I started running 8 months ago. The first couple of weeks I couldn't run more that 15 mins because I would get a lot of pain in my shins and knees. Kofuzi recommended Asics Nimbus 25 as a really good recovery shoes. They did help greatly, allowing me to run for longer periods in comfort and I did my first HM in about 2 hours. When I started running I weighed 210 pounds and I managed get to 195lbs before the race. A month after the race I got the Nova Blast 3. I'm currently 190 and when I run in them I naturally feel faster. The shoes are lighter and it feels like nothing holds me back. The upper is way more breathable and has a larger toe box even though reviews said its a narrower shoe( my feet arent flat or have a high arch, 6ft height). I've been doing 5ks and 10ks, making them in the in 23 mins and 54 mins respectively. I've trimmed off 5 mins easily. It's personally think they best shoes I've ever worn. I hope to get the metaspeed sky plus later on this year for races.
So I have been running for about ten years, but have struggled to find a pair of shoes that fit me well for reasons I couldn't figure out. After researching using your videos, I went into a local running store with a few of your reviewed shoes in mind. I comment here on the Novablast 4 because, as we were trying them out, the man at the store realized that I had been wearing the wrong size shoe the whole time. I ended up having a wider foot than I realized, and my foot pain was because of my nerves getting pinched. I always just assumed this was just part of running (I know, silly in hindsight) but with some adjustment to sizing, I was zipping around the store and on my first run in a pair of Novablast 4's in a way I had never felt before. So thank you so much for your videos- to no hyperbole, you have helped revitalize my favorite hobby. I can't wait to see what's ahead! You have a lifetime fan now.
Just bought my pair and ran 6k on them this morning before sunrise. I’m going to pair them with the 1080 v13 for longer/slower runs while I’m preparing for some local 10k races and (maybe) my first half marathon here in northern Italy. Great first impression on the Novablast 4, the shoe is super comfortable and accommodating at my regular pace. Picking it up is smooth and easy as well, the foam is super responsive and you can see that the shoe is made to be a good overall trainer. Thanks for your detailed reviews man, I’m a big fan of yours. You help us normal runners a lot in choosing our best options in the market. Keep having fun running!
@@jicalzad The Novablast 3 is technically a few tenths of an ounce lighter but the DN2 just feels like less shoe on foot and I liked that feeling. In that sense, I felt like it did run lighter.
First run today with my Novablast 4, just 5k to test them and it felt amazing. I've been running quite often for several months even completing one half marathon per week before I had a mental health issue during December. That kept me away of running so I started again around mid-March this year. I'm not a fast runner: I can complete half marathon under 2 hours and 5k below 25 minutes as well as 10k under 50 minutes. All of these with Asics Gel-excite 9. Today, with just a bunch of trainings I completed 5k in 25:23 quite easily with the Novablast 4. Recovery was also great. Let's see tomorrow with 10k and upcoming longer runs how it feels but the start has been amazing.
I have the Deviate Nitro 2, it is one of the best daily trainers out there. Great grips, soft and bouncy with the plates and a super comfortable upper. What a joy to use
I only have the first version. That was the best shoe i ever bought. Remember then it was the shoe that i pick up everyday for my run... still running it in till this day occasionally. Nice review as usual.
If you like the 1st version, which I did too (still have one pair) you will like v3. v2 was not as good as 1. But 3 is like the 1 but better. And it's on sale now. Highly recommend if you're looking for an upgrade.
@@tomekb4gin5ki opened the shopping app today... And wow the Novablast 3 is available at about RM317 (Approx USD67). Its the LE version with similar heel counter with pull tab as in v4. Instant buy 😅
I did buy the version 3, the Version 3 LE to be exact with different heel counter than the ordinary 3. After all the discount vouchers the price was USD66. Just got yesterday. Step in feel was superb
Ran through 3 pairs of NB3 in 2023. Bought a pair of NB4 in December and have gotten an average of 60km/week since. First thing I noticed was indeed the firmness of the NB4 compared to the NB3. NB4 are more stable on the feet and takes corners with great grip. But I must admit I'll be going back to a pair of NB3 once my NB4 reaches 700km. I miss the squishiness and bounce when running. For me the NB3 is a more fun shoe to run in and I also feel legs fatigued in my less after a run. As you said, Ko. You can get a good deal on a pair of NB3
What's your recommendations based on your experience, I'd like to buy either one of them, most of my run is easy run that is around 5-8km, long run once a week and interval once a week. I did try to put on nb4 in the shop, they felt really good but I have no idea which more suit me, nb3 or nb4.
@@chuenyoophua6047 I'll have to say it all comes down to preference and running style. I mainly spend my running time in zone 2 and 3. For me that's around 5:45min/km. That's a pretty comfortable cruise pace for me, for others it might be too slow. I would say if you are around that or perhaps even slower go for the NB3. You'll enjoy the comfort of the NB3 and "sacrificing" speed wont be a concern anyways
I’m glad to hear that it feels more consistent even at 100 miles. With the NB3, I got to 100 miles quickly and it still felt great to run in, but that wow factor I experienced with the first few miles went away. I did get 330 miles before I had to toss them though. I’m 6’1” 210 so I suspect that might have played a hand in the longevity. I’ve been using the superblast almost exclusively and am excited to see what the next iteration of that will be.
LOVE my Novablast! Honestly think if you only have the budget to buy one shoe the Novablast is the way to go. I actually switched mid race to the Novablast during my 100k ultra a few months ago
@@kofuzi This morning they still felt pretty good between 8:30 and 7:15 per mile pace over 8 miles. Heel still feels great to brake on downhill. My Mach 5s didn’t make it this far.
I have over 400 miles in my version 3 and they are also still perfect, the upper still looks new and the sole is still in good shape, lasting really well. I do however have 3 pairs of version 3 i rotate and now have version 4 in the rotation also. NB3 are still KING over version 4
I bought my NB4s 3 weeks ago and am now working them into my rotation. I've been running almost exclusively in Hoka Rincons, Machs and Cliftons because of their comfort for years. I had been running mostly in Asics gels and enjoying them but felt I had to get away from their 11mm heel drop and Hokas were 5mm drop which felt much better. After putting about 30 miles on the NB4s, I am impressed by how comfortable they are and especially by how fast they are and they are fast. I still prefer the Rincons and Machs because for speed over varying runs but the NB4s were designed to go fast. Although the 8mm heel drop isn't as annoying as the 11mm Asics, I still have to get used to them. The very high stack is also an issue but i think factors into why they are so fast for me. I have become a forward shoe striker where my shoes show minimal wear at the heel with my Hokas even after 450-500 miles. My heels are striking more with the NB4s but it seems like its just enough to propel me forward. Takes some getting used to but so far, I really enjoy running in them for speed. I also expect them to last longer than my Hokas (which last me 400-500 miles). They won't be replacing my Hokas but add a different option for speed over longer distances. I went with the day-glo green too just to annoy people.
@@shpeksyy I'm having a problem getting used to the high stack of the NB4s and 8mm heel drop. All of the Hokas are 5mm. I don't know why the stack should be an issue. Mainly, I scrape my heels with the NB4s.
@@pasadenaphil8804 I was looking for a decent change from my rincon3. They lasted me for 400 miles and I took them as a recovery shoe, ended up using them as a daily trainer. Wanted to switch to something newer but as comfortable as they only more durable. Now I’m in a doubt again 😂
I'm not a Rebel person, but I'm still very much looking forward to your review of the V4 since I'm Peba-curious. 😉 I think the colorways of the NB4 match its new personality: more boring. My biggest issue with my NB3 is that there's never a situation where I reach for it instead of (one of my pairs of) Superblasts.
You may be right about Supers vs Novas but not everyone wants to drop $200 on the Super, and not everyone wants max stack all the time. (But hey, some do daily drive Porsches so you do you)
I'm heading to Japan as we speak, and they have the superblast for 22k (150USD) in my size. I think I'll just grab a pair just because they are so cheap (also I have a marathon coming up).
I've had the Novablast 4 for about 3 weeks, and I'm just shy of 100k in them. I'm really enjoying them, I didn't get on with the previous Novablasts because they were too unstable for me, but this one seems to be a sweet spot. I've done all my easy running the last few weeks in them and they're great, and I've just got home from running a 22:45 ParkRun (5k) which is a steady effort for me, and it really bounced along very nicely.
I actually like the Novablast 4 more than the 3, which is weird as someone who prefers the more chaotic original Endorphin Speed to the more refined and broader mass appeal v3. I think the Novablast 4 is a great improvement for me because I have dedicated workout and tempo shoes (Endorphin Speed 3, and tonight I just put my first workout into the Magic Speed 3). I work in running specialty and between my discounts and seeded (free) pairs, I have quite a specific rotation going. I had been using the Novablast 4 for shorter long runs (up to 12 miles) to save my Superblast for my longest runs incorporating some marathon pace work, until I got seeded a Triumph 21, which is now my LSD shoe (long slow distance, for those not familiar with the acronym beyond the drug lol). I think the Nova 4s are more versatile for those wanting to increase their distance, as they are more stable and more rockered (the 3s were a little slappy in the forefoot and I found myself wanting more rocker) and overall more comfortable. I don't really do anything faster than half marathon pace in my daily trainers (other than strides), and I don't notice a difference in the new midsole and slight weight increase. For those wanting a daily trainer that they're also going to use for intervals and fast stuff, while I don't think either version is ideal, I think the 3s have a marginal amount more pep, and if there's any reason to get it, it's the discount on the v3. As someone who gets the same price on the v4 and the v3 and can choose without the influence of a price difference, I favor the v4.
I'm 84 miles with the NB4 so far. I've ran in all 4 novablasts and these required more break in time than the other ones. The NB3 felt good right out of the box but the NB4 took me about 20-25 miles to settle in and now that the foam is broken in it feels similar to NB3. I love them the more I run in them!
I’m eager to hear your eventual review of the Rebel v4. I’ve seen/heard some exciting things about that update, but your comparison is tempering my expectations.
I ran in v.1 and loved it but eventually had arch pain from the instability on cantered roads. I am excited to hear they have improved the stability in the 3 and now even more in the 4. Gonna go with the 4 and skip the 3 so I’m not disappointed.😂
I wanted to love this shoe but couldn’t get past the heel slip I was experiencing so I sent them back after a few runs. Back to using the Superblast and weaving the Ride 17 into the rotation
Thank you for your review. I bought Puma Deviate Nitro after watching your reviews and so happy with them. I see they have discounted Novablast 3, but not sure, if I already ordered Saucony Triumph 20 for easy runs, I guess I am good for now.
Asics FFblast+ will not disappoint. Its like a tried and tested midsole😅. But I agree its the eco version was a but firmer compared to the novablast 3. But more stable.
Novablast 4 & nb 1080 v13 are completely different shoes for me. I use novablast 4 for speed training as it has an amazing bouncy foam which helps in increasing the speed gradually with ease. 1080 v13 is an excellent shoe for recovery & long slow pace runs.
I do agree with you, that bouncy feel is amazing with the NB3s I've been unable to do easy runs in them. Even if I try I still run my paces too fast but in a good relaxing way.
Love both the 3 and the 4. Completely agree that the 4 is a lot more consistent and predictable in its ride where as the 3 could change daily depending.
short answer: 10-20 miles or two to three runs long answer: I'll run however many miles it takes before I'm confident in my opinion. I'm comfortable reviewing a shoe after one run if it feels pretty straightforward, which most shoes are. if I get mixed signals, I'll keep running in them until I get a clearer picture of what is happening. but it doesn't take more than three or four runs when that is the case. and from a practical perspective, there can be scheduling externalities that may result in me running in a shoe 40 miles before I get the review filmed (maybe there was a lengthy embargo, maybe I had a bunch of other reviews I wanted to get out first, maybe I had some travel/events, or maybe I had a batch of shoes from the same brand and I wanted to space things out a bit).
I have done over 100miles in my NB4 and I must say they are feeling much better now than they did out the box, whereas the NB3 felt great out the box and didnt need to be run in. Version 4 felt hard and pretty dead out the box but now feel nice and squishy and am enjoying them, but still I return to my version 3 , they are better
@mrdsbaker Thanks for sharing because this was exactly the same experience I had. I got around 20 miles in over 3 runs, and the v4’s felt pretty dead and hard. Maybe I need to break them in more. I ended buying 3 new pairs of the v3’s just to have back ups. On my first 3 pairs of v3’s. I got about 350 miles on each. I will give the v4s another few runs… maybe when it warms up.
Just over 100 miles now on my novablast 4s I really like this shoe it's the best one so far looking to get another pair maybe something better if possible
Personally the 4 is like a refined version of the 3. Similar feel under foot but they fixed the issues with the outsole turning into an ice skate in the rain and the slappy sensation when running on certain surfaces. I use it for everything besides my longest of long runs, which in that case I bring out the superblasts.
That spot between my toe’s starts hurting around 3-4 miles in the Novablast 4 and around 6-7 in the 3. I went from the 3 to the Superblast and I can make it 9-10 miles. I was excited for the 4 and bought it the day it dropped I just caint run in it lol. I will be running my first half marathon in 2 weeks thanks to the Superblast.
Sacramento native here… i recognized ur footage at the start of this vid instantly. Ur runnin out in front of the Golden One Center. When u were out here for the CIM i assume?
It would be crazy to have a Deviate Nitro 2 for tempo run/daily training novablast 4 for daily training and a sc trainer v1 for marathon/super long runs? I'm thinking about adding deviate to my tempo run rotation
I've heard a lot of comparisons between these and the NB 1080 V13 which i have put 300 miles on. I'm 5'11, 175lbs and I probably put 30-40 miles of my weekly mileage in the 1080's. For about 100 miles, they felt so springy and good. I found them very comfortable at paces slower than 8 minutes and they felt great even at sub 7 minutes. While they're still very comfortable, that magic is gone. I'll probably still rock these up to 500 miles unless they start fatiguing my legs sooner than that. I'd be interested to see how the NB4's fair at 300 miles.
I stopped using my Novablast 2s after 300 miles. The bottom of my feet started feeling sore after longer runs. My Novablast 3 TRs are now at 150 miles and still feel good. The only problem I have with them is that the front has discoloured completely (orange sandy look) whereas the 2s still look clean. Skipping the 4s for now, longing to try something else next time. Maybe Hokas.
I haven't tried the Nova blast 4, but I did try the Nova blast 3. I felt the Nova blast 3 was very flat in the forefoot and did not have much cushion or spring. I think people need to keep in mind that most of these RU-vid reviewers are between 130 and 145 lb, so their version of cushion is going to be much different from "regular" people that weigh anywhere from 160 to 200 lb. I'm a 180 lb and fairly muscular, and I found the Asics nimbus 25 to have the perfect amount of cushion and pep to run slow or fast.
thanks for providing insight as to which other shoes you've been enjoying instead. a lot of times people complain about shoes and then don't provide context. and in that situation, it can feel like it was written by a bot or someone who just wanted to get on the internet to disagree
It's a tricky part of working in run specialty. I'm 5'10 135ish lbs, and also a mid-forefoot lander (most of the people we see strike more dominantly on the heel) and I often don't perceive much difference in cushioning the way heavier runners do, so when customers ask my opinion of a shoe I sometimes have to disregard my opinion entirely whether it's disregarding why a shoe works so well for me (the Novablast series is one I get along with really well) or disregarding why a shoe is something I wouldn't even consider (the Adrenaline has such a high drop and the forefoot padding is lacking as someone with a more forefoot-oriented strike, but it could work great for a heel striker). I also have to keep in mind that a shoe that has "plenty of cushion" to me might not be experienced the same way by someone who weighs much more than me and therefore will compress the foam more (the Clifton is an example of a shoe I perceive as max cushion-adjacent, while many others note a much stronger distinction between it and the Nimbus or Triumph). Despite the similar midsoles and I believe same stack heights, the Nimbus is a much denser use of FF Blast+ (eco) and still has that gel in there, so it'll deaden the impact in ways that the more energetic and airier Novablast 4 doesn't. You mention being fairly muscular, but mass is mass - muscle, fat, a pound of bricks weighs the same as a pound of feathers and your shoes don't know the difference, and it can be tricky to bring up this point about weight and perceived cushioning to customers because it really isn't a statement on anyone's body proportions, but about more force and more impact being put onto the midsole foams in these shoes and how that alters the experience.
Hello, I just started to run again after a while and I bought novablast 4 as my daily trainer. I had run for 30 miles and everytime I ran, it felt like both of my sole were in pain. Was that because my slow pace (9minutes/km) or I didnt have enough strength training to use this shoe? I need some advice, thank you 🙏
I’ve got 125 miles in my novablast 4, including a marathon. I love the novablast line, but the 4 are a bit too plush and the toe box is a lot warmer and less breathable than the 3. I’m excited to try the rebel v4. The rebel v2 was my absolute favorite.
No one saw the Hallmark reference coming, did they? After you and the FOD Runner noted the 4 was less fun than the 3, I splurged on the Superblast and am currently using it for everything. It's a great shoe.
I still want to try that Puma Deviate Nitro shoe and I'm less excited about the NovaBlast 4. Especially when I just found a pair of NovaBlast 2 hanging around for $65! I'm looking forward to your thoughts on the Rebel v4.
Great video man! I was waiting for this review and I am planning to get this shoe! But when the New Balance Rebel V4 was announced I was hyped as well and it became a good problem for me what shoe should I get! I am choosing between the two and I will wait for your video about the Rebel V4. Was planning to get both shoes and make the Rebel V4 as my speed shoes? Hope you can give me insights for this. Great vid again!
I like the Magic Speed 3 and its firmer more rockered ride than the Endorphin Speed 3 fits my workout preferences better (the Endorphin Speed 3 leaves a little to be desired once I'm cranking it past my mile pace, whereas the Magic Speed 3 responds better at those intense paces). The Endorphin Speed 3 is soft and bouncy like a Novablast with a more snug fit and better personality lol. I'd imagine both clash with the Rebel. The Magic Speed 3 is carbon plated and you don't break the bank (it's $160). I've been hearing good things about the Hyperion Max as well. I think that both shoes would offer something different enough from the NB4 that they'd feel like they have specific places in your rotation. The NB4 is comfortable over easier paces and longer runs but is more limited in the higher intensities, while the Magic Speed 3 and Hyperion Max aren't nearly as comfortable and might not be your long run shoe of choice (but can race a half marathon if needed) but can get the legs turning during your workouts much more efficiently than the NB4.
@@ielle. Thanks for this! I am actually a beginner and wanted to try running as workout/sport and I really enjoyed it so far! I am new to the sport so this really helps me more to understand it. So I wanted to get a daily trainer and a speed/5k or 10k or half marathon shoe for now. Will check these out!
@@rcardeno the Magic Speed 3 is perfect for what you're describing. It's a great introductory carbon-plated shoe (you could look into the metaspeed series once you're more aggressively chasing some half and full marathon PRs) and it's neither particularly stable nor unstable, which is relatively quite stable for a carbon-plated shoe as these types of shoes are often not typically known for their stability (some, more than others, like the Endorphin Pro 3 is said to be pretty stable). The Endorphin Speed 3 will feel better at slower paces than the Magic Speed 3 will, so for longer tempos and fartleks I prefer the ES3, but if I was racing or time trialing anything up to a half marathon I would choose the MS3 for that, as well as for my fastest workouts. The NB4 isn't as fast as the ES3 but is versatile enough to be doing much of the same work you might consider doing in the ES3 (NB4 feels totally fine up to half marathon pace for me, and only at 10k pace and faster do I feel like it's holding me back in ways where I wish I had the ES3 on my feet). The ES3 is great at 10k and 5k paces, longer workouts, and longer intervals like mile repeats (which should be approx 5k pace anyway). For me, it's that mile pace and faster where the Magic Speed 3 does what the ES3 doesn't. I would rather take the MS3 to a track than the ES3, and for longer tempos on the roads the ES3 is more comfortable and at tempo paces I don't necessarily need the little bit extra that the MS3 offers at top-end effort. Basically, the MS3 has more top-end speed and for that reason I would pair it with the NB4 over the ES3 due to the overlap, but if you didn't own a NB4 or uptempo-capable daily trainer similar to it, I would recommend the ES3 for its excellent versatility (a common 2-shoe rotation for many is Triumph-Endorphin Speed).
I have about 50 miles on the 4. My only complaint is that the tongue slides down and the tongue doesn’t come with a tongue loop. Very frustrating because it’s such an easy fix.
I have about 50 miles on my pair and am still kind of waiting to really enjoy them. They're not a bad shoe by any means but for me they've just been a little 'meh'. Sort of regret not going with the 1080v13.
Great video! New runner question. I am new to running and currently going through my first training block for my first marathon in late Feb. and I am running slow, goal sub 4:00 marathon so not breaking records here. I have been running in Endorphin Speed 3 which I have loved for 90% of my runs. Now that I am into 18 and 20 mile long runs for my training, my legs are really sore for the last 5+ miles and hard to finish the run. Considering I need to go 26 miles, do you think the NB4 is a good shoe that would be better for my legs in the marathon or is shoe not the problem and I need more training?
can you tell me which shoes you have been enjoying, for reference? sometimes different groups of people experience the same shoes differently. knowing what you like will help me in making future recommendations for other who might not like these shoes.
@@kofuzi hoka Mach 4(got the 5s..didn’t like..weren’t as compact) rincons great shoe durability terrible..carbon x2…im basically try anything that’s on sale..I’m looking switch from Hokas!
Would you recommend this shoe for quite a flat footed person like me? But have more of a neutral gait? Or should I stick with the Kayano 30 for the extra stability? What I like about this shoe is the energy return you have been saying and not much a fan of a super cushioned shoe because of the low energy return. Currently using a Nike react infinity run flyknit, at 84kilos at 5'7". Thanks!
Hey! I just bought the Novablast 4 as my daily trainer. Could you recommend me a recovery alternative from the Hoka One family? Will the Bondi 8 be a good alternative for the rotation?
Also not a fan of the trend of widening the base of neutral shoes to the point where they feel like Hokas. If I need stability, I'd wear a dedicated stability shoe
it was a trend that started in 2023 and I suspect we will continue to see a lot of it in 2024. that's what we get when a handful of people complain that they don't like squishy shoes. it ruins it for the rest of us
I ordered Novablast 4 today. An instant smile on my face as soon as I started testing them. Excellent return energy and overall fun to run in. I think they'll be a good pair with my Endorphin speed 3 which I use for my fast workouts on the athletic surface. But I'm thinking of completely switching to Asics line in the future.
I HAVE THE EXACT SAME SETUP RN!! I recently got into running have put 120 miles on my peg 40s since february and am very excited to switch over to the nb4s this upcoming week.
I’m moving from the New Balance Fresh Foam v3 to the NB4. Any thoughts on the feel difference? I bought the NB4 based on reviews and in need of new (daily/versatile) running shoes. I bought the NB4 without ever testing them and am awaiting their delivery. The last pair of ASICS I owned were the GT2000.
Hey, you made me run. And its fun. I am having the Novablast 3 and im wondering whats best now, considering getting new shoes and i cant help myself. Should get new Novablast3 and buy eather nimbus25 or metaspeed. or just get novablast4 and do it all with that... Im 38 years old, 90kg, gooing first half marathon in april. 70.3 in Sept. And full distances in 2025. Whalt do you guys think and recommend? thank you in advance!
Hi Kofuzi. Thank you for your reiews. You live in Chicago, where winters are cold. Thus , you can share valuble info about how various running shoes, expecially foam, plates, upper knit behave in cold conditions. It would be helpful, if you could share your thoughts about the above. Does it become more stiff in cold, less sringy, more stable etc? mabye other things that you noticed how shoes work in cold conditions?
@@kofuzithanks. But I've seen that Eva foams don't really work in cold conditions,i.e. they become less responsive, stiff, whereas TPU foams work the same way both in cold and warm conditions. If that's true and you noticed that, then it deserves to be told about in your reviews.
Found version 3 to be clunky and loud (compared to my normal Hoka Machs that I have been using for the last few years). Do you find this to feel less clunky and loud compared to version 3?
I used to be a Brooks-only guy, then tried Hoka Mach 4, and recently been in the Asics Novablast and Superblast, which now seem routine, if no longer exiting. I don't see Kofuzi talking Brooks much - has Brooks fallen a tier in the running community?
Brooks doesn't pump out new tech all that much compared to other brands. Experienced runners seem to like the Hyperion line and the Aurora is a well-liked trainer, but their market is really catered to the newer or more casual runner who will walk into a run specialty shop, get fitted into a Ghost or Adrenaline or Glycerin, and buy them year after year as most run specialty customers do once they find a shoe that works for them (and most run specialty customers aren't runners). The Beast/Ariel is one of the best sellers at the run specialty store I work at, and it's not exactly a shoe the shoetubers are going to be talking about as it's a shoe most people wouldn't think to run in (it's classified as a running shoe and you'll find them in virtually any run store, but they're heavy and stiff as a rock meant for people with severe gait problems or plantar fasciitis, and podiatrists frequently recommend this shoe and refer their patients, list in hand, to stores that stock them). One thing that is polarizing about Brooks is the very high drop of their popular models. The Ghost and Adrenaline are both 12mm drops, and in these models a lot of forefoot strikers find the forefoot of the shoe to not be cushioned enough (a 12mm drop is really more beneficial for heel strikers). It loads the knees and hips more than a lower drop, but requires less work on the achilles, calves, and ankles, parts that newer runners haven't developed quite as much, hence their success as a reliable shoe with first-time and casual runners (combined with the plethora of width options and reliable fit, e.g. slightly wide feet have no issues with Brooks which often don't have any sort of gusseted tongue. These shoes sell out mad fast at our store, models considered "bread and butter" to the business. They're frequently bought, and unlike Hoka (due to their strange shape that doesn't agree with a lot of people), usually not returned.
Great review. Would you recommend these or the NB 1080v13, or rebel 4 for heavier runner (215lbs), only run 5-10km distance at moderate pace. I also have 2E width feet
I returned my Novablast 3 LE version because I did not like the upper. But I regret it now. I can't find another pair of the regular version my size. I've been enjoying the rebel V3 a lot. Those who did not like Novablast 3 did not not like them for the same reasons they did not like the Rebel V3. So I have a feeling I am not in that camp. The last thing I need right now is another daily trainer but I'm still hoping to find a pair of the Novablast 3's.
@@kofuziI found them my size and on sale too. Why didn’t I get them sooner. Now they are in my rotation along with Rebel V3, Puma DN2 and Triumph 20 for recovery. They feel so good almost like they are made for my feet for all kinds of runs. They are probably the only shoes you need and a one pair for racing. And I’m not saying that because they are your favorites. But thanks to you for recommending them. I’m thinking I might get another pair before they are gone.
Debating on picking this up as my daily for my spring block (just started). How are they handling winter conditions: snow, slush, wet tarmac? May grab the TR instead and scoop another 3.
Seems like a good daily trainer, but i dont know where daily trainer fall into my workout anymore. I use Speed 3 for tempo and intervals, Triumph 20 for LSD, and Kayano 30 for recovery run. What kind of workout do people use daily trainer for?
You might not get a reply from Mr. Fuzi since he didn't get along with the ES3, but your plan seems sound on paper. He would probably pick TS8/9/10 for a speed day though.
love your videos and commitment to reviewing so many shoes - reckon you can chill / make the disclosures quicker though? especially when i watch a few of your videos back to back - they're pretty long / we get it lol
if you hit the L key a couple times (or double tap on the right side of the screen a couple times) it'll fast forward 10s each time the disclosure is worth including on each video