Nvidia's Jensen Huang and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg recently revealed their visions for what the Metaverse will look like in the future. Watch both presentations and see how they compare. #omniverse #metaverse
You may have misunderstood Metaverse. It’s the future of internet, so one company can’t build the internet. All these autonomous planets connect to the Metaverse. So both are contributing to the building of the RPO or Matrix or whatever. I own both stocks, including AMD. 😅😂
I think Nvidia sort of got the right idea. If VR is to succeed it needs to be more like what the world wide web is now. Content creators need to have a way to easily add their own virtual content to a space that is easily accessible by anyone. Basically have a VR client that works like an advanced virtual browser and a bunch of development standards and APIs that allow developers easily add content to it. Of course Nvidia is going to try to make it all proprietary to rake in as much money as possible. I feel this is going to be a repeat of the browser wars where at first every big company will try to monopolize VR and just do their own thing, until we end up with twenty different virtual worlds that barely interact and people are divided all over them. Then someone finally realizes that virtual space is owned by all of humanity and will only properly work as a medium if it's properly standardized and the technology is not owned by a handful of companies. If I had to choose a company though I'd put my money on Nvidia, this is not that different from game development and they've got experience getting developers on board with their technology.
@@timwong3597 what do you mean who has the plan to build the foundation? are u familiar with the crypto space lots of developments being made and even outside of crypto.. everything is being built in convergence each technology is what will bring the metaverse to life... crypto (digital currency) is how we will be earning in the metaverse..NFTS..5g/6g/ haptic feedback. sensors, technology not yet known to us/..the plan is alredy layd out and has been for a long while this is not new its new to the masses. . transhumanism , will be a thing. we live in a fractal simulation inception we evolve with technology
@@ProdByGhost keep it real with you. I can build the metaverse. If I get the funding or find an artist to help me make a few NFT. And the way I’m going to do it. I been around when games were evolving and social media(old school ones before MySpace and Facebook) I’m coming with experience. I think , I put my first VR in the 80s or 90s in San Francisco. If an companies get a hold of it first. They can set the price for a creator who wants to create on their platform.
I don't think I'd want to be a part of a metaverse owned by a particular organization, no matter how they put it. That will be putting so much data and power into the hands of a single entity. We'd be literally handing over data that we wouldn't want anyone else having. The metaverse should be open source, built by the people and for the people. That is a metaverse I'd want to be a part of. Side note - can we come together to stop calling it the metaverse? Maybe Nexus... just saying
Nexus is an old phone & high speed internet company & what’s the difference between owning an android or iPhone? Xbox or PlayStation?That’s still a particular organization with data your relying on. Just saiyan but I’m open minded so your welcome to school me
Is it just me is this really just 2nd Life 2.0? The Facebook perspective seems lame, however I can actually see the use of the basic Nvidia functions on digital twins
Omniverse seems likes it's aimed at professionals and people who are looking to be productive , Metaverse seems like it intends to distract people even though they claim to want to make working easier.
Nvidia's Omiverse is only the plumbing/infrastructure that enables Facebook, and the millions of other developers to design their unique version for the Metaverse. Nvidia offers Servers, display, AI scene generation, software infrastructure, avatars, AI animation, audio, translation and visual enhancements, and real technology to deliver immersive experiences. Nvidia have been running their own "3D collaborative space" with digital twins for companies like BMW, Lockheed Martin, Bentley Systems since 2018.
Humanity is doomed... & all these fools love it.. people are lost .. this government is sick ..along with all these top people ... they were leading us up to this .. with their little covid routine first .. i buy none of it .. these guys are sick..
New tech like this will allow us to reflect on our physical reality differently. Concepts needed to create the virtual world will bring new vocabulary. I believe New Science discoveries/rediscoveries (physical world) will reveal a radically different reality and we will be able to digest it easier using that new vocabulary
@CosmoSapien That is a false assumption of what Capitalism is about. These modern corporations do not represent Capitalism. They have become "Oligarchies" and there is a huge difference between the two. Capitalism is about individual rights and liberties to where the individual is able to keep the profits of their labor and achievements. Someone needs to go back and read up on some American History. The Capitalism that the founding fathers fought for is not the same thing as the interpretation that Modern Mass Media is trying to convince you that it is. I would never trade in Capitalism for Socialism!
The BIG problem with this is one with any technology that tries too hard: If it substitutes real life, it doesn't work. It has to add to real life to be a success, not substitute it. Apparently depression and anxiety cases skyrocketing since the dawn of social media haven't taught Zuck anything. All this is sounding more and more like an isolationist dystopia by the minute.
Ur right. If can do work, hangout with friends and literally anything by just putting on a headset then I'm sure most people will not leave their homes in months.
The problem I have with Zuck's idea is that, in his metaverse, we're all using a facebook login to do anything, even if we're just puttering around in our "homespace". Nvidia's omniverse idea feels like what's gonna happen if people keep investing in NFTs.
Wrong, the "absurd, not needed at all" comment is yours. Like dude, what is even wrong with you? All this guy is doing, is that he's just sharing his opinion.
@@SemGabelko stop being jealous of zuckberg :) most propaganda against him is anti-semitic. people comparing him to an alien, lizard, robots and what not
Yeah, I worked in VR until recently. Except for some of the kids, most testers did remove their headsets after minutes. Unless they rethink vr goggles and stuff, Metaverse is just a prototype.
Correct, i think what meta and omniverse are doing is to create a slave of thier companies, they are trying to create a habbit that is not required when there are better problems to solve
Lmfao bro, do you drive at night? Do you wear glasses? Led lights doing more damage than you realize. So is that unshaded light bulb that burnt out your peripheral vision. The light par values of a vr headset dont cause eye damage. TVs from the 90s were worse for us and I grew up watching my family glued to that cable box. They arent blind, but they all desperately need glasses tho, they all also don't use shades for light sources that cause damage.
I've spent 6 straight hours in vr skyrim, and I never spend less than 40 minutes playing dirt rally vr. I'm a middle aged man. Idk how people can stare right at light bulbs but you cant handle goggles with tvs in them that are designed to be looked at. You know what's not designed to be looked at? All those unshaded lights that are causing blindness.
All this is, is vr chat with gta online shark cards. And society did it to themselves. Infinite bitcoin and its worth nothing. Copy and paste codes with ai moderation of licenses.
Metaverse looks infantile compared to Omniverse. While both of these basically look like Second Life with a "work feature" addon, Nvidia is definitely going in the more interesting, open and realistic direction.
This premise is pretty scary, Our future is going to be sitting in a chair with a headset on while AI runs the world. Tin foil hat may actually be a good idea lol
So? If people/sheep wanna do it that got nothing to do with you becuz it’s going to happen rather you like it or not…..nobody forcing you to go in the metaverse
The truth is we already exist in 2D virtual universes already, with companies building ecosystem solutions. Meta, Microsoft and now Nvidia are providing infrastructure for these businesses to pivot into 3D virtual universe by providing the build tools. This is so that once these technologies (VR, AR and MR) become mass accepted by the public, they would already have an existing solution in place. imo I’m loving Nvida’s approach though
Loving is not the correct word here. Please read this its not a joke nor an exaggeration not in the slightest. Privacy and safety... What a joke a cruel reality that people will oh so come to know that that will literally be the farthest from the truth in the future. They will keep pushing this world tho and we can all see this. Worldwide mass adaptation in every sense yes you can't hide not by land nor by sea. What does that tell you? If you had insight into this world you'd run far from it.
@@andreamoscoso4065 darling, you have your opinion and I have mine. You have your likes - which is fine, and I also have mine. I believe we can still coexist in this beautiful blue Oval we call earth. I LOVE Nvidia’s approach to the metaverse and as for privacy, let’s be sincere with ourselves we lost it since we were 12. I mean as far back as the early days of FB and Google we’ve been churning out our personal data. The concern should be how do we TRUELY get it back from these companies or better still run the system in the opposite direction so that those data become irrelevant to them. This is my humble opinion.
Nvidia seems to be a middleware between real world and digital world. They have the right approach. They actually want to help users and developers solve problems. Meta just seems kinda desperate...
@@feff232 honestly I think Facebook and Meta is a liability to society and the world. It is a net negative producer in our world. They have skewed and misdirected human behaviours. But hopefully with time they will perish...
Because Meta is desperate. It does nothing to help humans. One is about living in VR the other is about how tech will make are life better. Zuck just wants control.
Nvidia's Omniverse has more commercial use. It creates a digital replica of the real world like city, building, places, factory. Unllike Metaverse it is more like social interaction in a virtual reality but does not really have the actual environent. With Omniverse, it can manipulate object in different environment with a digital copy of the actual world.
Nvidia sounds interesting. Infrastructure and functionality with real end users in mind. Meta sounds trite. Social spaces curated in fantastical ways.... hardly unique or applicable in any meaningful way outside personal expression and adding load lag to importing other peoples assets into a meeting. Meta is targeting the VR playspace crowd. This seems highly artificial and disingenuous with the silly cake building animation and stapled smiles on all the cartoon avatars. Nvidia targeting working professionals who want to improve both real world and virtual spaces.
I wasn't excited about the metaverse until I watched Nvidia's presentation, many more use cases there. Combined with Blockchain tech like RNDR the future is looking crazy. Facebook is like a tumultuous ex, no matter how promising a new relationship looks with them (which it doesn't in this case) there is to much damage done in the relationship to ever make it work.
well since you put it this way, let me tell you : be careful who the "ex" really is in this case. fb might only be the hand of the ex. imagine an ex with interchangeable parts.
Lets further disconnect ourselves from reality by escaping into a world where house prices are even higher and the price for luxury is even further divided by those that manipulate the systems early and those that were too slow to act. Sounds stupid too me to plug someone into a matrix like data stream to play out a life you couldn't live. The scientific application to help people in needs is beneficial but all the other crap is just devolving humanity and further distancing ourselves from reality.
@@AshBethel unless your employers do and you like to eat and have an actual place to live, of course. Even if you're not forced, human are not atomic units isolated in space - it's perfectly reasonable to discuss this kind of thing at a social level.
It’s just the next evolution of the internet. I’m guessing you use a smartphone everyday? Well this is the next step which is replacing smartphones with AR glasses and video game consoles/tvs with VR goggles.
These centralized metaverses may not even communicate with other metaverses at some point. That’s going to be dangerous when we’re living in these things. Bridges are needed for all of life.
I think, upon all the three (meta, Microsoft and Nvidia), Apple is going to be big and disruptive. I'm not an apple fan, but hear me out. 1. Apple has face ID, and they are not getting rid of it, because for metaverse to work, they need face tracking. And for avatars, they already have animoji. 2. For a long time we are hearing a rumour that they are working on augmented reality glasses. Rumours say that they work by having every processing done on iPhone. So the device is going to be lightweight and practical. 3. More people will get into Apple's metaverse because of their fanbase
there's this blog by an analyst that theorized on this idea in such immense detail even before all the metaverse hype came in. I seem to have forgotten it because I remembered bookmarking it but I can't find it anymore :(
And a lot of people won't get into it because of who they are. No doubt whatever Apple does will be big, but their presence alone will create competition
Regardless of the early Internet or the current VR, none of them can simulate human feelings. Only after new breakthroughs in brain research can simulate various human sensations (taste, pain, touch, etc.), The Metaverse can enter the new the height of.
I'm into everything tech related, and as much as this is cool... It creeps me out. Are we all going to live in basements and use this tech to escape to virtual worlds...?
The same nerds who spend all day playing video games will probably do the same in VR. Most normal people will use the Metaverse the same way they use the internet now.
It should. Privacy and safety... What a joke a cruel reality that people will oh so come to know that that will literally be the farthest from the truth in the future. They will keep pushing this world tho and we can all see this. Worldwide mass adaptation in every sense yes you can't hide not by land nor by sea. What does that tell you? If you had insight into this world you'd run far from it.
Please read this its not a joke nor an exaggeration not in the slightest. Privacy and safety... What a joke a cruel reality that people will oh so come to know that that will literally be the farthest from the truth in the future. They will keep pushing this world tho and we can all see this. Worldwide mass adaptation in every sense yes you can't hide not by land nor by sea. What does that tell you? If you had insight into this world you'd run far from it.
We went from 3D buttons, desktop metaphors that literally looked like real life objects, to stylised metaphors of flat buttons, scrollbars etc ... and now we are back trying to recreate the physical world in the virtual space. Think about the convenience of roaming a virtual mall vs searching for something on amazon. Each has its pros and cons, but I wonder how that will complement or replace the web. Remember SimLife?
HELLO, I'M NEW TO CRPT0 AND FOREX TRADING AND I HAVE BEEN MAKING HUGE LOSES TRADING ON MY OWN BUT RECENTLY I SEE A LOT OF PEOPLE EARNING FROM IT. CAN SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME A NEW STRATEGY OR AT LEAST TELL ME WHAT I'M DOING WRONG?
I lost £1200 carelessly trading on a platform before I was referred to Mrs Diane, she recovered the loss and made an extra profit of £4600.. I will advice you should stop trading on your own if you keep losing and start trading with Diane Walter trading services.. Consistency is key✌🏻
it's not about watching videos about trading and wasting your time on strategies like i was ignorantly doing earlier I was still making losses until Mrs Diane started managing my investments now I make approximately $7000 weekly. God bless her , she's been a blessing to my family.
Sooo I love all of the virtual ideas, worlds or workspaces but how will that effect who in reality will feed us with real food, housing and all the physical life we live...I don't see how that connects except for creation of new machines to create newer living/working conditions that people will still have to physically maintain.
Omniverse seems interesting, albeit they seem to be overselling it a bit in this presentation. From the tutorials they released it seems less like an all encompassing virtual world and more like a collaboration tool for creating 3D environments. Which means it will likely have to compete with Unreal Engine, which is already being used for similar use cases while being more versatile. Still, it looks very interesting.
Nvidia role is more about providing the tech to create things like Omniverse. UE could be one of the tool to create things like Omniverse. Similar like how you still need gpu from nvidia (or others) to run games or 3D rendering from unreal engine. But sometimes even when the hardware and software exist some people did not know what to do with it. So nvidia create something like Omniverse to showcase what you can do with their hardware and software. For the client side they can take the "template" that nvidia already build or create their own thing from the scratch. Either way will work for nvidia as long as they buy into nvidia solution.
Can't wait for Metaverse to come, because then I can travel to different places in the real world without stress, because few people will get in the way when traveling to different tourist places
I find it odd that at least three companies (Meta, Microsoft and Nvidia have all announced their alternative reality projects at once. Seems like a coordinated effort. There’s something bigger at “play”.
Nice to see 👀 there's another human on board with me ... this government with these top Dawgs are sick.. I see what you see.... & its been started since they started gathering everyone's data.. & pictures .. & everything you say .. I can tell u tons.. but ill end it here.. I dont buy none of it.. part of the master plan. For sure. These guys have no end... HEY CAN A PLAN A VIRTUAL FUNERAL FOR MYSELF & JUST INVITE EVERYONE NOW... WTF...
Nothing is bigger at play, these companies are usually working together or working on similar thing. Microsoft and NVIDIA collaborated on most dx12 features.
I feel like we should introduce AI into the omniverse instead of the real world. Because, they'll be doing real world applications and, doing things within real reality but, contained in the omniverse. Yeah, it can become sentient, and try to escape but, how would it know what real reality was?
There are ways for an AI which has useful real world information to know something like that. Also, would an AI without internet access even be useful in this world? There are also some fairly mathematical ways for an AI to check the passage of time. Also, if the AI can become sentient and try to escape, why would you expect it to not happen to get to know this while interacting with a billion clueless humans? Really if an AI has general intelligence and sentience (a tall order, to be sure), I don't think there's any sure-fire way of containing it
@@user-sl6gn1ss8p well ofc but, it's not hard to replicate real world physics and applications like you're saying. We do it in video games everyday. Unreal engine 5's "The Matrix" is the perfect example. We can build an entire world around it that seems real but isn't real. Like yes it would know that the building exist around it. but, wouldn't know that an earth existed. Sorta kinda like, different dimensions in a sense. and, time is relevant in every aspect so it'd literally jus be calculating time lmfao. I don't think it could do much with knowing time. and, he wouldn't be able to escape because, he wouldn't know which world was real. The physics is most likely gonna be/seem the same so it'd jus think it's reality was the real one and, it not knowing that it's being watched in a sense. (p.s, i don't think it's a good idea to introduce them to the internet cause, that really can turn out bad in ways we couldn't hope to conceive yet.) Wait until the collective consciousness and, knowledge expands we'll start to understand deeper ig. It most def is a way to contain it. If our technology get's good like its supposed to then, we could literally simulate its own universe so it's stuck and jus lives in the world. We can literally put it in the matrix with other A.I and, it wouldn't even know. Sorta how we are now. 🤐
@@smithhoowe lowkey probably lmfao. I wouldn't doubt it because literally 75% of the people around us are the same if you think about it. Unconscious and Unaware of alot going on.
@@AR-mx5tc Videogame simulations, including the matrix UE experience, are a long way from "replicating physics". They're impressive and do their job fairly well, but they're still quite limited - it just so happens that the products build out of them (usually) know those limitations and are built to avoid showing them, while capitalizing on what actually can be done. Also, if you want this AI to be useful to matters in the outside world, it will need information and connection. Also also, it would be in contact and "communicating" with a lot of people. People who will also want to use the internet inside this world, by the way, so again you have a supposedly generally intelligent AI which can become sentient and might want to "jump out", by the very definition of your scenario, which can't know about the internet despite living in a (virtual) world where the internet exists. If an AI has general intelligence, a lot of resources, is capable of reaching sentience and is to be in contact with a lot of people and have useful applications for the world, it won't be easy, if at all possible, to fool it about it being boxed.
It’s cool but until we higher levels of computing power and more advance VR tech the quality of the multiverse isn’t gonna be enticing enough for most people I don’t think.
Meta is more entertainment-based which is why it will most likely gather more users and buyers. But practically speaking Omniverse is way better off in terms of productivity and real world use.
Nvidia seems to be focused on creators while Facebook is focused on users. It will be interesting to see the outcome on these different directions. I except that Facebook will be great at generating early interest if they can overcome their bad rep regarding user data and security, however I believe Nvidia will build a rock solid platform, drawing interest from major creators. Those creators will will do the real marketing, drawing the masses to the metaverse. Players like Microsoft and Sony are notoriously bad at creating good social environments and google doesn't seem to be making a play. Other so-called metaverse companies seem to be a bit gimmicky, so I expect Meta and Nvidia will go head to head in this race. I predict that Meta will sprint and lose momentum, and Nvidia will pace itself for the long run and the win.
Basically this is just a prediction of things that (may) come in next 50 years or so right. I don't think we will get devices that are capable of doing these stuffs any time soon. Even though if its coming right now a high end Gaming PC might be the only thing capable of running this, I don't think my flip phone will ever be able to handle these.
Have you been paying attention to the current innovations in quantum computing? They are getting smaller and easier to build, cheaper and the amount of qubits are nearly doubling each iteration... Just wait until this technology improves and advances and gets thrown into the mix with current A.I. and Machine Learning Algorithms... Eventually you may not need a "GPU" to do all of the pre and post processing to where it'll just do the drawing or rendering itself where most of the calculations for the 3D Scene, its lighting and shading, and the physics would be done on cloud servers.
@@skilz8098 still this thing will take decades, he’s not talking about something they are launching next year or so. Stop the cap man. Even tho this technology is available right now they will still struggle to make it into production, just imagine how chunk of a hardware is required to run this level task. May be they can, still not now, just some concept in far future. Imagine flying cars that’s this thing…lol The concept of flying cars are possible but it’s too expensive that making it into production is not possible. It’s the same old cool thing only exists in fiction right now. In far far future and all it will be possible. May be next generation.
Telln you ... all these peoples asleep ..hey everyone got the shot though .. now what's next 🤔.. this government & all others are sick . Master plan for sure.. & they got all these idiots eating out there hands. I dont buy it... I see what you see 👀.. your the fourth .. I find on these comments with a greater mind... everyone else .. sorry for humanity
Can someone explaine me, why would any company creates a virtual factory ? Whats the point ? So people can see how they operate ? Or why ? Please explain
Not sure how these companies imagine the future of web technology. It is still so much hustle to get into this "new world". You need high performance mobile computing device. I think we are still far from this kind of technology. Then you can't visit the web in comfy positions. If visiting metaverse means that you are required to wear HMD, it still feels there are lot of sacrifices need to be made. I already feel comfortable with smartphones. Visiting the web on the bed laying down.
Omniverse Duh 🙄, it's not still obsessed with the one that went ew you're creepy leave me alone and then created a social media frenzy that the world went crazy over and still stalking over even though you're married.
Another great mind.. so far .. I have you me & GAB. Above your comment.. as the normal.. humans.. in all this .mess... people just don't see the big picture like us... wow..
I think that both platforms will have benefits. One thing for sure, this will help stop the spread of Covid 19, avoiding sick calls, saving gas, employee bickering, avoiding office building space, etc.
Please read this its not a joke nor an exaggeration not in the slightest. Privacy and safety... What a joke a cruel reality that people will oh so come to know that that will literally be the farthest from the truth in the future. They will keep pushing this world tho and we can all see this. Worldwide mass adaptation in every sense yes you can't hide not by land nor by sea. What does that tell you? If you had insight into this world you'd run far from it.
You have the power in your hands. You can cut the very blood line to these platforms. It's called the internet service. So, by not getting internet service, you're doing yourself a favor if you're that concerned about it.
I can see in the future mixing this with neurolink and you can have the web in your mind it would help with eye strains from head sets and it would feel more real.
Nvidia is known for the graphics processing and ultra real graphics. Just think what game developers can build when it comes to real world node triggering. Based on an optical data sensor array they can take that data and create the virtual counterparts to make a blended reality system. Trust that Nvidia is taking back their titles. They Are involved in high level deep learning algorithms and advanced AI mixed reality. Think game engine meets actual reality. It's going to be a wild 2022 for certain so get ready.
It is hilarious how they portrait the "physical world" as being the same size as the Internet or smaller than Ominverse. No scientist would ever do it, because it is obvious that the amount of data and objects in the physical world is tremendous. Any single patch of desert has more information that the entire Internet. Yet they go on to say "this new world will be larger than the physical world". Lmao. These computer guys should really go outside and spend a few hours studying some ants in the dirt - then they might see (though unlikely, cause they are not going to be looking) how real world is vastly more complex than any of their digital fantasies.
@@tiramisucocolands7952 I highly doubt, and if they will be, it will be the usual bullcrap: there is not a single "virtual" world that has anything close to biological systems we have in reality. Even "hardcore" science fiction is at best lame fantasy when it comes to biology: "invertebrates" having vertebrate mouth and teeth, nonsensical legs (like with spikes at the end) and so on. Graphic artists are notoriously bad in depicting any animal that's not a pet. And even when they do, those animals are still behaving like a biologist's nightmare, like all those wolves that attack a player for no reason in every game from RDR to the Witcher.
