shes exactly why we dont. shes the only one who isnt afraid to take the democrats in the right direction. U should go to college or something you probably work minimum wage
@@kr111ss "U should go to college you probably work minimum wage" lol well if you are actually a college grad, you are making the rest look bad. Considering to choose the path of deflection when confronted with an opinion you dont like... so you choose to generalize xD Whats your major?
She learned from the Republicans who are masters at it. In fact, the only honest person in congress (as evidenced by the minimal list of assets he owned) was John Lewis and he is gone.
@@helenpauls1496 he is polling 35% on X and he will be on all 50 states gaining over a million signatures. DNC has tried to sue him at every turn to keep him off the ballot and RFK has overcome all of it. Have the courage to debate him and lets see who is more qualified
Every day I see things about this man and I just shake my head. How can people support this type of behavior? What has this world come to it just saddens my heart and some way it scares me for the future of my children and my grandchildren.
You’re kidding,right? Every 84 yr old I’ve known is a lot more lucid than her 😂😂 And more agile. She speaks like she has something wrong with her teeth/mouth. Even my 87yr mother in law can name every world leader, and their policies. And politics aren’t even her favorite subject, she can also name every top ten tennis player and every tournament they’ve won and their losses 😂😂 And I’d bet money she’d win a race with Nancy, my mother in law is quite an athlete.
@@jlb1971 All of her time as speaker of the house and Democratic leader since the Bush years all the way to now (20 years plus), cannot be forgotten. She is in the history books whether you like it or not, and she’s the first and only madam speaker. Nobody has been more influential in the Democratic Party over the whole 20 years (obviously Obama and Biden have been presidents, but for shorter time). And she’s still to this day calling the shots, making Biden step down, even when she doesn’t have a formal leadership position.
America accuses some countries of dictatorship, and they do not see that they also have dictatorial rulers, but rather groups who sit in seats for decades, and the American citizen pays the costs of these people.
@@jlb1971Such a limited view of equality . It’s about hiring the best qualified person regardless of gender or race, not judging a person because of their gender or race. Let the best individual rise to their potential. I hope that you can do that in your life.
What happened to Paul was horrific. The jokes were disgusting. I was worried about Biden stepping down but this was the right move. Joe is a good guy a good president but not aggressive enough.
@@jlb1971 Sorry, not really into superstition. I'm a buddhist meditator and there really is no satan. There is just stress. a cause of stress. a plan to remove the stress from your life. and 8 practices to achieve happiness here and now and have the truth revealed directly to you through deep meditation.
Joe BIden on Mount Rushmore? Nancy, have you been in the vodka again this morning? Remember when everyone else had to skip haircuts, but Nancy could go out to a salon with no mask? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
@@smitty5890 Wrong-I'm. also not backing war mongers. The Democratic party used to be for peace. Why are we backing wars in other countries again? I was of the opinion the war in Iraq was not good for us and that we should fight for peace. Crazy thought-I know.
There has been no definitive proof that Nancy Pelosi has engaged in insider trading. Members of Congress are subject to the STOCK Act (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act), which was enacted in 2012 to combat insider trading by members of Congress and ensure greater transparency. The law explicitly prohibits members of Congress and other federal employees from using non-public information gained through their official positions for personal financial gain. It makes clear that such actions are illegal under existing insider trading laws. The STOCK Act requires members of Congress, their staff, and other federal employees to publicly disclose any financial transactions involving stocks, bonds, commodities futures, and other forms of securities within 45 days of the transaction. These disclosures are intended to increase transparency and allow the public to see whether government officials might be benefiting from non-public information. The law mandates that these financial disclosures be made available online in a searchable, sortable, and downloadable format. This provision aims to make it easier for the public and watchdog organizations to monitor the financial activities of government officials. The STOCK Act includes provisions for mandatory ethics training for congressional staff and other federal employees to ensure they understand the requirements and restrictions related to insider trading and financial disclosures. While not mandatory, the law encourages the use of blind trusts or similar arrangements to manage the financial assets of members of Congress and other federal officials to avoid conflicts of interest. It also provides guidelines for recusal from participating in decisions that could directly affect their financial interests.
PTL Y'all... especially ENP, respect has always been due you, bought your first book; expecting to get the new one. Continued good success to you and your family!
She has money and power. The average American Citizen has high inflation, high gas prices. High interest rates and mortgages. But some people continue to vote for these people, Career Crooks!
Nobody has been better at legislating than Madam Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi. She is committed to this country and to all Americans. God bless she and her husband and keep them safe.
What about her daughter filming her for a documentary on January 6 and she admitted she didn’t get the national guard when she was asked to several times by various,people.
When Trump asked, “How is her husband?” it was interpreted as mocking and led to violence. However, when some influential Democrats mocked the attempted assassination of Trump as being staged, it was not considered mocking and falsely accusation?
@@ChristineWhittaker-o9j There has been no definitive proof that Nancy Pelosi has engaged in insider trading. Members of Congress are subject to the STOCK Act (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act), which was enacted in 2012 to combat insider trading by members of Congress and ensure greater transparency. The law explicitly prohibits members of Congress and other federal employees from using non-public information gained through their official positions for personal financial gain. It makes clear that such actions are illegal under existing insider trading laws. The STOCK Act requires members of Congress, their staff, and other federal employees to publicly disclose any financial transactions involving stocks, bonds, commodities futures, and other forms of securities within 45 days of the transaction. These disclosures are intended to increase transparency and allow the public to see whether government officials might be benefiting from non-public information. The law mandates that these financial disclosures be made available online in a searchable, sortable, and downloadable format. This provision aims to make it easier for the public and watchdog organizations to monitor the financial activities of government officials. The STOCK Act includes provisions for mandatory ethics training for congressional staff and other federal employees to ensure they understand the requirements and restrictions related to insider trading and financial disclosures. While not mandatory, the law encourages the use of blind trusts or similar arrangements to manage the financial assets of members of Congress and other federal officials to avoid conflicts of interest. It also provides guidelines for recusal from participating in decisions that could directly affect their financial interests.
@ChristineWhittaker-o9j Paul Pelosi trades based off of learning information from his wife that is not available to the investing public - but it is not illegal under standard insider trading laws, as Pelosi would not meet the definition of “insider.” That being said, in 2012, Congress passed the STOCK Act in order to prohibit trading on non-public Congressional information and requiring disclosures of Congressional stock trades: the law has proven toothless, however, as in spite of literally dozens of members of Congress violating the Act - a rare act of bipartisanship, as both Republicans and Democrats partook - no one has suffered any consequences. You really think she let's him invest half of their documented earned income without saying a word about it to help influence his decision at least
Paul Pelosi trades based off of learning information from his wife that is not available to the investing public - but it is not illegal under standard insider trading laws, as Pelosi would not meet the definition of “insider.” That being said, in 2012, Congress passed the STOCK Act in order to prohibit trading on non-public Congressional information and requiring disclosures of Congressional stock trades: the law has proven toothless, however, as in spite of literally dozens of members of Congress violating the Act - a rare act of bipartisanship, as both Republicans and Democrats partook - no one has suffered any consequences. You really think she let's him invest such a massive amount of their documented earned income without saying anything to atleast influence his decision a bit. I think she does not only is she currently being investing for it but also they make tons of trades within days of major bills or policies that benefit them tremendously...
@@ChristineWhittaker-o9j Paul Pelosi trades based off of learning information from his wife that is not available to the investing public - but it is not illegal under standard insider trading laws, as Pelosi would not meet the definition of “insider.” That being said, in 2012, Congress passed the STOCK Act in order to prohibit trading on non-public Congressional information and requiring disclosures of Congressional stock trades: the law has proven toothless, however, as in spite of literally dozens of members of Congress violating the Act - a rare act of bipartisanship, as both Republicans and Democrats partook - no one has suffered any consequences.
Finally, in the last 60 seconds, you let her speak. Before that, the whole segment was chopped-up and scattered. It was terrible, very unprofessional. Especially considering that there were hours and hours of tape to edit, and create something flowing and focused. It wasn’t. Madame Speaker deserved much better.
That is a great lady. Nobody knows that more than Donald Trump even though he'll never admit it. She was the most effective Speaker of the House in our lifetime and possibly the history of the country.
Nancy Pelosi is a classy lady and professional. Thank you for this example to my family - especially my daughters. I admire high character in doing the things that need done.
Nancy is very accomplished, and no one should be attacked for doing their job. With all that said, it’s time she hands that torch to others. 84 and she’s running for re-election? Is there no one else who can do that job?? Doesn’t make sense.
