Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III - 8 Reasons to Buy the Z6 OVER the a7 III (PLUS 10 More) 

Rest in peace man... So heartbroken. Thank you for sharing your time with us.

All good reasons but you left what to me is the most important, Nikon’s color technology is way ahead of Sony’s.

RIP Matt. Thanks for making those comparison videos. I did enjoy them

I would take the z6 even over the Z7. I like Nikon’s ergonomics. I’m used to 24 megapixel and those files will be smaller than the ones in the Z7. The battery is rechargeable. The EN-EL 15 battery that is used with the D500 and D850 can be used with the Z series cameras. The rechargeable battery for the D series camera can’t be charged with the adapter for the Z series cameras. Then there are the F mount lenses that work with the FTZ adapter. Then of course all the things mentioned in your video. Looking forward to more info as the weeks progress

I am thinking about A7III Tamron 28-75 or Z6 external recorder for video only, the eye af vs 10 bit ?2800 a7 vs 3500 z6

Great reason given. I am moving towards Z6 & Z7 as well. I think they are wonderful cameras

I want to purchase first camera, can I start with full frame or mirrorless to learn and after that for professional purpose , or I should purchase crop sensor first to learn ?

I already have few d750 el en15 batteries that I can use with z6 z7

Nice review, but you didn't discuss focusing system. Apparently the a7iii has a much better focusing system?

Well, I have used the camera and I really liked almost everything about it. True there was a Nikon guy standing beside me, but I've used enough cameras to know what I'm looking for (if I'm a fan of any brand these days it's Fuji for sure). Focus was fast and accurate in the shop with fairly poor light. The image quality looked amazing and is surely better than the Sony competition (which I've also played with). The Z7 felt so right in my hand that I was sorely tempted to do a runner with it, but I suspect I might have gotten into trouble. OK, there's only one card slot, but the camera has fantastic wi fi capabilities, so maybe there are other ways to back up pictures. The biggest lapse, I know, is no eye recognition, which is a great pity given how well it works on other cameras. (Just for the record, I went into the shop during a lull and had around 30 minutes to evaluate the camera.)

Would you demo the 12fps mode? Hope it's not cropped.

Thanks for this Matt always the place to get the “Unbiased” skinny on camera gear.

Thx mate! I wish you will compare Z6 or Z7 with D810 too and lets see how they perform in terms of IQ, ISO performance, Focusing ,and more. Cheers

And these are based on paper spec and limited hands on preview? Seems a dejavu question, how many native lenses the Z6/7 have?

Please explain the " no external battery charger"?.

Aside from all the shortages the Nikon Z camera has to offer, what really killed me on the Z6 is that it has a Optical Low Pass Filter while the Z7 doesn't. That is why I'm staying with my Fuji with the Xtrans sensor. Looking to see what the XT3 offers and can it compete with the Nikon D500 in low light capture.

I have a d7200 and wants to move to Full frame mirrorless. I hesitated between the Z6 and Sony a7iii. As I understood Sony have better af, better dynamic range and they know what they are doing (gen3) but no interval timer... I mean the exposure smoothing and interval timer on my DSLR just made all of my tinelapses. I don't understand why Sony did not keep it. Ofc you can have an external one but mirrorless are supposed to be light, right ? So z6 won my choice..

How'd you think Z6 and a7 iii will compare with EOS R..

I just looked at the MTF-charts of the new S-lenses. They seem spectacular. I think one clear advantage is that the "kit lens" coming with the Z-cameras is on par or better than the 24-70/2.8E except that it is one stop slower of course. The resolution of the Sony 28-70/3.5-5.6 falls very quickly towards the edges and corners...

damn.... I’m only knowing of this now... A shout out to your family, may they endure through the pain, and become better and stronger, without you present. For all it’s worth...i learnt quite a lot from you, you actually responded to my/out questions&comments, you did good videos, and you seemed like a really great guy. It’s really unfortunate that you chose this.....in deed...permanent solution to a temporary problem.. Ride on!

What's the max shutter speed? 1/4000 or 1/8000 D750 maxes out at 1/4000

In terms of specs between Sony and Nikon, they are pretty even. Its all up to preference. I am more curious about the auto focus speed/accuracy and image quality of the Z6/7. There are a lot of mix thoughts on this and we won't find out until it release.

Miss you Matt. Good review sir.

Hi Matt. I am a huge fan- I bought my first DLSR (Nikon d7200 with Nikon 50 1.8G and Sigma 17-50 2.8) on your recommendation and it really got me in to photography. Loved it. So much so I soon upgraded to a Sony A7III. And I must say I haven’t looked back. The whole package is amazing- the eye AF in particular has been a game changer for me. I have some decent- fairly reasonable- glass, and I haven’t found the menus and ergonomics to be as big a problem as some have made out- I have a lot of the functionality I need mapped to the custom buttons which negates the need for the menu much of the time. But it does make me sad you don’t seem to be giving this camera a fair run, and every video you put out at the moment seems to be either extolling the Z6/7 or just slating the Sony. Could you please get one in to review hands on?

I own both and have a lot time using them in the field. Basically, the A7 has faster autofocus. The Nikon has better engineering, color science, menus, a lot more special functions and feels better in the hand. The new lens lineup is going to be far better when they all become available. But even using the f4 zooms and the primes right now is a solid indication of just how good the rest are going to be.

Real Good video Matt and thanks for making it. Though I do believe there are some valid criticisms of Nikon's first 2 "major" mirrorless cameras, the vast majority of them are from people who don't like Nikon (like another camera brand, for whatever their own personal reason is). These aren't perfect cameras in the mirrorless category which makes them just like every other mirrorless produced so far. But you have detailed why in many ways, that the z6 and z7 are better than the Sony counterparts (not even sure what their names exactly are). Was surprised that the Sony didn't have a top LCD screen. And one thing you didn't mention is that every camera body needs a lens attached. I would say, here, ADVANTAGE Nikon. But Ive actually heard some commenters say that Nikon needs to catch up with Sony with their glass. I don't have a response for that one. But glad you shed some true light here like you always do.

How can you be so irresponsible to recommend a camera that you haven't even tried?! Credibility is at risk right here

I shoot Nikon and also bought a Sony. It’s only the a6000 so no comparison. Anyone who shoots Sony most likely has the a7iii because it’s the best out of all of their affordable bodies. No way in hell people will switch to the Nikon zilch system. They’d be going backwards.

Damn Matt for the first time Nikon is impressing me. Sound really nice.

“Nikon has the qxd card. I’d rather have 2 as cards like the Sony. Advantage Nikon” what? Lmao.

By the way Sony supplies external charger BC-QZ1 with 7M3 and you didn't compare battery life which is most important for me, Z6 is disappointing when its comes to battery life vs 7M3. And AF points are also more in 7M3.

Thanks for the review, I'll be buying the Sony 7RM3

since long time i was planning to switch to mirrorless. but i didn't want to have my camera same brand as my TV or Washing machine or shaver. So i decided to wait for Nikon and Canon to start making mirrorless, finally it's here

I want to see real hands on testing with production cameras and production firmware, until then, the only person that I've seen images from was Fro using his F mount lenses. I'm not in the market for a new camera. The D4's, D500's and the D850 that I own are all working fine. Silent shutter and mirror-less isn't a reason for me to purchase. What is of issue for me is having the second card slot, having a battery grip and the ability to use all of my current glass. The FTZ adapter needs to incorporate a screw drive mechanism to auto-focus D series glass. Ergonomics has to be right. I've got large hands and fingers. I can't grip a Sony a7r or an a9 without my middle finger knuckle getting stuck into the tight space between the grip and lens. By all reports (RU-vid reviewers) the z mount lenses while supposedly sharp, feel cheaply made plastic creations. A grand for a 24-70 f/4.0 zoom? That's a kit lens at a high end lens price. Nikon, shutdown that Chinese factory and get a hold on your quality manufacturing. The z mount lenses are a joke, and a bad one at that.

Another great content what about the color science

I was a Nikon user for a lot of years and just recently switched over to the Sony A7R III. If I ever get any extra money I probably get a Sony A7 III camera. Suspect this guy is just trying to validate is his reason in buying a Nikon Z6. I'm glad Nikon is getting into the FF Mirrorless market for competition is good for everyone. The Sony A7 III & Sony A7R III have proven they take good pictures and videos. I'm sure Nikon with the A6 & A7 lineup are going to follow suit and that is - have the capabilities of taking good pictures.. A camera is only a good as the person behind it.

Only guy on RU-vid that makes video about gear that he actually never holds.

The 25th of September Panasonic is going to announce a full frame GH?. We are now entering full frame heaven !!!!!!!!

I left Sony back to nikon bought the z7 and love it. Buying the z6s they will replace my Nikon 750s 👊. These Nikon mirrorless love the egormomics there so sexy and is a Nikon period

Autofocus on the Nikon Z Mirrorless Camera with its Z lens by DPReview: "Autofocus in video is up there with the best. Tracking and refocusing on subjects is intuitive and reliable... besting what Canon and Sony offer." "AF-S performance is snappy and precise." So what does AF-S mean? It means Autofocus with Silent Wave Motor in the Nikon Z lens for speedy autofocus operation.

I was not that interested in ML, particularly after shooting my friend's a7II which had the worst ergonomics of any camera I ever felt in 50 years of shooting. On the same shoot and conditions, my D800 got the images right the first time without menu diving. But the idea adding a D850 has been brewing in my mind since the workhorse D800 has 300,000 frames and I could retire the D7000 to 3rd camera on a shoot. But the features of the Z7 really has me intrigued. 1 XQD card will be more reliable with a longer MTBF than consumer cart interfaces like the problematic SD. we all have had SD cards fail but XQD was designed as the pro grade memory system. So XQD is an advantage for me over 2 all plastic sockets for SD. The other major knock by early YT pundits is no EyeFocus. I just can't figure out why someone who is an experienced photographer would bother letting a camera decide what it picks for focus target. That is my job because the camera has no idea what I want the results to be. The heavy bias on the Sony is nearest object and that is very often not what I want as the peak focus plane. I shoot a lot of wide aperture shots and seldom have the nearest focus plane the key subject. So I would just turn it off if it can be defeated in the Sony. Nikon seems to understand what photographers use a camera for. Battery life has also been knocked but not by people who actually used it, a non-issue. As you say, everyone has extra batteries since all our cameras use the same one and have an independent charger. That is a much more pro configuration than plugging in a tiny flimsy plug into the camera to charge when the camers should be working of its keep. Advantage Nikon in a big way. Build quality is radically different with Nikon, connectors are high quality, tough castings, no stamped sheet metal etc. BIG advantage for Nikon. Color science according to early hands on review is just better. Canon's R series might have very good color also. The most interesting aspect of the Z series is what that big flange and short flange distance allows in designing simpler, lighter lower distortion lenses that are as sharp wide open as f/4. That is the biggest advantage. I will wait for the 85 1.2 and buy the 35 1.8 with the camera plus the adaptor for my 15 fast Nikkor lenses. The more hands on reviews are coming out, the more the cries of "deal breaker" appear to be childish rants from ignorance by people who are not Nikon shooters in the first place so have no idea why so many of us choose Nikon....build, handling and image quality.

From what I’ve heard people are having a lot of AF issues, is this true? If so, things like the menu systems and NLOG systems really won’t matter.

Pls compare Nikon Z6 vs Nikon D750

I was first contemplating between sony a7iii and fuji xt3,but after using them, ergonomically both were uncomfortable to hold .I then tried the z6 ,which was amazing .The quality of the camera is top notch. For me the z6 is the camera to buy. My reasons: -Good colour science,better than sony. -Good ergonomics -Im not a pro so 1 card slot is fine.even if i had two card slots i would not use it for redundancy, maybe for more storage. -good battery life.(I read quite a bit about it ,and all reviewers claim its atleast 1000 shots) -lens for me( i was going to buy 35 or 50 1.8 and a f4 zoom with a7iii which nikon has natively.Thats all I need.) -intervalometer -the lcd is awesome ,2.1 m dots -weather sealing -FF(wanted to upgrade form a 70d) -4k30p no crop,1080 120p no crop 8 bit video is fine for my needs. -usb charging -customisable modes (missing on xt3) -nice evf -silent shooting -ibis -good lowlight -lots of buttons for customisation.

I still wait for Z6II for 2 reason. 1. Lenses choice. 2. Card slot.

Depends a lot... I would give a lot for the A7III dynamic range and AF ... IT IS VERY GOOD!!!

I shoot the northern lights and long-term the new mount should make faster wide angles lens possible and the new Z line lens are being made to shoot at their sharpest wide open. But as of now, only the 35mm will be suitable for northern lights and wider would be desirable.

I would like to see all of the camera manufacturers bundle a battery charger with their cameras and have USB charging ports on the camera bodies. If you do not have access to electricity but have taken a power bank along, you can plug the bank into the camera's USB to charge it. And, as Matt said, the advantage of having a separate battery charger is that one can charge batteries while using the camera. So, I would rather have both.

Clearly Nikon's website is an unbiased resource, Panasonic also claimed the GH5 would have no focus issues.

I guess it's just what your used to. Nikon SLR bodies (film & digital) fit my grip, so much so I've never even thought about it. picking up a Sony A7iii just doesn't feel right. Doesn't stop A7iii being the best camera since the invention of photography, but just not for me.

Z6! Because I have thousands of dollars worth of Nikon lenses.. But one thing holding me back.. AF video focus performance, I want to see first how reliable and fast is it. Also I give A7III props for EyeAF. Wished Z cameras had fully articulating screen, it would have been a great vlogging camera.

Maybe the next version of the Z line Nikon should put an pupil or retina AF detect lol

AF in both stills and video much improved (Jared Polin)

Hey dad! I miss you so much

XQD card is faster, but why does the A7iii have higher buffers?

You miss the fact that while using the EVF, can’t use touch screen to control AF, huge omission

Great video as always Matt, from the (objective) reviews already available, I fear this initial foray into the world of mirrorless cameras has been poorly researched, developed and implemented. I'm a Nikon user, and there is NOTHING about these offerings that would make me want to spend my $$$$, I think they dropped the ball here. Mirrorless reinvented? Hardly think so, thanks again Matt.

A huge advantage to Nikon is their Raw and color profile seem deeper and more color accurate for skin tones out of the gate than Sony does by a long shot. The Raw images I find are thicker with more data and more usable data. Having used Sony cameras for years, I fell out of love with their entire eco system. They where brighter, contrasting TV’s, video cameras, still cameras…. And soon I just really got sick of them. I think they have toned down a lot since then. Now for a point for Sony that I don’t care about, but has to give Sony is their AF is far faster with better hit ratios than the Z6 or even Z6II. However Z9 seems as though Sony has closed the gap with Canon and Sony AF. Again I don’t even use AF lenses so I really couldn’t care less.. but Sony has the advantage there. Also if your using the Nikon adapter for your older AF lenses.. they will work, but are slower and hunt more than they did on you old DSLR body. But the Z series I think is made to run with new Z glass and that Nikon made a decent adapter to talk to a fair portion of the later year full frame glass is great.. but if you are a wedding photographer or journalist, you will want the new Z glass.. Me? As I rambled on on another of your videos I use vintage prime lenses… Nikon Manual Focus, Zenit - Helios etc.. or modern Lensbaby and maybe some future Lomography lenses…. I think I have a couple Nikon AF 50mm somewhere around here… . Never use them of course, but maybe some day. My older body’s (D300s and D5200) seem to never focus fast or where I want them to. I’m much faster with a MF lens on my D300s with focus assist (green dot in viewfinder). But yes…. I’m thinking of a Z6II or a used Z6 if they drop in price once the chip shortage and post Christmas season 2021 (now January 2022) is over. Once more new cameras land I expect the Z6 will drop in price some more… and honestly kind of hoping that the tech from the Z9 will filter into a Z6III… but I think that will be years and I would be hurting myself waiting that long to move up from my decent but older bodies….. unless I knew it was 6 months away.. and I think it’s more like 3-4 years…. But yes.. for stills and hybrids, I’ll stick with Nikon.. for strictly shooting cinema, I do like shooting Bm BRAW on BMPCC4K.. though it’s a tiny sensor.. and BM doesn’t even make a full frame camera…. Their APSC sensors have canon mounts so unlike Z cam or even my JVC LS300 (super 35 sensors with MFT mount….) put on a 0.71 speed booster and brings the super 35 to nearly full frame.. 1.08 crop for instance.. But up until Z6 and Z6II came out I was looking at Sony, Canon and other mirrorless cameras…. Not worring about the other brands at the moment.. sticking with Nikon I believe.

I am a Nikon user and probably a Z6 future owner but... I do believe that Sony has the edge vs this 1st generation Nikon mirrorless cameras. The one thing that keeps me loyal is the adapter as I have quite a good lens collection. Personally I don’t care about video, the 1 card slot or the battery life, if the AF is good I am sold (no Eye AF though) :(

I was upset for the specs the past week. Now, I'm still in Nikon as user experience is really matter. To pick a camera you know it well and ergonomics is really matter when it comes to real world.

Bro, I truly respect your opinion a lot however, it seems like your are one of a few that still talking good about Nikon. I'm a Nikon shooter myself and I think that Nikon is falling behind when it comes to technology like autofoucs for example which is very essential for video. Maybe Nikon is a very rugged camera as built quality but technology wise i think isn't the best good luck and we want to see your posting more often

Travel through time. That's what Neapolitan Dynamite's uncle Rico needed! He'd have too sell a lot of Tupperware to buy a Z7.

How much Nikon paid you ?

Nothing can beat the z6 full frame 4k at 10 bit.

I really miss Matt, his reviews were honest.

I currently shoot with a Nikon but if the new A7SIII is half the camera it is rumored to be then it blows these new Z series cameras out of the water. Nikon had to come out with a camera fast to stop the bleeding even if it specs out to the Sony MK2 cameras. If you own Nikon glass you would go Z, if you were starting from scratch Nikon has a couple years of catch up on the mirrorless side.

z6 and Fuji xh1 both are well built bodies

144 MB/s will definitely help in good 4k quality

This is my next camera. I thought to buy the sony but after many reading g I think that I'm more into nikon

I don’t know enough about Nikons lens selection to make a choice

Guys we are yet to see the Nikon Z cameras in action. All what’s been released is their beta version. Give this few months into production. I do agree that they should have included a second card slot. I am not a big Sony fan except for their tv and sound systems. I would like to wait and see how Canon and Nikon performs in terms of autofocus, video quality, sharpness, etc. Let time prove the winner.

These cameras are not competing with the Sony. To be honest these cameras don't have any competition the market today....you can ask and I can elaborate why I think so. I'm going for the Z6

I had Nikon and Canon gear for 7 years now im using Sony A7R2 and R3, Nikon and Canon are just too late !! sleeping for 5 years cant believe it! ( sold our all my Nikon and Canon gear for still good prices 2 years ago....) Now finally the sleepers start to bring out some more or less good mirror-less cameras but for me the train has left I now got several great Zeiss-Sony and Sigma lenses and the pictures are just amazing and unless there will be a revolution in picture quality from Nikon or Canon I wont switch back And lets not forget Sony will bring new products soon as well.... Ciao Nikon see you Canon had a great time with you but times have changed

Lenses choice

I’m not a Nikon shooter but I have seen the images that they produce. I printed thousands of prints in a professional lab shot on Nikons. If I had Nikon glass I wouldn’t hesitate to buy one of their bodies. Also there is nothing magic about a mirror less camera. You can make great images with a fifty year old camera if you know how.

Looking forward to getting the Z6. Looks like an awesome camera.

The Z6 has a lot going for it despite the many flaws that it shares with its bigger brother the Z7. That said I'd say these Z series bodies only make sense to existing Nikon users who are already heavily invested in the f mount system. For somebody starting from scratch I couldn't recommend them, the Sony A7III being a more compelling proposition at this time. 😊

It's funny how people get upset at Nikon and forget that the two first generations of Sony were not having 2 card slots , good battery etc. but still despite these trade offs Sony managed to sell The A7 R/RII; A7S/I/II & A7i/II anyway. Am not saying that Nikon is perfect , but i understand the choice. Unlike Sony NIKON has already A HUGE RANGE OF CAMERAS (Dslrs) in the market and although Nikon is starting with mirrorless , they need to protect their current flagships too. The NIKON Z6 and Z7 will sell anyway . People bashed the Canon 6D mark II , but now are buying it for vlogging. Nikon's reputation is well known . Instead of spreading hate , how about you Sony lovers etc keep shopping what suits you and leave us the Nikon lovers with our babies ;-) ? At the end of the day WE ALL TAKE PICTURES , a camera is just a TOOL !

I know very little about the A7 iii or Sony cameras in general, other than that i think they look beautiful. I have also seen a lot of awsome images by Sony A7 iii users. What l do know though, is that l love my Z6. The viewfinder is great and its a pure joy to use old manuel Nikkor lenses with it. And, all Z lenses are awsome

Will hold off purchasing to see what upgrades Sony will offer - rumor is 80 mp sensor. Deeply invested in Zeiss lens on the Sony - So the lens collect is a valuable asset and going back to Nikon lenses is not something that my wallet wants to do.

There are some triggered Sony fanboys in the comment section... bring the popcorn and the beer. :)

Everybody can decide, but the nikon more strong body, and the nikon experience in the cameras manufacturing for a long time irá worth ir, sorry for May English os ir not muy idiom

Everything you mentioned honestly are secondary features and do not make it a better camera than sony, In fact you didn’t mention all the important features that Sony is clearly a better camera at, i was a nikon shooter ever since I started photography and I shifted because they are way behind in comparison to sony and canon.

nice

Matt this is my first ever falling out with you! I'm sorry but reading out Nikon marketing headlines is no more credible than reading a car manufacturers 0-60 and mpg claims! Please I can read those myself I want you to tell me more than just parrot headlines.

Good job Nikon ambassador. Nothing is ever perfect, and I am sure you did a good job missing one card slot, banding, bad focusing, refreshing time in 9fps, and if I looked up other misses if would go on and on. I will tell you, I went to Nikon in 1972, EL2-FM-F-F2-F3AS-N60-N80-D65-D90 and over 6 lens. When I moved to the desert, I wanted a smaller lighter system, Nikon showed a poor product, I had a hard time between Olympus-Fuji and Sony won my choice and have been very happy. I really wanted Nikon to win me back before I got the primes I wanted and I am ready for better glass and camera. A good image can be made with many brands , however some tech features to assist in focusing , selection of lenses, I find I want now and tired of conservative camera companies waiting to see what the people want, instead of giving it and pricing it affordable.... Maybe Nikon should pick a unknown photographer and show them why they should have a Nikon...

I miss his videos,, RIP

do people that shoot sony cameras actually take pictures? or do they sit around on nikon youtube pages all day? people need to get a life.

R.I.P. Matt

The Sony outperforms the Nikon in almost if not every respect, least of all the 2 SD card slots 1 card slots is for the non professional market or landscape photographers where you cant miss a shot so unless you own Nikon glass and don't want upgrade the z6 will have to do until Nikon release the pro version.

I m very sorry Matt , I really loved your channel .

I didn't even read the comment but i know alot of sony fanboys will write long complaining comments.

the stupid card is a flaw, expensive and nowhere you can plug it out of the box, laptops have sd, imacs have sd etc

Look, no milc can contend with dslr in stills shooting. I'm getting a Z6 for the video. All of a sudden no one cares about video because it might change their opinion about this camera. I don't care what all the talking heads on YT have to say. Matt thanks for your take on the Z6. I was over on the video YT Channels and it's apparent many are interested in the Z6. It doesn't mean they are changing systems but at least they aren't petty little kids bragging about their dog is bigger.

And the Sony has focus that actually works,the Nikon focus is pants according to all testers and no I’m not a Sony lover,I’m a Nikon owner,,,,,but people say all these problems will be ironed out with updates,.....so tell me when did Nikon do regular updates? D700 3updates in 10years D750 2 updates in 3years D810 1update in 2years........if a camera has rubbish focus then why would you buy it

Sony’s auto focus and IBS still blow the Z6 away. If not I would buy a Z6

How the hell can you pass judgement on a camera that you have never touched? Taking Nikon marketing materials as gospel? I have a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you. It's beautiful, and I can get it for you at a bargain price. Nikon's praise of it's own camera may all prove true, or it may not. Had you based your comments on actual experience, I would have no beef, but in this video you are just a shill. You lost all credibility in this review.

R.I.P. Matt.

Come on one card slot battery rated half as much one third of the af points eye af buffer less than a7iii these are important points we don’t know the rest nobody has had a good enough test on the rest weathersealing anyone soaked it yet faster lenses you said don’t see any on roadmap Sony already got .95 so if a smaller mount can do that why need bigger and it’s 799 not the already quoted 6k native lenses on Sony more than Nikon will ever have Sony opened up its tech for mount for other company’s to produce Nikon won’t blackout looks bad on this camera few people had af problems on the day don’t go reading Nikon’s literature on it as gospel remember people watch you to get advice on buying you have a input on new people into photography’s buying habits and a video like this recommending a untested camera is just wrong

RIP bro