Yes, but we can take it even further. It’s like “stop being homeless, just buy a house in an alternate dimension that most scientists agree doesn’t exist”
No I don’t remember him saying that, but, if you want to be a dumbass, go ahead, and live your life without a brain. I’ve actually never seen a worse attempt at strawmaning a much more intelligent human being in my life.
@@user-bf6pz6kj8f it's dumb, really dumb, there is a 33.33% chance that if you state a fact using factual data that you can search up and really easy to find you'll sound smarter than you actually are, even tho such data doesn't actually support what you say but ionstead is just data that can be intereperted however you decide
The reason why alot of incurable diseases is because we know very little about them because when we put those cells in certain light or even temp they die before they analyze them. It's delicate, so delicate that they can be destroyed by bright light. So it's incurable because they can't really see what it is, or see how it lives in the body. Same thing with Neil's answer, they don't know why it happens but if and when they find a way then it is possible.
It's "under a certain condition, this is impossible" "The given condition can be uncertain, hence making it rare, but possible" Nobody wins, it's a fair assessment on both side.
@@kyayi1230 negative density isn't impossible though. It's basically another word for antimatter. The 'if' being postulated (that Tyson says he isn't sure what it is) is essentially 'anti-energy'. (ie, when matter and antimatter (density and negative density) collide, they *release* energy, not consume it. The 'if' is just whether a type of matter and antimatter could be created, that would consume (absorb) energy when it collides (or any other means to fit a model).)
Negative energy and negative energy density are two entirely different things electrons are a form of negative energy where as we have no idea what negative density or the opposite of density should look like or if it even exists in the first places that's why he says it's not possible but it's true that we never know for sure how all things works so u never know we could be so wrong that we even have been lead to believe that the world works different than it actually does and we are so out of it we are either not affected or we are also unaware of the possible affects of that ignorance crazy stuff like this runs in my head a lot so I'm jus gonna stay a optimistic nihilist cause that's the a more comfortable way to live
I mean the only reason he is popular is cause he's black theirs no real merit to his degree he doesn't understand conspiracy theories or anything watch a episode with Rogan this response wasnt even sound like yeah maybe if we made negative it COULD work but it could also not work even after changing the laws of physics it could still do nothing because we can't be sure of stuff that doesn't exist his point even when forced to work still isn't sound
The correct answer would be to go through a black hole which moves time and light so fast that you could go back wards but even that is not one hundred percent but the chances are higher of it working
@@BonyHomie He kinda does. Like, with his eyes and whatnot. In some watch some videos with him, there's this where you can clearly see that "no way you said that." Look, and in this one video where he roasts his host and you can see him slightly smiling. They're limited but there.
Not sure this just just my own personal point of view but a circle in a 2d right, now if you turn a square into a cube with its 2d representation in a paper you can see it has those slanting edges, same with a 4d cube looked from a 2d plane. Now what if it was an infinitely many dimensional plane wouldn't looking at a cube in that plane from a 2d view resemble a circle due to all the weird edges and vertices being so many to align them properly and at a fixed way we might get a circle or almost (99%) circle
Negative energy already exists lol he said "negative energy Density" which is entirely different and hasn't been proven to be "impossible" thats why Hawking said its not possible "IF" his studies are factual. A true scientist knows there's always a chance for anything to happen.
Look at how Steven rolled is eyes towards him with that dumbass comment he made. Dead ass I’m pretty sure he was talking about pure positive energy density. Most likely allowing the positive molecules in our body withstand the pressures on our body with the theory of time travel.
"Energy is always non negative so it's not possible" "So what if we just find negative energy then it's possible right?" "Listen here you little shit..."
Stephen Hawking sideways in his wheel chair on the floor with Neil de Smartass Tykeson in a headlock, staring into his soul with those all-knowing eyes.😳
According to the academic socialite rumor mill, Neil deGrasse Tyson once had a custom playboy magazine full of Stephen Hawking photos that he kept under his pillow.
It wasn’t really a big discussion it’s simple when you understand but looks hard when you don’t know. Probably no human will go in the past, but alien yes. Too tired, but basically exotic matter or what he was saying do everything matters does, but the opposite. A white hole is like a black hole, but instead of absorbing light it push it out since it got a negative gravity and mass.
Negative energy is a concept that actually exists in the mathematical theory behind the physics, a good example is a lot of Newtonian based predictions are solved via a quadratic formula where theres always a negative solution for time that we don't use for the sake of solving a real problem. But you can infact try using the negative solution and try to expand on it and come to a lot of interesting conclusions, tho non have been observed to be applicable in reality. But in theory do work.
I heard a story once when I was a kid. A man appeared at the whitehouse in the 70's wearing a black suit, had no name, and proposed guidance for our country. He was depicted as carrying items easily relative to modern things (like a smart phone and a clothing brand I can't recall). Apparently, his arrival was televised once on the news, and then everything about him was deeply buried. He was said to have stayed some time in the whitehouse and won many battles in that current presidents shoes. I have tried several times over the years to find the story or even a similar fiction so I can know what I heard for sure, but it's as if the words were never uttered.
Its a stupid question and Neil knows it. I think hes just messing with Stephen Hawking and trying to treat him like a human and not a robot or a computer
For real why tf is there some random unrelated gameplay footage at the bottom? I've seen this phenomenon a few times on youtube shorts. It's so weird and out of place.
@Daybid Bander Becht It's to make it technically transformative, even though it is the lowest possible effort method of doing it. Especially considering dude is trash at driving lol.
Bro literally said “I’m assuming it’s impossible because if we were able to, we would’ve met someone by now”, and then said it was possible if we made it possible
@@killemkillua what I’m saying is that dr Tyson said that he’s assuming it’s impossible, and when dr hawking says that it can’t be done, dr Tyson says that it could be, only if it weren’t impossible
Too many years as a celebrity and too many years out of an actual laboratory might have yeeted his PhD in physics to another dimension. Neil get off the camera and do some science like the rest of us, before you say some dumb shit again. Love you tho.
Pretty sure Neil was just talking to him like a student would... eg... asking questions in the hope of gaining knowledge because he is interested in the topic... Not every conversation has to be an argument lol
@@jaybee8862 The title of this video is "Neil deGrasse Tyson Wins Argument with Steven Hawking". I agree it's not really an argument and my point stands that Neil didn't win shit.
@@jerrymemes2207 he basically saying that time travel is not possible but anything can happen in the future so who knows, maybe our knowledge of things is too little we dont really know anything
@@jerrymemes2207 You have reasoning for that opinion? Seems plenty logical to think if we are sending someone via machine back in time, that there would need to be a machine that can receive on the other end.
I think the point is that at higher energy densities time moves slower however never stops and certainly doesn’t move backwards meaning you’d need to use an object with negative mass to warp time in the opposite direction
Hawking thinking to himself, "Bro, you don't think I've thought about creating negative energy density matter? I've got nothing better to do than go through all these possibilities in my head. Ain't gonna work, Al Roker."
If I remember right, Steven hawking made a party and nobody showed up because he gave out the invitations the day after it happend for time traveler's to go back and party
@@nanomachinesson3635 the homes are there, standing empty. It's people and their delicate feelings that prevents other people from being in homes. The negative non-energy energy is also there. We just don't know how to make a bucket to catch it.
"wins" debate? He just pointed out that hawking said "if" and then admitted he didn't even know what hawking was talking about. Hardly a win. He can barely have a conversation with him
