Nikon D780: We Know Exactly Who It's For. Our Full Review 

I'm awfully glad that you do like it. Really. It's gratifying to know that someone is getting full and total enjoyment from his/her camera (even those who still hold on to their old film cameras), just as I am still enjoying my two trusty D610 beauties with my old collection of expensive, fast AF lenses I used during the film era, each and every single one of them. I particularly like the FF memory that receives more light, hence more details to capture and store.

@@sottosopra4769 Return it. Did you read the Instructions Manual? Check out others that might have what you want and need.

@@sottosopra4769 what issue are you having with it?

@@sottosopra4769 I have a review on my channel about why I got the d780 over the z6

@@calicodnikonian2774 So old analog autofocus lens's will work on this new 780?

It's not quite accurate, I own a large vintage and manual collection and enjoy shooting that way, always keep my cameras on M setting only and mirrorless has been a game changer for me, no DSLR ever made can replace shooting experience and keeper rate. Focus peeking and magnifying gave a whole new life to vintage lens world.

I'm at that spot here. In EU it's currently at 1.5k euro which is same price as Sony a7 mk3 but I already have few lenses for Nikon so it's a tough fight.

​@@jozosaravanja1626 where? I paid 2400 euros in belgium

I have an 8 year old Fuji XE1 that shoots just fine!!

@@jimmason8502 You hit on something there, my friend. Today, camera manufacturers are catering to "must have" crowd that spend their money to store the purchase within a few days, like a child with a new toy. Insane! I bought two Nikon D610 bodies... I carry both with different lenses attached (I've been doing this since 1965); I miss very, very few shots since it's easier and faster to switch cameras than lenses. I can afford to buy the latest photography toy ...but I refuse to make those humongously wealthy manufacturers richer at my expense. Today's cameras are overloaded with options and features to attract the gadget/gear junkies... most of which they'll'll never use. A salesman told me, "Why with this (another) model you can freeze a bullet!" and I asked, "Why or when will I ever need to freeze a bullet?" As I told the salesman, "I'm satisfied with the 610 capacity to accept my 7 expensive and fast AF lenses; I shoot on A Priority, S Priority and Full Manual but I rely on AF due to my failing vision." Most young or newbie photographers want an expensive camera loaded with features and options... for bragging rights. No, thank you; I'll stuff my money in the bank.

I used a D7000 for over 9 years!

Clodomiro, because if the viewers are encouraged to upgrade to the NEW camera, they might just click on the shopping link at the top and help Snapchick make a little more money via Amazon referral$$.

@@vinnym6734 And I hope you've enjoyed it every second you used it.

I agree

Robert Maxfield The Z6 & Z7 evf is good.

Only if it enables you to do things that are required of your shooting style... if it meets a NEED. But, I wonder, how many of today's gear junkies can make a living with totally manual cameras that only had automatic light metering as we did back in 1965. You know, some of our modern age cameras have more computing power than the first astronauts had when they first landed on the moon... and our modern cameras are loaded with features we'll never need nor ever use. What's the sense in that? Well, that's how camera manufacturers lure the gullible gear junkies... and they're hauling in money by the hundreds of barrels, too.

@@calicodnikonian2774 New features like Image Stabilization do make the job easier as do all the AF improvements.

@@ancientfishing I do understand that but... we were able to do without image stabilization before... we learned how to deal with what we had and didn't have. I'm not knocking the modern features; I simply don't need them. And my two 610s serve me well and meet my simple needs.

Same here

The D 610 will give you stunning pictures. If you are not a professional photographer, like myself, you made the absolute best decision. I have a D610 and most of my images are superior ( in my eyes!) to my friend's D850. You have the focus peaking in the D 610 and backward compatibility with all vintage lenses. Enjoy.

@@Stentz1 Plus there are a greater variety of lenses (new as well as used) at far lower prices (I like that).

where is that option?

On the i menu there is a “Negative Digitizer” option, works with the ES 2 adapter for digitizing film. Search “scanning negatives with Nikon 850” and you get quite a few hits. B&H Photo also has videos on this.

Once you know your camera (where to find the features/options), you learn to appreciate (and love) the camera. I use two D610 cameras; they allow me to use my old film era lenses. I don't need all those fancy features and options; I'm "Old School," I didn't need them during the film era, either. I hope you have many, many decades enjoying your camera. It's a really nice feeling.

I totally agree

Even though it's only 100g heavier than the £6,000 Sony A1?

Lol the amount of money you save on Z6 would let you buy a whole crate of spare batteries, here's your durability 😂😂

well then, go buy a D100 and stfu

The D750 is a amazing camera. I shoot both Nikon and Fuji these days and I don't see either leaving my collection. Not sold on Nikon Mirror less just yet as it means I really don't get to bring my F-Mount lenses without losing all the auto focus features.

I like mirrorless cameras... I don't use them and I don't even care to own one but I LIKE that they've driven the prices of DSLRs down, and probably will continue to do so.

That's pretty much the way I feel. I own two D610 beauties. I bought them because I can use my expensive lenses (had 7, gave one to my best friend's granddaughter and she's making good use of it). MY reason for getting two is so I can use both with 2 different lenses; it's easier and faster to switch cameras than lenses. When I started, around 1965, photogs often laughed at me when I started using two cameras; I kept quiet. Then they realized I was catching the shots (sporting and weddings events, mostly) while they were fumbling and juggling lenses. Soon, the laughter died down. Today, I often see photogs with two cameras. I'm not interested in upgrading. I'm not a gadget nor camera collector. Both D610 cameras serve me well. Why pay for options and features I don't need nor will ever use? I'm strictly a still photog. I no longer do weddings (it's like running a marathon), and people think that photogs charge too much for merely owning a camera; they don't understand all the experiences some of us have, that enables us to catch "the moment" and avoid photo traps (like mirrors, reflective materials, or people that cross in front of me, or in the background). Years ago, a photog would help a newbie... today it's so cutthroat, and I find too many infantile photogs bragging very loudly. I prefer to work in silence; the subjects quickly learn my subtle directions.

@@calicodnikonian2774 I think it is great that it so easy to get into photography these days. I started with my first camera in 2002 when digital was first coming on the scene. If not for digital I would not have learned as quickly and easily. The main problem I see with it being so easy is now there are a lot of people out there that think they know it all and start putting out bad information that can lead one in a terrible direction. I seen some videos here on YT that have few likes and subscribers yet the info they putting out is gold but some great marketers putting out horrible advice. Like you said work in silence.

Nothing wrong with D500. I have one too. And I love it.

I’m in the exact same situation. Love my D7200 but am also looking to move up. I’m also stuck between those two options.

@@justindesroches5530 I went for a totally diffirent option, an older Nikon D3, and personally, i feel like I want to marry that camera lol, the colors are insane, even comapred to the newest models, this thing beats them in the overall look of the picture even through it has less MP

@@frederikvanreusel oh wow that’s a great choice as long as you don’t need all the fancy video features. But it’s a true legend for photos and will likely last quite a long time. Great choice.

Im D7100 and been wanting to modernize with way better capabilities, my ISO is absolute crap, FPS useless and the buffer, do i really have to explain the buffer ! but it could be way worse. i still own my old D90 , looking back and looking at the performance writes up etc from back then is just plain hilarious !

@@TheFykle i switched to a d3 and i could never be happier, still old tech, but i fell in love with that camera, the colors are better than the newest most expensive cameras, it still has a 11fps burst, and high quality, i think i never switch until it breaks, maybe i just buy a second one,

lousy af

@@billmoyer3254 AF works fine for me... I'm always praised for the sharpness, details and color rendition... I didn't even have to tweak it. Did you ever consider that it might also have to do with one's personal technique of working? My cameras (two D610) let me use all of my expensive AF FF film era lenses, but it also comes jammed-packed with many features and options I'll never need to use. Insofar as Mirrorless, they still have a few flaws I can do without, in spite of the hype they have... to me, it's simply just another camera with new features and options to lure newbies and gadget junkies (nothing wrong with that; it's OK for those that enjoy having the latest gadget/toy). One problem Mirrorless cameras have is that you NEED their expensive lenses... I'll stick with my two D610 cameras and my 6 expensive, and fast lenses; the Mirrorless don't offer me any features or options I need. I've done well with my D610 cameras; I don't have a need for Mirrorless cameras, really. I'm happy for those that are enjoying their Mirrorless cameras. After all, it's their choice and probably meets a need.

Yup, I also have my D610 and looking for a reason to upgrade. I told myself that I'll get a new camera once it breaks, but that's really hard to do.

Hey! i'm tempted to buy one too, but i hear that it has some problems with oil on the sensor, after 2-3k shots taken. did u ever got that problem? I can buy this or a Canon 6d (on my budget).

I went from a D610 to a D780, no regrets. It feels like the same camera, but litterally every feature is just better.

I agree.

Don't fancy the large sized files from the d850 though

Katherine Arnett Mirrorless are awesome, I used to be the same but now I’m addicted.

Katherine Arnett me too

Right on... write on, bro!

What's wrong with your current camera?

or someone on wheelchair like me, who can't reach that optic viewer:)

There is a rumor that Nikon has a patent that would allow a screen to pop in through a DSLR viewfinder effectively giving you a EVF. It was thought they may have released it with the D6 but that was not the case. I hope they still release at least one more generation of DSLRs as the best reason to go with Nikon has always been their large collection of usable glass.

@@mfreeman313 how it eases if uses old mount for dslr?

@@mfreeman313 if you used to shoot holding camera like a smartphone using display then it's ok, if not then better to buy mirorrles with evf

The problem I see with the "hybrid" features of the D780 is that you have to use the rear screen, sorry but no. I love the vertical grip on my D750 and that is not a option on the D780. I think D750 is a good price on the used market right now. Not sure if any of the D780 features would make me choose it over a used D850.

@@Being_Joe I've asked several newer photogs yearning for a new upgrade, what feature or option prevented you from getting great shots before you heard of this new camera? WHAT feature or option does this new gizmo have that will make you a better photog? I AIN'T received a satisfactory reply yet... just plenty of dumb stares.

@@calicodnikonian2774 Agree. There is also a subset of photographers that are really just into the gear. A lot of photographers try and use the art of photography as an excuse to justify their love of gear. If you like gear that is cool too but own it.

Frank Luo I see your point to a large degree, but the sort of hybridization of some of the mirrorless features like face and eye detect are appealing. I am usually the guy who buys the retiring model, rather than the newest thing, to save money, but I find myself somewhat tempted by this D780.

@@matthewkeisling2776 my point is largely on the D750 owners. D750 image quality is much the same as D780 and second value has dropped significantly. So for a D750 owner to get a D780, the cost is about the same as adding a Z6 body, or sell D750 and get a second hand D850. Either option is superior than selling D750 and buying D780 new

Did you get one in the end?

Agree. This is a great take and one of the many benefits of watching SnapChick: an actual honest, independent, creative and well-informed opinion. Kind of rare on RU-vid IMHO.

Did you buy another camera..? I have d700 too.

I would buy a D780 today, if it only had a vertical grip option, damn Nikon. I'll keep using my D4s and D500 with grip, because my most used lenses are the 400mm f2.8 VR and 70-200mm FL. No way I'm buying a Z6 or D780, even though I like both and want a new camera. No grip, I no buy!

Yes it's great for a wedding photographer. Not 400% for hybrid wedding shooter tho as the second card doesn't back up video like the A73 will.

WHY would you "upgrade" if your current gear is doing the job it was designed for? Are there any features or options in the upgrade you absolutely NEED and can't do without? Or do you simply want a toy loaded with options and features to brag to your friends? I've asked a few newbie photogs and they usually give me the old, patented replies, "Well, it makes my job easier..." (REALLY? HOW???) "Well, you see, it adds to my skill set..." (OK, EXACTLY HOW? EXPLAIN) and all I get is a blank stare and a barely audible, "Duhhhhhhh..." (Edited) I am reminded of the old, simple, manual film cameras used with great success by experienced photographers that did not need "special" features and options, yet they made a good living with their skills, talents and experience, knowing how to use their cameras rather than their cameras dictating to them. Very simple, photogs often laughed at me for using two cameras (I still do) each equipped with a different lens; they realized that I got the shots they missed while fumbling and juggling while exchanging lenses. They laughed at me when I used a thin, flexible white translucent plastic over my strobe that subdued the intensity of light and thusly I eliminated the huge grotesque shadows on the walls, and the red-eye effect when the light reflected from the eyes' retinas. The other photogs took photos on bright sunny days; I preferred overcast skies because the light that trickled through the clouds were refractured thusly eliminating strong shadows, while allowing increased details and subjects did not squint.

Calico D'Nikonian Woah. Take a breath buddy. You sound like a parent at Burlington coat factory. If you don’t see the value, don’t buy. But let us happy folks (my full time job is photography btw) make the purchases we want. No one even said they’re making this purchase (at least not under my comment). It’s all skepticism and hypotheticals friend.

@@calicodnikonian2774 yes - Liveview AF that is reliable.

My lens collection covers the range from 30mm (not 24mm) to 200mm (I also have a rarely used 70mm to 300mm), which serve my shooting style. I don't need gadgets, just good, fast lenses known for their sharpness and sturdiness. I sometimes pull out my old trusty film cameras... it's still fun. I also do something I never saw anyone doing before I started doing it: using two cameras, each outfitted with a different lens; kids laughed at me back then but the laughter soon died down when they saw me switch cameras and get the shots they missed while jumbling lenses. Ironically, I've never dropped a lens.

I wish Nikon would update the Df. I've been eyeing it for years, but the prices are crazy!

LARRY L sharpness for the majority of photographers is sufficient. Landscape, pixel peepers, commercial are the only ones to benefit from Z mount lenses and high mp cameras.

Im a D750 hybrid shooter - the D780 solves the one problem I have with the D750 that is touch focus on video. The battery life on the Z cameras isnt good enough for my needs - plus I like a larger body to grip.

Correct! Because of Ken, I ended up buying it last week. Great advice! Love my D780 👍🏽😎

I am in same dilema i have D700 and thinking to get either D780 or D500 both are fantastic. 780 got an edge to to do all kind of photography and video as well as.

"Cameras don't take photos; the person holding the camera takes the photos."

Hey there, I'm in the same boat, shooting prime AI and AIS lenses on my D780. However for me the exposure preview in live view (with the meter set for a correct exposure) is too dark for ff5.6! In other words, live view, meter and resulting image all agree only for f5.6. Non-cpu lens data are set correctly and if I just follow the meter I get correct exposures. Is it so for you as well or is my camera malfunctioning?

@@loukashareangas4420 I never use live view so I don't really know. But you have to be in aperture priority as well as having Non-CPU set to get the right exposure.

Better than 850.

Do you have like D5 or D850?

Lens junkie is the best kind of junkie!

@@scraymond5597 DITTO... wait... I'm a strong Spanish black coffee junkie! I can't go to sleep without a nice huge cup of that stuff.

This body has both! (The focus peaking is only in Live View)