Nick Kyrgios: Best Ever Shots vs Big Four 

Federer - Comment Kyrgios - Like

He also mimics his forehand. Look at how Kyrgios is hitting forehands in the other clips compared to vs nadal. He does the whip forehand against Nadal, and a more traditional "windshield wiper" forehand against the rest. Amazing how he can maintain effectiveness while mimicing him lol

Better be joke how people think kyrgios is better than Federer. He is literally a bad sportsmanship. Roger is a humble player and sportsmanship player. He is a better player.

Fireball Dude Federer is better but sportsmanship doesn’t define if you’re better in skill.

He’s trolling

A class player...is always in the mood 😎

He shit....whether he plays well or not, he's a total shithole

Inconsistency is found in tennis players like him. Monfils is really good sometimes but he’ll never be part of the top 3 because he isn’t like them

Hes like ash's charizard from season 1 lol

@@HighTierMike A talented asshole

Underrated comment, haha.

Won Acapulco... Just to piss off the crowd.

@Bud Kaiwi The thing with Acapulco was it was almost like he was a pantomime villain, where they knew he was an amazing player but booed him cause it was fun and cause he encouraged them to do it. Then in the final he got the support he deserved and it probably felt weird to him lol

kh2freek the crowd was bandwagoning, then started cheering for kygrios once he started winning

Are you genetically engineered to whine like a little bitch?

The top 3 have won 52 Grand slams and this idiot at best is a talented asshole.

54

I know but I still enjoy watching him play

If he cared about this sport like the big 3 do, best believe he’d be number 1. He literally doesn’t care or try against anyone else

@@harrysaluja9890 55

Is strange but is a dream for tennis player And laver Cup

Brian Liu he seemed to play seriously vs Zverov yesterday

​@@pappisto probs because he's world no 3

uranfaggit no way. The reason murray was a part of big 4 is his consistency and his unmatched ability to push the rest of big 4 than any other players. The only reason it was not big 5 with wawrinka is his lack of consistency as of murray. And zverev is not even close to stan

uranfaggit if you cant understand what i wrote you should learn to read. I wrote murray’s position in big4 in past tense, because big4 was in past tense. Without murray there is no big4

And 0/0 grandslams

And 100% spoilt child percentage as well 😉

He defeated Djokovic twice in his worst year : 2017 I would have been interested to watch him against Nole in 2015 as Djokovic was almost unbeatable

He also has a 25% win percentage against Gasquet, sorry to tell you that mate

@@raybans8712 He has so much potential, it's a pity he isn't more disciplined or he could be the best.

Haha and here I spent the whole video thinking Kyrgios was number 4

@@nprwikeepa6082 When Kyrgios has won as many 1000 masters, grand slams and Olympic medals as Murray can talk about. Whether you like it or not, Murray has been the one who has posed the most problems for the current big3 and with such a track record he humbly deserves his place. 😉

No. Im a huge fed fan. There is a big 4. But the fouth is no where near the big 3. Hes part of the big because if we take the fifth six sevent eigth and ninth players achivements. Add all of them. Only then it'll equate to murray's achivements.

sora roxas that is about right its like in football where ronaldo and messi are the big two and neymar used to be the third big not because he was on their level but because he was better than the rest

@@haziq12ish Yes, there is a big 4 and a big 5 etc. It's just that when nr. 1, 2 and 3 have so similar skil level and the gap between 3 and 4 is big, it makes sense to let 3 be the cut off.

I love him

I love him when he plays well

I've hated and loved him over the years

He is an awesome player when he is patient and work the points but when he rush them he can be the most boring player to watch. If he work more with his mind he could be top 5 without problems for a lot of years.

W Nij the problem is some of his best shots here were on the run with not time to think

I think that’s correct he likes the big stage and theatre, maybe he should be a politician 🤣

Novak Djokovic est le meilleur de tous les temps mdr

​@@TonyStarkLeGOATactually no its Tony Stark

couldnt have put it better

wouldn't put him in the same boat as Adebayor, he's not that much of a dickhead. he's more like Quaresma, insanely talented, just doesn't put the effort in or have the desire to be the best

@James MacDonald I agree sir

I won’t put him with Messi. Nick is entertaining but Messi and Federer are the ones who make their respective games look beautiful and effortless to watch even at extreme competitive level.

@@__jan6113 What do you mean? When kyrgios is at his best adding to his highlight reels, it looks completely effortless as well.

No, he couldn't. He doesn't have any of the qualities of Federer, Nadal or Djokovic.

He’s one of the few who has beaten once every big four player. Too bad he’s inconstant.

@@masters.1000 He does. His serve, volley, feel, and forehand are good enough to get him to beat the likes of Zverve--or at least be part of them.

A handful of crowd pleasing shots isn't enough to get you to number 1. You need to win week in week out against all types of players. You need to have a Plan B and Plan C. You need to be able to dig deep when not playing well. You need to be able to stay fit. He's not even close to being a world no 1. His return is ordinary, his game management and attitude are dreadful. He's a very very passive player and in my opinion has too many deficiencies to be a long term no 1. He might get to no 1, but a lot would have to change and frankly I don't think it will.

Emmanuel Chiu his inconsistency comes from injury coz he probably doesn’t train as hard as he should. But he’s easily the most talented in the new round of players

nobody is remembered forever anyways

@@rafael-sx5go where the f that come from

@@rafael-sx5go im not the optimistic guy who advice anyone to look to be remembered but believe me your sentence is way beyond wrong. cause there is people that we still talk about thousands of years after their death... and that actually boggles my mind at times.

Well personally I find him very entertaining to watch, and I like seeing a tennis player that isn't always try harding, but also plays the game for fun and to entertain others. Not every tennis player is destined to be decorated champions. This is his style, and if he enjoys that than good on him.

He’s playing a GAME how he wants. And he’s beating the best. And here you are talking about who’s going to be remembered for hitting a ball over a net in future generations....

Respect to Ronaldinho that won WC and Champions and defeating Real Madrid with amazing goals... Respect

@@ricardchillonpt153 total respect for Ronaldinho. Kyrgios had the potential to become the Ronaldinho of tennis, but it looks like he actually became more like the Balotelli of tennis, unfortunately.

@@gmmgmmg I was exactly thinking this mate :D

Ronaldinho actually won trophies

Pas encore malheureusement

4 ans plus tard il en a toujours pas😅😅

​@@TonyStarkLeGOAThes got the aus open doubles, which counts as a grand slam

Well he's quite the Quaresmatic player I'll give him that 😉

I guess, against Murray he is bored and unmotivated. He beat Murray where it really counts, in Wimbledon. lol

@@minifik He beat him before Wimbledon, in Queens I think. As far as grand slams go (including their meeting at Wimbledon) he always got absolutely trashed by Murray.

@@minifik he's good friends with murray

Murray is definitely better as he has won the world tour finals, been number 1, won 2 Olympic gold, and has a better h2h over Wawrinka. That being said though, the Big three is still better than Murray.

@Theodwros Vanezis Majors are not everything in tennis, Murray and Wawrinka are the textbook example of this. Murray has been world's #1, won two olympic gold medals, a Davis Cup, the WTF, a ton of Masters 1000 and has made it into 11 Slam finals. He also has a very good h2h against everyone not called Federer, Nadal or Djokovic. Wawrinka is a great player, but he is nowhere near Murray.

@Theodwros Vanezis I agree that Murray and Wawrinka aren't as good as the Big 3, but majors aren't the only thing that matters. Even though they both have 3 majors, Murray simply has had more feats, and frankly I would argue a more successful career. You can disagree with me if you want but this has been a great conversation.

The big 3, and then Murray always on the fringes, but never as good as them.

He won't

So you love him AND hate him.

What do you say in those cases ? Ah yes, "this did not age well"

No, he couldnt be top 3. Not only does he lack the mental qualities needed, there are many aspects of his game that are quite average.

easily? lmao 😂

Dre xdxddxx

Lol easily?? What is he like 36th in ranking. Please!

Moto Life yes easily, if you dont understand tennis..

not against federer

he’s only defeated Murray once

NYCzora and Federer but he can smash pushovic and pushadal

Football Winner just wait, Djokovic is gonna cream him in the third round of Indian Wells. And the fact that you’re implying that Djokovic and Nadal push the ball is just ridiculous, especially Nadal

Lane Dale defensive plays and Djokovic plays only aggressive against other defensive players and Nadals pushing balls. It ok raftard

I am tennis coach. Nick has elite racket head speed and great touch, big serve and moves well for a guy his size. Everything else is a mess. His decision making on the court is bad. You can make a highlight compilation video for any top 50 player on tour. In actual matches, he lacks the discipline to keep making the correct strategic decisions. He'll get impatient and let it rip down the line instead of maintaining the cross court rally. He lacks the patience to play middle to middle and build his points. His backhand is pretty average, his return of serve is nothing special. He's not a player I would want my students to emulate or learn from, except for his racket head speed which is special. He's great for those who aren't really into tennis and might tune in if he's playing. For those who love tennis, they usually get the kick out of watching the strategic chess matches between Rafa, Novak and Federer

@@ren2871 I agree !

hh you're right!

Instead of Tomic Monfils I would say

imla ughtuing s ohard really dudy xD

Not Dustin. Should be Paire.

I thought those were Karlovic, Isner and Anderson.

He already is a challenge. I’m sure the big guys are twitching every time just before they go up against him

yea