Nikon P1000 vs Sony Full Frame Camera - filming Saturn & Jupiter - who wins the Ultra Zoom battle?

Подписаться 21 тыс.

Просмотров 125 тыс.

50% 1

I had the Nikon P1000 and the Sony a7 IV with the 200-600mm lens with teleconverter compete against each other. I was interested in which camera is better for filming the planets Jupiter and Saturn. I was really surprised what good shots the Nikon takes in the ultra telephoto range.
Ich habe mal die Nikon P1000 und die Sony a7 IV mit dem 200-600mm Objektiv mit Telekonverter gegeneinander antreten lassen. Mich hat interessiert mit welcher Kamera man die Planeten Jupiter und Saturn besser filmen kann. Ich war wirklich überrascht was für gute Aufnahmen die Nikon im Ultra Telebereich macht.
music:
How it Begins von Kevin MacLeod unterliegt der Lizenz Creative-Commons-Lizenz "Namensnennung 4.0". creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Quelle: incompetech.com/music/royalty-...
Künstler: incompetech.com/
I DO NOT allow my video material to be used in other videos, be it here on RU-vid, Instagram, TikTok or anywhere else. Anyone who uses my videos or parts of them without my express permission risks legal action.
Ich erlaube KEINE Verwendung meines Videomaterials in anderen Videos, sei es hier auf RU-vid, Instagram, TikTok oder sonst wo. Wer meine Videos oder Teile davon ohne meine ausdrückliche Erlaubnis verwendet, riskiert rechtliche Schritte.
My gear that I use / Meine Ausrüstung, die ich benutze:
(These are Amazon affilate links. If you use this you support my channel, because then I get a small comission, but you don´t have to pay more. It doesn´t matter whetter you buy the proposed item or something else. / Es handelt sich hierbei um Amazon Affiliate Links. Wenn ihr diese benutzt unterstützt ihr dadurch meinen Kanal. Denn ich bekomme dann eine kleine Provision, ihr müsst aber nicht mehr bezahlen. Dabei ist es egal, ob ihr den vorgeschlagenen Artikel oder etwas anderes kauft.)
cameras
Sony a7s amzn.to/3jXXpWk
Sony a7s III
Sony a7 IV amzn.to/3KsrXLy
Nikon P1000 amzn.to/3Crz97Q
Sony RX10 IV amzn.to/3iODGJb
drone
DJI Mini 2 amzn.to/37KNbTF
lenses
Sony 14mm 1.8 amzn.to/3KzYwaz
Samyang 14mm T3.1 amzn.to/2VRNvND
Sigma 20mm 1.4 amzn.to/2Xy7nGs
Mitakon 50mm 0.95 amzn.to/3AQwHG7
Laowa 100mm Macro amzn.to/3jRTL00
audio
Sony ECM-B1M amzn.to/3mbvwNc
Sony ECM-W2BT amzn.to/2VTeTea
accesories
Falcon Eyes F7 RGB Light amzn.to/3yTDQVl
Yongnuo YN216 LED amzn.to/3xSzv3B
Lens Heater amzn.to/3k260Y0
Intervalometer amzn.to/3g9N8W6
Gorillapod 5K amzn.to/2VY1Rfo

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

1 окт 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 152

@LATivi Год назад

This video is one of the reasons I bought a Nikon p1000 this month 😁

@d.diggler9936 Год назад

How do you like it??

@LATivi Год назад

@@d.diggler9936 yaa i like it, but if you are looking for results for professional photos or videos, this is not recommended

@user-qx4zb9yt1w Год назад

@@LATivi so what do you do with that camera anyway?

@LATivi Год назад

@@user-qx4zb9yt1w see distant objects, and don't bother changing lenses

@user-qx4zb9yt1w Год назад

@@LATivi ahhhh 🤔🤔🤔 I see, is it have good result like sky pictures?

@mariemccann5895 Год назад

I wasn't expecting that! Excellent video, thanks for posting.

@JaunSagar14 Год назад

I like Nikon Coolpix p1000 🥰🥰🥰

@FunnyVideosLover Год назад

This is the kind of videos RU-vid is supposed to promote.

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

Not really, unless you prefer bad comparisons with a obvious outcome

@jayesh5131 22 дня назад

Fr One of the coolest comparison videos out there ❤️‍🔥

@nicoladegiuseppe8354 Год назад

Thank you

@Ludiscnature Год назад

wow... beautiful

@kaox44 Год назад

$999 Nikon vs OVER $10,000 Sony set up to keep up with a old Nikon. Amazing shots BTW, I can never get pass the atmosphere heatwaves to get a clear shot of Saturn....

@davidadair1387 Год назад

Nikon everyday. Enough said

@harrison00xXx 11 месяцев назад

You forget to realize we talk about a 4.5-539mm lens at 2.8-8. Thats in the best case effective look of 24mm F16 up to 3000mm F45 look. There is absolutely no headroom for creative stuff with out of focus backgrounds except for (well lit!) macro stuff where the P1000 really isnt that bad. Its also a pretty unreasonable comparison... as if you would take a super expensive 300mm 2.8 lens and the most expensive 12 MP professional camera and then complain it cant beat the P1000 in its reach.... I have the Canon EOS R7 and a RF 800 lens, thats native 1280mm and 2200mm in 4k60 crop video mode, up to 3000mm with enhanced digital stabilizer. I can even shoot saturn HANDHELD!

@AshishKumar-kv4hr 9 месяцев назад

@@harrison00xXx talk is cheap, show us the results.

@harrison00xXx 9 месяцев назад

@@AshishKumar-kv4hr what results? you have to specofy since i have no clue what results you are talking about? reach? stabilizer? For reach i have enough examples with 2200mm

@AshishKumar-kv4hr 9 месяцев назад

@@harrison00xXx the results of your setup about which you've been harking on and on continuously on every P1000 video. You wrote that you can use your Canon EOS R7 with the RF 800 lens to shoot Saturn handheld. So show us.

@surfintheinternetzufos8626 Год назад

Awesome comparison, would have been good to do a moon, planes day and night, a satellite or rocket launch?

@michelvondenhoff9673 6 месяцев назад

Got a Sony FDR-AX100 (29-348mm eq.) camcorder as a 127/1500mm Maksutov telescope. Pretty nice results from the P1000 😀 Versatile camera on and off a tripod. Have been able to see Jupiter with several moons as Saturn and rings with the Mak 😊

@tomn8tr 5 месяцев назад

The Nikon image was clear and had good colors, while the Sony suffered greatly from chromatic aberration on the edges. In daylight I think the costly Sony setup would shine through though. That Nikon gives a lot of power and options for a lot less money, getting shots that would have otherwise been missed.

@NsndoBrasil 5 месяцев назад

Amigo esta camera da para tirar foto desfocada? Amigo tem programa para ela enviar fotos para computador em celular eeu acho que tem

@salimabinasise8397 Год назад

I love nikon

@fredericberard8843 Год назад

superbe vidéo 👍 , ceci me rappelle cette superbe conjonction jupiter saturn du 21/12/21 , le P1000 à des lumières basse et beaucoup de grain dans l’image au-delà d’un certain ISO . J'évite toujours de rester au plus haut en iso sauf cas particulier . pour éviter de longues pauses monter l’Iso s’avère utile malgré le grain dans l’image 🙏

@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne Год назад

Merci beaucoup. Je me souviens encore de la conjonction :) Oui, c'est vrai, il faut être prudent avec l'ISO sur le Nikon P1000.

@ehoradoplay0403 Год назад

Sony wooow

@NaturMV Год назад

Beachtliches Ergebnis für die Nikon, hätte ich auch nicht gedacht. Aber bei so starkem Zoom mittels Telekonverter, Crop und Digitalzoom muss man wohl irgendwann mit diesem Bildqualitätsverlust rechnen. Hast du diesen Clear Image Zoom von Sony verwendet oder den digitalen Zoom oder beides? Oder musstest du ins finale Video sogar auch noch croppen? Das sind ja wahnsinnige Brennweiten, ich bin mit meinem 200-600 und dem 1,4er TC + Crop durch 4k60 bei der Sony A7IV und aktiver Bildstabilisierung glaube ich immer nur bei ca. 1300mm.

@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne Год назад

Ja, ich habe auch den Clear Image Zoom verwendet. Der reichte inklusive Telekonverter und APS-C Crop aber "nur" für 2700mm. Mit dem zusätzlichen Digitalzoom kam ich dann auf 7200mm. Aber um an die 10800mm der Nikon (optisch + digital Zoom) im Endergebnis heranzukommen, musste ich tatsächlich noch im Schnittprogramm um das 1,5 fache reincroppen. Und wie man im Video sieht, da hält ein Objektiv mit 600mm optischer Brennweite einfach nicht mehr mit.

@NaturMV Год назад

@@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne Ahh alles klar, danke für die Info!

@i.d.4097 Год назад

Nikon ist der beste 👍

@januszyanek94 Год назад

Nikon ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

@user-jb2ig1ih5l 11 месяцев назад

Which of the quality of Nikon or Sony was superior in the results of the photograph

@bolonissay8953 Год назад

do a comparison during the day of random pics and videos.

@ramunasreifas4317 Год назад

Nikon 💪

@spotonlevel5629 Год назад

Thanks for the video. What is the difference in price between them..

@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne Год назад

Here in Germany around 1050 € (1030 Dollar) for the Nikon. The Sony a7IV (2650 €) + the Sony 200-600 (1580€) + the 2x-TC (550€) = 4780€ (4685 Dollar)

@LATivi Год назад

@@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne woowwwwwww

@guruburu4962 Год назад

Don't forget the difference in weight. The sony, including the lenses, is about 6 times the weight of the Nikon. About 3kg vs 500g.🙂

@LISTEDGames Год назад

@@guruburu4962 the nikon is 1.4kg not 500g

@bazpearce9993 Год назад

A large amount of chromatic aberation with the Sony. The DSLR would do much better in a telescope i think.

@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne Год назад

Yes, I think so, too. Definitely something optically closer to the 3000mm focal length of the Nikon.

@TheBertieW Год назад

Nice video. What song is this?

@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne Год назад

The sony is called How it begins by Kevin MacLeod

@falxonPSN Год назад

Would be interesting to see a crop sensor camera with a higher pixel density per surface area also.

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

EOS R7 + RF 800 F11 Sony A6700 + 200-600G Panasonic G9 II + 100-400 All of them are giving better results than the P1000

@philipchesleyiii 5 месяцев назад

@@harrison00xXxso the Sony a6700 $1300 out performs the $3999 Sony a7 IV.......

@harrison00xXx 5 месяцев назад

@@philipchesleyiii yes, higher pixel density, a lot higher

@kiisseli1337 Год назад

Cool. But how much closer 60MP Sony Full Frame DSLR or high-MP APS-C DSLR would be?

@harrison00xXx 11 месяцев назад

and how affordable the high MP APS-C setup would be compared to the A7 IV setup when it comes to reach. I have the Canon EOS R7 and often use the RF 800 F11 (in total i paid about 1900€ for both, the RF 800 2nd hand). It gives me native 1280mm, 2200mm in 4k60 crop mode and about 3000mm with enhanced digital IS. I have some moon shots and wildlife stuff uploaded. It was my first setup at all to have much reach for wildlife (EOS RP+ RF 800F11 for native 800mm) Im very happy with this affordable supertele-setup (R7+RF800F11) but often enough its just too slow and/or too long (1280mm is MUCH) so i also have some other lenses (Sigma 150-600 6.3, 70-200 2.8,...) It gives me native 1280mm, about 1400mm with digital stabilizer, 1800mm with enhanced digital IS, about 2250mm in 4k60 crop mode video (no digital IS, 1:1 sensor readout) and about 3000mm with enhanced digital IS in 4k60 crop but little bit sharpness lost. I never understood those comparisons... its like comparing a regular car to a pickup and complaining about a single issue with the smaller, regular car the pickup doesnt have. Sure enough the pickup is more versatile (as the nikon has "amazing" 24-3000mm), but it is slower, less agile, consumes more fuel, probably has less space for passengers,... the 24-3000mm zoom capability just DESTROYED most reasons to buy this camera: Its image quality sucks, its low light and video performance is WEAK, its sensor size and lens choice make smartphone/bad looking images and videos (missing DoF, "real" look and so...). And still its a heavy, big monster.

@paulantony4598 9 месяцев назад

Nikon P1000..👍👌

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

No. Outdated piece of crap

@samwang5831 8 месяцев назад

I was surprised by the result. I thought the Sony combo would be vastly superior, how wrong I was. Perhaps this is an example to show that pixel density is sometimes more important than sensor area, and also that pricey equipemnt is not necessarily better. Thanks, excellent comparison

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

Make a more reasonable comparison, such as Canon R7 + RF 800 F11 or Panasonic G9 II + new 100-400 and you will realize the P1000 sucks pretty hard at anything beside „zoom“

@jan.tichavsky 7 месяцев назад

When you have a lot of light you can get by with smaller sensor area. Outside of that the full frame sensor wins by less noise and more details.

@idkanymore3382 7 месяцев назад

I hope you know that you are wrong and judging a compressed youtube video isnt gonna show you the result

@user-yt5tt9sw6f 7 месяцев назад

The Sony a7R4 has a 61 megapixel full frame sensor. The P1000 has 16 megapixels. As far as I can see, you can crop an image taken with Sony's a7R4 to a quarter of the original image and then obtain the same resolution as with the P1000 = 16 megapixels, which in that case would mean that a correct comparison between an image taken with the P1000 and 3000mm and sony with 2X teleconverter and 600mm = 1200mm corresponds to an image of 4 x 1200= 4800mm if you use Sony and crop to the same 16 megapixel resolution. Am I right or wrong? On the other hand, if the largest aperture that the P1000 has in the 3000mm = 8 mode, Sony's zoom 200-600mm with teleconverter cannot measure up to this, since the Sony zoom is at aperture 6.3 at 600mm and with the 2x converter loses a step to aperture 11 ? I think it will be. How do other properties such as dynamic range and other important features of the P1000's tiny sensor compare to Sony's full frame, even if you only use a quarter of it when you crop the image ???

@ashgiles4401 3 месяца назад

P1000 has 4x digital 3000mm

@QodhirJOfficial Год назад

1000❤

@harrison00xXx 11 месяцев назад

yeah rarely you can find (sadly abused...) 200-600G lenses for this price. Pretty much unbeatable, its probably the best longer telezoom at all and i would love to be in the sony system with the 200-600, instead im at Canon and have a 150-600 6.3 zoom and a 800mm prime...

@tonysantana7415 Год назад

I would appreciate information about the error that my nikon coolpik P1000 camera gives me. The error is the following: THE CAMERA WILL SHUT OFF TO PREVENT IT FROM OVERHEATING.u It turns off and you can't do anything anymore. Thank you Jose Antonio

@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne Год назад

I'm sorry I can't help you with your problem. I have never had any overheating problems with the Nikon P1000.

@falxonPSN Год назад

The error is pretty self-explanatory. What specifically are you trying to learn? Also, what have your web searches turned up on this topic already?

@asalalawsi Год назад

I have sony a7iv with 70-200mm my question should i buy 2x converter or buy Nikon p1000 ? Which one better

@carloscolon4295 Год назад

Buy the p1000,good for the money

@harrison00xXx 11 месяцев назад

get a 200-600, its the best longer telezoom lens you can find more or less. Especially with a A7R IV body! With such a camera you should be advanced enough to even know a P1000 "camera" is not for you, unless you ONLY want "small and light" reach without any usability (forget BIF, owls in a dark forest, proper video, lowlight in general, etc,...)

@ashkenaze 9 месяцев назад

That 2x teleconverter obviously murdering the PQ. P1000 tiny sensors at 1/2.3 has 5.6 crop factor; it means 600mm in Sony FF is actually 3360mm in P1000. no need for PQ smasher teleconverter, just zoom it digitally.

@magicstix0r 5 месяцев назад

Exposure is way too high for these planets... You should be able to pull out detail at that zoom.

@almu1803 Год назад

Klarer Vorteil für die Nikon. Sie ist einfach Lichtstärker.

@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne Год назад

Tatsächlich ist die Sony mit ihrem Vollformatsensor deutlich lichtstärker. Der Vorteil der Nikon ist der enorme optische Zoom.

@mibnsharpals 8 месяцев назад

das verliert sie wider mit ihren krümelsensor hat sie einen Cropfaktor 5,6 und eine pixelgröße von 1,3ym . Dh. jedes abblenden reduziert schon die schärfe. Die effektive blende , gegenüber 35mm , ist dann auch ab 8*5,6 = Blende 45 ( gerundet ). Dafür ist das bild dann recht beachtlich.

@MYBNMZ1 5 месяцев назад

Why don't they use a minimum of 1" sensor, it will be much better.

@hifinphoto Год назад

how did you get to 10800mm zoom ?

@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne Год назад

It says so in the video: crop, digital zoom, teleconverter...

@Fessoid Год назад

and for P1000?

@jasminmangyari7494 Год назад

It's nikon for zoom. But id go for sony's realistic resolution pixelate

@mariemccann5895 Год назад

I think you are kind of missing the point.

@mameshiba691 9 месяцев назад

Sony camera is trash.

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

@@mariemccann5895be she is on point. The nikon can „zoom“, for anything else i would take the sony as well

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

@@mameshiba691im with you, the A7R5 is pretty bad for some things and i would prefer many cameras over the A7R, but its still much better than the garbage the P1000 is

@ufukberber9563 8 месяцев назад

Bendeki teleskopla 10800 yazan kadar görüyorum hatta bendeki teleskopla üzerindeki desenler görünüyor

@user-yj6hm8ot3y 3 месяца назад

Congratulations .

@user-kc9id8ml2f 5 месяцев назад

Can you zoom in it

@olafgraf73 4 месяца назад

Daylight bird photos with the P1000 are not as good as sony alpha 7xx.

@subhampal6266 5 месяцев назад

Nikon clearly wins

@pazuso 7 месяцев назад

I always thought Saturn and Jupiter photos were "artist's representations," or photos from telescopes in space. I never thought you could simply telescope it like that lol. I assume you should be in a ridiculously dark area away from light pollution in order to see them?

@jan.tichavsky 7 месяцев назад

Why? Jupiter is one of the brightest objects in the sky. Saturn is further away but still bright as it's a planet illuminated by our sun.

@Turbo999be 7 месяцев назад

Both planets are visible with your naked eyes even in cities, they are pretty bright, saturn a little bit less than jupiter.

@agusr32 6 месяцев назад

Not really, you don't need a dark sky to see them with telescopes or binoculars because the are too bright. Although a low quality atmosphere would degrade the image quality, you'd see turbulence specially at high magnifications.

@Tosibosi911 Год назад

Получается NIKON получше и удобнее чем SONY

@KEWE131 Год назад

Интересно, а в РФ (России) что-то подобное выпускается для населения, или нет? "Зенит", "Смена 8", ФЭД, или что-то ещё?

@Bigermans Год назад

Несомненно.

@savoie886 3 месяца назад

😏Nikon

@qaesarx 5 месяцев назад

Yeah, but the exposure is not done right, they are overexposed.

@AshishKumar-kv4hr 9 месяцев назад

The P1000 image is better at probably 1/5th price of the dslr gear

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

Its not

@crazyRyoga 8 месяцев назад

@@harrison00xXx It is tho, at least regarding the specific purpose of this video.

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

@@crazyRyoga no its not

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

@@crazyRyoga Just compare the P1000 to something better suited for reach on full frame, and if its just a cheap 200$ 1000mm 8" newtonian on a wooden dobson mount.

@crazyRyoga 8 месяцев назад

@@harrison00xXx You're all over the place hating on this Nikon for some reasons, so I won't argue. The proof is in the video itself, in which the P1000 provided better results than the Sony. It's a fact. Keep on hating tho ;)

@Shima256 17 дней назад

勝敗見えとるびっくり

@rogats Год назад

For a fraction of the price...

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

A fraction of quality

@BizlaC 7 месяцев назад

@@harrison00xXx Yeah tat's generally how it works. You keep shitting on the nikon but you are completely forgetting it's 1/6th of the price, but only about 1/2 the quality, that's actually extremely good value for money, and better than anything you are going to put together until you are touching the 3k mark. It's the perfect entry point to planetary photography for people not yet ready to drop a months wages on a set up until they know they are going to enjoy the hobby. And if they don't, it's far easier selling on a single camera than a telescope, a lense, a barlow, a camera, some adapters etc..

@harrison00xXx 7 месяцев назад

@@BizlaC wrong A Sony 200-600 you get for like 1200$ already, a Sony A6600, ZV-E10 or similar for about 500-1000$ as well FullFrame + Teleconverters is already questionable, especially with teleZOOM (!!) lenses its pretty much an emergency solution. If you didnt know… TCs were and are mainly meant for fast primes, such as 300 or 400mm 2.8, 600 F4 etc, so the „professional“ lenses, not for „slow“ Telezooms such as the 200-600 6.3. And thats just the sony system, if we look at other systems you are even comparable in price, yet have a noticable better quality compared to the P1000: Canon R10/R50 + RF 800 F11 (between 1200-1500$) Panasonic G9 + 100-400 (also about 1500$) any random APS-C or even MFT camera and the newly released TTartisans 500mm F6.3 lens… lens „just“ 300$, the rest depends on your budget but good APS-C bodies you can get from 200$ and up. You also fell for the stupidity done in this video… comparing absolutely not fitting gears with each other, at which point he could have also compared the P1000 to a Hasselblad D2X and saying the P1000 is „much better“ then.

@Fessoid Год назад

$1000 vs $6000 setup )

@harrison00xXx 8 месяцев назад

Yep absolutely useless Throw in a APS-C, better MFT system with a cheaper tele(zoom) and the nikon will lose easily

@trakkino 7 месяцев назад

the teleconverter is introducing a lot of chromatic aberration

@LindemannFilmFotoDrohne 7 месяцев назад

Yes, unfortunately

@Turbo999be 7 месяцев назад

NIKON P1000 ==> 900$ SONY A7 MARK IV Body only ==> 2000$ SONY FE 200-600mm ==> 1500$ SONY SEL20TC 2x Teleconverter ==> 500$ So we are comparing a 900$ ALL-IN camera with a 4000$ one... Based on this comparison it's a waste of money to take the SONY.

@harrison00xXx 11 месяцев назад

The beginning is already nice "faked".... background music while showing the tube zooming out.... I guess the zoom motor sound isnt that..... nice sounding? :D Also its shaky AF when you zoom, seems like poor and bad mechanics in the lenses zoom system. P1000 wins only one battle: The battle for the worst camera! Its heavy and big, its image quality sucks, you can barely create out of focus backgrounds (F16-F45 look), the autofocus is slow, its stabilizer is pretty bad for handheld usage which a stabilizer is meant to be used,...

@harrison00xXx 11 месяцев назад

Btw your F stop numbers are pretty wrong. the P1000 NEVER EVER create a 3000mm F8 look. multiply ANY F stop value with at least 5,5 (thats the crop factor for the P1000s sensor) and you have the real possbile F stop (look): F16 to F45. congratulations now you realized the P1000 leave NO ROOM for creativity.

@BizlaC 7 месяцев назад

@@harrison00xXxif you hate it so much, don't buy it, stop spamming this comment section man.

@harrison00xXx 7 месяцев назад

@@BizlaC I just want to help others which might be interested in this camera so they avoid it in case they understand what i was writing. Its a garbage camera, in fact its even hard to call it a camera… its a (bad, outdated…) smartphone sized sensor, outdated electronics and a (optically bad…) superzoom lens attached to it.

@user-yj6hm8ot3y 3 месяца назад

He's angry because he doesn't have p1000. And because it's really good, this camera. He either can't afford it or can't accept the obvious. There is always something better in everything.Like someone better than you. But for your mother, you are the best, although you can be a bad person. Goodbye.

@ErykDziad Год назад

AI and zoom.

@xy-box 3 месяца назад

Both images are un-focused.

@alessandrobergamaschi9945 Год назад

Nikon and Sony suck!!!! SUPER BEST CANON IN EVERY WAY, THE BEST!!!

@danguelph2676 Год назад

LMAO Canon is dead long time as of now. Sony is the king for many years now.

@rogerbarnett8412 10 месяцев назад

@@danguelph2676 Nonsense. I shoot Canon.... and the R5 is a great camera, Same goes for the Sony A7 V, A1, but the latest Nikon the Z8, may be the best...until early 2024, when the R5 II is released.

@user-yj6hm8ot3y 3 месяца назад

What does best mean? Best for what purposes? What's the best way to get around? Bike? Perhaps a motorcycle? Airplane? Auto? To each his own, but for me my legs.