New findings on JKF assassination 

It’s so sad. I get why the doctors lied but 60 years later our intelligence agencies have been weakened and corrupted, which is the price the doctors pay for keeping quiet and trying to spare the public from confusion and grief as well as protecting their families. It’s like the lie accrued interest and now that bill is due because they have been unable to defend us from a marxist takeover. Lord, please give us the strength to defend ourselves and save us from the horrors that await should we fall to the marxists

And never will..

Um, I think Franz Ferdinand being assassinated and thus triggering WW1 was a bigger deal

Because they clearly don't want a "just" conclusion.

@@jimmycricket5366 or maybe because it happened 60 fucking years ago, numb nuts

Everything is a conspiracy with you minorities. gtfo

I have my doubts at this stage. The FBI/CIA/MILITARY didn't have to kill him. Only discredit him. All they had to do was make sure he wasn't elected in 1964. It wasn't sure he was going to. He barely won in 1960. He had health problems. Johnson and Kennedy were on bad terms. Scandals with Mafia and affairs. The Mafia connection is stronger.

Ruth Paine laughed all the way to the bank. She had it made; big cash from the CIA, LHO blamed, and her involvement covered up... 🎉 Paine is still laughing today!

No they didn't..look up the real film clip..the driver shot him..look it up and watch the driver... watch the documentary about William Cooper..truth..by the way..they killed William Cooper also..we can only speculate why..truth!

All credible evidence points to Oswald.

Not a true statement, necessarily ..

@@PalmaColantuono-rz1pt Her exchanges with Ruby came during his public trial where he could have come forward with any statement he wanted to make, she didn't die until nearly two years later, her reporting was only going to be part of a much larger book on other trials she had covered she wasn't planning on publishing for months (hardly an urgent expose), her death, ruled an accident, was investigated by the police and the HSCA, who found no evidence of foul play.

The term "Political" does not apply ..

No doubt about that!

Nothing is politically motivated anymore right 😂😂😂

The motivation was getting to the truth before the American public demanded we go to war with Russia or Cuba.

Getting the "Case Closed Narrative"@@franclin0

It's does if you're in a moving vehicle. Also his head didn't explode it's was shot at. Learn the difference minority.

​@@5star_BigChief631You evidently have no idea about physics. Everything in that vehicle maintained the same forward velocity at the moment of impact. The limousine was moving quite slowly, and the only thing that would move any brain matter backwards would be an "oncoming" wind. There was a Westerly breeze that day, but it could not have blown anything denser than mist backwards to any great extent - certainly not a visible "lump" of brain matter.

What is still baffling is why there is no "obvious" explosion of the rear of Kennedy's head visible in the Z-film. If the shot had come from the front, one would assume that the frontal "blowout" was caused by friction pressure in the brain mass. Sure, that pressure could have caused multiple "blowout" directions as the "Harper Fragment" and the "Triangular Fragment" (skull bone) might imply. If it was a "frangible bullet" (or mercury-tipped bullet), it could cause all sorts of effects in the brain mass and skull cavity. According to many witness statements there were two shots heard very close together. It would explain how two shots from different directions could cause the apparently incongruous skull fragmentation and "blowouts" to the front and to the rear.

@@ulicadluga first of all you don't know anything you poland loser. this isnt from your terrible country. You have no say in this. idiot. Do you see me commenting germany and ww2? no so shut the h up

From all my years of research it comes down to this. Tangible VS Frangible For the sake of argument let’s go through the Warren Reports Findings 1- bullet#1 misses the car and either chips cement or part of a ricochet hits James Tague in the cheek. #2- this is CE-399 or the single bullet that passed through Kennedy and Conley creating seven wounds and being discovered on a stretcher at Parkland hospital. #3- Takes Kennedy in the head from the sixth floor of the TSBD. That’s from the Warren Report- My conclusion is that CE399 Went through both men shattering ribs bone and other than it’s being fired the bullet is relatively intact. There was more lead removed from Conleys wrist than is missing from CE-399 The head shot from the official X-rays of Kennedy’s skull shows 42 shards of bullet fragments. If CE-399 fired a solid round through two men with very little deformity then the third shot hits the President in head and shatters on impact It’s called a “hollow point” a bullet used to create as much damage as possible. SO If both Kennedy and Conley were hit with a full metal jacket or “tangible” round then how did Kennedy get hit in the head with a “Frangible” or “hollow point”round? Guess what That’s two rifles and two shooters.

🎯

Other reports say he was an average marksman in the marines. Shooting on Houston street would be dangerous because everyone was looking in the direction of the building, especially the car drivers. Better wait until everyone had their backs turned on Elm street. Didn't know about the sign. Interesting.

They pulled more bullet fragments out of Connally than would have been needed to reconstruct an entire bullet? So tell me, how many fragments did they removed from Connally, and what size were they? Oswald performed above expert level in the rapid-fire portion of his Marines Corps shooting test, hitting 8 out of 10 bullseyes from 200 yards, and 7 out of 10 bullseyes from 300 yards.

Rubbish. Oh, and Oswald scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorecard, and any idiot knows firing on the limo on Houston means it would zoom past him and leave him a sitting duck for the Secret Service agents behind it. He was mad, not stupid.

That vital evidence was destroyed deliberately to nix any attempts to make a case for the possibility of multiple shooters.

Exactly.the car was a crime scene and it was cleaned up at parkland

​@@robertlavrakas7442the car wasn't "cleaned" at Parkland. Door handles and other touched-often surfaces were probably wiped off. When the car returned to Washington, it sat in the White House garage for almost a month before it was sent to Ford Motor Co.'s Engineering Division in Dearborn, MI to be thoroughly cleaned and refurbished.

@@franclin0 Plenty of time to destroy or falsify evidence.

@@patrickeurolingua6896 what was destroyed and falsified?

In frame 222 of the Zapruder film as the limo emerges from behind the Stemmons Freeway sign we see Connally has already turned to his right, and neither JFK nor Connally has been shot yet. In frame 223 we cannot see JFK yet, and Connally is still turned to his right and has not been shot yet. In frame 224 we see Connally reacting to being shot (we still cannot see JFK yet), and in frame 225 we see JFK again, and he is moving his hands up toward his throat. So yes, they did react at the same time to that shot.

@FallenStarFeatures Also, Connelly was still holding onto his cowboy hat, impossible with a shattered wrist. One of the later shots had to hit Connolly and the first thing he wanted to know was "Were "they" trying to kill ALL of us"? Witnesses that reported hearing more than 3 shots were dismissed, perhaps because they didn't match the prescripted results from the LBJ(not Congress) appointed committee.

@@9Ballr Even if it was the same bullet it couldn't be pristine as the Warren Comission says. Then there is the problem of the hole in the throat which had to come from the front because it was too small to be an exit wound. That wound was enlarged in the hospital to push a tube down, so they doctors doing the autopsy later thought it could be an exit wound and told the Dallas doctors to keep quiet. But if there was a bullet from the front, where did it go to? No mention of that anywhere. Conclusion: still no answers.

@@patrickeurolingua6896 The bullet was not in pristine condition, it was significantly flattened from having struck Connally’s right wrist. The bullet was full metal jacketed and designed to pass through a human body. Tests have shown that bullet to remain intact when fired into solid wood. The wound in JFK’s throat was estimated by doctors at Parkland to be anywhere between 4mm and 8mm in diameter, which even on the smaller end of the scale is consistent with a round from Oswald’s rifle, and tests have shown that an exit wound can be smaller when there is pressure against the skin where the bullet exits, like the shirt and tie that JFK was wearing.

wronnggggggg

Exactly!!!

100%

After 60 years all credible evidence still points to Oswald.

After 60 years all credible evidence still points at Oswald.

@@aaronz7056 Yes I agree. All credible evidence points to Oswald being innocent in that he never even fired a shot. He was guilty of being a CIA operative, however. So important was it to find the right patsy, however,, that they threw one of their own, (Lee Oswald) under the proverbial bus.

@thepub245 Too many things wrong with your comment. 1)Earl Rose, the medical examiner who would have done the autopsy had it been in Dallas, rejected the idea that there was a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy and he supported the Warren Commission's conclusion that a single gunman shot the President. 2)The cold hard fact remains that no witness saw any human, with or without a rifle, standing behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll at the time the president’s limo proceeded down Elm Street. In any event, forensics alone rule out any shots from in front of the limo. 3) Conspiracy enthusiasts always love to yap about witnesses who saw "smoke" on the street or by the Grassy Knoll. Of course, they forget about motorcycle exhaust and also the plentiful V-8 engine emissions, and act as though all witnesses saw smoke from a rifle. Fact is, modern rifles produce little if any smoke, so little in fact that you'd practically have to be the one firing the rifle in order to see it. 4) JFK had a cratered entrance wound on the back of the skull, an impossible shot from the knoll but a clear one from Oswald's window, and a massive exit hole at the right front temple. The back of the skull was not blown out. The Z-film, the Moorman photo and the autopsy x-rays all show the back of the President's head to be *_intact_* . The four main doctors who attended to the dying president: Perry, Carrico, Jenkins & Baxter; all agreed that in Carrico's words, "Nothing we observed contradicts the autopsy finding that the bullets were fired from above and behind by a high-velocity weapon." The same Parkland doctors appeared on NOVA in 1988, re-examined the autopsy photos and agreed they are accurate and depict an entry wound on the back of the skull.

@@stddisclaimer8020 What is still annoying is the small hole in the throat, which could have been an entry wound and which the doctors in Dallas enlarged to force down a tube. It had been so damaged when it got to Bethesda that the forensics thought it was an exit wound. Then again, if there had been a shot from the front, where did that bullet go?

@@patrickeurolingua6896 The wound in JFK’s throat was estimated by doctors at Parkland to be anywhere between 4mm and 8mm in diameter, which even on the smaller end of the scale is consistent with a round from Oswald’s rifle, and tests have shown that an exit wound can be smaller when there is pressure against the skin where the bullet exits, like the shirt and tie that JFK was wearing. (The HSCA panel members agree that the fabric of JFK’s shirt and tie and their anatomic relationship to the underlying bullet wound served as sufficient reinforcement to diminish distortion of the skin upon exit.)

Modern long rifles do smoke if they have been cleaned or over oiled, admittedly not as much as you would expect, but they do smoke under specific circumstances...a number of people, including railroad workers and a military person saw the shooters behind the fence...what is amazing here is your inability to see, read or hear what has been clearly verified...further...audio tapes, reviewed by audio experts, clearly state that to a 95% certainty, there were four shots and possibly five or six...the parkland doctors do not agree with the x-rays and photos of the autopsy (See Paramount+. what the Doctors Saw), nor does the x-ray tech and morgue photographer...and the Petty Officer of the Day for the morgue at Bethesda...@@stddisclaimer8020 ...you have been fed the same drivel from the assassination mill that wants Oswald and Oswald alone...look beyond your own predefined windows...

@@patrickeurolingua6896 The surgeon who preformed the tracheotomy on JFK was more than skilled...it was a small incision not a gaping wound that is shown in the Bethesda autopsy...which photo should raise suspicion in your mind to who, exactly, did that to him...

Precisely - both shots from the front - both wounds to JFK are entrance wounds! In addition factoring in that ' the odor of burning gun powder clung to the limo all the way to Parkland hospital ' would suggest the obvious. With each new revelation the size of the protected shadow that has protected the author of ' Hidden In Histories Shadow ' diminishes as the light of truth reveals the darkness hidden within the degrading shadow.

I’ve never heard that before and would love to know who these witnesses are that said that. If anything, if shots ring out, you’d speed up, not stop & become a sitting duck.

Driver stated he was hesitant to go forward because it looked like an ambush ahead. Sounds legitimate to me. And being in that car knowing there would be bullets coming your way seems unlikely to me.

Driver shot him.. Look at the film..watch the driver..he delivers the head shot from the front..

@@user-jp9kq7rv3m No. There were no witnesses of this and there were lots of people looking that way. Also it is just plain ridiculous. Watch it again closeup.

He even says you have to shift Connelly to the left - but that's exactly how he was seated in the motorcade!

Yeah he was in a jump seat. Slightly lower and to the left.

That’s what I’ve heard to explain it, but I now also concentrate on Connelly’s arm resting on the car door/frame.

Exactly. This so-called, "study" is pathetic.

100% correct, i don't believe the Warren Commission's conclusion but let's stay within reality of what we do know, Connally was seated slightly to the left.

Film was in custody, processed, copied, distributed and viewed by investigators and media representatives way too fast to have been screwed with. What the hell is the point of this? Just leaving well enough alone and saying Oswald must have had an accomplice who got away would have suited any conspiracy just fine.

@@aaronz7056 Ok, so you just want to be satisfied. Most people would prefer to know the truth.

@@johnl7443 What the hell did I literally just say above? This crackpot paranoia is hilarious. No doubt you will now explain what the hell Plan B was if other films or evidence turn up that contradict an altered Zapruder film and just prove a conspiracy exists?

The Zapruder film was not altered. Read Robert Groden. Also if they were going to alter the Zapruder film wouldn't they have altered the head shot and Kennedy's movement back and to the left?

There is a great book called Mortal error by Menninger which says the secret service in the follow up car did it. By mistake or by design I can't remember. Worth al ook.

Probably because the plan was to kill JFK at the turn but the driver went far right and screwed up the shot.

a) They were speaking figuratively. b) Opening fire on the limo while it was still on Houston means it would zoom past him and leave him a sitting duck for the Secret Service agents behind. Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid. c) You could find lines like that painted on other streets, gimme a break, already. d) All credible medical, ballistic, forensic, film and eyewitness evidence clearly demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window and from Oswald's rifle. e) It's obviously completely implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns.

@@patrickeurolingua6896 Theory is flatly contradicted by eyewitness, film, ballistic and medical evidence. Agent Hickey successfully sued the publishers of that crackpot book that accused him.

@@patrickeurolingua6896 Mortal Error is flatly contradicted by eyewitness, film, ballistic and medical evidence. Agent Hickey successfully sued the publishers.

Let's forget about witnesses. Witnesses can't be trusted. The facts.

Most witnesses in that echo chamber of a plaza in fact said the shots came from the TSBD. All credible medical, forensic, ballistic and film evidence also clearly demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.

In fact, most witnesses in that echo chamber of a plaza said the shots came from the TSBD. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Victims' reactions clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind. Kennedy's massive exit wound plainly seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. Witnesses a few feet directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. Zapruder's secretary was only yards from the fence and saw no gunman there. It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns.

No shots came from behind

Why?

@@jhfit the emergency room doctors said that no shots came from behind… that was a lie.

@@Mayoo22334 I don't think they said that. They claimed the back of the head was blown out. There's a difference. Also, the Z film clearly shows the right side of the head blown apart. Photographs from the other side also don't support what you're saying

On the contrary, all credible film, eyewitness, ballistic, forensic and medical evidence clearly demonstrates the shots came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.

Lee is rubies son Robert most likely the other shooter. Presidents birthday night Marilyn Monroe 3 weeks later Alcatraz supposedly escape the inescapable it was still a military base. Gladys Johnson is Lees real mother Marguerite Oswald is actually mark lanes mother

This presentation is filled with inaccurate information.

Dulles ran the show, and he was no longer head of the CIA, but he ran it anyway....and he hated JFK. The CIA was his baby. A horrible, evil man.

The shooting has been replicated, quite easily and frequently with similar results many times. Accept not by a "team" but by a lone shooter from the same height and distance as Oswald was. This digital recreation is extremely flawed.

@@justinmj6586Not that many times. And hardly any under 5.6 seconds. And they were not under pressure. However, maybe (and just maybe) Oswald got lucky once in his life and pulled it off.

@@patrickeurolingua6896 The time from the end of the first shot to the third shot was about 8.3 seconds, not 5.6.

@@patrickeurolingua6896 Any idiot just watching the victims' reactions in Zapruder's film will clearly see it demonstrates 3 shots over 8-9 seconds. This is what happens when people get their info from Oliver Stone.

@@aaronz7056 Now there are those who say the Zapruder film is not the original so that has to be clarified before speaking about time. Josiah Thompson says up to 6-7 seconds in a documentary of the late 80s. That sounds more credible because the actual rifle was tested. Let's wait until 2038 : 75 years after when all will be released.

... and fatally flawed and erroneous.

Listen to the podcast by Rob Reiner, "Who Killed JFK?" Also read the book, "LBJ, Mastermind of the JFK Assassination".

He's an idiot and just trying to make a fast buck.

Also, watch the new documentary 'JFK: What the doctors saw.'

@@jimofannarbor1472 Don't forget to also watch: a) their first press conference after the assassination where you can see them speculating wildly about the wounds, unable to conjecture about numbers, trajectories, etc. b) the 1988 NOVA special where you can see them examining the autopsy photos and having no particular problem with them...

Yes, I've read over 40 books on this fascinating topic, and Mr. Reiner's podcast sums up all of the information brilliantly!

@@johnl7443 He cites that lying idiot Mark Lane as a major influence, claims to have proof there were four (!!!) shooters blazing away at Kennedy while assuming they would frame this on a lone shooter, etc.

Huh? John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

... and demonstrably erroneous.

BAD, sensational-seeking, juvenile coverage of this serious topic.

His wife said he kept holding the hat until they reached the hospital.

@@GreenArt4 Yes, he held on to that hat for dear life! So much for the idea that he couldn't have been shot at the same time JFK was shot.

Meaningless, he was still holding the hat when they got to the hospital.

He did, but no matter how many times I replay the Zapruder film I don't see him reacting at the point he said he was shot, only in the specific point where JFK was shot as well, indicating they were struck by the same bullet.

Victim's reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet.

YES. CONNALY WAS A HUNTER AND WOULD KNOW.

This recreation is screwy, the wounds line up on a perfect trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.

The researcher being interviewed SAID that so far this is only about the second shot, the one that for decades was caused by the "Magic Bullet", until recently when a SS agent admitted that he had found the bullet on the back of Kennedy's seat and placed it on a stretcher.

@@johnl7443 Assuming Landis is even telling the truth (only "coming forward" sixty freakin' years later...), that bullet can still be the one that fell from Connally's leg wound, no problem.

Check out Dr. Corsi's relatively new book, The Final Analysis. He and other medical experts work through the measurements using released autopsy photos, not the famous doctored ones. Frontal shots all. More than one shooter. That leaves Oswald completely out......except for shouldering the blame. Come on! How convenient, a pimp, stooge of lower levels for the Mob his whole life kills Oswald before a trial!!!!! How oh so convenient. We are constantly duped by all things government.

One of America's most famous Presidents, right alongside FRD and LJB.

Interesting point.

All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.

@@aaronz7056 Which rifle? The Mauser they originally found, or the Carcano owned by Oswald with the wobbly scope? Once again, Aaron, you clearly have not done any studying on this topic.

Jackie did. She grabbed it from the trunk after she shot JFK.

fact-check..... You'd be arguing against the very people who make the claim of the magic bullet, because part of their story, is that the missile, traveling at over 2,000 ft per second, flew unabated right thru JFK's neck and on thru with sufficient power and speed to zip thru gov Connally, break his rib, fracture his wrist, and still emerge in almost pristine condition.

@@PANCHOVILLAMATO But, according to the "magic bullet", the bullet must have "tumbled", as the entry wound on Connolly's back, near his armpit, is not a round wound, but a long wound.

See how that doesn't make any sense... If the missile started to "yaw" before striking Connally, how did it maintain its near pristine condition, after breaking ribs, then fracturing wrist bones. How did a bullet that was doing somersaults as it went thru the Governor, before finally burying itself in his thigh, emerge practically brand new? Please do not refer to the "normal" deformities of the bullet caused by the act of firing it out of a rifle, as "proof" that it wasn't pristine.. We concede that it was fired from a weapon and didn't come straight from the box. .. And let's not forget that the bullet was found on a gurney, while the governor was in surgery, undergoing the removal of the bullet in his thigh. And let's not forget the sum of the fragments left behind in the governor's body, ribs, wrist and thigh exceed the mass missing from the magic bullet. Simply stated ...Things don't add up!! But thanks for your response. Appreciated!

@@PANCHOVILLAMATO Yes. Things don't add up. The limousine was showered with bullet fragments - certainly not all recovered forensically. I mean, they started mopping the car at Parkland. As you say, the bullet yawed and it striking side on would explain the "squishing" of the bullet - but going through a thick rib and a an even thicker wrist bone would have to have deformed it extremely. BTW, according to Paul Landis, security detail officer, he found the "pristine bullet" on the head area of the limousines back seat, and later placed it on a gurney, because he wasn't sure what to do with it!

Thank you... Landis explanation fits MY theory, and the "original" working theory of Dr Humes. When Humes could not find the track of the "back" missile, and when Parkland reported finding a nearly pristine bullet on a gurney, the Dr surmised that the back bullet must have fallen back out of JFK's back, as crazy as that sounded. My injection of plausibility is that 1) The 1st shot sounded to many like a fire-cracker, or as I call it a "dud" bullet. A weak missile might have collided with JFK's back brace, fizzled out and fallen back out... I think that my theory is as valid as Spector's twisting and turning magic bullet. To further corroborate my theory, we only need to read the testimony of the 2 FBI agents: Sibert & O'Neil and Army Lt Lipsey, who were eye witnesses to the autopsy. They all claim the back wound had nothing to do with the throat wound. They say the doctors could not locate where the back bullet went inside of JFK, even after pulling out all his major organs. While I'm here, I would also like to point out that Lt Lipsey says that on that Friday night there wee TWO head shots... One near the EOP and the other higher up near the crown. In '64, the WC went with the EOP entrance. BUT...15 years later the HSCA insisted that the head shot was up near the crown and that the doctors in '63 had made a simple mistake. Lipsey, miles away in LA,, was telling HSCA investigators that JFK had TWO head shots and described where they were. So it is EXTREMELY interesting that the HSCA moved the head shot from one spot described by Lipsey to the other spot also described by Lipsey. (Lipsey's testimony is on RU-vid). Side bar note - In 1978 Lipsey thot his testimony for the HSCA would be kept top secret, but it was later released. Lipsey now claims he was wrong and that the WC had it ALL RIGHT.... Yea sure!

This recreation is demonstrably flawed. The wounds line up on a perfect trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.

$$$$

Exactly.

HE DIDNT. GUN WAS PLANTED. BAD SIGHT. COULD NOT GET OFF THAT MANY SHOTS. I ASKEDD 2 SNIPERS AND THEY CONFIRMED IT.

The Warren commision avoided this woman like the plague: Mrs. Geraldine Reid. Here, for the first time, is Geraldine Reid's story: About one minute before the fatal shots were fired at the motorcade, Lee Oswald walked into the office across the second-floor hallway from the snack room where he had been eating his lunch. He wanted to buy a bottle of soda and did not have the required change for the machine. He walked up to Geraldine Reid at her desk and handed her a dollar bill and asked her for change. "Mr. Oswald didn't like pennies. I remember that," she recalled. "As I was counting out the change, I heard what I later learned were gunshots. Mr. Oswald and I looked at each other quizzically for a moment, but neither of us said anything about the sounds. I did not know that they were shots at the time. I gave Mr. Oswald the change and he turned and walked back into the hallway toward the snack room. That's the last time I saw him until he passed by me a few minutes later as he was leaving the building." Approximately seventy-two seconds after the shots ended and Oswald had returned to the snack room to buy a soda from the machine, Officer Marrion Baker and Oswald's boss, Roy Truly, confronted him in the snack room. Truly told Baker that it was alright and that Oswald, in fact, worked for him. At that time, Truly mentioned to Lee that President Kennedy had been shot. Oswald seemed genuinely surprised. Baker and Truly then left the lunchroom and headed upstairs to investigate further. In the meantime, someone had informed Geraldine Reid about the assassination. Geraldine Reid's final encounter with Lee Oswald occurred a few minutes later. "The last time I saw Mr. Oswald, he was leaving the building," Reid stated. "As he passed me by, I noticed that he had his jacket slung over his arm. I told him that the President had just been shot and he simply said 'Oh?' or something like that, and kept on walking out of the office to go downstairs and, I assume, out of the building."

@@leonardcollings7389 Where can I find this testimony from Mrs. Geraldine Reid that she was actually with Oswald at the time of the assassination?

@@leonardcollings7389 Rubbish. Oswald owned and smuggled the rifle, he immediately fled the crime scene, he took evasive action to sneak back to his rooming house, he was seen shooting a cop, seen trying to hide, seen ducking into the theater, seen fighting so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him, caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop, refused to cooperate, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"

And what Zapruder had to say about it?

@@imeprezime1285 Abraham zapruder was a Jew, that tells you all you need to know. A Jewish man happens to be at dealey plaza at the best spot to record the assassination, who then later sold the film.

All credible eyewitness, medical, forensic, ballistic and film evidence clearly demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.

All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle and witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.

Mr. Files' claims: a) He and Oswald were palling around in New Orleans in 1961. Oswald was in Minsk in 1961. b) He was present at a Dallas meeting the morning of the assassination where it was discussed how the parade route had been changed. The parade route was never changed, accurately described in the newspapers from the start. c) He was an assassin on the knoll. Phone records demonstrate Files was in Chicago during the assassination and when confronted with this he tried to claim he was being confused with his own nonexistent twin brother. NBC cancelled their planned TV show on this lying clown after taking a closer look at him.

He's not interested because it's not all about him

"Magic" bullet theory makes perfect sense and is backed up by hard evidence.

Not quite @@aaronz7056

Early 1960's (different world we thought ) ..

he didn't want it on

Okay, you're crazy.

No, you are absolutely right, Jackie Kennedy talks to the driver, who by all accounts is CIA, then shoots the President and tosses the gun in the back of the car.

Iceberg ! Straight ahead ! Frederick Fleet crows nest Titanic. Titanic 6 crows nest crew 6th floor Oswald. Who´s the ´iceberg´. Head. Crew toilet in a ship.

Running Lady. Rosemay Willis running. Clint Hill running. Where does a running stitch end. With Abraham Zapruder dress maker.

John Kitzgerald Fennedy.

True. Probably all those conspirators don't believe what they are writing but they sell. Imagine one day all documents are released and Oswald was the author, who will be the idiots? The average citizen who spent time and money on it while the writers were running to the bank.

Innocent? No. Complicit? Yes.

OSWALD never seen on 6th Floor TSBD 1230. Or rushing to 2nd floor. He had been 1st Floor and then to 2nd floor to finish his lunch when the cop and building manager spotted him. Not a shooter.

@@thomasraftery409 ... ... Agree 100%! Thanks.

a) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds. b) Victims' reactions clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. c) Kennedy is clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound at the temple, consistent only with a shot from behind. d) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. e) Connally's said the shots came from behind. f) Autopsy demonstrates the shots came from behind. g) Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos demonstrating the shots came from behind. h) Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. i) Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. j) Zapruder's secretary was yards away from the fence and saw nobody there. k) It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns. l) Unarmed people were not running towards a crazed gunman to "catch" him. Officer Haygood parked his bike and raced up the knoll to secure the area, finding nothing and nobody, as he firmly testified. People saw him, assumed he was chasing somebody, and this sparked a rush of onlookers following him. Behind the knoll fence, they were filmed milling aimlessly around with nothing to see.

@@thomasraftery409 Only person to place Oswald in the lunch room before the shooting was Oswald and the people he claimed he was with flatly denied ever seeing him. You neglected to mention that he then immediately fled the crime scene.