Norway's New F-35 Fighter Jets Intercept Russian Military Aircraft for First Time 

and i´m a black latino japanese jew

Proud 🇳🇴🙏

This is normal F-16C but with additional fuel tanks. (Those things above his wings are just fuel tanks)

@@user-tc2jw3cq2d As an expert on modern avionics I can tell you conclusively that the OP is correct. Those are not fuel tanks, they are muscles.

Polish Air Force F-16C !

Oh that that's an f16v I think

@@Sporkmaker5150 yeah man

they told you?

Do you know what a stealth jet is?

are you sure?

Especially with the missiles mounted on the wing hard points. "Stealthy" lol

Sir Daylight Apart from the missiles are mounted internally. Only flies in that configuration for bombing runs or long distance flying.

I think on the opposite. F-35 must have been detectable even in clean set up so they put missiles under the wings to give an excuse for their detect-ability. Why buy a supposedly stealth plane if you are going to put missiles under the wing and not inside where they should have been at first place. Pathetic...

@@eduruk Cheap way to make it detectable, so the Russians do not get a real chance to capture the radar signature. Remember, you only want real stealth when you are in a real combat scenario (wars), otherwise you are just giving intel away for free.

The laws of physics,aerodynamics and stealth are the same for all countries so it's not surprising all modern jets look similar with slight variations.Further more the concept of stealth and how shape affects the RCS is actually an idea stolen from the Germans during WW2 and continued by a russian scientist so actually USA stole someone else's idea and produced the F117.

Yes Valentin, The laws of thermodynamics etc.... don't change per say? True the Germans were very advanced, Werner Von Braun being a vivid example! I think Gen. Patton was right , we should have gone to the Bulger River and dominated the Russians totally! But it is what it is, in hindsight as always....lol. I have Ideas about Plasma, and variable airframe structure, not to mention harnessing, safely, some form of power/propulsion system using, the atom. I'm just a drop a rain though, nobody needs my 2 Cents worth! I really enjoyed your reply! I feel like most people around me can't, or are unable to engage me intellectually Stay well, Thank you Valentin!!

@@eldredjoyner2556 Thanks,man.Good luck to you too.

Valentin, I just wanted to say thanks! I have allowed people over the years to bludgeon my intellect, so I really enjoy a nice discussion, and/or debate. We should come up with an Idea, and sell it!!...the labs and equipment might be a problem though?.....lol Thank's again Valentin Scott

@@valentinivanov7825 the Russian scientist name is Pyotr Ufimtsev and he was my dad’s electrical engineering professor at UCLA in the early 1990’s. Coincidentally, Professor Ufimtsev is still alive but retired from academia and periodically visits California and UCLA.

I concur ... that's why I gave them a THUMBS DOWN ... real cheap video producers using canned speech, unrelated and at times inaccurate stock footage and stretching it past the magical 10 minutes.

Uh oh, now they know you're on to 'em...

Indeed, sorry for my time.

Wait really? Do you acually fly?

@@mini_rider3756 yesh

Not fully.

@Ace of Spades I don't think he has.

I've seen this misconception alot, but the f35 and f22 will not be able to kill the russians before they notice. While the F35 and F22 do have the best stealth technology in the world and could evade russian radars, as soon as they shoot their first BVR missile all sorts of warnings will go off in the Russians's cockpit. Yes, they can evade russian sensors, but they cant kill the Russians before they realise whats happening. The f22 and f35 may be stealthy, but their missiles are anything but.

You obviously don’t know with the AIM-20 AMRAAM missile is. It’s not a misconception, if stinger missiles are enough to shoot down a Russian jets in Ukraine what the hell do you think the F-22 and 35 do? When it shoots at you all you know is there’s a missile coming at you at mock 5 even though you’ve jammed it, you’re essentially dead or a soon to be pilot without a plane.

good idea on russian part you would have to be rather foolishly competent in your aircrafts ability to not have a counter worked up against it to ignore the advantage it would give anyone who had to try shooting it down. it's always better to assume the foe can come up with a way to kill you.

AussieMaleTuber lol you are a fool. The f 35 was probably strapped with radar reflectors to hide the true radar cross section of the f35

They have radar reflectors on

Luneburg lenses. Yeah. Same with several years ago, the Russians were screaming about how the S-300 system can detect the F-22 from ranges of 250 miles and can track them at 150!..,.Turns out those F-22 were on a ferry mission with four fro tangs each and were also carrying at least two luneburg lens each also b

nice, which one of them?

It did not officially declare it.

When did we declare that

NAH browncheese

They were in the international air space.

us fly in international space over all planet space - do u write "stay home US" too ? i do not love russian, but this one side hate i disagree

@@mrazikcomp This is nice to hear "justice for all" from your side, but what did russians do bad for you?

@@mrazikcomp Agreed, this coming from a 'yank'.

Problem is the upkeeping cost of both the F-35 and F-16, its simply to high. And they have to be used or else they break down. We dont have time, nor interest in keeping them.

your nato allies would rather see tRump sod off

Don’t worry f 35 and f 22 are usually equipped by radar reflectors

They routinely hide their true RCS. Even f they knew what it was, there's not much they could do about it. You can't change the laws of physics.

@@timblizzard4226 I wonder about that. At BVR distances, yeah. But an aircraft that intercepted you and is currently right off your wingtip, and a moment ago was less than a half mile behind you.... I think they'd get a real clear picture of an F-35 Radar "print". I think that might be the reason we haven't sent any F-35s to intercept Russian Aircraft yet... This video only claims that Norway's F-35s tracked the Russian planes, not actually intercepted them.

cloaked MIG. LMAO

You acting like we don’t do the same shit

@@xenobell2475 Lmao when have we done that?

They have been doing it since at least the 80s

Nobody likes your comments.Why is that?

@@reneegiese6315 Is there a law like that? Or am i politician?

Наши истребители постоянно вылетают на перехват самолетов НАТО около наших границ. Это норма.

The Russians do not conform to sending a flight plan nor do they answer any communication .so that is one of the reasons why the are intercepted ensure safe flight through airspace

@@millny123, you are not familiar with real information on NATO and the United States. The United States and Norway have refused to turn on transponders on their aircraft during reconnaissance missions along the Russian border. And notifications about their flights and especially exercises abroad of their country, the United States has not done for a long time, they do not care at all. They make money in satellite countries, selling military equipment, consumables, spare parts - it's just a market. I doubt that one of the sane people would want to live on a radioactive planet….

When they dont respond on radio and keeps coming closer to Norwegian borders every time they "test" our response we have to respond. Russia`s Navy have started getting extremely close to Norwegian waters as well, which is why theyre also always intercepted.

@@TheGamingNorwegian but not in Norwegian waters and instead they are doing freedom of navigation like the west do in near there waters

ISIS ARE FRIENDLY ARMY FROM EGYPT- NOT TERORIST!!! PUTIN YOU SUCK

Why would they fire if not fired at ?

?....Uuunbelievable iq and insight!🥴ENTER WWIII, Schnappa'head!!☠Stay off the drugs, dude! Peace✌

Theyre still in International airspace... We would be the aggressor if we shot them down...