch4
@david5ch4 10 лет назад
chinese characters could divide into smaller meaningful parts equivalent to morphemes in english and even categorize into bound M and free M if you have a close look at it
@syddlinden8966
@syddlinden8966 8 лет назад
The variations in inscription never stop surprising/bugging me... for "kisses," I'd call the "e" a Schwa sound or a glottal stop between the s's, but never [I](xsampa)...
@mominatariq9700
@mominatariq9700 6 лет назад
i just didn't get why {/re:g\} and { e:k\} are both derived from { e:g\} and not { e:k\}?
@juliange7
@juliange7 3 года назад
Is not if a subordinate conjunction? But is a coordinate conjunction yes, but if not.
@sab4895
@sab4895 3 года назад
What are the allomorphs of king? It was unclear
@MarkkBg
@MarkkBg 11 лет назад
It's Boardwalk Empire's Eddie!
@radhasharma7076
@radhasharma7076 Год назад
But i m very much confused . If this is morph then what is morpheme .please would like to clear my doubt?
@oer-vlc
@oer-vlc Год назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EFlXMYNZ2Hk.html
@radhasharma7076
@radhasharma7076 Год назад
Thank u very much
@susan770able
@susan770able 10 лет назад
why about is invariable? It is actually variable -- whereabouts
@stevenmonash624
@stevenmonash624 9 лет назад
Sue Yieu Perhaps he means those words that you can not do anymore with them.. regardless of how they were formed. For instance, myself (can not change) ... Or he means words that can not change without the meaning changing completely. For instance, you can not change to..the, or, an, and, etc.
@bonbonpony
@bonbonpony 5 лет назад
01:52 What about "No buts or ifs." ? 07:19 WUT?! In the example just preceding this, they were supposed to mean the PLURAL of NOUNS! It's a completely different thing than the "-s/-z/-iz" suffix for verbs (which indeed indicates the present tense 3rd person singular).
@Sepoz76
@Sepoz76 10 лет назад
morphology isnt pronoun, prepositions, nouns verbs...etc?
@tellingfoxtales
@tellingfoxtales 8 лет назад
Morphological analysis done in phonetic terms for the sake of illiterate languages is only a hindrance to literate languages, upon explaining the phonemes you grouped them together under something that could have been stated as -s rather than having no clear-cut way to express the morpheme.
@ekorunovska
@ekorunovska 8 лет назад
Grouping them as allomorphs of that particular morpheme would have sufficed.
@bonbonpony
@bonbonpony 5 лет назад
It can be used not only for illiterate languages. Oftentimes you _have_ to use it for literate languages as well, to account for different spelling quirks (which English, for example, is full of) :q
Далее
MOR104 - Morphological Processes
5:57
Просмотров 14 тыс.
MOR112 - Compounding
14:52
Просмотров 34 тыс.
MOR102 - Morphological Operations
14:05
Просмотров 19 тыс.
PHY101 - The Phoneme I
14:11
Просмотров 72 тыс.
Etymology and surprising origins of English words
13:48
Morphology trees
6:22
Просмотров 52 тыс.
SEM141 - Speech Acts - An Overview
14:28
Просмотров 204 тыс.
What is Feminist Criticism?
3:29
Просмотров 169 тыс.
SYN101 - Syntactic Categories in PDE
20:32
Просмотров 51 тыс.