Jack Carr shoots an unconventional 3-Gun run with a Glock 34 Combat Master, a Sig Copperhead SMG, and a Taran Tactical V-Seven .308 AR-10 #tarantactical #jackcarr #combatmaster
@@ryanrudolph2857 you get good by start out slow and smooth. Speed comes later. That's what the expression means. My father was national level competitve shooter and a coach for over thirty years and this was one of his mantras
@@TTime685 Well, maybe it's time to either start drilling at home or stop using any product where petroleum was used in the manufacturing process. If it's the latter, you'll need to go off-grid and start living life like it's 1824...
Fascinating to see his movements compared to all these competition shooters. Certainly slower, but so much more deliberate. He's aware of his surroundings and cognisant that in real life the targets shoot back
@@HWG-wm8ld no, 3 gun competitors would be dead. They'd wax him in this, but not real life. A 3 gun competition is not a scenario one would likely come across in any combat in the last 20 or so years. A pistol and an sbr M4. A breacher may have a shotgun if the platoon commander dictates.
@@slowpoke96Z28that only makes things easier to ANYTHING shooter… i dont understand how any of that is relevant in regards to replying to the other guy but sure go off🫥
Remember these Karen tacticool shooters are always shooting at targets that never shoot back hence the speed loading and fast movements. The way they shoot would get them killed in real combat, competition shooters lie to themselves alot.
0:24 That step he takes is CQB 101, but it’s beautiful. The real pros nail the basics, they make it so smooth, so effortless that you’ll miss it unless you’re looking
ANY pro with any tools doesn't seem fast, but the work is done much faster then the one all frenzied up. After several thousand of hours you get the exact procedure down and every move is effective.
LOL. If you're switching between three guns in CQB, you're getting fucked up. 3-gun always has been and always will be a shooting sport, nothing more. It's not combat simulation. Just a fun time trial.
@@concentrator3906 If that's the case, then he knows even less about what he's saying. If you're in CQB and you lift your weapon up to move around an obstacle, you're asking to get killed. Again, this is the action of someone who knows what preselected targets he's engaging at what range--it's not a how-to on CQB. Game plan it out. Your weapon is up like Carr's, you come tight around an obstacle or wall, and there's a bad guy also around the wall. Guess what, that bad guy is now in your "workspace" and your primary firearm is out of the fight and unable to be brought into the fight because the bad guy's into your body making it impossible for you to bring the primary firearm into the fight. So long as the bad guy hasn't been equally stupid, he's got you at distance because his primary firearm is leveled for combat and you're going to get stitched across the chest before you can say, "Oh shit". Again, this isn't combat training or anything like it. It's a fun time trial with its own skills that will get you killed if you try and employ them in real combat. I think Carr would say the same.
My takeaway: You see how he holds on the target like a tiny bit longer? That's that "until the threat is gone"-training. The other shooters on this course transition away so much faster; they send it from their 1.75lb, short-pull modified 9mms and they're on to the next. He holds on just a little more, just a hair, because he has real world experience and is naturally looking for target reaction. This is why competition shooting should not overly influence combat shooting. They are fundamentally different, in my opinion, and we see a bit too much cross over these days -- anything from extra unnecessary gadgets to trying to be super fast at course runs and disregarding fundamentals of movement as a result. Rant over.
That's what matters the most. I remember reading about ancient Greece and the wars they fought. Sometimes Olympic chariot racers would be on the battlefield and they'd get demolished. They might be good at chariot racing, but to actually test those skills in live combat is diffrent. Same here. This guy would dust any competitor in a combat situation. When you're trained for combat the guy would obviously be better at actual combat.
@@shootstraight91 yeah. If you're referring to sports. This navy seal is using his gun for practicality. And thats because war is where most of this shit was first tried and tested. And honestly. That's where the idea of sports originally stems from. At least in the west. Wrestling for example, was originally intended for use by soldiers for hand to hand combat. Javelin throwing, martial arts, weightlifting, fencing. All that. We made them into sports of their own. They all had practical use in combat, and that's where you will probably find its intended use
You can never miss fast enough. Every shot counts and every shot should be a final shot. The difference between down range guys and competition guys is very clear. Every movement counts and should be deliberate just like he was. Good work brother man. BZ and Semper Fi
