MP Midi Controller Preview 

What I fear is that the encoders doesn't have high resolution so you have to have a ton of interpolation.

@@allowambeBOWWAMB thew will in MIDI 2.0

@Daniel Stenning me too man... me too. And when I see this I don't know if I were to cheer or to cry... guess I'll cheer with tears in my eyes (tears for not taking the time and developing this myself)

Me too, that is all I need. The plugin mapping concept is cool, though. Hopefully they will come up with a smaller version, with just knobs and a OLED text screen below knobs.

Agree!

Agreed. Like a BCR2000, but with mini-displays (a la Novation remote series) for each potentiometer.

@@alexmarkowski4893 The Mackie c4 has that. But it is a bit big..

Alex Markowski yep

It must be limited due to it using midi, sad that nobody can as easily implement OSC as they do with midi

@@FigittyFau If this thing or something like Synth master suggests - is released with open source code and API on Github it would allow people to come up with stuff like OSC etc.. And leave the manufacturer of this hardware to just focus more on the hardware bit than clever pretty GUIs and all the applications for these things... just a thought. :)

Get your self a behringer brc 2000 you'll have to use midi cables because the usb drivers army compatible with windows 10 not sure about mac, because i owned 1 already I also use Softube console 1 as controller

@@simonbarton7863 Hi there, problem with Pro Tools is that AVID doesn't support midi mapping on regular audio channels, only instrument channels. It has been a giant headache for years. Only some of the expensive AVID controllers, maybe...

I think it has to do with resolution, steps are absolute and kind of large - you can't hold shift while mooving to make smaller steps.

Sliders are more expensive. Also, they are absolute -- you must mechanically move them to sync them up with the value. Relative knobs are cheap, and you can sync them in software.

You can just buy a touch screen. Drag the plugin window to the touch screen and ... touch it!

The layout of the controller is very important. Could have placed the encoders around and outside the controller's screen, or all 32 at the bottom of the screen, or don't use a screen at all. The placement of the encoders is practical, as it allows to map via the nearest distance to the controller parameter. For example, if the Cutoff filter is on the left upper side on a virtual synth, it makes sence to have the encoder near mapped onto that. Also, this layout is a kind of universal solution to control any plugin (effects and instruments) of any design/layout. With the custom image backgrounds, you can "group" encoders in the same manner that are grouped on the controlled plugin. If you look at any plugin's interface carefully you will see how the designer separated controls in different groups by using different colors or border lines. This makes it intuitive and easy to the eye. And the same concept can be replicated using this controller.

Yeah like a push but screen in the middle instead of pads,I do love this though but with that kind of implementation of the encoders won't it just be ludicrously priced ?

@@mpmidi It is indeed a difficult problem to solve. Perhaps a version could be designed where everything is laid out into the sections of a synth style interface - such a 4 knobs for Osc 1, 4 knobs for osc 2, 4 for Osc 3, 4 knobs for each envelope, 3 for each LFOs etc. In such a case i'm not sure a display would be needed. Then you can develop some sort of intuitive muscle memory of knowing where the parameters are intuitively. One thing that could be an idea is to have the background of each synth having a line / cable looking graphic that leads to the controls that you have mapped to show how the knob mappings relate to the plugin. I like the idea of having custom sections. One thing that could potentially work would be to split a plugins GUI into the various sections and have a corresponding section of knobs below each portion of the GUI to make it more universally applicable. Just throwing around ideas anyway. I like that finally you can get a midi controller that you are actually looking at the plugin whilst tweaking it rather than just focusing on the control which is completely visually disconnected from the interface you are controlling. I definitely think you're onto something and i'd love to give it a go if the price isn't too expensive. 4K or 2k screen resolution would definitely be appreciated as an option.

Jorge Ramos probably more than most would want to pay. On the website you have to submit a form to get the price lol.

looks like more than anyone can afford. in the thousands probably.

It's shown at 5:26

Robert Anthony very good point 😂! I guess this one has a screen though! Lol

@@josephflores4787 and suction knobs

Yeah dude I really like to assign every parameter of each synth and plugin manually every time I insert one.

Stef Milojković I know, me too! Takes like 2 clicks to assign a knob or fader if/when you need it. I’ll decide what get’s mapped, I hate when a DAW or plugin hijacks the controller and auto maps things. Glad I’m not the only one!

Indeed, but I doubt it's going to change as it projects the VST in the middle. I doubt I ever buy this one.

@@ferst5937 Designed can be changed but this is really good. This proto type