most popular general in history known for his exceptional genius in miliary tactics vs some dude known for his atrocities towards the jews. i think the winner is clear.
@@PrVecXD_innovations, tactics, strategies, battles won, battles fought, better leader, feats, casualties - all say napoleon is better than Austrian painter
@@PrVecXD_ Idk why tf thes guys are mentioning tanks and airforce, this is not a real war, just a comparison, tanks and Airforce will come under one word (factor) "Technology", and I am pretty sure that the French would dominate in other factors
Historical fun fact: The Austrian mustachioed man was inspired by Napoleon. Napoleon was inspired by Caesar. Caesar was inspired by Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great was inspired by Achilles. And Achilles wasn't a real person.
How so?germany was the one who started the war with the invasion of poland but then the uk and france declared war on germany so technically germany started the war by invading poland which made them declare war.@@yasinneysari
@@sharlockborls6308 poland and some land was part of Germany before ww1. Germany just wants their own land that had been lost in the treaty of Versailles. Germany needed that land for space of living because the population of Germany was so high and resources are so low. Germany didn't want to conquer the world. This is a big lie. So balance of power just was an excuse. And the UK and france shouldn't be declared a war. In addition,even your biggest enemy wants peace you should accept. Germany gave so many big proposals to stop war. He didn't attack Dunkirk just for peace. But uk shout out "i want war" . Germany started a war to survive. Even if it started the war, it didn't start ww2.
The Russian empire and the mongol empire did not co exist. Mongols conquered the small tribes that consisted of the Russian empire in later years not the Russian empire itself.
Literally Napoleon is so goated that it took several countries to beat him and they got defeated numerous times before managing a win, the funny part is that they where so scared of him being alive that they sealed his corpse within several coffins.
@@kingdragonthefirst4686 No he had fought against Austria, Prussia, Russia, and Great Britain which for 1800's are the superpowers at that time, he fended them off simultaneously and even with a weakened french army they still lost badly, one of their tactics at that time when they see Napoleon was to run and not engage him head on...
@@Capin-Crunch It's more his practice. Since there was a case when he praised the useless Austrian general, who lost to him, and thanks to this, the Austrians decided that since this general surprised Napoleon himself, then he should probably be re-appointed commander-in-chief.
@@jaguarbrave8453 Le fait qu'ils aient tous pratiqué l'esclavage annule donc le fait qu'Haïti soit un génocide ? Le fait que tout le monde ait pratiqué l'esclavage annule tout ce que les Espagnols ont fait dans les Amériques lorsqu'ils y sont arrivés ?
@@jaguarbrave8453 Bien que les Français aient aboli l'esclavage, Napoléon était favorable à l'esclavage et a même envoyé des troupes pour mettre fin à la révolution en Haïti,
I have an old book that states the quote below was said by the same painter: “ _A dictator is like a bicycle driver. If he/she stops, then he/she will fall_ “
But if we are being honest, a lot of engagements for the mustache man weren’t taken into account with the ‘less than 10’ scoring. Look at events like Bialystok, Minsk, Narva, Hungary, Warsaw, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Paris, Kiev, Sevastopol, etc. I doubt it scaled up to 53, but probably damn near close
to be fqir when hes was exiled for the first time he came back and the second place he was exiled to was a rock floating in the atlantics ocean thousands of kilometers away from a landmass my man also had 2 ships and 2000 men constantly guard him
@@painvillegaming4119 might i also point out that like 4 empires declared war not on france but fucking napoleon himself. like napoleon was that much of a menace
@perseus274I wouldn't call him a nazi, but i agree with your initial statement. I hate people who are obviously uneducated in a certain subject and just say common shit you'd find on Facebook. Like bro, if you're gonna comment on a subject, you best have common knowledge before you say random shit.
@HansLanza tf you talking about? they obvs didnt want a war and even more they didnt want a russian german joint invasion since the soviets were their allies
but Hitler wanted to destroy Russia, and Napoleon simply wanted us not to trade with Britain... Napoleon was many times taller than Hitler, maybe not in height, but in soul and mind.
@@thetanmanmcg6378 It's just a theory/meme. Also you think Napoleon fan (who's romantically attracted to Napoleon) would think he actually said that?? Lmao I think you're the one who should be educating themselves
Gloire à la Pologne et aux troupes de Józef Poniatowski Maréchal de France et Grand Chevalier de la Légion d'honneur ainsi qu'à tous les Polonais de 1795 jusqu'à la fin du vol de l'aigle en 1815 qui combattirent pour leur pays et les idéaux de liberté avec la France. 🇫🇷❤🇵🇱 Chwała Polsce i oddziałom Józefa Poniatowskiego Marszałkowi Francji i Wielkiemu Kawalerowi Legii Honorowej oraz wszystkim Polakom od roku 1795 aż do końca lotu orła w roku 1815, którzy walczyli za ojczyznę i ideały wolności z Francją. 🇫🇷❤🇵🇱
As great things as indirectly causing the death of over 6 million people in 10 years of Napoleonic Wars? As great as restoration of slavery and drowning Haiti in blood? Or as great as imperialistic point of view on the world and destruction of ethnic minorities on French Territory?
My view: If you want some quick win with low casualties > Napoleon If you really aggresive for wanting to annex big size country > Austrian Painter (with calculation caution)
Napoleon Bonaparte (born Napoleone di Buonaparte;[1][b] 15 August 1769 - 5 May 1821), later known by his regnal name Napoleon I, was a French military and political leader who rose to prominence during the French Revolution and led a series of successful campaigns across Europe during the Revolutionary Wars and Napoleonic Wars from 1796 to 1815. He was the leader of the French Republic as First Consul from 1799 to 1804, then of the French Empire as Emperor of the French from 1804 to 1814, and briefly again in 1815. Born on the island of Corsica to a family of Italian origin, Napoleon moved to mainland France in 1779 and was commissioned as an officer in the French Army in 1785. He supported the French Revolution in 1789, and promoted its cause in Corsica. He rose rapidly in the ranks after breaking the siege of Toulon in 1793 and firing on royalist insurgents in Paris on 13 Vendémiaire in 1795. In 1796, Napoleon commanded a military campaign against the Austrians and their Italian allies in the War of the First Coalition, scoring decisive victories and becoming a national hero. He led an expedition to Egypt and Syria in 1798 which served as a springboard to political power. In November 1799, Napoleon engineered the Coup of 18 Brumaire against the Directory, and became First Consul of the Republic. He won the Battle of Marengo in 1800, which secured French victory in the War of the Second Coalition, and in 1803 sold the territory of Louisiana to the United States, which doubled the latter's area. In December 1804, Napoelon crowned himself Emperor of the French, further expanding his power. The breakdown of the Treaty of Amiens led to the War of the Third Coalition by 1805. Napoleon shattered the coalition with a decisive victory at the Battle of Austerlitz, which led to the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire. In the War of the Fourth Coalition, Napoleon defeated Prussia at the Battle of Jena-Auerstedt in 1806, marched his Grande Armée into Eastern Europe, and defeated the Russians in 1807 at the Battle of Friedland. Seeking to extend his trade embargo against Britain, Napoleon invaded the Iberian Peninsula and installed his brother Joseph as King of Spain in 1808, provoking the Peninsular War, mainly fought by his marshals until 1814. In 1809, the Austrians again challenged France in the War of the Fifth Coalition, in which Napoleon solidified his grip over Europe after winning the Battle of Wagram. In summer 1812, Napoleon launched an invasion of Russia, which ended in the catastrophic retreat of his army that winter. In 1813, Prussia and Austria joined Russia in the War of the Sixth Coalition, in which Napoleon was decisively defeated at the Battle of Leipzig. The coalition invaded France and captured Paris, forcing Napoleon to abdicate in April 1814. They exiled him to the Mediterranean island of Elba and restored the Bourbons to power. In February 1815, Napoleon escaped from Elba and again took control of France in what became known as the "Hundred Days". His opponents responded by forming a Seventh Coalition, which defeated him at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. Napoleon was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena in the South Atlantic, where he died of stomach cancer in 1821, aged 51. Napoleon is considered one of the greatest military commanders in history and Napoleonic tactics are still studied at military schools worldwide. His legacy endures through the modernizing legal and administrative reforms he enacted in France and Western Europe, embodied in the Napoleonic Code. He established a system of public education,[2] abolished the vestiges of feudalism,[3] emancipated Jews and other religious minorities,[4] abolished the Spanish Inquisition,[5] enacted the principle of equality before the law for an emerging middle class,[6] and centralized state power at the expense of religious authorities.[7] His conquests acted as a catalyst for political change and the development of nation states. However, he is controversial due to his role in wars which devastated Europe, his looting of conquered territories, and his mixed record on civil rights: he abolished the free press, ended directly elected representative government, exiled and jailed critics of his regime, reinstated slavery in France's colonies except for Haiti, banned the entry of blacks and mulattos into France, reduced the civil rights of women and children in France, reintroduced a hereditary monarchy and nobility,[8][9][10] and violently repressed popular uprisings against his rule.[11] Early life Napoleon's family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family who emigrated to Corsica in the 16th century and his maternal ancestors, the Ramolinos, descended from a noble family from Lombardy.[12] Half-length portrait of a wigged middle-aged man with a well-to-do jacket. His left hand is tucked inside his waistcoat. Napoleon's father, Carlo Buonaparte, fought for Corsican independence under Pasquale Paoli. After their defeat, he eventually became the island's representative to Louis XVI's court. Napoleon's parents, Carlo Maria Buonaparte and Maria Letizia Ramolino, lived in the Maison Bonaparte home in Ajaccio, where Napoleon was born on 15 August 1769. He had an elder brother, Joseph, and, later, six younger siblings: Lucien, Elisa, Louis, Pauline, Caroline, and Jérôme.[13] Five more siblings were stillborn or did not survive infancy.[14] Napoleon was baptized as a Catholic, under the name Napoleone di Buonaparte. In his youth, his name was also spelled as Nabulione, Nabulio, Napolionne, and Napulione.[15] Napoleon was born one year after the Republic of Genoa ceded Corsica to France.[16][c] His father fought alongside Pasquale Paoli during the Corsican war of independence against France. After the Corsican defeat at the Battle of Ponte Novu in 1769 and Paoli's exile in Britain, Carlo became friends with the French governor Charles Louis de Marbeuf, who became his patron and godfather to Napoleon.[20][21] With Mabeuf's support, Carlo was named Corsican representative to the court of Louis XVI and Napoleon obtained a royal bursary to a military academy in France.[22][23] The dominant influence of Napoleon's childhood was his mother, whose firm discipline restrained a rambunctious child.[22] Later in life, Napoleon said, "The future destiny of the child is always the work of the mother."[24] Napoleon's noble, moderately affluent background afforded him greater opportunities to study than were available to a typical Corsican of the time.[25] In January 1779, at age 9, Napoleon moved to the French mainland and enrolled at a religious school in Autun to improve his French (his mother tongue was the Corsican dialect of Italian).[26][27][28] Although he eventually became fluent in French, he spoke with a Corsican accent and his French spelling was poor.[29] In May, he transferred to the military academy at Brienne-le-Château where he was routinely bullied by his peers for his accent, birthplace, short stature, mannerisms, and poor French.[26] He became reserved and melancholic, applying himself to reading. An examiner observed that Napoleon "has always been distinguished for his application in mathematics. He is fairly well acquainted with history and geography ... This boy would make an excellent sailor".[d][31] One story of Napoleon at the school is that he led junior students to victory against senior students in a snowball fight, which allegedly showed his leadership abilities.[32] But the story was only told after Napoleon had become famous.[33] In his later years at Brienne, Napoleon became an outspoken Corsican nationalist and admirer of Paoli.[34] this isn’t the full story btw
@@raUser9982Stalin wasn't a great leader, in war he only won because of the help from his allies through men and food supplies, he won only because of army numbers instead of good strategies, he held back the Soviet union' economy and population by using communism instead of capitalism and his ideology (communism) has failed and is now on life support in the countries that matter (not to mention that unlike H1tl3r the USSR won the war and he had nothing holding him back from spreading communism)
The painter was so stupid he basically went from homeless to emperor in a few years. This is a trivial achievement and everybody can do it with very little effort.
The only inaccuracy here was the size. The Nazis at their peak literally conquered most of mainland Europe, which is way larger than the (First) French Empire. But anyways, *VIVE L'EMPEREUR!*
Give Napoleon Bonaparte some more points. He was put in worse situations than Hitler and made it out alive. Last time I checked, Hitler wasn't an outlaw like Napoleon during the war of the seventh coalition or just called hundred days.
Worse Situation??😂 France was uniffied strong Military Germany was Not uniffied tiny States and Made war against each other and He only lived because Back then they Had Honor and even thougth He Made Europe into a mess and Ruins and did also many warcrimes
AH was an outlaw since 1st of september 1939' internationally. Inside Germany, he had dozens of failed assasination attempts on him before 39' and many after. After 1945 he was still an outlaw. and even today he is an outlaw - you are not even allowed to say his name, hence Austrian Painter.
Ephesians 6:10-18 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints. The bible is no old book. You have to really let Christ open your eyes; to see the world in shambles. Many people say it's a religion to lock up people in chains, and say it's a rule book.. why? Because people hate hearing the truth, it hurts their flesh, it's hurts their pride, it's exposes on what things have they done..people love this world so much, s*x, money, power, women, supercars.. things of this world. Still trying to find something that can fill that emptiness in your heart. You can't find that in this world.. only in Christ, the bible is no chains, it's a chainbreaker. Breaking your sins into pieces... Repent now, and turn back to the true Lord only.. God bless.😊😊😊😊
Só ganharam usando estratégias da Terra arrasada a favor do seu povo, nunca a Rússia teve um exército para se igualar ao inimigo, um exemplo disso é hoje em dia, vocês estão perdendo pra um país fraco e pequeno igual a Ucrânia. 🇩🇪🇧🇷💪🏽
@@user-uf2vw5fg9xпо сути вся пойна Наполеона и Гитлера была с Россией(СССР) - войны в Африке или во Франции были очень незначительны хотя Америка и Британия описывают эти события как грандиозные - Наполеон самую массовую армию привёл в Россиию и проиграл - опять запад выдумал историю о победе "зиме" - хотя Кутузов тактически переиграл Наполеона - но наврятли покажут и расскажу про это
Napoléon was in Moscow, he left russia by himself because the russian burn Moscow so no food, water and Somewhere to rest, and when Napoléon was in russia there is a volcano that blow up in oceania and the rumor Say that Napoléon Lost because of the volcano.
@@PyrrhusHLhe didn't left moskow by himself... if he stayed there for 2 more days, then they'd be surrounded by russians... and napoleon didn't have enough forces to fight against russians any further... so he was forced to leave... but his entire army got destroyed during the invasion and he got defeated at the end
The fact that his peak army size is so much higher than napoleon yet still he won less battles then napoleon, just shows how much strategy napoleon had
Tenía menos soldados ya que son otras épocas, en los tiempos de napoleón esa cantidad era enorme y en los tiempos del pintor esos números eran los normales
"Normal" obviously Revolutionary France adopted massive draft as one of the first nations, but its not Napoleons ingenuity that lead to that draft to be adopted. And other countries did so too. Especially Prussia. Moreover in the time of the "painter" he still had one of the biggest draft rates up to the manpower pool being depleted. @@DROLEAN755
@user-f49kyyo8u he wasn't really that evil, coalition forces were the real evils who wanted to suppress the French Revolution because they don't want their people to be inspired by French Revolution and rise against them
Napoleon's Crimes: A Blueprint for Hitler (French: Le Crime de Napoléon) is a book published in 2005 by French writer Claude Ribbe, who is of Caribbean origin. In the book, Ribbe advances the thesis that Napoleon Bonaparte during the Haitian Revolution first used gas chambers as a method of mass execution, 140 years before Hitler and the Nazis. His accusations in the book has caused a minor political and academic storm when it was published, and its premise remains under contention to this day. In the early 19th century, Napoleon had reinstated slavery in the French colonies of Saint-Domingue (now Haiti) and Guadeloupe, these were subsequently hit by a series of massive slave rebellions. Napoleon, as the person responsible for the reinstatement of slavery after the First French Republic had abolished it, was in charge of putting the slave revolts down, and he did so with brutal efficiency. Ribbe claims that some of Napoleon's men refused to do as they were ordered, and then later wrote journals describing the massacre. From these passages, he claims that Napoleon's troops burnt sulphur (readily collected from nearby volcanoes) to make sulphur dioxide gas, which is extremely poisonous. This would have been effective at helping to quell the rebelling Caribbean slaves. Ribbe's most controversial accusation is that the holds of ships were used as makeshift gas chambers; and that up to 100,000 black slaves were murdered in them. These revelations are still in considerable academic dispute, but when the book was published, the French establishment was quick to condemn his allegations. The French newspaper France Soir, a populist tabloid, for instance, published a stinging editorial, calling the claims of the book insane. The French historian Pierre Branda wrote a critical analysis of Ribbe's book, stating that it is mainly based on suppositions and that the sources are few and often quoted and referred to with heavy omissions. The book was written in a context of social tension for the bicentenary of Austerlitz and in the same timeframe as the Affaire Olivier Grenouilleau, where the author is strongly implicated. Jérôme Gautheret, in Le Monde, considers that « Le Crime de Napoléon n’est pas un livre d’histoire » "is not a history book" and describes it as « charge polémique dirigée contre les « historiographes officiels » "a polemical charge directed against the "official historiographers"" and a "pamphlet" that does not really contribute to a “critical re-reading of the colonial fact”.[1] Nicolas Lebourg denounces “this type of anachronism, [...] describing the slave trade as a Holocaust in wedge Napoleon's Crimes: A Blueprint for Hitler (French: Le Crime de Napoléon) is a book published in 2005 by French writer Claude Ribbe, who is of Caribbean origin. In the book, Ribbe advances the thesis that Napoleon Bonaparte during the Haitian Revolution first used gas chambers as a method of mass execution, 140 years before Hitler and the Nazis. His accusations in the book has caused a minor political and academic storm when it was published, and its premise remains under contention to this day. In the early 19th century, Napoleon had reinstated slavery in the French colonies of Saint-Domingue (now Haiti) and Guadeloupe, these were subsequently hit by a series of massive slave rebellions. Napoleon, as the person responsible for the reinstatement of slavery after the First French Republic had abolished it, was in charge of putting the slave revolts down, and he did so with brutal efficiency. Ribbe claims that some of Napoleon's men refused to do as they were ordered, and then later wrote journals describing the massacre. From these passages, he claims that Napoleon's troops burnt sulphur (readily collected from nearby volcanoes) to make sulphur dioxide gas, which is extremely poisonous. This would have been effective at helping to quell the rebelling Caribbean slaves. Ribbe's most controversial accusation is that the holds of ships were used as makeshift gas chambers; and that up to 100,000 black slaves were murdered in them. These revelations are still in considerable academic dispute, but when the book was published, the French establishment was quick to condemn his allegations. The French newspaper France Soir, a populist tabloid, for instance, published a stinging editorial, calling the claims of the book insane. The French historian Pierre Branda wrote a critical analysis of Ribbe's book, stating that it is mainly based on suppositions and that the sources are few and often quoted and referred to with heavy omissions. The book was written in a context of social tension for the bicentenary of Austerlitz and in the same timeframe as the Affaire Olivier Grenouilleau, where the author is strongly implicated. Jérôme Gautheret, in Le Monde, considers that « Le Crime de Napoléon n’est pas un livre d’histoire » "is not a history book" and describes it as « charge polémique dirigée contre les « historiographes officiels » "a polemical charge directed against the "official historiographers"" and a "pamphlet" that does not really contribute to a “critical re-reading of the colonial fact”.[1] Nicolas Lebourg denounces “this type of anachronism, [...] describing the slave trade as a Holocaust in wedges So yes napoleon did commit atrocities
@@Jan.jan2024please remember that the best german general is blucher, and he himself got defeated 4 times in a single campagin against napoleon alone, napoleon also has several of the greatest french generals like jean-baptise jourdan, andre massena, davout and much more, rommel or manstein or any german general wouldnt win if they face them in a 1v1 or even a 1v2.
@@Jan.jan2024Rather depends on the size of the army. If there were only a couple of battalions or divisions, Napaleon would have won. Because I think within a couple of weeks or even days, Napaleon would have fully studied the technologies of the 20th century. It turns out that the larger armies collide, the higher the chance of victory for the Austrian and the lower Napaleon, and vice versa, the smaller the troops, the higher the chance of victory for Napaleon
Napoleon was one of the greatest military generals of all time, having speed, element of surprise, and great tactics. Sad that he had to spend the rest of his life in St. Helena
@@Puro116 Napoleon beat Russia in every battle on Russian soil but the Russians kept escaping capture. The winter was the final nail on the coffin for Napoleons army
Napoleon is known as one of the greatest millitary generals rarely losing every battle he faces Many of his 26 marshals are also famous generals who won several battles for example Michel Ney
Not only his Marshals, but his generals many who were better than some marshals were very gifted men. Vandamme, Saint-Hilaire, Kellermann who actually was the one who saved the battle of Marengo. Dupont, Gudin, Lasalle, Kleber, Moreau,any more who at one point served under him could've been greater than Ney and many others.
The only reason Hitler won the army size is because during napoleons time the population was still extremely low, but of Napoleon was around with his empire etc during ww2 his army seize and population would be much bigger.
@@fuxihutterer8088 Tiny state? Prussia? You mean the same Prussia with the same troops commanded by Frederick II, who was arguably the best general Germany ever had and who dominated Europe using those same troops? That Prussia?
"no genocides" Oh yeah how about when he was invading Egypt then switched to Gaza and Alareesh when he tried invading Yafa he told their people no blood will be shed, when they let him in he killed every single one of them, totally no genocides.
Maybe because the people of Egypt kept killing his men when he tried to approach them with peace. He wanted to get off of the Mamelukes who kept oppressing the people of that region. Not to mention when Napoleon sent men to send messages they kept getting beheaded and put their heads of those Frenchmen on top of the walls. Stop trying to imply he committed evil acts like killing for no reason at all. Not only that, after he left Egypt and left a talented general in charge who wanted to surrender with the british, general Kleber, he got stabbed by a local student.
Mao Zedong has entered the chat Stalin has entered the chat Hideki Tojo entered the chat Leopold II of Belgium has entered the chat The British Empire has entered the chat with its boys the Roman Empire and out of nowhere, the whole Spanish Inquisition.