Тёмный

More Street Photography Tips [podcast] 

The Moe and O Photo Show Podcast
Подписаться 3,3 тыс.
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.
50% 1

The Moe and O show is a (mostly) photography podcast which features Moe Morales and Omar Gonzalez, two childhood buddies. They discuss photography, tech, movies, food, and nonsense in no particular order. Join them. And feel your brain cells melt away.
Find our podcasts on the Anchor App:
anchor.fm/them...
Itunes:itunes.apple.c....
Our Instagram!
/ themoeandos. .
Follow Omar
Instagram: / ogonzilla
Follow Moe
Instagram: / moemorales_photography

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 57   
@Actionray
@Actionray 4 часа назад
Wha a cool podcast! Glad I randomly came across this right now, I like you guys, great listen and watch! Thanks for making this and sharing it!
@giselesmith7795
@giselesmith7795 5 лет назад
Great conversation, good advice fellas Thanks for another fun podcast.
@thenexthobby
@thenexthobby 5 лет назад
Hmm, I know 2 guys who somehow haven't seen Endgame yet? (Apparently.) It's interesting you mentioned the Sony's dynamic range. DR is a one reason I jumped back into film recently (well, for B&W at least). Other reasons involve poverty and just wanting to better master a medium I gave up way too soon. I'd been a Canon digital shooter for a long time but unless they get their act together regarding DR, Sony will be what I look at first in full frame, funky menus and ergonomics be damned. ProTip: If you only have a kit lens but the Internet said get a nicer one ... 1) Take the kit lens with you, shoot it however you want … any focal length. Learn it! 2) Later, take note (in the file data) of common focal lengths you used _for the pictures you like best_ . Those focal lengths are where you should spend your upgrade money. 3) There is no Step 3.
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
Always insightful. Always appreciated.
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
We did see End Game but Omar didn't see it at the time we recorded this one. Maybe we'll discuss next week
@TrentGamingCo
@TrentGamingCo 5 лет назад
no editing here, cut...
@mikecastles
@mikecastles 5 лет назад
Good one guys! I did my first attempt last Dec in NYC with the XT20 and the 23 f2 and 18-55 'kit' lens. Times Square was amazing at night and a total blast. As to asking, there were several NYPD lined up by one of the store fronts, made eye contact with one of the officers and pointed to my camera and the group and he gave me an OK and I got a nice shot and memory of the trip. Others shots were like you mentioned shooting from waist level and they worked great as well. It was fun, and totally outside my normal comfort zone.
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
Sounds like a great shot of the boys in blue! Thanks for watching.
@thegreatvanziniphotos5976
@thegreatvanziniphotos5976 5 лет назад
18-55 is still quite small & stiill allows me some breathing room. 23 is a great little lens.
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
Great lenses
@johnshiever2998
@johnshiever2998 5 лет назад
Lets face it, you two claim to be street photographers but you live in suburban NJ. You are therefore, "cul de sac" photographers. Instead of the old asian guy with smoke rising up around him, you mainly get the fat guy on a ride around mower with flip flops and a can of Bud. Enjoy your podcasts and keep it up until I have no more brain cells!
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
Have you seen my Instagram @moemorales_photography. I scare people in the Cul de Sac.. 😂 Thanks for rocking with us.
@830Video
@830Video 5 лет назад
I just got my first zoom lens 🤣 but primes are life, I film though
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
A tough place to be. Zooms are life to some people... Not me.. But they need love too 😂
@830Video
@830Video 5 лет назад
@@MoeMorales Ive never used a zoom lens, but someone i look up to told me the SIgma 18-35 F1.8 is 6 primes in one lens. And honestly its 100% true
@markyteo
@markyteo 5 лет назад
"... Those muscle men... " "WOOOOHHHHH!!! FREUDIAN SLIP THERE! " I'm roflmao
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
Nam Hua Teo 🤔👀😂😂😂
@user-sh3kn9ov8v
@user-sh3kn9ov8v 9 месяцев назад
What about taking picture of someone, and asking the permission to keep or delete afterwards?
@jeffjaekel2558
@jeffjaekel2558 5 лет назад
Question. You talk about taking pics of people. Do you get releases from these people? If not why? Thanks
@lakehouse9164
@lakehouse9164 5 лет назад
My Pentax K-1 with battery-grip & 24-70 f/2.8 watched this video with me. It thinks the cameras on the table in front of you, are, ADORABLE. #StayBony
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
Nice... But your camera would be out of breath way before ours in a stair climbing contest.
@lakehouse9164
@lakehouse9164 5 лет назад
@@MoeMorales well played Moe, well played....
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
Haha 😂 ✋🏾 high five
@mattg8888
@mattg8888 5 лет назад
I started not that long ago with photography all together and my first street photography tryout was with a 100d and a 24mm pancake. Super challenging, but very rewarding when you get a good picture. A lot for me was also about finding what I like to take a photo of and learning what might be a good scene.
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
It's always nice when you get something you are happy with!
@JayMacroPhotos
@JayMacroPhotos 5 лет назад
What’s the tattoo of?
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
No spoilers.
@rajneshlohana5826
@rajneshlohana5826 5 лет назад
First! Still waiting a6400 review
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
May not get a full review... But I am sure he'll give you his overall opinion on it
@loufonolleras5544
@loufonolleras5544 5 лет назад
Bony..not touching that one....🤣
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
WEPA!
@muatao9943
@muatao9943 5 лет назад
Hey fellas, great conversation as always. I recently watched a really good video by Sean Tucker called "Defining Your Style of Photography". Your video today touched on some of the points he raised. And it really made me think. I have to realize what I'm comfortable with and try to work on improving that. I agree it is important to go out and shoot with intention as opposed to throwing out my fishing line and hoping to catch something. #newstreetgoals : )
@dani.p
@dani.p 5 лет назад
Great podcast! I loooove street photography but I'm always so scared about thieves/burglars so I only do it when I'm with more people xD
@rogerdunn5988
@rogerdunn5988 5 лет назад
Great conversation and I learned something - taking iPhone shots using ear phones volume control.
@MuzzFury5
@MuzzFury5 5 лет назад
I’ve never had a problem with my kit lens XC16-50mm but everyone talks about how great the 18-55 is. Is it really that much better or still good to stick to the kit lens
@pixure
@pixure 5 лет назад
the 18-55, with f2.8-4.0, takes in TWICE as much light and also give you a shallower depth of field. it depends of how you shoot. if your only shooting outside at daytime, then you can still have low ISO and high shutter speeds with your 16-50, then nothing else matters if you like the photos your getting. but as soon as you want to take pictures later in the evening or inside, then you'll notice you have to push your ISO too high and lower your shutter speed, and then the 18-55 taking in twice the light would shoot way better pictures. but if you REALLY want to take it to the next level, get a fast prime like the 23mm f2.0 or 35mm f2.0. they take in more than twice as much light as the 18-55. then there's also the 23mm f1.4 or 35mm f1.4, which take in more than 4 times the light of the 18-55, and more than 8 times the light of the 16-50. I have the 35mm f1.4 and can take crazy good pictures no matter the time of day, outside or inside, in any light and the quality and shallow depth of field just makes everything look professional without even trying. xD but as you say, you've never had a problem with your 16-50, and that tells me that you mainly shoot daytime outside. then theres no reason to spend money on a lens that can take in more light unless you want a shallow depth of field and nice bokeh around your subjects.
@MuzzFury5
@MuzzFury5 5 лет назад
NorthernOtyg thanks. I already have primes and the 35mm f/2 is my favorite of them all. I tend to not have much of a problem with the 16-50mm but I keep hearing how great the 18-55 is. Which is the reason I ask.
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
I have not tried the xc as you know Fuji is new to me but I am really impressed by the xf18-55! But rock what you have and don't worry about the xf18-55. Until you use it you don't miss it.
@MuzzFury5
@MuzzFury5 5 лет назад
Moe Morales that is a good motto to go by. Until you use it you don’t miss it.
@Krekkertje
@Krekkertje 5 лет назад
Yaaay, new podcast!
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
I know right!?
@Krekkertje
@Krekkertje 5 лет назад
@@MoeMorales I missed you guys
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
We missed us too! But Omar had Irritable bowel syndrome and I had to get my bail money together. 😒 the preceding message was not factual.
@michaels8597
@michaels8597 5 лет назад
I have no idea why this took over three minutes to discuss,because it's not that deep. In heavily populated places like NYC,there are local,and state laws,and you should follow them.If you do not there is a possible outcomes and consequence..PERIOD..In other places,if there's even one person outside,just get consent.Public domain is also tricky,so know what the rules are.I cAN shoot the Federal building,courts,Empire State buildings,yet inside most of them,i might jot be able to,not even with a cellphone,like in court.Take some pictures in court and they probably will take your phone,have you delete the images,and they might even detain and question you ,unless you are authorized press.Stand too long some places and take 100 pics of a government faci;ity,and you might be detained.If you want to shoot in the subway,understand that all media content probably belongs to the MTA,although they probably would not run into a gallery and remove your print.Understand you should never take pictures of cops,firemen,COs,or agents,etc,etc,unless you're ready for some possible heat. If you shoot someone without asking them,since they own the right to be shot or not you should respect their rights..Period..If you do not,and they grab you and the camera and beat you to a pulp,you are then under the protection of the laws about your property and your person,and they suffer those possible consequences for violating your person/property after you violated them.Ask folks like Sean Penn or others who take their privacy seriously,allegedly.I have a shot or two of Will Smith,yes the real one,who was filming MIB3 in the Bronx,close to where my son went to school..Apparently i had just dropped my son off,and was walking back,and they had a block cordened off.Next thing we knew Will comes out of the trailer and many wanted to see him and speak.At first the security told everyone to move back,and then Will said it;s ok,and came to the tape,shook hands,took pictures,and spoke to adults/children.I spoke and asked,and then took my pictures.The best part of the experience was him giving consent and then engaging the crowd,even though he was worth the asking price of $20 million dollars for a feature film. I live in NYC and since i have a working brain and common sense along with a big ole DSLR,i get consent,duhhhhhhhh...If i am shooting i am never trying to be sneaky,so i would also never got a smaller camera so i can call myself 'getting away with ',being sneaky.That's just my sense of integrity,and i shoot a LT of street art and would NEVER print it and try to make money from it without the specific consent of the original artist.I have at several times had people,men and women ASK ME TO take their picture AND not ask anything of me in return,except to make sure they left me see the shots. More than likely,if you're the guy who wants to be sneaky and not have to pay someone or get permits,you might be that same guy who runs stop signs and lights and 4 am since you think no one is watching or outside.If you do not care about consent then you might be that person who would only approach a certain person and have sex with them when they are drunk,plastered,and barely coherent,and then say they said yes.It's easy to go online and get free forms or have your legal counsel draft some,carry them around and hand them out to models.I also grew up with this thing called manners,so when i am shooting i normally wait for people to pass by,unless i want them in the frame.I also read what people say,do,and how their body language speaks,and sometimes i dont even havde to ask,because i already figured out they do not want to be photographed.It's wise to just use logic and dont do to others what you dont want done to you.Dont say stupid shi- online ,like calling people 'fanboy's',because they use a certain brand you dont,unless you're going to say the same thing to their face,in person.It's simple,plain,and not hard to figure out..
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
I respect your opinion. Agree with a lot of what you said, not the insults. And I also envy your typing stamina. But it is just your opinion. In my opinion street photography is a form of candid photography in public areas. I believe opinions that condemn all other opinions that don't match up with what they are saying is a very closed way of looking through life. So Michael while I respect and agree with a lot of what you are saying.. Again except for the insults... I will agree that we won't agree on your complete vision of street photography. But thank you for your support and watching our little podcast.
@michaels8597
@michaels8597 5 лет назад
@@MoeMorales .hmmmm......first of all,if you were seeing what i said as 'insults' then maybe YOU took it personally.SEcondly,if you're going to say something,and try to make it seem like it's a fact,that i was insulting you,then provide the specifics,or dont cry and make some generalized statements. Then here you are talking about opinions,while you gave yours,and then again,saying i am not tolerant of the opinions of others.How do YOU know what I accept from others and feel,unless you know me personally?I spoke on people's personal rights,which is NOT an opinion.I spoke on public domain,which is NOT an opinion,along with what I do as far as asking permission,which is also NOT an OPINION.Now,please find where i wrote that my way is the only way,and I will wait for it..
@michaels8597
@michaels8597 5 лет назад
@@MoeMorales .. Oh and I do not envy any man who cries about nothing said directly to him.Your writing stamina had nothing to do with the subject because you didnt say ONE instance of where I insulted you directly.This sounds like you are saying you just like to take pictures without permission,under the guise of 'the moment',and if that's what you want to do,then just do it.Then here you come,like you're doing some type of qualified accessment of me,my writing,and whatever else.Quite frankly,this is a public forum,and if you do not like what I write,then just do not read it,or post it privately to all the people who agree with you. I can care less,because it's not my gear,nor my issue.I merely spoke on me,using manners,common sense,obeying the rules,and respecting people's private space.Now does that mean I always ask?NO it does not,yet i am man enough to deal with the consequences,and it has happened. I was walking a woman to the bus stop who had just left my home.We were having a private moment and afterwards,I figured i could take some pictures of her while we waited on the bus.Not only did she get pissed,she also asked me to delete the pictures,and stood there to watch me and make sure they were gone.Of course it didnt make sense to me,yet it's her image,her privacy,so I just did as she asked me.
@michaels8597
@michaels8597 5 лет назад
Commercial purpose is not the only limitation imposed on freedom of expression. There are a host of laws that can limit the First Amendment rights, such as national security, safety, health or personal protection laws. For example, while it may be perfectly legal to photograph strangers in public places, as soon as the photographer steps onto private property, he or she could be trespassing. Expression that is derived from an illegal act may not receive as much First Amendment protection, which is thought to be a deterrent for such conduct. Even where entering private property isn’t immediately considered trespassing, such as a hotel, the photographer is obligated to comply with the property’s rules (or that of its agents, such as an employee or security guard), even if those rules aren’t readily visible. Just because you don’t see a “no photography” sign, doesn’t mean that photography is allowed. If a security guard tells you that photography is prohibited, rebutting with “I don’t see any signs” is not an appropriate retort, and does not have any impact on your legal position, except perhaps to irritate the guard. Even seemingly public places, like city parks, may have rules that may impact a photographer. For example, the government could put restrictions on the use of certain types of equipment, such tripods or supplemental lighting, since they can disrupt the general flow of traffic or create a safety hazard. Additionally, those areas critical to a city’s infrastructure such as subways tunnels or power plants may also have restrictions based on security and terrorism. Courts have generally concluded that such rules comport with the Constitution, so long as they are enacted for legitimate safety reasons, and not as an attempt to quell unwanted speech. So, if you plan on doing a shoot that requires excessive equipment, spending time in heavily trafficked areas or locations that might have a security concern, it is a good idea to check the rules. It may also pay to have those rules printed out and available in case police or another official who may not know the rules, asks you to leave. Additionally, military bases, crime scenes, airports, museums, energy installations, courthouses, public hospitals, and certain government facilities may also be off limits to photographers or subject to significant limitations for security, privacy, or logistical reasons. ----- While street photographers may have broad discretion on what to photograph, the rights are far from absolute. If you think of your next shoot from the perspective of privacy, you can likely make a good guess as to whether your photo is invading the privacy of others or whether your use of the photo could lose you your First Amendment protections. Still, even if your street photographs are well within the bounds of artistic expression and non-commercial in nature, you never know what you may want to do with them in the future, or how the law may change over time. When possible, it never hurts to get a release signed. It’s much easier to get a release immediately before or after photographing a subject than it is to try to track down a stranger later. (Download our generic model release here, to help get you started).>>>>>alj.artrepreneur.com/is-street-photography-legal/
@MoeMorales
@MoeMorales 5 лет назад
Hi Michael I took nothing you said as a personal insult but your comments about "what kind of person you are if you" and "you probably wouldn't say it to someone's face "and a few other comments were insults in the general. Of the if the shoe fits variety. Keep on being you but my response was laced with humor. I understand that maybe the humor escaped you as it was not intelligent enough to register on your level. Post away. Be happy in your awesomeness. I welcome you good sir. I wish you a wonderful day. I am out matched and will try to avoid another undressing. 🤗😁
Далее
Street Photography Technique, Ethics, and FEAR!
37:42
Просмотров 3,1 тыс.
Учёные из Тринидад и Тобаго
00:23
Why Your Street Photography Doesn't Stand Out
8:21
Просмотров 20 тыс.
Reviewing Every Street Photography Camera I've Used.
14:14
Camera Deal Breakers.
40:30
Просмотров 5 тыс.