Love it. I had the opportunity of chatting with many people - secularists - about JWST. From just after its launch to just after the first images. When I told them what I expected JWST to show us (fully-formed galaxies, no pop III stars, etc) I was mocked. When my expectations were confirmed I humbly reminded them that they were invited to embrace the Creator. I was blocked from the chat, removed for "spreading conspiracy theories", and again mocked. To this day I am still blocked from the chat. Please join me in praying for those who are lost and for those who deny.
You’re blessed. Heavenly Father I pray that you would open the eyes of the men and women in this world who are lost and blind, and I pray you would reveal yourself to them, as you have for me and others here reading and watching. In Jesus’ name I pray, Amen. That is interesting though I’m not surprised. Nothing would have made me believe before God revealed Himself to me. I would’ve written all of this off probably, simply because I didn’t really want to believe in God. I didn’t really realize I didn’t want to believe, but I certainly didn’t.
@@cgeorgeleonde5175 I would add: believe on the name of his son Jesus Christ and love one another as he gave commandment, 1st John 3:23 Very Definitely 💯 matters beyond only that God created us, with the cooperation of his son Jesus Christ In The Beginning, John 1:1-3.
When they turn their back on God, God turns his back on them. The further they walk away, the further God gets, and he will not restrain it. They're not lost, they've been rejected and abandoned by their own choices. First mistake was believing: "In the begining a singularity created......"
@@waynerenee3809 only with the New Testament revelation is there understanding that there were two 2️⃣ Creators IN THE BEGINNING, but only God, the God of Israel, would allow no other Creator, or God, to be known by Israel, for he ALONE AUTHORIZED bringing Israel out of Egypt; he did have helpers with him, such as Moses but not ending with Moses. The two 2️⃣ Creators were the Word and the God, John 1:1-3 ‘without him ( the Word) was nothing made that was made’ by the God of Israel, who wasn’t made flesh, John 1:14. The God of Israel made things IN THE BEGINNING with his hands 🙌 Isaiah 45:11-12, Hebrews 1:10!
Before a telescope was invented Job 26:7 God stretches the northern sky over empty space and hangs the earth on nothing. 7 He spreads the skies over unformed space, hangs the earth out in empty space. GOD is.
Yes people continue to believe that big bang but the James Webb telescope already proved it couldn’t be like that but for some reason people don’t listen. God does not give his glory to anyone else!
@@DarthGandalftheBlackThere is one version of the Bible. Silly head. It's in Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. It is translated directly from those, so everyone on Earth can read and understand God's word. Nice try though.
As far as I know (correct me if I’m wrong), Dr. Jason Lisle was the only creationist to make successful public predictions of what JWST would discover. For example, fully formed and mature distant galaxies.
Love Dr. lisle , secularists demand science or God. Bit in reality there is no science with out God. God is the best mathematician, best scientists, best artist. His is I Am , and with out I am there is nothing.
I doubt that very much. I am not a trained scientist of any kind; I am what you might call a "buff" regarding astronomy. That is to say that I, an average guy, made the same predictions - independent from and prior to hearing what Dr. Lisle predicted. I am no genius. I am average. God does not try to confuse us. As Romans 1:22 says "Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools..."
On the day that JWST was launched, there was plenty of chitter-chatter in the comments of various RU-vid channels which had made predictions of what we would likely see in the "early" universe. I commented that we would see just more of what we see around us, and that there would be more unanswered questions and problems for the evolutionists to ponder over. I was laughed at by my comments, but I bet they're not laughing now!
That is exactly what science wants, a better understanding of how nature works. It will provide us with a more accurate model. the framework needs to fit the data in search of the true nature of nature. No fixed stories we want the truth.
The observable universe has a radius of 46.5 billion light years, but is only 14 billion years old according to popular science. Why has no one picked up on the fact that the universe supposedly expanded at 3x speed of light despite the speed of light being Unbreakable?
Because the fabric of space-time is expanding at that speed. Only things travelling through it can not travel faster. I'm an electrician so don't really know shit but i heard Brian Cox say it once
@kristaylor6694 I'm guessing they came to that conclusion by simply doing the math and saying "The math don't add up. Guess the universe just expands faster than the speed of light *shrug "
In the theory of the expansion of the Universe if you travel at the speed of light time stops, you can see both the past and the future, but the Universe expands much faster because you will never be able to see the Horizon Of Events that don`t yet exist. Now , the reason why the Universe is expanding faster and faster some scientists attribute it to antimatter. But a theory is just a theory , and is taken as a reference until another theory has more validity or is proven without a doubt that is a fact.
Being a student of science i am learning more on this channel than all the books and research I have done in my life so far. Lucky me I found this channel and continuously watching videos to learn with rational but logical approach . Bravo
I heard some of this on another channel too. They said the further they look, the more they find, and didnt expect it. Almost as if its coming about as they come up with ways to search further. Almost as if, "Oh, youre going to look way out there? How do you like this?"
Uhu old and new testament both of 26 or so books full of water in wine and fish stories. was it to much to ask to include a theory of everything and it's equations in it, I mean I presume a creator knows how it works and interacts, right. If humans make a product they include a manual. but no ....nothing .Magic .
@@ulftnightwolf when the Creator is the one who created the laws of nature and the laws of physics, he is not subject to them and can do as he pleases.
@@ulftnightwolf nothing could have avoided human suffering because humans, regardless of the situation, would have chosen to rebel against God and bring suffering into this world.
Comments suggest if an atheist/scientist is correct it means they're a good scientist. If a theist/scientist is correct he's just luckey. Sorry folks that qualifies as willingly ignorant.
I’ve often thought that people with a PHD and those involved in the sciences who reject Creator God will have a worse time in judgement because God has allowed scientists to observe the complexities of our universe on both a macro and micro scale which defies all other speculations as to origin of the physical universe and life on our planet. Were able to see into the far reaches of the universe and then to see the function and process inside the human cell with all its micro machines and mechanisms and all the information to make it work. All praise to a Magnificent Creator God
"If you calculate the age of the earth using the Bible you get 6317 years" ..... "Oh wait it's actually 6586 because we forgot to add in this one guy in the lineage" ...... So it was off? That means the Bible isn't true! Exact same thing.
@@jamesjaudon8247 not sure how that follows. Making a prediction based on a belief in a higher power isn't luck. Atheistic "science" is constantly being disproved, as proven by this video. Theists just have a better starting point.
Starlight and Time: Solving the Puzzle of Distant Starlight in a Young Universe, written by Dr. Russell Humphreys a physicist is an excellent book for both the layman and those who have advanced mathematics.
How old was Adam when he was created? He was zero years old. How old did Adam look when he was zero years old? Probably 30 or 40 years old. How old was the universe when God created it? Zero years old. How old did the universe look when God created it. As old as God needed it to look
I love it that they keep using descriptors like “The edges of the universe”, when really they should say that the limits of our technology restrict us from viewing deeper into the universe. Conversely, our technology prevents us from seeing the “beginnings” of molecular matter; everything we find microscopically is made of smaller particles. God has made our environment with no beginning or ending.
Yeah, I've always wondered that, how can they possibly know? I mean, is it like the fluted edge of a pie crust or what? Seems more likely to me that there is no edge at all - isn't "infinite" kinda like "eternal" ? Makes more sense that as far as we can see is the edge & we keep expanding that line within everything that is there.
Revelation 22:13 [13] I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.” Revelation 21:5 [5] And he who was seated on the throne said, “Behold, I am making all things new.” Also he said, “Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true.”
@@arbenlakuriqi578 created but they did not serve Gods will. God ordains things and God allows things. We are free willed to love and follow or choose our own path. That why there is so much chaos
Let's face the truth: human beings DO NOT WANT to be accountable for what they do. But like it or not, we must do so on THAT DAY. We have to be ready for ACCOUNTING DAY. I know I am. I hope everyone here becomes prepared too.🙏😊
Not in my experience. I desperately wanted to believe God exists, but the evidence from biology, geology, geography, virology, chemistry, paelontology, linguistics, zoology, archaeology, astronomy, particle physics, astrobiology, and indeed every field of science is so extremely strong that the universe is old, that the God of the books of Genesis and Exodus has set out to deceive us.
@wefinishthisnow3883 Excuse me but if you just look at how the body works: every single system and look at every single muscle how it works and what it does should be enough to convince you of intelligent design. You know less than you think.
@@wefinishthisnow3883 I believe and study all of the same things you mentioned and it's amazing to me that my findings always show God has the glory. Just like this discovery, once again, God can't be disproved. Not to mention the Atheists have limited arguments. Concerned about your last statement. Jesus is the God of Genesis and Exodus and he came to show the Truth, he is the Truth and I very much disagree that he wants to deceive us. God created the Laws of Physics and he even follows his laws, just like the Kings in the old testament. The story of Esther is a prime example of how Kings had to stick to the decrees they laid down. They literally couldn't go back on their word. The thing is, we will never know all of the mysteries of God not hard for me to tell you why. It's fun to look at creation to further our faith, but there is always going to be less than 100% to make that decision. This is God staying true to another Law he laid down = Free will. Also, faith is a main theme in the Bible Galatians 3:6 The Bible teaches that Abraham was justified by faith, i.e., he believed God and His promise, and was imputed righteousness. Also, God never went back on his other word that the wages of sin are death but just like the King in Esther, Ahasuerus, he made a way. Bottom line, be like Mordecai and don't bow down. I'm at the point in my faith where I logically start with the only Truth that matters: Jesus.
Great topic and thank you. Slight correction to avoid confusion: the first law of thermodynamics says that ENERGY (not matter) can neither be created nor destroyed.
@markvanoostrom Another important distinction is that the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics do not GOVERN reality, they DESCRIBE it. Saying that something is impossible because it violates either law is a logical error. If we observe something that violates some expression of those laws, we shouldn't deny the evidence, but rather come up with a more accurate expression of the law that is in line with what we observe. The virtual particles of subatomic physics is a case in point.
I was going to make the same comments. Accuracy is important. Having said that, the point he was making, that an infinitely old universe desires the first law of thermodynamics is still true, just for a different reason. It's true because the universe would have LONG AGO run out of energy. Another problem a steady state model has is, you cannot get to now (this moment in time), from eternity. Time is a created property, just as space, and all it contains is. Good physicists usually speak of time and space together, "space time", they will say, because they are inextricably linked.
@@BrainDamagedBob It is considered a law because all observations are consistent with this. If something was actually observed that violated the law, then that would disprove it, but the issue is that for those who believe such things about the past are essentially claiming that in the unobservable past, something happened that goes against every scientific observation ever made, and that this hypothetical event conveniently enables their worldview. To believe in an eternal or uncaused universe is to deny the evidence in order to make up a story.
Haleluya. Great and mighty our God. Thank you Dr.Sarfity and CMI team for this material. This is the core and substantial material for us as the churches. God bless you.
Wow! What a fascinating conversation! Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Sitting here, I am in tears. I lost someone recently. Just a guy from the street that I spoke to on a number.of occasions. He was so adament to try end disprove creation. And followed all the religions out there, except Christianity. He had just passed about a week or so ago. I dont even have all the details. Someone mentioned his passing in passing. I can't help but wonder what it would have taken for him to open his heart. My hope is that he found Yeshua somewhere in our conversations.
When we had the steady state model of the Universe, Creation always stood at the doorway reminding folks that it was indeed a viable option. Comes then the big bang model, that was a bit more indigestion inducing, creation was even more obvious. Current discoveries indeed hint at the idea that the current models may not be correct. However, creation is still there as a viable option. God has always said that He is evident in creation, everywhere.
GoneCarnivore God said Let there be light, Genesis 1:3, and God formed the light Isaiah 45:7 with his hands 🙌 ( which is what FORMED means, Isaiah 45:11-12).
@@GoneCarnivore I appreciate your response. Some misuse Psalm 33:6,9 without realizing that it was speaking of creation as coming into existence because of God’s speech rather, it was a result of His physically making all things Isaiah 45:11-12, Hebrews 1:10 for both God and Jesus In The Beginning.
Great video on so many levels! However, the statement - "Christians believe in miracles b/c we have a Miracle Worker, whereas atheists believe in miracles with no Miracle Worker, i.e. magic" is worth the whole thing! :-)
The sun and moon were not created till the forth day. This implies that a day in the universe is not a 24 hour day. A 24 hour day is only possible with the sun and moon, which hints that a day for the Creator is not a 24 hour period. What’s a day in creation? That knowledge belongs to our Creator, which exists outside time and space.
Exodus 20:11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.
Good video, but I think he unintentionally made a mistake at 3:10 or so, when he said matter cannot be created or destroyed, I presume he meant energy, not matter...
Genesis 2:2-3 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. [3] And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
Why does science insist on explaining everything within the confines of physics? It doesn’t make sense to me that you can create physics within the confines of the laws of physics. Kinda like a computer being confined to binary obviously can’t create a computer - something ELSE must have made the computer first. Scientifically - there MUST be another contributor to “kick things off”. It’s not scientific to limit the explanation of everything to science. In my opinion - believing everything we obverse and study was the result of chance requires a lot more faith than believing everything was designed and created by a supernatural being (God). Our accidental or happenstance existence both defies physics (matter) and is mathematically improbable (even after 13.8Billion years - it’s not enough time for all of this to happen). So here’s my question: Why are we so afraid of the possibility of a supernatural God that we spend trillions of dollars and millions of man-hours trying to discover an alternative explanation to our very existence? “The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will make you an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.” - Werner Heisenberg
Well, perhaps God is tired of all His eye witness testimonials being shredded by scientists, so He is going to give them scientific, provable evidence - real soon!!!
We even still hear the remnants of the explosion from the Bing Bang in the static found between different radio frequencies. That finding won a Nobel Prize.
A note about the "let there be light"dilemma. The idea of an earth that is old and in existence,and the let there be light in verse three is not in conflict. The genesis account is describing what an earthling would see, if he was standing on the surface of the earth,and observing the creative events taking place. So in verse 2 it says that the earth which didnt have any land masses,and was essentially a water world,was dark. The hebrew word used in these initial verses translated into "light",comes from a root that conveys the meaning diffuse(verses 4,5).This suggests that initially,the atmospheric gas composition was dense enough,and composed such,that it scattered light to a large degree,it was dark at sea level.However,in later verses a clearer atmosphere forms,its not as dark at the surface as it was in verse 1.Later,land and vegetation forms,there is less scattering of light.Finally,the two luminaries are now clearly distinguished from the surface by the end of verse 19,and the two luminaries were clearly visible from earths surface.The hebrew word translated "light",now has a change in the root meaning,which denoted direct visibility. This means sun,moon,and photons were already in existence BEFORE verse 2,the universe was fully formed,and the creator is from that verse onwards, describing the sequences taking place on the earth,from an earthlings viewpoint,as if he were watching from the surface. This seems to square with general scientific thinking that the earth had an initial thick atmosphere that thins out gradually over time. The Big Bang is not inconsistent with the genesis account, it is inconsistent with our misunderstanding of what Genesis is telling us. Much thanks.
Yes, I have often wondered how Genesis was written. I too think that Creation was shown, in imagery or vision by God to the writer (traditionally Moses). So, when written down, it would describe the events as seen by the writer.
I always wondered about the Bible saying "God ""stretched out"" the heavens" I figured maybe He made everything locally and then sent it all flying in every direction. Sounds like that "inflation" idea matches up quite nicely.
I predicted before the JW was launched that the images we got back would be no different than the Hubble images. It felt so good to be right when a large part of the scientific community was wrong. This coming from a high school graduate. :) It makes a difference when you get your information from the right source.
I would agree brother. But we should let the scientists do their science without forcing the Bible on them. They will find out what truth is if they have an open mind. God's creation shows his fingerprints and we have nothing to fear from scientific discovery. The more that gets discovered, the more it undeniably points to God.
The Universe because of its staggering immensity and uniformity could not have come from a physical singularity. That’s preposterous. It has to have its origin which is ongoing from a metaphysical dimension outside of the material restrictions of the space/time continuum. This is logical even without reference to the Bible.
Exactly. A sufficient cause for the universe must be: • Eternal (if it had a beginning, then it, in turn, would need a sufficient cause) • All-powerful (to be the sufficient cause of a universe of this size and energy/matter content) • Non-material (i.e. SUPER-natural; something cannot be it's own cause) Logic and the laws of science do actually point to God as the Creator. See creation.com/who-created-god for more.
Here is another miracle for the atheists to explain: Evolution to the Shroud of Turin that has an image that can't be duplicated even with todays technology. Add that to the list of miracles the atheist needs to answer.
Galaxies that shouldn't be there, animals that shouldn't exist, prophecies that couldn't be real... Any explanation but they don't admit the truth: We were wrong, God Is The Creator and sustains the entire universe
I'm a Christian, and every time my mind doubts "is God even real?", I watch one of CMI's videos and it puts me definitively back into my initial convictions
@@Choraldiscourse Apologetics is fine as a way of promoting an idea, but as a general rule I feel that allowing a proposal to be challenged is a stronger way to promote an idea. The same applies to political and ethical debate in my opinion, and very much so on matters of science. This broadcast is most certainly about religion and science, so I feel it would have benefitted from a higher degree of challenge. Do you?
@@simonthorneycroft1339 I was replying to the other guy and I don't agree. Sometimes an idea needs an accepting space to be expressed. There's certainly places where these ideas can be challenged though. I see you've posted many many times here. What are you hoping to achieve?
@@Choraldiscourse I am not sure I am trying to achieve anything. I just like engaging with people who hold views / ideas that differ from my own, to see how they think, maybe even why? Young Earth creationists, 9/11 Truthers, people who believe the world is flat, people who believe that there was a lost civilisation 12000 years ago that built the pyramids. I also feel that some of the ideas and the explanations do need politely challenging,
Another issue with the Big Bang is the idea that heat itself created an explosion. So what actually exploded? You need a flammable material under pressure to cause an explosion. And what was causing the singularity to compress? Something is needed to cause the compression. Nothing g can compress itself
@@klouis1886 you can’t get an expand without explosion and atheists don’t mean expand. The Big Bang model, not theory, says it was rapid and hot. Plus it would only expand until the pressure was gone. A singularity is said to be as small as the head of a pin. That isn’t going to expand to the size of our universe. Not even an explosion that small would. Especially without an oxygen atmosphere.
I love that you're asking good questions! I think asking good questions is the start of good science. The answer to this particular one is that it's an unfortunate effect resulting from the popular term 'Big Bang" and that some understanding is required of what exactly spacetime is. It's not just some explosion in space like what we understand in our conventional 'macro' physics. Einstein proved that space and time are basicaly the same thing (like electricity and magnetism are the same thing we know as electromagnetism) and therefore was there was no single point in space that stuff exploded from. Instead, there was a single point in TIME that spacetime itself EXPANDED from. Spacetime can be a bit weird to get a hold of at first (anyone that works in GPS satellites has to account for time moving slower for satellites relative to us on earth) so I'd recommend a good science communication channel like Arvin Ash, Sabine Hossenfelder, ScienceClic or Science Asylum to help explain it. Quantum mechanics is even weirder, just look up the "double-slit experiment" which you can do for yourself at home! (or for the lazy, watch youtube where Veritasium and Looking Glass Universe both did it). But keep asking those questions!
@@littlesoul8282 that is constantly being proven as theists make correct predictions that would be impossible to know unless the creation perspective is correct. Atheists are constantly making wrong predictions and go through infinite amounts of mental gymnastics to explain more parts of an already unexplainable phenomenon (the big bang).
I’ve watched a lot of Hugh Ross and he is a Christian astronomer/physicist who has also studied ancient Hebrew and he contends that the Bible got it right and it is NOT in conflict with the Big Bang model - many Christians actually think the Big Bang supports the Bible
@@darag2358 nothing has changed in 15 years. They simply keep trying to patch holes in a theory that doesn’t work Hugh Ross has always been wrong. He believes in evolution and that we came from apes there’s no natural process to explain the formation of a single planet or star doesn’t collect and gather it dissipates in space, in fact, the gas pressure is 50 to 100 times greater than any gravitational attraction pulling it together. This is simply ignored by the faith of the atheist evolutionists that he follows.
Christans stick to the bible and jesus. Most never studdied planetary science to put it to the 7 days of putting life on earth. So the athiest will chew them up. I try to keep them informed . Did you know the planets were formed closer to our sun ? Never life prior. .
@@rayspeakmon2954 lol, the universe gets billions of years older every few years, and this "singularity that blew up" spawned from nowhere/nothing. What faith they have in nothing.
I follow a ancient Turkic religion which is called Tengrism which believes the Cosmos itself to be Creator which we call TENGRi. Even though there isn't many followers compared to other religions we are still in the few millions.
Im always amazed that most people couldnt even explain a 4 cycle engine, but they can exclaim the beginning of our universe with the big bang theory. Surely they jest. God is infinetely smarter than us.
True. It seems like the less they know the smarter they think they are. When you try and make them see they change the subject and if you keep pressing them they will tell you that God is mean and they wouldn’t allow xyz if they were God. Yet they do evil but don’t want to be held accountable. It’s interesting and sad mental gymnastics.
That sounds familiar to me . . . I'm sure I read that somewhere . . . gimme a minute, let me think . . . got it narrowed down . . . Psalms? No I think Proverbs - several variations of that actually.
I would love to see your explanation of creation contrasted with Hugh Ross’ explanation that perfectly lines up with the Bible. Hugh posit’s that the frame of reference from which the creation event is told in the Bible makes a big difference.
There's no reason to believe God wouldn't create things in a completed state. He created everything merely by speaking it. He created Eve fully while Adam slept. She wasn't a baby.
Correct. Also, God could have created everything in a completed state instantly at once instead of over 6 literal days. God is all-powerful as we know. God had reasons for doing it over 6 days, one of them being to set up the 7 day week we still use today.
I would like to know the scientific answer to Isaiah 38:8, and how that can be explained. Also if we have any writings during that time which is likely around 671 bce on how long one day during that time was.
I found these two articles on this channel's website, creation.com, that talk about Azah's sundial. Materialist's 'defence' of Bible fails - creation.com/materialist-defence-of-bible-fails Joshua's long day - creation.com/joshuas-long-day
There is no other logical explanation for this verse and many others that that the Bible is true. It is absolutely true. No doubt. But let the scientists do their thing. God's creation will point to him all on it's own. He does not need human validation. He is, and that's it. We submit, or we burn. I believe in Jesus.
The findings of the James Webb telescope show the glory of God in the universe, like as if God is saying, "Hi, it's Me!" and we are looking at Him through the telescope and He is looking at us with the microscope at the same time! That was what shocked the unbelieving scientists, astronomers and cosmologists.
According to big bang theory, as I understand it, when expansion began the outer edge was expanding outward at infinite velocity. Think about that. How far can it expand, very quickly, at that rate? I've asked a few physicists about that, but they don't talk about that. It makes a serious difficulty in dating the universe; makes the time much much less than 13.8 billion years...
Cosmic expansion at the rate scientist claim is impossible. I don't believe for one minute that the universe expanded from nothing to about half the size it is now within a second.
Then the physicists you spoke to are incompetent or you are choosing to ignore what they're saying. Physicists LOVE to talk about it. Those mysteries are partly what made them want to BE physicists. The answer to your question is that there was no 'outer edge'. The evidence so far suggests that the universe continues infinitely based on the fact that the geometry of the universe is flat. What this means is that if you follow two straight lines, they will not eventually converge like they would on a globe or move apart like they would on a saddle, but instead continue forever. So while it's possible that the universe may be closed in some way, the evidence is strong that it is infinite in all directions. So with an infinite universe in mind, the Big Bang was not an explosion in space, it was an EXPANSION of SPACETIME. Space and time are the same thing, so when we look out and see vast distances in space, we also see vast distances in time (e.g. light-years measurement). So there was no central point in space like an explosion, but there was a central point in time. The age of the universe is calculated by studying the oldest stars, the cosmic microwave background radiation, the hubble constant, the expansion rate, computer modelling amongst other pieces of evidence and now this most recent JWST data. They ALL agree that the universe must be somewhere between 13.7 and 13.9 billion years old relative to the earth. The only part that's really up for debate is the exact age, but we know the ballpark.
@@happyguy650you mean the fine tuned for life laws of physics? The laws of physics that demonstrate the universe isn't eternal because it isn't the same temperature? Those laws of physics? The laws of physics which rule out the big bang without the inflation fudge factor?
Big bang didn't happen but I have to tell you it's more complicated then that, it's a super complicated fake story. Dr. Danny Faulkner has a good explanation of what the big bang story is just Google dr. Faulkner big bang.
While I find these video from CMI excellent and thought provoking, what I like most is that I am 25 minutes in and he has stuck with the "science" and made me think on how much more we might know of God's Book of Nature if we sought answers with based on what our Creator had in mind.
Another thing to consider, in addition to the appearance of creation are the physical laws of physics. We must have a law giver and law creator to have order in the universe, otherwise we have complete chaos! Chaos never orders itself.
What I don’t understand is if our solar system is travelling at 66,600 miles an hour how are we able to get back to earth after leaving wouldn’t it be going to fast for nasas space ships and satellites to catch-up with?
never thought about that before but that is weird, but I would guess it's because the spaceship is actually traveling that fast in the same direction as well, so the spaceship starts with a speed and direction directly matching Earth.
& it's taught in school just like Theory of evolution that the education system wants you to believe. Environment adaptation & theory of evolution are different concepts.
Our insistence on the Big Bang as an explanation for the start of time and the universe shows just how little we understand about how things are in the cosmos. For starters, the theory requires that things move vastly faster than the speed of light for its first phase……. How else would you get a 96billion LY wide universe in 13.8blion LY. Also, it requires that “unseeable” forces and entities comprise 95% of the universe (dark energy and dark matter). For now it’s the best we have, but it’s a rather simple explanation that falls apart regularly.
Ross tries to make the Bible fit what scientist think. He was in the big bang, 13.5 billion years camp. He's probably waiting for scientist to come up with a new theory before he speaks on the issue?
Imagine Jezus a Human created all this This is proof JEZUS IS NOT GOD GOD IS DESCRIBED IN HOLY QIRAN BY GOD HIMSELF IN 4 LINES DEFINITION SURAH. IKHLAAS
Sorry bro, but he really is the Son of God. I worship him even if you don't. But tell me, what will you say to him when you finally meet? That day is coming, and no mistake.
I can agree with that. The bible does not give us an account of the entire creation of the universe. We are the babies in His vast kingdom. There is much for us to learn when Jesus comes, but I do not agree with the big bang theory as it has proven to be full of flaws
Singer song writer Terry Clark wrote a song telling of the mountains pointing to our creators glory. Speaking though they have no lips. All creations anthem raised. Our creator liveth. See all the worlds his hands have made.
The most marvelous miracle science not only confirms but insists upon: the creation of matter from pure energy. I really enjoyed this video, thank you.
People who steal or comit murderdon't want to be held accountable..but they don't want the sane thing they do ..being done to them. They know its wrong.. Morals exist..there is right and wrong..where it comes from? We re made In Gods image...thats where it comes from.
Instead of being disappointed, secularists-atheists ought to be persuaded that God is real, and that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh. They out be mesmerized in the glory and power of our Creator !
John 1:1-3 is a good starting place. But see others like John 5:18, John 20:27-29. Philippians 2:5-7, Colossians 1:15, Colossians 2:9, Hebrews 1:3, etc. For more, seee creation.com/trinity
@michaelhaigh9182 In addition to Jesus’ specific claims about Himself, His disciples also acknowledged the deity of Christ. They claimed that Jesus had the right to forgive sins-something only God can do-as it is God who is offended by sin (Acts 5:31; Colossians 3:13; Psalm 130:4; Jeremiah 31:34). In close connection with this last claim, Jesus is also said to be the one who will “judge the living and the dead” (2 Timothy 4:1). Thomas cried out to Jesus, “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28). Paul calls Jesus “great God and Savior” (Titus 2:13) and points out that prior to His incarnation Jesus existed in the “form of God” (Philippians 2:5-8). God the Father says regarding Jesus: “Your throne, O God, will last forever and ever” (Hebrews 1:8). John states that “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word [Jesus] was God” (John 1:1). Examples of Scriptures that teach the deity of Christ are many (see Revelation 1:17, 2:8, 22:13; 1 Corinthians 10:4; 1 Peter 2:6-8; Psalm 18:2, 95:1; 1 Peter 5:4; Hebrews 13:20), but even one of these is enough to show that Christ was considered to be God by His followers. Jesus is also given titles that are unique to YHWH (the formal name of God) in the Old Testament. The Old Testament title “redeemer” (Psalm 130:7; Hosea 13:14) is used of Jesus in the New Testament (Titus 2:13; Revelation 5:9). Jesus is called Immanuel-“God with us”-in Matthew 1. In Zechariah 12:10, it is YHWH who says, “They will look on me, the one they have pierced.” But the New Testament applies this to Jesus’ crucifixion (John 19:37; Revelation 1:7). If it is YHWH who is pierced and looked upon, and Jesus was the one pierced and looked upon, then Jesus is YHWH. Paul interprets Isaiah 45:22-23 as applying to Jesus in Philippians 2:10-11. Further, Jesus’ name is used alongside God’s in prayer “Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” (Galatians 1:3; Ephesians 1:2). This would be blasphemy if Christ were not deity. The name of Jesus appears with God’s in Jesus’ commanded to baptize “in the name [singular] of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19; see also 2 Corinthians 13:14). Actions that can be accomplished only by God are credited to Jesus. Jesus not only raised the dead (John 5:21, 11:38-44) and forgave sins (Acts 5:31, 13:38), He created and sustains the universe (John 1:2; Colossians 1:16-17). This becomes even clearer when one considers YHWH said He was alone during creation (Isaiah 44:24). Further, Christ possesses attributes that only deity can have: eternality (John 8:58), omnipresence (Matthew 18:20, 28:20), omniscience (Matthew 16:21), and omnipotence (John 11:38-44). Now, it is one thing to claim to be God or to fool someone into believing it is true, and something else entirely to prove it to be so. Christ offered many miracles as proof of His claim to deity. Just a few of Jesus’ miracles include turning water to wine (John 2:7), walking on water (Matthew 14:25), multiplying physical objects (John 6:11), healing the blind (John 9:7), the lame (Mark 2:3), and the sick (Matthew 9:35; Mark 1:40-42), and even raising people from the dead (John 11:43-44; Luke 7:11-15; Mark 5:35). Moreover, Christ Himself rose from the dead. Far from the so-called dying and rising gods of pagan mythology, nothing like the resurrection is seriously claimed by other religions, and no other claim has as much extra-scriptural confirmation. There are at least twelve historical facts about Jesus that even non-Christian critical scholars will admit: 1. Jesus died by crucifixion. 2. He was buried. 3. His death caused the disciples to despair and lose hope. 4. Jesus’ tomb was discovered (or was claimed to be discovered) to be empty a few days later. 5. The disciples believed they experienced appearances of the risen Jesus. 6. After this, the disciples were transformed from doubters into bold believers. 7. This message was the center of preaching in the early Church. 8. This message was preached in Jerusalem. 9. As a result of this preaching, the Church was born and it grew. 10. Resurrection day, Sunday, replaced the Sabbath (Saturday) as the primary day of worship. 11. James, a skeptic, was converted when he also saw the resurrected Jesus. 12. Paul, an enemy of Christianity, was converted by an experience which he believed to be an appearance of the risen Jesus. Even if someone were to object to this specific list, only a few are needed to prove the resurrection and establish the gospel: Jesus’ death, burial, resurrection, and appearances (1 Corinthians 15:1-5). While there may be some theories to explain one or two of the above facts, only the resurrection explains and accounts for them all. Critics admit that the disciples claimed they saw the risen Jesus. Neither lies nor hallucinations can transform people the way the resurrection did. First, what would they have had to gain? Christianity was not popular and it certainly did not make them any money. Second, liars do not make good martyrs. There is no better explanation than the resurrection for the disciples’ willingness to die horrible deaths for their faith. Yes, many people die for lies that they think are true, but people do not die for what they know is untrue. In conclusion, Christ claimed He was YHWH, that He was deity (not just “a god” but the one true God); His followers (Jews who would have been terrified of idolatry) believed Him and referred to Him as God. Christ proved His claims to deity through miracles, including the world-altering resurrection. No other hypothesis can explain these facts. Yes, the deity of Christ is biblical.
@@michaelhaigh9182specifically? Isaiah 9:6, John1:1, Phillipians 2:7, the entire Word actually but start there and read the whole of Revelation.. the Bible says that Jesus is God. And people who spout it doesn't have absurdly not read it and just parrot the devils lies ignorantly
Just like in quantum physics, the observer changes the observed, what if when we are observing the space, it is also changing and giving us a different perception?
A simple question for the Big Bangers: if "the singularity" was infinitely dense, how would the energy and mass have escaped? We know at the centre of a black hole, the gravity is so strong that nothing can escape. This would be multiplied to the nth degree at the point containing, as it were, *all* the black holes, no?
What a lame answer. 13 billion years of universe exposed all you can explain is ya a creator did it. Give credit to humans and the marvel of science discovering distance galaxies.
There's no proof of 13 billion years, only unrepeatable speculation and the last couple hundred years of "science" asking more and more unanswerable questions. The only answers are answers that have more questions and plotholes than the original questions. Humans are not as smart as we think we are. The creation model has only one potential plot hole in it's model, the evolutionary one adds more holes to its so called science constantly
One of my problems with the "Big Bang Theory" is that we are seeing these galaxies, not only highly structured galaxies, but we see them where they would be NOW and not 13.8 billion years ago.
Watch Dr. Gerald Schroeder and understand the 6 days of creation and what that actually not only means but more importantly the time element. This is absolutely incredible ❤
I think a good summary of this video is that science can’t explain everything therefore magic. Of course, magic does not need to be explained. That can simply be claimed as if it’s totally true without any need for any evidence of any kind.
