NVIDIA GeForce RTX - Official Launch Event 

And it's much more powerful than our Beta RTX model called 2080ti 🤣

"...heres the RTX3090," *takes it out of the oven*

i died reading this!

Well is corona virus time so is hard making a huge announcement in a event.

And a 3090 in a fucking oven

At under half the price.

You wish so, just keep blindly believeing all what they saying and comparing. Nothing to do with smart marketing right 🤔 Anyway good luck to you when we see actual benchmarks ✌️

phong nguyenviet you should wait do you rly belive this????

Joonas N. Well Digital Foundry got the 3080 and proved that there is a minimum of a 70% performance gain over the 2080, with most titles getting near double performance. So I believe that it’s quite realistic to say that the 3070 will have somewhere near the power of a 2080 Ti

Adreaux yeah that shit is sick

6 DAYS LEFT

Lets hope the prices arent gonna suck and will stay the same...

@@ThunderBlastvideo hopefully

3.5 days left!

@@ThunderBlastvideo I've heard rumors of $1400 for the rtx 3090

You have an RTX 2080ti?

@@ClintochX RTX 4090 and RTX 2080ti on a old pc

​Upgrade your CPU bro

In traditional raster 2080 Ti is a 1080p GPU since the Geforce 40 series release. Considering RT it should render below or around native 720p res (then upscaled to 1080p with DLSS) for stable fps. 2080 Ti is a revolutionary GPU by 2018 standards in the graphics silicon industry. The rest of the market is building upon it today.

@@Shehryar89 its a 1440p gpu still on high and ultra settings,not with RT tho

Shut the fuck up :)

thank you xD

thank you

Thank you King

Ty

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Yes indeed

But now they are focusing on data centers it's a bad idea

Lol what?

shut up

@@masternobody1896 data centers are more important. games dont really matter as it is for entertainment

This aged well

It is here

Who's gonna tell him?

@@deebo821 Noes goes

In the water and the particles

Yep! RTX 2000 was a scam. But they've outdone themselves with the 3000 series.

@@rickandelon9374 weel they nailed the tech in 3090

What's so funny about it? Those were the greatest GPU's at the time. And because it was a new tech, it was very expensive.

@@user-bv8wr3vw4x Historically, there have been bigger leaps of performance without ridiculous price tags.

price will go up again when Nvidia go back to TSMC for 5nm next year! samsung 8nm is not that good thats why higher watts and cheaper gpu!

On god

I remember my first major step into better gpu and game play. I built a rig myself and part of build was 3 way sli with 280 video cards. the video cards cost more than all the other components. But was it smooth. Ran every bench I could find. Was a blast. Just built a new rig with a 2080. :)

The thing is you are still playing game on both the machines....

AMD be like "hold my beer"

Aged like milk

@@blazeddddddd Naw his 2080 will be fine for at least 2-3 more years, maybe longer

Yes

Wow intel Launched the Acr First " Dual Channal " Vram Gpu [6Gb (2*2*2Gb) Vram]

@1234 True

also 1:21:56

@@ploopybear xD

It just works. Works like Fallout 76

That aged well just like Todd Howard's quote

@@Koozwad well you shouldn't be expecting him to explain the mathematical computer science jargon on how everything just works to an audience who probably won't even understand most of it. Hell even he probably doesn't understand most of what's going on behind the scenes. You can just see for yourself if everything's just working or not

They are doing great

They wouldn't need to. They have path tracing which is a superior technology.

Ray tracing and path tracing are essentially the same technology. RT cores (Nvidia) and Ray accelerators (AMD) can still help offload pathtracing calculations in both games and rendering softwares. ​@r05dc

Many things usually has to draw by game developers to simulate things related to how light interact with things. Soon those things wont be drawn into games anymore because developers will assume IT JUST WORKS. Saves them a lot of unnecessary effort and gives much better results. If you have a 1080 Ti...it wont just work...it'll look like crap because all the fake shadows, reflections, etc are not meticulously drawn into the game anymore...but by the GPU itself...in real-time. And then there's the AI image enhancement.

Wow intel Launched the Acr First " Dual Channal " Vram Gpu [6Gb (2*2*2Gb) Vram]

​@@INDIA-yi1sli think it's triple channel

Thanks to mining.

Me

Yeah

Me

Me

Dude, you must be smoking some real good shit.

Lol

now look where we are crazy..

New awesome graphic cards that I can't afford

@@rawjames1 Well now can get an RTX 3050 GPU for only $250.

@@aninditabasak7694 rtx 2060 iz actually usually cheaper than 3050

Good luck for the giveaway = )

Richie Dhillon this is founders edition price is not 1400$ the tax makes it that Wait for the card to actually release Amd Vega 20 will not be able to beat 1080ti and 2080ti has ray tracing

AMD GPUs don't have hardware and AI accelerated ray-tracing. They didn't raise the prices for no reason.

And judging by AMD's past it will be too late most likely. NVIDIA being a bigger company can easily pull the rug from under them. I bet they are already working on the next gen of cards after Turing.

Have you seen the AMD leaks thus far? Vega 20 is coming out THIS year, would be less than half the die size of Nvidia while offering 25% higher performance. Even if both of those leaks are gross overestimates, AMD will atleast have a competing product at much smaller die size, making it much cheaper for AMD to produce. Nvidia refresh wont come around for atleast a year and a half. And Nvidia just launched a new architecture, they have never before refreshed a product in less than 18 months. You do the math.

What they might do though is make a version without the the ray-tracing and AI cores (it's a bit early for ray-tracing still) and sell it for cheaper. We don't have any performance figures about any of these cards. I think NVIDIA was justified in making the move towards ray-tracing (someone has to do it) and that obviously comes at a price. I'd jump ship to AMD if they could actually compete properly in the high end market. So far they haven't really done it.

no its not

aged like milk

I wonder if they sell them in man-size as well

2080

Boring to see he wear those jackets, he should wear bikini next year.

Over ten thousand

RTX can't handle Minecraft shadow details xD

i do.

5 years later are you still running the gtx?

Aleksander Olson yea idk why 🤨

Rtx 2080 ti 1200$ btw

@@amine8124 I bought it for 1650$

not me either bro

Underrated comment

u didn't get it did you? :D

The reality is the fabrication process is becoming difficult because we are getting to the point of such small transistors, the yields are getting smaller and smaller. a 7nm transistor gate is so small that if a spec of dirt larger than a couple of atoms can spoil a chip. yield goes down price goes up. we are in the era of more expensive silicon. the truth is i'm willing to pay more because i know how powerful this new technology is. I'm 40 and started playing with the atari 2600. the chip in the atari had 4,237 transistors on it. My gtx 1080 has 9 billion transistors. my parents paid 300 dollars for the atari 2600. i paid 860 dollars for the gtx 1080. the math works out to 2 MILLION times more transistors. that is incredible.

This comment made my year! LOL!

Sure, cryisis 4 on ultra with rtx and cryengine 5 8k 60fps

Better question is: can Crysis run RTX?

I'll do you one better, why can it run Crysis

If I had to guess, they would probably focus their efforts first towards VR. They've done a lot of work on it but it's more a question of "how optimised can you get" at this point. Even if they'd conquered the 2D space, real-time VR rendering would need serious touching-up to achieve that level of realism without using monstrous resources. This is probably true for most aspects of computer graphics; as Jensen said Ray Tracing was an incredibly intensive process that was just inefficient for the most part since tracing every photon's trajectory - even the ones that you can't see - was just wasting resources, so they literally thought backwards and thought of reverse ray tracing, this time starting from the eye instead of the light source, and that basically perfectly optimised the issue. Big achievement on the lighting and reflection front. After this generation of graphics, they would probably tackle physics optimisations like smoke effects, considering that many of these still clip through solid textures (you can even see it in this demo, the steam from the machines just clips through the ascending platform - 43:53). I would picture the bomb at 1:31:28 exploding around the buildings instead of through them, with smoke rolling up the street, creating more realism. Even though NVidia showcased dynamic smoke and fluid physics back in 2007, it looks like most developers don't use it in today's games for the sake of preserving resources, and I believe that's what they'll tackle next. After VR, I guess they would start tackling more real-world problems, maybe microscopic renderings for medical applications, using AI to create more accurate projections, damn I mean who knows? But hey, that's just a theory.

Wow, thanks for taking the reply. I agree completely and a it's a very plausible theory. Don't really have anything else to add to what you just said. Thanks for taking the time to type that.

There is still lots of ways to go. To get fully path/ray traced games running at say a 8k 60fps would be the first big goal. It could take 18 years to achieve that on a reasonably priced card. Then comes maxing out the frames, 8k 144fps or 8k 360 fps then 16k 60 fps or 16k 144 fps would be the second goal. Then comes doing all of that on VR. VR requires the same image to be rendered twice with some offset for both eyes so that could take a while. That would be the third goal. Then comes more texture detail, better realistic physics and stuff like that and being able to run that on VR as well. That would be the 4th goal. After that idk larger worlds, more polygons? That could be a 5th goal Doing all of this would take ages. We could also have realistic npcs with some proper ai instead of current decision tree based npcs. That is also something a gpu does. That could be a 6th goal.

After no more improvements will be left then integrated graphics cards will attract focus, and competition will be based on price, size and power usage. But once that is done, these manufacturers will have to find a new market, or better yet *create* a new market, that is, making processing units entirely designated for physics simulation. Games today look realistic but they don't feel as realistic because there are a lot of limitations compared to real life. In some modern games, something like a tank can't run-over a tree.

It fascinating that we are advancing in technologies that are better than us

runs better but got nothing to run with like games/apps so 1000$ worth of nothing, too bad their super computer couldnt make this video in 4k and just 1080p. i wouldnt pay more than 600$ for a videocard.

fucking hell, that's me AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

good guy 😹😹😹😹😹😹😹

Sneakerhead_107 me

Games and graphics are often the main drivers of innovation in computer science.

Its like NVidea HairWorks. If the game doesn't support the technik, you don't cna use the extra performance. But if the Game support it, you have much more detail without losing performance.

yeah but more developers will use the technology... they said, before this technology all reflectiosn and lights and so on were difficult to make, but not anymore. Besides prettier games = more costumers ;) Besides it doesnt affect only games but also hardware like monitors. you could play in 4k hdr 100+ fps, now imagine if the demand for 4k 144hz rises in the next years, the prices will go down too.

btw 1:40:56 benchmark (sort of)

YayL thanks man you too

Yes man same here.gl to you

Good luck boi I'm in it too!

what do you think of my new profile pic or do you still see the minecraft one i did 4 years ago

You could always, idk, look on the website?

2080 has 2944 cuda cores

14 TF. It was in the presentation

To who?

probably the comp scientist from the 1970's

Also would have to bring a modern PC and games to show off what you can do. Pairing an RTX card with any really old CPU would be a major bottle neck. Plus old motherboards couldn't even support modern GPUs.

"heh. easy money."

£1099 for flagship card, WTF!!!

FeAr FOX I have a 1060 and I do art with ray tracing on 2 hours of rendering is what it takes to make 1 raytraced frame

me too gtx evga gtx 1050 ti its great for gaming especially battlefront 2 and pubg

Yeah "great"

I have a 970m

I hope it is awesome. who knows maybe the 2070 will actually be more powerful than the 1080ti. Then at least the prices would make since

Calm down, it won't be. :)

@@GeorgeD1 It Is though i think? xD

So we can laugh at 2080Ti users 🤣

Nope

I want Half-Life 3!

He was saying the new series starts at $499.

Yeah. The series starts at $499 (the 2070). The 2080TI Founder's Edition is $1200. The Standard Edition will retail for $999.

Dennis x vat

and they botched it, like bad.

Yes, God forbid a company tries to make money

10 years R&D and one of the biggest chips ever created yes "MONEY GRABBERS"

@@hyperusgudgeym1724 I agree those people just like cry like cry babies. Don't buy a 1000 dollar gpu what made the biggest revolution after CUDA what is 10 years ago but baying a 1000+ dollar smartphone what is probably 200 dollars in production is not cash grabbing and is fine??? I really don't understand those people sometimes...

reddead2067 price is 999 1200 is for founders edition You can get 2080 or 2070 who is asking u to go for a particular card these cards are still way more powerful than last gen plus amd is not even there in the competition

that's the theory but in reality just like we saw with th 10xx series no board partner will sell their card significantly below the founders edition price. many premium cards will probably even be priced above the FE again just like the 10XX series.

yes.

yes.

It's sad we will most likely never get it again 😔

@@EnlightenAlchemist At least Low Profile GPUs are getting faster so that's a good thing.

It's actually $0019 in Aussieland because everything is upside down.

I'm here for the 3090

yes, and people forget that 2070 is better performance than titan xp ($1200) lul

And now the 3000 series is here