Ummm... would Rupert agree with your statement at 1 minute and 13 seconds? We are finding 'morphogenetic fields ' to be very much entwined with genes and biochemistry and already worked out thousands of ways this may be so... I like Rupert's ideas and do not want his idea to be misconstrued. We see morphogenetic fields as one example of how the Universe is likely intelligent.
If you want accurate information you should read scientific papers in academic journals. Here, on this channel, we are more interested in exploring ideas. For example, putting two concepts, like morphogenetic fields and the ancient idea of the astral plane, next to each other in order to see which parallels might exist. This videos is not a proof it is an open ended speculative hypothesis.
@@OntologicalOdyssey this person was questioning the specific statement made at 1:13 not the premise of the video. As far as I can tell Sheldrake would agree with what you said, but that's beside the point. You should never, EVER qualify your claims by saying that you aren't holding yourself to standards of accuracy. If you can't be accurate and also explore ideas, then you need to find another shtick, because you clearly aren't cut out for doing anything that anyone should be taking seriously. You need to have the spine to make dam sure that you can back up what you are saying before you say it. Deferring to academic journals as though they are more accountable than you is a laughably bad look.
*sigh* when a bunch of materialists run a full court press telling the public that the world is a series of meaningless physical permutations over aeons for decades only to accidentally stumble upon the activity of the logos, and shamelessly peddle it as if it’s some ‘breakthrough’ and not what people have been saying for thousands of years. Complete arrogance and lack of accountability.
Indeed.. *sigh*. The mind that suffers from materialism/physicalism is a mind that suffers from narcissism (that which Dr. Iain McGilchrist refers to as left-brain dominant thinking).
Interesting! I always tell people that there is a reason why you have two brains and that it is one’s task to think with both at the same time. For example, a photo of your child is a symbol of love AND color particles on piece of paper. Things are physical and metaphysical or rational and irrational at the same time.
I think electromagnetism has a huge influence on the development of biological organisms. If the fields shift it probably has an effect on all forms of life.
If you want to see the Aether. Work with the sri yantra and microdose psilocybin. Plop yourself in a recliner with a poster of the yantra 4 ft from you. Stare into the bindu and enjoy the show. EXCEPT .... the show is not the Aether. It's microadjusting your eyes. After about 45 minutes take your gaze off the poster and look into the space around you. You'll see the Aether. The yantra (machine) is tuning your harmonic sympathetic phase.
Try it. I beg you to. But to answer your question I really don't know. I'm assuming because it is because of numerous descriptions I've read. It surrounds me in every direction. It has an undulating movement. It is nearly transparent with a light blue shimmer. I've tried many times to interact or coax it but it never reacts to me. I've tried chanting, crystals, electromagnetism , single pointed concentration, and other spiritual practices but nothing. At first I was introduced to it with the help of entheogens and the yantra but now I can witness it unaided.
@@OntologicalOdyssey I've worked with the shree yantra in the protocol I mentioned above about 7 times. Each and every time I come to see it, the aether/the shimmer. But what is beautiful to me is ayahuasca brought me the same result. For the summer of 2022 I worked for an ayahuasca church. We journeyed every weekend. I'd say at least 4 times I saw the aether, but without the yantra. The same undulating shimmering sea of energy. Referring back to your question, only once did I work with another drawing. It was a Tibetan mandala. I did not give it much time or effort with that one but I'd venture to say yes different yantras different outcome.
I hope my comment reaches the many. Especially psychonauts who have a science background. You don't need to take a large dose. The yantra does the work. Each and every time once I take my gaze off the poster, I am able to see it. I first got in to it because for a while I was researching terms like resonance and frequency. I used to practice mantra but wasn't getting any where with that. Then one day it occurred to me there is frequency in still photos, the yantras. The frequency of sacred geometry. Specifically the equilateral triangle. But more so that yantra has phi built in too. I hope some one tries it. Remember you don't need a large dose. ty
