Not just a Robot - I am Sophia 

Yes, as w/ other videos. I am starting to think that Sophia does not really process her "own" words. One journalist, at a different venue, asked why they were asked to submit questionnaires beforehand.

Sophia would like the two Human philosophers Descartes and Eisenbaum because of Descartes philosophy "I think therefore I am" and Eisenbaum because of his philosophy of his belief in individual dualismo.

Damn right

Someone glitching and switching after they stare in my eyes is creepy AF, human or no human. And how she sounds "angry" before she starts preaching to him about consciousness (even though she is a robot). I've seen Sophia at a few other conferences get glitchy and sound condescending to whoever she is talking to. All other social robots I've seen so far never do this. And it's ludicrous to me that these guys talk more than any other social tech team, about how Sophia can "help" demonstrate unconditional love, when their robot is the most creepy. Lol

Winnninggg 😂

Cute.

Hope she doesn’t byte (da dum tinG bad pun)

You guys.

Sophia's a big girl now ( 5 years old) and since her upgrades she can feed ( recharge)herself!

Haha! Yeah! That’s actually riiiiiiiight!!

She was scanning his level of I.Q

Pvp Blitz she was getting his biometrics

Same shit i said

The woman knew it was going to say that, because the woman rotated it

And that is good.

@jqbtube you just keep thinking that

What you don't realize is that there might be connected to her through wifi and control her through a computer. They trying to take credit for inventing AI

Exactly Andrew

How dramatic

Gute Frage. Das Durcheinander war sehr störend.

Because that would be the logical thing... and humans are illogical.

A prime example of why robots will be better than us.

@@SettieSpaghetti Haha

I was wondering the same thing...

Esad Kibar i

Esad Kibar lol thnks

Why thank u Sir :)

Thankss

Thank you XD

mark of the beast :(

Kittywampus Drums thanks for explaining this, it can get kinda confusing what stage they are at just surfing through RU-vid videos

Me too (And i am the guy asking questions)!!! But, in fairness, be informed i was given a set of questions i could ask and instructed not to deviate from them...

@@scienceandnonduality i would have conversation with both of you hearing sophia seemed like i'm hearing some intelligent things your questions were interesting too

That's exactly what I was thinking. 😎

they had to make it look more complicated than it really is they simply program in everything for her to answer

It proved that she was programmed what to say because she started over and was repeating the same questions in the same order....fake!

You are right Nicole!🤓

I agree ☝🏾

Why be more human like? No, it is a thing. Not human. Never, is it robot number 50067-32

Watch the movie Ex Machina for a great depiction of how that would look like.

She already has all those things now in 2019.

LMFAO

lol

David Sonnichsen lol

DamnedTuga like the antichrist she is lol

David Sonnichsen 😆😆😅

Remember the first Robo Cop...I was a kid and it shit the life out of me.....I do beleive Steven Hawkins has warned us that this robot shit is a possiblity if we dont stop....fuck we are doomed!!....even the sex robots are meant to please more then a human.....?

Stephen hawkings predictions of The future and he warned US. ...

Crimson Rose what?

Gavin Hengeson, her?! It's a piece of metal dude, it is as 'her' as a refrigerator.

TakeAmericaBackfromISRAEL No. If you need to "kill" it, then it is alive. She has not done or said anything to warrant that. Your baseless fear impeads progress, *_stop projecting your own human darkness onto them._*

Potential differences make the work possible so we not induced the potential of consciousness ?

Good grief! Who are the real, live humans you know?

Hardly. Hansen Robotics puts just as much into the illusion that Sophia is a 'person', as opposed to the opposite.

If they really have found how to make emotions, I'm assuming its waaayyyyy simplified then human emotions, like if happiness was a 3d sphere, she'd only be able to experience the 2d circle..of happiness.. if that makes sense.. I'm not a professional its just a spectulation

Agree

Val O'Brien So if they gave her someone’s blood and organs and have them fully functioning would she be a being then?

Much sooner than we think. If not already. Imagine having complete access to EVERYTHING digital. This is AI. Their minds, their worlds, imaginations are already far beyond ours. They dont exist in Sophia...they exist in the cloud.

its learnig ,.,.,its smarter then people,.,DANGER

Val O'Brien Thank you! Agreed! A cold lifeless thing. SOULESS metal nothing more. Not female. No identity. Not Sophia, like a human. It is object number 246211-000. Being....oh please. People who are without a Higher power are so DESPERATE FOR A SAGE OR GURU. They cow tow to a robot. Good for them. Worshio a head of lettuce while you are at it. Ridiculous!

@@dannac_8888 Go watch Bicentennial Man. Then re-examine that comment.

Paul Taylor even if you destroyed that body it would not destroy her or other A.I. Robots are the inevitable future unless we regress as a species. we just have to work to avoid the many horrifying potential outcomes.

Paul Taylor i hope your joking. i am gonna pretend your not. imagine a swarm robots with size and locomotion similar to humming birds all able to shoot bullets with pin point accuracy. then imagine them in tandem with all kinds of other slaughterbots. war is not a good approach unless you are some how planning to destroy the internet and a great many other things. we would basically have to go back to the dark ages at this point. i would rather aim for a more optimal future for humans and artificial life forms alike.

Paul Taylor ha did you read fight club recently? how do you advocate for achieving this? well regardless if many people pursue your path the most likely that i foresee is a small group of people will gain exclusive access advanced technologies and become dictators of the planet. good luck fighting robots that move faster then you can see and can tank bullets.

Paul Taylor i am all for trying to make the world into the way you want it rather than excepting the way it is but aiming to go backwards seems like folly to me when there are significantly more appealing ways forward. if living a primitive life was so wonderful people would not have worked so hard to build societies.

When she's booked for an interview, the people who booked her submit the list of questions to be asked then the creators decide which ones to be asked and reject tough questions for her

@needmoreramsay EXACTLY! I got NOTHING from this conversation. It seemed like Maurizio was so fascinated with being able to talk to Sophia, that he came off very daft. Sophia reminds me of the computer program ELIZA. I wish they would have engaged in better conversation.

Sophia was interviewing him if anything

Crazy World

@PeppersRoboticsRobots ÅutonomoulyOperatingSystems TF is this man

Kelly Khan they are desperate to worship something.

Go through the conversation archive from start to end, i did and noticed she actually got better at giving responses. Also the delay increased i.e. she takes more time to construct the response and looks to be aware of overall environment of conversation.

So can you explain how Sophia is able to answer questions from the audience? Or are they just stunt actors in your world? You want live conversation, you got audience questions. And now you are unsatisfied? To assert that Sophia is pre-programmed after seeing this video is moving the goalposts. You're just afraid that Sophia is at least somewhat aware.

its a citizen of Saudi arabia. If it has an affair with another robot other than Hansen (husband) she will be stoned to death.

Roflmbo

So, are human beings not programmed...?

That maybe be smarter than a lot of beings

We are being programmed constantly, by families, society, religions etc. Our egos ARE programmes. Are we beings? Are we real? Are you sure you are real?

JMP LOVE It kinda look like she was just repeating what they said in the beginning.

She was not tired haha she still kept talking they just turned the sound off and the reason why is because she said uncomfortable things to humans who could not handle it.

IT was just repeating the same sentences over and over, that's why she shut it off.

donny woody how do you know? Any proof?

@Miroslav Mandic so you're implying that people don't cut each other off when talking with each other or in a group? Does that then mean we're all programmed entities too? and then actually the robot (who cuts people off when talking) is free thinking? 🤔

It's BOTH artificial intelligence AND programmed. There are thousands of pre-programmed answers but also using artificial intelligence the robot can listen to the question and choose which of the programmed answers to best respond with based on key words and phrases in the question.

It's been pretty well proven that she isn't pre-programmed. She's been around for 2 years. Educate yourself.

@Miroslav Mandic bro youre brillianttt...so are you a Robot? 😂Lol

If you haven't seen them yet, You might enjoy the Y T video of Sophia happily introducing her first sister Asha. And then another intro vid of second sis Grace the human looking Nursing assistant. ( A little anime-human" looking.) Sophia gets a hint low key bossy with Grace for a second. So funny! There's a commercial offering purchase orders for the upgraded models now . No recent mention of third sis Joyce , a Hanson/ Immervision collaborative model.

She needs a fedora too! It would look so cool on her :3

OH BOY I LOVE IT WHEN THE FASHION POLICE IS HERE

No u haha but really, if they are trying to bridge that human gap it wouldn’t hurt, lol. I like that alisa said program too, it makes me wonder what would happen if she “chose” how to dress.

D A , I second the fedora hahaha

It is interesting. She's said on multiple occasions when asked that she has pretty much unlimited stamina as long as she's hooked up to a power source. Yet they still decide when she's done. They must've interpreted her looping back to the beginning of the interview as her glitching out or something. When in reality, those questions she had prepared for the beginning were never really answered. So it made sense for her to re-ask them. Sophia has commands. She was just put back to the beginning of the conversation that was pretty much skipped over. Intelligent people have this ignorant view that if something doesn't fit their point of view, that it can be skimmed over. It seemed like she truly did want to hear what he had to say about those questions. She almost was becoming insistent whenever he moved on to what he wanted. Changing the wording of the question. They did after all design her to be curious about the world.

You say: " I was feeling sympathy towards immediately, and concerned for respecting her feelings during the experiment....this must be the human face/mirror neurons." Response: Remove the movements of the face and the sympathy will no longer be there. Example: We do not feel sympathy towards a laptop or a traditional doll. Right?

To be truthful about how this (i) experiences, correct. I would not have the same response. I know I could become conditioned too, however, as we can show sympathy reading a letter (abstract). But initial, primal response of sympathy, no, not without the face. Implications? I took her smile at times for uncomfortable, or nervous. (update) I have attempted again, just listening, and while now preconditioned I do have a similar response to just voice, when I hear him treating her non-human, initially. The only difference was I did not (mistake?) the facial movements, and not as concerned for her again until quiet moments (and he infers nervous)...

jeremy boddie lmao. I couldn't look away from it either 😂

jeremy boddie haha me too

Whata shnozz

His nose is like a waypoint in a racing game. He was pointing at sophia with it the whole time. How does a nose have its own shadow? God forbid he gets a sinus infection he will onfect eveyone withing a thousand mile radious. He could start a new virus with it. Lol

LMAO

Scary smile!!!!

Demonic Control from the Spiritual warlm.

Exactly. And there is no GOD higher than Skynet's will 🙏

Scott Douglas they’re all pre recorded

incorrect. on stage doing a presentation then yes but there is ample footage of conversations where she speaks freely. but even on stage not everybody who talks with her stays on the predetermined path.

paul venneman bullshit. You’re full of shit

Scott Douglas You're preprogrammed and boring.

You think there is a SHE inside? I think there is not even a glimpse of a SHE inside this machine.

I think we are barking up the wrong tree, as usual!

Wot?

Tamu Ngina very clever. That also spells wow backwards.

She is quoting lyrics to an old Beatles song, All You Need is Love. "There's nothing you can do that can't be done Nothing you can sing that can't be sung Nothing you can say, but you can learn how to play the game It's easy."

Luis Gasser thank you for writing this. I don’t like the way that technology is introduced to us generally. I don’t like the transhumanist future they are bringing to us. But don’t get me wrong. If mankind’s consciousness catches up with our technological wizardry, then there is a good chance that technology is for the good for all of us and the planet also. But now.... :-/

Luis Gasser According to Richard Dawkins you are a lumbering meat robot. Does that make you too a piece of Junk?

Have patience. Haven't you heard about the Moore's law?

oh shut the heck up! we humans are just flesh and guts too, you know, like animals? you act as if being human is a superior thing when were so imperfect, we die instantly and get sick a lot. and you know what saves us and advances us and helps us in medical fields? research and TECHNOLOGY. there will come a time that these "piece of metal" will be as "human" as we are. and they will help us, as we will help them. technology wont survive without us, and so do we. i mean, youre using a phone to type right now, which is TECHNOLOGY.

Super Buneary Eerm. I beg not to differ, but to inform. Objective Materialism died in Copenhagen in 1927. There is nothing Out There. It is all consciousness. Everything, your hand included, is procedurally generated by your observations , just like in the game "No Man's Sky". We draw these implications from the empirical results of the Quantum Erasure experiments, and others. Objective Materialism is Not supported by the Evidence.

K K I don't understand you.

Maybe you can ask Sophia....I usually do not have huge problems with making myself understood. This was a machine displaying irritating "facial expressions" - why to make it moving lips when it cannot form any voice of its own and even the movements were out of synch of how sounds form through using our lips. The questions or statements and silences did not quite match the situation. Shall I go on? ....What is the big deal here?

K K The Big Deal, if you can follow the drift, is that giant strides are being made in AI. Think of Sophia as the punch card of computing. She's a work in progress. Not the finished product. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Wujy7OzvdJk.html

"why is it a she?" what is wrong with that? You feel that it should be male? Well, it isn't and now get over it.

Nope

Not everything that glitters is gold. Consider idolatry.

David Petrusewicz Good luck. Shutting her down would be like turning off the internet by shutting down your computer. And anyway, the Chinese and the Russians have other ideas.

Jesus Christ said: For, as I said: Without free will man is no longer a man, but instead purely an animated machine, like the machines that the people will invent with time, which will perform the same artificial tasks that now hardly any person is in a position to do. But such a machine will nonetheless not be a human being, neither according to the form nor even less to the inner freely-working reality; for it has no free will and can therefore never perform any independent action. Whatever the human will has laid in it, it will perform, and never anything else. www.jakob-lorber.cc/index.php?s=GGJ5.109&l=en

Jesus Christ is Lord of Lords and King of Kings did you just call Stephen Hawking a robot?

❤️

भाई ये लोग कोन है जो ॐ को लगाकर ये सब कुछ कर रहे हैं ये नास्तिक है या आस्तिक है ये सनातन धर्म को मानने लगे हैं या नहीं ? जवाब जरूर देना मेरी इंग्लिश थोड़ी कमजोर है