New BMW M5 vs BMW S1000RR superbike 

I agree

Relax, we all know that.

If bike win in this video. Many comment of biker are different.

I wonder which one has the highest survivability in some sort of an accident - like with a cable barrier or something...

Ben Legacy Not easy in Britain...

Auto Express in Britain cars r faster.....

Auto Express Film in a place thats not a shit hole then.

Fucking shitty England always raining, fuck that place and it's arabs

TGSNT Chaaalay oi.

VedderTheFixer mllOP

No doubt. I chuckle when I see guys who don't ride spending several thousands of dollars on their cars to make them faster when you can go out and buy a cheap beater bike that'll blow the doors off most cars lol.

Okay but turbo E36 2.5 L is a true beast, 600 hp and you can beat Suzuki sportbike 750

+Hen zo who cares. 22K buys you a Ninja H2 and not a car in the world is going to catch that. and now bikes like the R1M have slide control and gyros. look, fast is fast, but I promise you the guy on the bike is having 100 times more fun and thrill. cars are cool too! but unless you have a fortune to spend on a car, and I mean a fortune, you will never beat a bike. your bolt on turbo civics are only cool at the stoplight game, nothing else.

Who cares about Honda civic. Bikes are 100 times more fun than cars ?, do you drive BMW ?, because i driven both and choose BMW and Ninja H2 is good only on stright lane on circuit i can beat that with tuned E36. Look: M3 E36 V10 800HP+ vs Kawasaki zx10r 191hp /watch?v=X3R5s5WXt0g

Thats it i have nice car now and Miss my bike so much i am always jealous when i See Bikers now

this track is always wet...

PostCulture So... It's better to change the location ;)

As opposed to all the videos that show a bike is faster than a car in the dry and conditions are absolutely perfect? Genius....

Ajay Kumar The fact is that it's obvious... and it's not a good comparison. The car is not quicker than the bike because it's a good car, but because it's wet... I mean, with wet track even a 60 bhp car could be quicker than a bike (if you race on a circuit with lots of corners for example). So the point is that this comparison is meaningless

If this is obvious, then a liter class super bike beating a car when it's bone dry is obvious too. It's obvious that a bike will be quicker unless you consider insanely expensive HyperCars. One race in the wet and everyone starts complaining.

True

***** but slower than the BMW or Ducati Pinigale 😂

Hahaha is that all you have got ? Cars are more compfy ??? Haha tgats won me mate im completely off bikes now thats me done. Im gunna sell my r1 and buy a fiesta. Thanks for telll ng me this i didnt know!!!! Dick head!!!!

Can u afford £500,000 + ? No you cant so that not a reason plus a £5000 litre bike will leave it behind. Why dont you fuck off and comment on peppa pig or sumat. You obviously know fuck all bout bikes and cars

Why so Butthurt???

+Dominique Haupt Why? stupid to race a sports bike against a 5 seater large saloon car eh?

Andrew D it lost tho lol

@@tricktop9064 lost when the bike has 10 second head start lol

Fekyu Jason it lost when it thought it could complete with a liter bike lol a sport bike is always gonna beat a car on a track or straight away endless their are some weird conditions

on a dry track, the M5 wouldn't know which way the bike went. That might differ with the X-drive M5.

nice bike and

A cage... -_-

In my country, bmw z4 crash on wet street and driver died but naked bike crash on wet street biker and his girl friend safe and survived. Car aren't always safety both dangerous and require skill!!!

Like the test they made with a Lambo LP and the Ducati? The Ducati won and boy that for sure was a real race, with all the data for us to see. I don't remember the video on RU-vid, but if you find it you will know, it as two parts and there are japanese pilots.

If you can't afford a car, then you buy a bike.

MetaxaGallarado Bullshit. Almost every biker has a car as well. Most of them have families, and you can't take your wife and children on the back of a bike, can you? Besides, a proper bike costs about 20k dollar or 15k euro's. More than enough for a nice second-hand car.

MetaxaGallarado If you can't drive, you buy a car.

DolleHengst Yes probably, a car worth 10k or even less to get from A to B and that's it. Be honest now, if you had the wealth to buy a Audi RS5 or a car in that class, would you still pick a 2 wheeler that everyone can have?

GerwinPlanet Your comment did not make any sense

And on summer tires, so the least amount of grip possible under these conditions, bar slicks. Want to stick a restriction kit on there while we're at it?

peter schiller LOL :P

blow1977 no i think you'll find you are, if that ground was dry the M5 would have been slaughtered

blow1977 this is a shitty test ! Of course every car has more grip on a wet track than a two wheeler, just redo the test on a 30°C summer day and let the motorcycle warm up for 3 laps you will get a totally different result. Its not surprising that a motorcycle is better in accelerating than in that sharp corners .

@finlay: perhaps read again what i've written and thank you for confirming what i was saying ... @tobi: no reason for an argument. In the light of the given track and weather condition the result couldn't have been another and would have been a significantly other one under other conditions. I know that, you know that - hence peace and harmony to all oft us

nice

Put some proper tyres on the rr and the m5 wouldnt stand a chance even if its wet. IMO its just stupid to compare cars to bikes since they are so different

probable tyres? if a big sedan 9 seconds faster, the bike won't go alot faster compare with M5 even with "probable tyre" on. Or fine, I'll be nice, let's pretend the bike go 11s faster, still 2 seconds ahead a big heavy sedan lol.

Skare147 rocket is aways trying to compare the two. Those of us that both drive and ride understand the incomparability of the two. For little boys obsessed with cars they can only dream about, the idea that some one could have more excitement and exhilaration on a different machine, for just a few pounds, well it kills him.

Listen to the commentator. If he had the guts he'd have the bike. In the dry the car wouldnt catch the bike. The bike was on summer tyres not suitable for the wet. Is this the only example you can find? Id keep quite about it as its making you look silly.

New top speed for a production bike 207 mph not sure of kph.

another m5 fanboy its funny that BMW doesnt have a super car and even the japanese do lol....

I'm so sorry XD..you comment makes no sense to me , no need to replay it

replay it well tht english is grt too

Exactly, the M5 was struggling NOT to overtake the bike. Probably would've ran over the bike.

First of all, comparing a bike and a car in wet conditions is completely retarded. If you think the M5 stands a chance against the s1000rr in dry conditions. You need serious help. If you try pushing the bike slightly too hard in the wet you're going down. Same with acceleration. The contact patch is just too small. Cars have much more contact patch. Both machines are awesome and would be a lot of fun to drive. But the bike would be much faster around a dry track. My 2 cents.......

well said bro :) God bless u

The difference between your stupid example and this test is that in this test the two competitors are in the SAME conditions. And even if your statement about power to weight ratio is true, it's not the only parameter that makes a vehicle fast around a track. I mean look at a Formula 1.

a car can beat a bike in a straight line, but it won't be a stock car outside of something like an F1, Veyron, etc. a proper sports car will brake and turn harder than a bike. but... you can get insane performance from a bike for under 20 grand. to get anywhere near with a car you're looking at nearer 200 grand. and bikes are more fun anyway. because wheelies.

How is the comparison not fair? The track isn't always going to be dry, especially not in Britain. The M5 was a full nine seconds faster, that's a huge difference on such a short track.

Jethro Rose BMW S1000RR, Ducati Panigale, etc vs BMW M5, Mecerdes C63 BUT F1, Veyron,etc vs Suzuki Hayabusa, Kawasaki ZX 14R. Yes, 20 grand vs 200 grand, you don't get leather seat, trunk, air conditioner...in a bike! can't compare the price between 2 completely different things man! We're talking about speed. The MTT Turbine Bike (Y2K) will beat anything (except a plane.)

the y2k doesn't turn for shit, and will get destroyed on track, probably by something like a 600RR

thatabu The M5 was a second faster because the track was soaked in water. Do you know how badly water affect bike's performance? You can't push it even close to its limits. In the dry the s1000rr would have spanked the M5. The M5 has no chance against this bike.

It'll Kill you?

Ajay Kumar It will smoke the car.

***** given its got a 10 sec head-start yes... of course it will fucking win its a tiny cute little bike with a 4 cyl strapped on it. race a motor cycle and a car with the same power/weight and you have a race... people these days...

TG Lasers on Isle of Man no car wins a motorcycle, the fastest lap there for a car is slower than those made on motorcycles.

Again back to the power/weight ratio. if they arent close on power/weight its like comparing apples to oranges there is no point in doing so. it would be the same as comparing a nissan leaf to a f1 car.

If you don't care which is faster, then why did you watch the fucking video? Makes no dam sense. It's like ordering food, you don't like it and yet you eat it anyway

+Professional Hacker So your telling me that you give a fuck that the bike was quicker? You'll sleep better at night?

Bill Paxton what difference does it make if I care or not

Ditto.....

Bill Paxton lol, whatever. It's besides my point

go watch the ulster grand prix brother if u think bikes are useless in damp conditions HAH

Or a wet TT...

Yeah, but this is a novice rider, if he had any lean angle and if he had tyres for the rain he would win flat out.

keep in mind this was on summer tires. bmw m5 wouldn't have had a chance in wet tires made to go with the wet conditions. the rider was a novice rider. though the conditions weren't favorable for the rider, he could have saved a lot more time by leaning correctly.

we're talking about the S1000RR. this bike has as much power to weight ratio as the Nissan GTR.

Yes it is a younger matt watson

Shut up Richie Kickass M5 is 9 seconds ahead the bike. Also don't forget its a RWD car.

ROCKETGUN BOOMBS The bike is rear wheel drive also, don't forget.

Richie Kickass Could someone please translate this drivel into English?

Hugh Jaanus Bike won't have wheel spin in acceleration but car does, also RWD car is very unstable in wet condition by percentage compare to bikes. Whatever, a sport sedan beat a top track bike for 9 seconds.

ROCKETGUN BOOMBS Lol Bikes doe have wheelspin, and when it happens most of the time they crash. Also a bike is hanging over 40-50 degrees in this weather , tell me whats unstable.

Would make no difference at all. The bike should be over 9 seconds quicker. And remember, the M5 was slowed down by the wet track as well.

thatabu if a car loses traction it will oversteer (in the M5s case) and the driver will handle it easily (especially if he is a racing driver like here) the bike will oversteer and hav the risk of falling... how many car drifting videos r out there compared to bike drifting videos? loads more as bike drifting/oversteer is loads harder to control than that of a car... dry conditions wud make a huge difference

Oversteer is wasted time. Yes the bike will be faster on a dry track but not necessarily by nine seconds.

This might would signal that weight is not as big a factor as some might believe Idk just saying

yup, weight isn't a big factor compare to bikes. Especially comparing to BMW cars. They handle so well. Car vs bike= grip vs power

Bike faster

Seth Reeves You like bikes, but you also need to admit the truth.

For what bikes are more fun .