Тёмный

New Realistic ATC for MSFS - FSHud Review & Full Flight | MSFS 2020 

Easyjetsimpilot
Подписаться 44 тыс.
Просмотров 90 тыс.
50% 1

FSHud - Air Traffic Control is a new add-on for MSFS which aims to bring realistic ATC to Microsoft Flight Simulator. Create flight plans, have them created for you, or import them from SimBrief, FSHud will give you worldwide ATC coverage from clearance to shutdown. The trusty FO can handle all of the ATC comms leaving you free to fly whilst following the realistic instructions. In this video, we give a full review and complete a full flight whilst covering some points that are not fully optimised for MSFS.
GET FSHud - Air Traffic Control:- www.fshud.com/#/site/overview
FREQUENT FLYER? You can now join the Easyjet Sim Pilot Channel & become a member, earning you extra perks along the way:- • Supporting the Easyjet...
DISCORD LINK:- / discord
Channel supported by:-
Thrustmaster:- www.thrustmaster.com/
Orbx:- orbxdirect.com/
Aerosoft:- www.aerosoft.com/en/flight-si...
REX Simulations:- rexsimulations.com/
Flightbeam:- www.flightbeam.net/msfs-products
Macco Simulations:- maccosim.com/

Игры

Опубликовано:

 

15 июн 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 195   
@EHEHspotter
@EHEHspotter 2 года назад
I didn't know that Captain Sim also made ATC software for MSFS2020 ...... : - )
@JD-qd1bp
@JD-qd1bp 2 года назад
Thank you for the review - I'm really glad you reviewed this as I was all set to purchase until I watched your review and noticed that it doesn't support addon airports. Bit of a show stopper for me until this is fixed. Good review, have subscribed and liked
@Shadow__133
@Shadow__133 Год назад
Not to mention no Demo and a hefty pricetag. Since I fly mostly to addon airports this is a hard pass for me as well.
@josneira1827
@josneira1827 Год назад
@@Shadow__133 i was 50/50 set to purchase till i noticed it's 35 dollars....i bought the game for not much more...no thx..
@davidrosenblum2178
@davidrosenblum2178 2 года назад
I was ready to pull the trigger on this until I watched the video, so thanks for that. I noticed that the call to Ground came well before you had cleared the arrival runway so that obviously needs tweaking. And of course add-on airports blah blah blah... So I will be waiting and watching its development.
@markgr1nyer
@markgr1nyer 2 года назад
Hi Gavin. I had the same issue with the INPI1E approach, the issue is "the N601 airway isn't capable on required altitude between ABEVI and INPIP", Change it to DCT and it works, Also make sure INIPIE has an altitude of FL260 as this is what it is on the plate and is an AT altitude
@JonathanPeel
@JonathanPeel 2 года назад
If you haven't already, I would love to see you do a review of Pilot2ATC.
@kakihara111
@kakihara111 2 года назад
On Avsim there is a discussion about this. According to that there are some big issues. The injected traffic gets only updated 1 times per second, which makes it look stuttery. If you miss a waypoint ATC simply... stops and you are on your own. Also it doesnt support the toolbar, so not really good for VR. No VFR but they write it will come in a later update. Can you confirm this? Also can you divert to another airport mid flight?
@KKBWHH
@KKBWHH Год назад
In MSFS - at times it appears AI aircraft are "jumping", or not smoothly moving forward? A. This is due to an MSFS SDK bug that doesn't allow aircraft to follow the path presented for it - therefore, the application updates the AI Aircraft position according to estimations every second. This behavior would be fixed once the MSFS SDK bug is fixed.
@RhysIvanMusic
@RhysIvanMusic 2 года назад
How does it do with regional differences in SOP’s? Flying in the US for example would have very different phraseology
@chop.stix_
@chop.stix_ 2 года назад
Would you stream with a32nx any time? Would love to see a mix up
@taoro33
@taoro33 2 года назад
I think the program is very good. It is a great option providing realism. However, it makes a very big FPS drop in airports with air traffic. I have RTX 3070 TI card and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor with 4.5 GHZ. My CFG on FS2020 is HIGH. I usually have between 45 to 55 FPS at all times. But with FSHUD it drops to 20 to 30 FPS depending on the airport. I think the developer should work on the aircraft models to bring them closer to the FPS level that FS2020 achieves. Also the air traffic Contrails design is not good.
@stevesumner9988
@stevesumner9988 5 месяцев назад
One question for you. Did the program set your transponder for you or did you do it? I'm wondering if my aircraft has to be powered up first, then start FSHud. Nice video.
@Deyan_B_Travels
@Deyan_B_Travels 2 года назад
No 3rd party airports, no transition levels, no diversions, no declaring emergency... not ready!!
@goalski134
@goalski134 2 года назад
what an epic disappointment. atc remains one of the worst elements of the sim. nothing changing soon.
@heythatsuzz
@heythatsuzz 2 года назад
Yeah… quite disappointing…
@drowzee6687
@drowzee6687 Год назад
Thx for saving me a watch lol
@Petefamily
@Petefamily Год назад
Any you do recommend
@Ramaprabhu
@Ramaprabhu Год назад
can you please consider uploading a detailed video tutorial on PF3 ATC for use in MSFS2020. ? Thanks
@henningsauer8777
@henningsauer8777 2 года назад
I sometimes still use fs2004 and there was a nice atc add on called "Radar contact ". It needs fsuipc as connection to fs2004. It has a own atc Window similar to the default atc Window, but with much more options like emergency procedures, short final, short cut to requested waypoints etc. This would be a nice approach to a better atc. Just for fun Ive recovered that It still work via fsuipc and msfs2020 but i had to use the fs9 nav database and unfortunately the atc window is Not supported. Ok, was just a try, but i wonder that It theoretically can work. Only someone has to discover the Code of radar Contact which is now Freeware but maybe the original Developer is unknown or still keeping the copy rights. But maybe someone can catch the idea. Radar contact seems to be better then this etc hud, but had a simelar approach.
@MWR62
@MWR62 Год назад
Radar Contact was brilliant. Works in P3DV5 too.
@BuggSmasher
@BuggSmasher 8 месяцев назад
Interesting ! I used RC back in the day with FSX. It was only IFR, but worked brilliantly following your loaded flight plan, but as soon as you requested VFR, you got rejected like a drag queen attending a formal dinner in red square !
@ReefAndReptileAutomation
@ReefAndReptileAutomation 2 года назад
Going to try this out for sure. I am little confused though. Live traffic from where? If you use AIG traffic manager or PSXT to inject do You no longer use it then? How’s does it get the AIG Manager liveries and so forth?
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot 2 года назад
It uses the liveries based in your community folder.
@cptairwolf
@cptairwolf Год назад
This is a great little program but honestly I'd love to see someone create an addon that could convert audio (from our voice) over to requests. I don't wanna have to click on items. I want to speak to the ATC the same way I would if I was playing on vatsim.
@oliverthorne8625
@oliverthorne8625 Год назад
pilot2atc does this
@captainzeppos
@captainzeppos 2 года назад
Great presentation, good stuff! Haven't tried it yet, but I'm very keen to as MSFS is in dire need of a proper ATC (the default one is just horrible and inconsistent). Simplest question would be: is this better than Pilot2ATC? If I understand correctly from the little I've seen, FS Hud offers a very small number of features compared to P2A, it has no voice recognition (just popup screens where you click numbers), only works with predefined flight plans and can't make SID/STAR decisions on its own and so on. The only upside seems to be that it can interact with AI traffic, but then only the traffic it creates by itself (hopefully it's consistent and "live" enough). Does it even offer step climbs/descends or any other more complicated instructions? How is it _significantly_ better than the default ATC? Seems like it still needs lots of work to make some difference.
@Seb851s
@Seb851s 2 года назад
For now, P2ATC is more deep but interface is horrible and not working / interact with AI Trafics.
@steveclarkemedia
@steveclarkemedia 2 года назад
@@Seb851s I use P2ATC a lot, but it also infuriates me and that UI - dire. Surely someone can come up with something better. It’s one of outstanding unclimbed summits of simming.
@BernieParker21
@BernieParker21 2 года назад
Sorry Gav. Won’t be getting this until it’s improved dramatically. Thanks for the review 👍
@CockpitSimAviation
@CockpitSimAviation 2 года назад
Nice video! do you need to run aig traffic controller in the background to inject traffic or not ?
@SleepySleepy500
@SleepySleepy500 2 года назад
No, do not run AIG TC. FSHUD control the traffic using the AIG routes, aircraft and liveries. Running AIG TC simultaneously will mess things up.
@yams900
@yams900 2 года назад
Thx Gavin ! Might try it
@farshadtimkvist
@farshadtimkvist 2 года назад
@Easyjetsimpilot i have a problem, I bought the program yesterday and wanted to test it. It works well but the problem is when i want to change something in the flight plan in MCDU so and i mean when i fly and when i have to change approach or something FShub stops working. Do you know what the problem might be?
@rayjennings3637
@rayjennings3637 2 года назад
Did the 'co-pilot' keep saying Tango instead of Echo in the identifier?
@yik68
@yik68 2 года назад
1. Are the departure sid and approach star specified by yourself, or are they assigned and processed by the computer due to wind direction and real-time traffic? 2. After landing, I can't see the colors on the taxiway to guide the route, will it be difficult?
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot 2 года назад
1. The ATC will provide you with runway and SID and STARs etc if you haven't selected them. 2. The taxi ribbon won't work as this is linked to detail ATC so see the video to show you how this is done in Fshud.
@fbwsimpilot
@fbwsimpilot 2 года назад
Seems very good on first look, however, if it can't recognise add on airports it makes it pretty limited. So won't be using it till it can
@iainmckay9744
@iainmckay9744 2 года назад
It can recognise add on airports just not those purchased through the marketplace
@jdshemp
@jdshemp 2 года назад
@@iainmckay9744 Great deal!!! I only purchased 40.......
@fbwsimpilot
@fbwsimpilot 2 года назад
So no third party airports then?
@iainmckay9744
@iainmckay9744 2 года назад
@@jdshemp yeah I tend to avoid the marketplace, MS take a cut from the devs and scenery takes longer to get updated and encryption makes It more difficult to modify. But it is very convenient for users. I will wait before buying to see if they can fix this!
@Seb851s
@Seb851s 2 года назад
@@jdshemp This limitation is gone with a upcoming Sim Update
@josec4790
@josec4790 Год назад
Great presentation. Can you switch from the first officer answering to ATC to the pilot through microphone?
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot Год назад
Not 100% sure, their website might have more information.
@antoinek1468
@antoinek1468 2 года назад
Tried it today and I got -10 fps in the sim...making it useless, unless I missed something in the configuration?
@hiortintexasracing
@hiortintexasracing 2 года назад
Yea, the inability to work with custom airports is a deal breaker. Also, the voices are super robotic and for the price i would expect it not to be.
@CJRGK
@CJRGK Год назад
I’ve downloaded it and thinks it great, however my MF2020 sound dips randomly, the ATC HUD sound works perfectly. Anyone had these issues or can recommend a fix? I’d configured the exact settings specified.
@GG_Booboo
@GG_Booboo 6 месяцев назад
I need to know if I should get this or wait for Beyond ATC! The default ATC is quite basic and sucks!
@peterbryson6159
@peterbryson6159 7 месяцев назад
Does it work with FSLTL or does that have to be disabled also?
@MrScott_e
@MrScott_e 2 года назад
I have yet to understand why MSFS and X-Plane 12 don't incorporate Voice commands like Pilot 2 ATC uses. P2A is still my GOTO ATC when not online.
@AlguienEnSuCasa
@AlguienEnSuCasa Год назад
what do you mean with online?
@thebasic5917
@thebasic5917 Год назад
@@AlguienEnSuCasa Im gonna assume he meant vatsim(online)
@desert1791
@desert1791 Год назад
Question : while I'm close to arriveing Airport I don't know how to contact with ATC tower for information and landing.... even if I find frequency number in airport diagram and put in com 1 or 2 I don't get no respond back please if you have any tutorial video about that let me know. (default flying not vatsim) Thank you so much.
@johnathandoe9346
@johnathandoe9346 Год назад
Thanks for let's us know before I spent the money. Most of the airport I fly to are add-on.
@JayantKumar-dn3zu
@JayantKumar-dn3zu 2 года назад
Why not they try to imbed an improved version of automated ATC like this in VATSIM, which shall takeover when Unicom is tuned in. that automated ATC will mange all the traffic on vatsim network according to their respective flight plan, etc, when no real person is there. The system could gather data from metar, traffic position, charts, available tcas function and might provide good guidance. If this happens VATSIM and even other such networks will be covering the entire planet with ATC service at all times. The radio will never go silent again.
@goalski134
@goalski134 2 года назад
this is the kind of think that is needed. find ways to fix and improve the atc we already have
@budguy21
@budguy21 2 года назад
if that technology existed it would have already replaced real ATC
@srenbohn4904
@srenbohn4904 Год назад
Great to hear about more realistic ATC addon. Do you know if you can use GSX together with FSHud or will they conflict ?
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot Год назад
They are two completely seperate programmes that do different thuifs. So no conflicts. 👍
@srenbohn4904
@srenbohn4904 Год назад
@@Easyjetsimpilot Sounds good, but in this video you requested pushback through FSHud, so should you then do that through the GSX menu if you want the full GSX pushback experience and interaction, or will that still happen even though you start it through FSHud ?
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot Год назад
@@srenbohn4904 you would just request push via whichever app you want to use.
@srenbohn4904
@srenbohn4904 Год назад
@@Easyjetsimpilot Sounds great. Thanks a lot for such a quick response ;-)
@scotty258
@scotty258 Год назад
Gav i have a question i always have problems with the landing namely the machine lurches to the left and right when coasting 320 fly by wire can you give me a few tips on how i can prevent this
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot Год назад
I've not had this issue before. Perhaps try raising your null zone settings a little.
@bjornuddenberg8007
@bjornuddenberg8007 Год назад
Does anyone know how to change voices? There should be 8 but I can not find them...
@deloford
@deloford Год назад
Not sure how you can recommend a product that doesnt work with addon airports?
@Robalogot
@Robalogot 2 года назад
Pilot2ATC combined with AIG traffic controller might be clunkier, but It's so much better and flexible.
@Seb851s
@Seb851s 2 года назад
Pilot2ATC is not interact with IA trafic just
@DesktopSimulation
@DesktopSimulation 2 года назад
needs alot work seems rushed out, we need the base game to get a better atc as the latest poll shows only 9% of msfs users use vatsim so the market is huge for a offline atc
@pg.ledesma
@pg.ledesma 2 года назад
The best offline ATC is ProATCX. I used it a lot in prepar3D. They are working in a version for MSFS, but unfortunately we don't have any news of it since 2021. I'm waiting so hyped for this ATC.
@captain7956
@captain7956 Год назад
Can this help you prepare for vatsim?
@bissonFamily
@bissonFamily Год назад
QNH below FL180 is valid since standard pressure only applies to flight levels 180 and above.
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot Год назад
Correct. However some airline SOPs are to set the pressure to STD when ATC tells them to climb to FL and to local QNH when descending to an altitude, regardless of your current FL/ALT.
@bissonFamily
@bissonFamily Год назад
@@Easyjetsimpilot Good to know. Great video btw. I currently use Pilot2ATC but might give FSHUD a go since I like how the taxi directions are shown directly in the panel.
@tf51d
@tf51d 2 года назад
I really don't see a major difference in the ATC itself to default. The one feature I do like is the holf for clearance of crossing runways. Also what AI models does it use ro inject it's traffic with? Already have a full compliment of AIG traffic.
@ricka47
@ricka47 2 года назад
It can use the AIG models but without the AIG Controller. Bottom-line, it doesn't really add anything extra that the default ATC doesn't have and actually takes away a few features like marshaling, weather awareness, and jetways. Getting a flight plan into the program can be quite tedious. If you miss a waypoint or a turnoff after landing, it stops talking to you. I asked for a refund and hope that it will improve over time.
@tf51d
@tf51d 2 года назад
@@ricka47 I agree, don't see anything game changing here. Jetways is on area I wish could be disconnected. The animation of them connecting to all the AI planes, kills performance, especially on a low end system like mine. If it doesn't engage Jetways on AI traffic, that could be reason enough for me to switch to it.
@SleepySleepy500
@SleepySleepy500 2 года назад
Well, one thing it does bring is actual control of the AI aircraft. Everybody that has used AIG has seen the disaster that is the default MSFS AI behavior with aircraft taxiing in a circle when holding on the taxiway, eternal go-arounds and all aircraft spawning at the same altitude as the player, and never changing altitude. This is all gone with FSHUD as it actually controls the AI using proper procedures. This is a big plus’s for me. If they can get the update rate down below 1 sec, support for VR and ability to read the WX (hopefully coming with SU10) then it will have the potential to be the best ATC addon by far.
@tf51d
@tf51d 2 года назад
@@SleepySleepy500 Don't know if you can blame the Holding AI circling problem on Asobo. I don't believe FS default traffic exhibited this behavior, and most of the AIG models are converted FSX/P3D AI models, so that maybe the actual cause of it.
@shodancat1000
@shodancat1000 2 года назад
@@tf51d it is definitely an Asobo problem... completely stock/default traffic in MSFS does the same thing.
@franklindberg2035
@franklindberg2035 Год назад
Is addon scenery supported now?
@homasas4837
@homasas4837 2 года назад
what about sid and stars ? Are they randomly assigned or does the app just follow your flightplan ?
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot 2 года назад
They are assigned based on your flight plan. If you dont have them in your flight plan, it will assign you one based on your departure routing.
@homasas4837
@homasas4837 2 года назад
@@Easyjetsimpilot do they update or change according to the ai traffic ? Lets say rwy in use for landing is 24L and you planned 24R, will the atc give you a landing on 24L ?
@whammo11224
@whammo11224 2 года назад
Thank you for your informative review. I'll pass on this product.
@kevindavis8175
@kevindavis8175 Год назад
How is it for GA flights?
@AlguienEnSuCasa
@AlguienEnSuCasa Год назад
I don't understand almost anything, i'm absolutely newbie, how can I learn?, thanks!
@user-gc9xu1th3y
@user-gc9xu1th3y Год назад
In this program, you can communicate with the dispatcher by voice messages through a microphone?
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot Год назад
No, just ATC.
@user-gc9xu1th3y
@user-gc9xu1th3y Год назад
@@Easyjetsimpilot Do you know any other programs with this feature besides pro2atc?
@rileyhampton1472
@rileyhampton1472 Год назад
Does it connect with fsltl traffic?
@manusilverliner9399
@manusilverliner9399 2 года назад
It’ a pity that Non default airports can’t be used ..
@rogermoore52
@rogermoore52 2 года назад
Thanks for the review. I don’t think I’ll bother.
@TeamSethRules
@TeamSethRules 2 года назад
Thanks for review as made up my mind whether to get this. no way this is ready. Can’t use with add on airports!! WT! Can’t use with AIG??? couldn’t tell if that was the case or not. Did you have live weather going? Because I read that can’t use it with that either!! I have been using pilot2atc for some time now and with its limitations it is still far superior to this at the moment. I’ll wait. Again thanks for the review.
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot 2 года назад
Live WX was on and so we're AIG models - NOT the traffic injector.
@SleepySleepy500
@SleepySleepy500 2 года назад
You can use it with addon airports, just now encrypted addon airports (from MSFS marketplace for example.) You can use it with AIG. Get all the routes, planes, liveries and callsigns from AIG, and it works perfectly for me. Can’t read the MSFS wx yet, but that is hopefully fixed after SU10 if Asobo allows reading the WX from the sim.
@steveclarkemedia
@steveclarkemedia 2 года назад
Agree P2ATC beats this easily. But it badly needs a refresh and update….
@richardnicholas2957
@richardnicholas2957 2 года назад
I’m guessing no Xbox support? What’s amazing is Flight Unlimited 2 had ATC that blows away this and default FS2020 more than 15 years ago. It was really REALLY good.
@andrewberry2838
@andrewberry2838 2 года назад
Finally, someone else who has noticed this. Flight Unlimited even vectored you away from traffic conflicts. I never once had a go around. It completely crippled my PC at the time, trying to play it on an SiS internal VGA chip. I still fly in that area on MSFS such as half moon bay, Senoma Skypark etc, good times. Seems ATC has always been an after thought in FS.
@scottallen8950
@scottallen8950 Год назад
Exactly! I enjoyed just sitting down for a flight and having ATC totally vector me to my destination. It was easy and fun!
@dhruvilgandhi3575
@dhruvilgandhi3575 2 года назад
please tell how you downloaded MS FS 2020 I also want to play but I don't know how to download I am not getting in Play store
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot 2 года назад
Microsoft Store for PC.
@triple_croche
@triple_croche 2 года назад
This is definitely a good base for the future, however I have some HUGE FPS impact with FSHud and I am not the only one...
@voju
@voju 2 года назад
As a user of PF3 I don't really see the appeal of this. Yes it has navigraph support but there are other ATC tools that do. Other than that they did unfortunately not really learn from the journey of existing atc tools that also went from passable to pretty excellent. They start at passable which is a shame I think. But I wish them success, for now it's definitely not for me.
@bwc1976
@bwc1976 2 года назад
I had tried PF3 before and had trouble with it, but after reading this, I tried again and I think it will serve my needs better after all. :)
@voju
@voju 2 года назад
@@bwc1976 I agree that it has some quirks but it's also very flexible and in the newer versions it has a verification for common issues with flight plans that already helps avoid some problems. I like its basic vfr support too. It definitely has improved over time.
@homasas4837
@homasas4837 2 года назад
honestly, i dont see any advantage pf3 has over pilot2atc.
@voju
@voju 2 года назад
@@homasas4837 i think that is very much personal preference. Besides navigraph support I don't see much that pilot2atc would provide over pf3. Also no need for expensive tts voices for variety in voices with pf3.
@homasas4837
@homasas4837 2 года назад
@@voju random star/sid assignments, atc which still follows you despite missing a waypoint, possibility to change procedure during the flight, voice control..the 2 flaws of pilot2atc are his outdated interface, but pf3 isn't better and most important the lack of interaction with ai traffic. But pf3 doesn't do it as well..
@daadood100
@daadood100 2 года назад
is nothing like Pilot 2ATC it is the same garbage as the defualt. so what is new?
@steveclarkemedia
@steveclarkemedia 2 года назад
Thanks for bringing this to our attention - but this is not even at first base. After a couple of years of MSFS the majority of my airports are third party of one kind or another. It’s naive to think ASOBO only airports are really much use. They would need to fix this for starters to get a second look from me. Personally I think there’s a BIG hole in the flight-simming market where good programmable ATC should be. P2ATC is my favourite, I can talk to it, it responds and offers good flight planning, and these are minimum requirements for me. BUT it’s a bit flaky frankly and the front end UI is like something out of the ark. There’s a good market out there for someone who can crack this. Maybe it’s this product, but they have a lot of work to do on the basis of your video.
@nikolatr71
@nikolatr71 2 года назад
Agrred completely market is deficient with a serious ATc! And that theirs (MS), custom one was tragical...i've had many times with it turned one where bug is w/ sudden, out of blue sky tug coming uncalled and started to push me back (while I was in the midst of preps not even ready to go..) lol. Cannot see this being a serious alternative, esp. if one cannot do legit way pointing.
@homasas4837
@homasas4837 2 года назад
yeah i use sometimes pilot2atc too, if im too lazy to go to vatsim. I bought some new voices for it so its sound quite nice and realistic. The big problem though is the lack of interaction with ai planes. You got atc, but you still feel alone since ai traffic isnt controlled. I ended up multiple times landing in front of an ai plane. And countless times as well i had a go around request at 100 ft from the ground..
@steveclarkemedia
@steveclarkemedia 2 года назад
@@homasas4837 it’s a good point there’s no sense of being part of something bigger. Would it be so hard to add voice recognition to this product to make it something MUCH more interesting? As I say I think the reward could be considerable for whomever gets this right.
@chrisattwood9588
@chrisattwood9588 7 месяцев назад
I’m guessing this won’t work with FSTraffic
@lyskmusic
@lyskmusic Год назад
Cannot fly to my airports addons ?! Really ? I have so many. Thank you so much for saving me $34.95
@jrhodes31
@jrhodes31 2 года назад
Will not waste my money still needs improvement
@pete2398
@pete2398 2 года назад
What's the difference???
@TheRealBigOnDonating
@TheRealBigOnDonating 2 месяца назад
i need help i bought it but i cant log in and i reset my password but it still says incorrect username or password what do i do
@TheRealBigOnDonating
@TheRealBigOnDonating 2 месяца назад
also if i try to reset it using a token it says invalid details
@TheRealBigOnDonating
@TheRealBigOnDonating 2 месяца назад
nevermiund i didnt activate my account
@Ridux76
@Ridux76 2 года назад
No addon aiports? This is a no buy for me...
@jdshemp
@jdshemp 2 года назад
None of my payware airports work,because they are encrypted? No buy for me......
@fernandonunogoncalves
@fernandonunogoncalves Год назад
Does it work with Fenix A320?
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot Год назад
Yes should do
@Gerbbo1
@Gerbbo1 2 года назад
I suggest the developers take it offline and do a lot more serious development before giving us a well underdone product. Until then I won’t even give this any consideration.
@enriqueosuna
@enriqueosuna 2 года назад
I was tempted to buy it just to give it a try, although I was apprehensive because of the lack of tutorials. Ended up buying it just to get it out of my system, and in the end; as expected, I was disappointed. MSFS Default ATC has improved, and still has ways to go. However, FSHUD is a step back because it is not compatible with the MSFS Add on airports. I did not realize it at the time, but I struggled to get it setup, for that reason. Waste of money, at this time, but more has been lost in the war.
@enriqueosuna
@enriqueosuna 2 года назад
@@captainpiett765 Correct! Unfortunately for FSHud, I bought all North America and Europe Airports!
@ganntradingsystemstimecycl2783
@ganntradingsystemstimecycl2783 2 года назад
Same here I regret buying this. Very limited and what seems half arsed xplane 11 carry over..
@Seb851s
@Seb851s 2 года назад
@@enriqueosuna This limitation is goon in a upcoming update (SU10?) for airports encryption
@enriqueosuna
@enriqueosuna 2 года назад
@@Seb851s good to hear. I know this product will evolve; and since I already own it, I’ll be keeping an eye on it, for that awesome update where all the current issues are fixed.
@MOTISHOW
@MOTISHOW 2 года назад
Pilot2atc is the nest atc addon
@robparker8101
@robparker8101 2 года назад
Thanks for the review but nowhere near as good as PF3.
@chrisgard4076
@chrisgard4076 2 года назад
and this why all mod devs MUST allow "Free Trials"
@Huntingbigfish38
@Huntingbigfish38 2 года назад
Nice review, but its really not ready for use
@gemunuabeygunawardane2146
@gemunuabeygunawardane2146 2 года назад
Hello Sir, can please provide the download link for the G-EZGS EasyJet livery. Thank you.
@WnDTech
@WnDTech Год назад
It's not realistic until you can physically talk to it, then maybe just then.. it will be amazing.
@Tom__L
@Tom__L 2 года назад
The voices sound not as good as the MS ATC. And while MS ATC will be constantly improved it is always fully integrated without compromises, I will pass on this.
@activex7327
@activex7327 2 года назад
Actually, these are more robotic, the MSFS sound more natural.
@NeoSkyAegean
@NeoSkyAegean 2 года назад
No sorry... Not so many differences with the default ATC... No added airports and no AI traffic support? No thank you... Regarding voices... EditVoicePack in fs9 and FSX did a way better job in that in phraseology and speed. Too bad they are not doing anything for MSFS yet. The extra features like simbrief integration and help you in taxi are cool but not worth the extra money for the same ATC as the default. P.s. I used to fly offline for years in fs9 and FSX with lots of AI traffic (280 airlines installed)
@danyyy9724
@danyyy9724 2 года назад
can we VFR with it?
@Easyjetsimpilot
@Easyjetsimpilot 2 года назад
No, IFR only.
@Seb851s
@Seb851s 2 года назад
For now, is only IFR , VFR is planned
@tahoma6889
@tahoma6889 Год назад
ATC doesn't sound like radio. It would be easy to implement, why leave it out? Sad.. And, this disables LIVE traffic, friends, groups, etc. Disqualified.
@uowebfoot
@uowebfoot 2 года назад
They need different voices when you hand off to a different controller.
@AnthonyRudolfHenryHeithuis
@AnthonyRudolfHenryHeithuis 2 года назад
The phraseology has quite some mistakes and doesn't match with ICAO standard phraseology.
@MrSpeaker69
@MrSpeaker69 2 года назад
No add-on airports😄😄 that's a program that is not ready for release.
@colb6171
@colb6171 2 года назад
I really don't have the time or the energy to waste on this . It needs to just work in the background rather than being managed by me
@Puretajugon
@Puretajugon 2 года назад
Pilot2atc is a lot of better than this FShud. This is like a Beta; P2atc works much better, more options and worls in all sims. Nice try FShud, but you need a lot of work to be a decent atc. Thanks for the review.
@SleepySleepy500
@SleepySleepy500 2 года назад
Well, one thing P2A does not have is actually control of the AI aircraft. Beat it can do is give you traffic warnings. Also no control of AI makes the world seem empty when using P2A as P2A does not talk to the AI either.
@BartLaureys
@BartLaureys 2 года назад
No add on scenery is no buy for me.
@SleepySleepy500
@SleepySleepy500 2 года назад
Only encrypted airports that does not work. Unencrypted airport addon a work fine.
@MrMK2001
@MrMK2001 2 года назад
Not feeling the ATC. Vatsim or go home!
@maxdenhaag1
@maxdenhaag1 2 года назад
ProAtcx was much better
@Rosenrot213
@Rosenrot213 2 года назад
It seems like they need to make the voices quicker and more realistic, very robot like, I would get quite annoyed listening to it on a long flight
@EleanorPeterson
@EleanorPeterson 2 года назад
But... gabbled ATC is incredibly annoying. You want faster voices to make things sound more realistic? Not for me, thanks. I hate the assumption that you have to run one word into another and mumble your comms as fast as possible in a sort of sing-song hospital radio DJ voice in order to sound 'cool'. It should be all about clarity, not sounding like a grumpy teenager who's worried about being bullied by his hard mates if he enunciates words properly. ATC's sole function is to convey safety-critical information to people and pilots who may not have English as a first language. That's all. It shouldn't matter where in the world you are or where you're from. If it's not perfectly clear at all times, it's totally unacceptable. Oh, yes. TOTALLY. I'm not a jet pilot, but I got my real-world PPL years ago in a Cessna 172 when my late dad was with the Flying Doctor Service in East Africe (Kenya). I have a voice that sounds a bit like Joanna Lumley's; it's meant I've been picked on ever since I left school for sounding 'posh', but I've never had any problems being understood on the typical crappy, crackly radio either back here in England or when I was flying out in Kenya. Frankly, I think we'd all be better off if people spoke more clearly. I find the indistinct, rushed, vague ATC announcements of most RU-vid flight sim experts to be far more irksome than the 'robotic' delivery you dislike. Yay for robots! 🤖
@Rosenrot213
@Rosenrot213 2 года назад
@@EleanorPeterson Yes I agree with you on what you say, but for me the app would be on the money - if the voices sounded for example, as close as possible, as the real life atc on steveo1kinevo youtube channel tbm flights its not gabbled, or unclear, its sharp and crisp and about the ideal tempo - I flight sim for fun only, if they work on this and can produce something similar I would consider buying.
@chrisgard4076
@chrisgard4076 2 года назад
not as good as Pilot2ATC though
@ganntradingsystemstimecycl2783
@ganntradingsystemstimecycl2783 2 года назад
I regret buying this over expensive xplane 11 carry over. Very limited it what it can do. Frankly it's just a cash grab.. So don't buy, unless they make better improvements..Also I hate the fact that it is too automated. Meaning I want options to manually change ATC frequencies etc etc..
@ButchNackley
@ButchNackley Год назад
No good. It is still a robot. They (Asobo) needs to update ATC voices. Dump the robot stuff and replace it with actual human voices. It shouldn't be that hard to record every ATC audio by a number of people (to get various tracks) for all the lines currently in the sim. Pretty graphics is nice and all, but constantly having to listen to those fake voices is a real immersion killer,,, at least for me. Cleared for takeoff runway 2 tree is really a drag. They can do better than this.
@captainzeppos
@captainzeppos 2 года назад
@4:50 another excellent reason to NEVER buy anything from the official marketplace. Nothing, never. I haven't bought a single one of my hundreds of addons and I've never regretted it. There's nothing inherently good in the default marketplace.
@Seb851s
@Seb851s 2 года назад
This limitation, is gone very soon ;)
@TimAlcoser
@TimAlcoser 2 года назад
The lack of support for third party airports is a deal breaker for me.
@Seb851s
@Seb851s 2 года назад
Attention, is only airport buy InSim Marketplace due encryption system, this limitation is gone with a upcoming MSFS SimUpdate ..
@TimAlcoser
@TimAlcoser 2 года назад
@@Seb851s it still doesn't work after the recent update or it does work after update? I buy most of my add-ons in sim.
@Seb851s
@Seb851s 2 года назад
​@@TimAlcoser It should after the MSFS DRM update (not ETA for now), except I hope it's not with the Marketplace 3.0 ...
@activex7327
@activex7327 2 года назад
MSFS ATC voices are better than these, disappointed. This more like FSX. 15 years backwards.
@Danny_Roman.
@Danny_Roman. 2 года назад
Don't like that add on... very robotic.
@jpht1964
@jpht1964 2 года назад
FS hood, no thanks…
@IAMYUNGGAF
@IAMYUNGGAF 2 года назад
This sim has become trash for me for me to the point i don't even like playing it. 20 to 30 mintues to set up a flight plan and then the a32nx doesn't follow the flight plan because the sids and stars are incomplete. We keep seeing addons and updates but they don't even fix the integrity of the basic flight systems. WTF?? How are you guys playing this sim? Just flying around looking at the scenery? I want to do real life simulation of airline routes and i can't do that anymore because the damn plane doesn't follow the route after spending a half hour setting up the plane. It's like the autopilot function is pointless.
@MrBillUp
@MrBillUp 2 года назад
I have just come straight from an XP stream with the Toliss A340 and I'm sorry, XP and the Toliss look absolutely dreadful. They can keep their nice flight model lol. 🤣😁 What this is also good for is people just getting into Vatsim, and are worried about going on a live network. Its a good training tool for them, as a lot of the phraseology, terminology, and order of contact is correct.
@jakubleschtina7734
@jakubleschtina7734 Год назад
same shit as defaul😂
@roberthatcher2773
@roberthatcher2773 2 года назад
Still only American voices. Just saying.
@mickg0756
@mickg0756 2 года назад
Actually, male(pilot) voice sounds Australian to me..also East midlands tower female atc is australian too
@davidschwarz7101
@davidschwarz7101 2 года назад
No 3rd party airports? no way! This product seems to be a beta!
@SleepySleepy500
@SleepySleepy500 2 года назад
No ENCRYPTED 3rd party airports. Airports that are not encrypted work fine.
Далее
Hamster Kombat 20 July Mini Game
00:13
Просмотров 10 млн
The Trump rally shooting from a photographer's POV
00:58
New FS2020 Google Maps MOD for the entire world!
14:27
I Pranked MSFS's NEW AI ATC (didn't go well)
11:39
Просмотров 220 тыс.
New AI ATC for MSFS: Sayintentions.ai
17:51
Просмотров 9 тыс.
Increase Performance and No More Stutters | MSFS 2020
9:45
🎉🎉ОТКРЫТИЕ МЕГА ЯЩИКОВ! ✨✨
1:54:28