NASA Artemis Lunar Terrain Vehicle (Official NASA Trailer)

Подписаться 703 тыс.

Просмотров 11 тыс.

50% 1

NASA hosted a news conference from the Johnson Space Center in Houston April 3, 2024 to announce the companies selected to move forward in the development of the Lunar Terrain Vehicle under the LTVS (Lunar Terrain Vehicle Services) contract. The award leverages NASA’s expertise in developing and operating rovers to build commercial capabilities that support scientific discovery and long-term human exploration on the Moon. NASA intends to begin using the LTV for crewed operations during Artemis V.

Опубликовано:

26 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 25

@Vector_Ze 5 месяцев назад

Hurry up, damn it. I'm 70 years old, can't wait forever.

@Marty_Bolton 5 месяцев назад

I'm right behind ya at 62. We might be the only group to see Americans on the Moon with Apollo and Artemis. Hang in there!

@ScumfuckMcDoucheface 5 месяцев назад

@@Marty_Boltonhaha that's awesome man - edit - it would have been way awesomererer if NASA had just stayed there in the first place right haha we could have been on Mars decades ago. =)

@ironspider9280 5 месяцев назад

God bless you sir, stay alive. You got this !!

@Vector_Ze 5 месяцев назад

@@ScumfuckMcDoucheface Thank Congress, and a lack of interest among the public, for that. But, we've got to maintain a military that dwarfs all others.

@bbartky 5 месяцев назад

@@Marty_BoltonWow - I hadn’t thought about that! I’m in between both of you and I’m going to hang in there doubly hard. 👍

@kyleproulx4911 5 месяцев назад

To the moon 🌕 and beyond

@stocchinet 5 месяцев назад

Damn, that budget cuts are showing up 😅

@RubyByte 5 месяцев назад

How could an LTV cost $4B. It's literally an RC car. Apollo's version cost way less than that. NASA is losing touch with reality

@JonGretarB 5 месяцев назад

It is really too expensive but lets not compare it to the LRV. There is quite a difference between the demands. The Apollo LRV had to be able to operate 3 days and be driven a maximum of 36km in total. It did not need to recharge or need to have any ability to be serviced or repaired. It did not need to carry anything more than a couple if astronauts and a small bag of rocks. It’s really is like comparing a small private airplane to a jet liner.

@undertow2142 5 месяцев назад

Because the shareholders and CEO. Believe they should be paid 3000% more than the people who actually do the work.

@Eurypter1d 5 месяцев назад

@@undertow2142 Nasa is a government agency. There isnt a CEO or Shareholders lol.

@pranititiwari6525 5 месяцев назад

Wow 🎉. Such a "fool proof " vehicle. ,for the moon!!

@TRIIIAD 5 месяцев назад

0:40 dune buggy from Battlefield?

@planetsec9 5 месяцев назад

Sort of wish they just made Apollo LRV 2.0 for crew mobility, because they want it to be active unmanned it will take so long to develop, design, test and get ready instead