OLED vs QLED TVs 2022: Don't make a mistake! 

So true

@@nr.1176 feel the same about your opinion. Even the well thought out ones

@@HolisticHunt even more true

You obviously have not seen the picture quality of the TCL 8 Series. It's not as good a picture of OLED but about 90% to 95% there. Definitely QLED quality.

The differences are inherent to the technique though, no matter if its samsung or tcl, qled remains a glorified va panel

Solid advice.

@@jon4lakers That's something you should've mentioned in the video don't you think? 🤔

I was trying to explain that to a customer but he said the q70a was good enough smh. I can usually guarantee a sale on a full array like a q80 or an x90 but man this guy was stubborn

@@doctorfresh3856 Was that a thing in January 2022 tho?

@@Jokamutta Been a thing for years.

Samsung's aren't brighter, QLED is. OLED is superior in every way beside brightness. Whether it's Samsung or LG's OLED. QD-OLED from Samsung is getting almost as bright as QLED now though. QLED is cheaper and brighter. If your TV is not going in an extremely bright room and you have enough money / want the best, then OLED is always superior. The viewing angels and colours are just amazing. I myself would go for Sony's OLED but all 3 (LG, Samsung and Sony) make amazing TV's.

@Max007 LOL. QLED may be brighter, but it is far from cheaper. It also fails far, far easier. Period. LG alao sucks in warranty. No comparison. Period. Take it to the bank.

@@trevorwesterdahl6245 QLED is way cheaper :) Idk if you have this thing called Google, but if you do, you could just check it out yourself. OLED is, definitely on the smaller models, close to 100% more expensive. Cheapest QLED at best buy is around 350$ and the same size in OLED starts at about a 900$. For bigger sizes the difference is less. OLED does fail easier but it's not like the old days anymore. I have 2 OLED panels which have no signs of burn-in whatsoever after 4 years. LG having bad warranty has nothing to do with a QLED vs OLED comparison.

@@maxjames00077 Now you compare tiny, not mentioned, TVs. I have been referiing to 65" or larger LG OLED vs Samsumg QLED. LG is charging MUCH more for their OLED. Won't buy LG again. Period.

@@maxjames00077 Sorry, read my comment more closely... It was a typo to say QLED. My comment was about OLED (the version that sucks and costs more).

how do i enable instant responce? I got the lg c2

I have heard on one review that the black levels on the Samsung S95B are better than the LG C2 & G2 ?

@@breaker1685 It's the same panel, LG makes them and sells them to Samsung.

@@huhdidwhat I think for the S95B Samsung they made their own panels - although Samsung have used LG panels prior to this on some models

I use a 55 LG OLED for 2 years now. I'm satisfied with it; bought it with some discount at the time and use it mainly as an all-in-one. I use it as pc screen, game on it and watch movies. I know that the only negative is the burn-in, but to prevent that I don't really put my brightness that high. Usually at 40-45, which in the evening can still be very bright. Maybe it's not a positive when watching GOT season 8... but who wants to rewatch that garbage anyway. As for most movies, I tend to watch the older classic quality stuff instead of the garbage that Hollywood is turning out for the past 5 years.

although the next size is 77inch

I feel your pain, but the 77 inch was not available when I bought the 65. Now I own both the 65 and the 77 inch and the 77 inch is AWESOME.

@@stijnvdv2 sounds more like movie complaining than TV rating

dont buy QLED lmfao garbage, technology is gonna die in 1-2 years l0l

Thanks for Watching!!! ♉ Contact me for INTERACTION on CLAIMING via handle above. You have been selected among our lucky winners!

I agree

So, that's the main difference? Thanks! Saved me quite a few minutes

Would you say QLED is a big jump from regular LED?

I got my LG OLED in 2018 and haven't experienced any burn-in. I use it as a monitor for work and play. I figured I'd have some burnt-in taskbars by now, so I guess I'm fortunate. Honestly, I'd still go for another OLED at this point. The perfect blacks I can't give up! Also my friend's Qled artifacts like crazy in dimly lit scenes of movies and RU-vid vids. I simply just ask how he lives with this lol, a few extra years of TV life when it looks like ass the entire time is beyond me.

@@Nahinalau Do you know what brand Qled it was? I’ve been thinking about getting the TCL R656 myself.

@Ugo Ewulonu sure man. I'm hanging with him tonight ill get you that in a couple hours

@@Nahinalau 👍🏾

Did the same. Got an OLED for my bedroom and a QLED for my sunny living room

What ended up being better bro?

Kinda except good QLEDs cost the same of OLEDs.

Samsungs mini led QLED models cost the same as LGs oleds. I got one myself and am pretty happy with it. The black levels are pretty good and it can get really bright

​@@twennywonn Only if you mean "good QLED" to only mean Neo QLED, which is so dumb when we see what amazing technology even budget QLEDs can have, such as the 2020/2021 TCL Class 5 and Class 6 series which both have full array backlighting, local dimming (true blacks), Dolby Vision, and mini-LED for the Class 6 Series, as well as still having amazing colors compared to most TVs in the last 5 years except OLED. And the Class 5 Series is only around $500 for a 50" (I personally got it on sale for $430), meaning you can get great technology and excellent features at a really low cost. And it's not just for people on a low budget either, if someone wants a ~75" TV and is considering QLED and OLED, a 77" LG C1 as compared to a 75" TCL Class 6 Series mini-LED is $2900 vs $1300 (USD, going off of the current sale prices on Best Buy for both TVs), or literally less than half the price, and the TCL still has better brightness on account of the mini-LED, over a 200 nit advantage in terms of max brightness. And if someone has a strict budget of $2000, which isn't that unreasonable for a working-class individual, then if they went OLED they'd be sacrificing a lot of screen real estate compared to a similarly priced QLED which is generally going to have around 20" on it. I will agree that Neo QLED is so close to OLED in price that it makes it not worth it in 90% of instances, but don't sleep on these excellent budget QLEDs with amazing tech, they can make a great option for a lot of people such as myself

@@burnoutcollectivist4660 I stopped reading when I saw TCL.They do make great value TVs but just not great TVs IMO. But you do you man be happy with what you have.

@@twennywonn I dunno why you would respond to a comment you didn't read, but you do you, your time is your own lol

Congratulations! I can't get a tv to last me more then 2 years it's pathetic

I have the GQ65QN90A and in combination with the PS5 it's just awesome

I'm thinking about getting the C2. I play games daily, and the LG OLED gaming features caught my interest. I am worried about burn in. As games have static things on screen at all times. Healthbars, HUD, etc. I hear mixed messages. Some say it's a non-issue these days. Other say they got burn in withing 3 months. So... I figure I should be fine. As I play many different games, and usually only for a couple hours a day. With the TV not in use the rest of the time. But I'm still reluctant. I don't want that constant nagging worry in the back of my mind. That every time the TV is on the pixels are slowly dying and running out of their limited lifespan. So I'm torn. If it lasts long enough I won't have a problem. I would hope for around 5 years. I guess they also have a warranty against burn in for that long... I dunno, I'm conflicted.

@@sawdust8691 Those burn ins must be some old TV or something. C1 improved the heat dissipation from thr CX models, I'd assume the C2 is better. I play on my CX everyday, even on games with long standing HUDs like Cyberpunk, Super Smash, or Splatoon didn't burn anything in so I don't think it's a concern

@@RaigonZelo ya... it's probably fine. I'll keep an eye on the prices. It's the time of year where they drop the lowest. I saw a while ago it was around 1700 for a 55in. C2, which is my preferred size for the room. It's already dropped to 1300. And still dropping. So I'll keep an eye out.

The burn-in on my LGs is horrific. A major issue. LG refused to do anything. Samsung's have no burn in. Samsung honors their warranty. LG does not. Will never buy an LG again. FYI: I have multiple TVs for a sports bar setting. Leave up an image that has, say an ESPN logo in same spot, it burns in badly. Horrifically. No thanks. If you just watch movies/TV shows, you are probably fine. FYI: the Samsung's have been outdoors for years. Only had one issue where I accidentally let one get rain soaked. Looked like washed out mountains. Self-healed in days. Samsung's are just durable, cost less, honor their warranty, and I never had one person say the LG image looked better. In bright light, the Samsung's are better. Everyone notices.

Also FYI: All my TVs are 64" or larger.

this is from tcl. a bit dont dismiss it all. actually pretty basic advice, with mild propaganda but do liststen to the basic facts.

It’s pretty biased

unbiased?? he is comparing a top tier OLED to a TCL instead of a top tier QLED like Samsung

THnaks for sharing , I am going to buy c1 for me living room too , but not sure about it too

@@starsbridge5115 my QLED had issues. Returned and got a C1.

@@FayyaazAhmed so to you think the brightness is enough ? Thanks for your time

I'm sorry for your loss. (Your money) buying samsung products is like going to a near by trash can picking out some trash and paying for it

Yeah. Many gamers advised me to choose a QLED over OLED cause of "burn in" and I didn't wanna deal with the constant anxiety and waste 1k

This comment helps alot!! Im a gamer and i was stuck on oled or QLed but because of the burn im going Qled

Me too. Its great!

Same here man, my picture setting is standard I don’t want to over work it and burn out the pixels

@@marentes133 Adjusting the picture settings shouldn't damage the pixels

This is a tv im going to get when the c2 drops so I can get at a better price or during the holidays this year

@@bignbad47I got a C1 but I’m def considering getting the C2 come Black Friday stuff. The C1 is perfection only negative I have is lack of brightness. The Evo panels of the c2 should solve some of those issues tho.

I mean, don’t take my word, but I’d say it’s worth it. LED to QLED is a huge jump. You’ll definitely see a difference. It honestly may depend on the price. If it’s $600-700 more then the AU8000 then maybe not. But I think it’s a pretty good purchase just because you get QLED

@@idkbro1228 Yeah I’m sure it is, but all the QLEDs I’ve looked at have issues like grey uniformity issues or something like that that’s a deal breaker for me. The TCL R656 doesn’t do 480p upscaling well and I have some older video game consoles that I want to look good.

Appreciate you.

technology has increased a lot since your C7

@@sgrulido ok..u spend the 1000...use the tv for youtube and other streaming. My colors were also totaly off after 5 years. Get back to me in 5 years and let me know how u make out.

The tech isn't even 10 years old yet. When pink shows up as purple, orange looks like green...and reg tv everyone looks yellow 5 years after purchase ? New....its was best pic money could buy...5 years later its not worth viewing and junk! My 480's lasted 20 years...my plasma 15 with barely any color loss. Oled...less than 5 years. Don't know about everybody else. But most don't have 1400 to throw away every 5 years. I went nano cell this time..half the money

@@z74birdman not sure everyone spends 8000+ hours in front of a TV

@@z74birdman What is your phone screen? Most smartphones use oleds for years now with a lot of static elemets and there are no issues so there is no reason to think burn-in or color fringing is an issue if the technology gets sufficiently advanced.

@@rockyj5047 well I can say from own experience that Qled blacks are black AF. The blackest blacks are largely due to the mini-leds dimming though, which works real real well but when it dims when it shouldn’t you see behind the magic.

@@rockyj5047 no, the QD OLEDs will have exactly the same black levels as both are self lit. The only thing that can make a QD OLED look worse is a too aggressive anti glare layer. The QD OLED display technology is an improvement over traditional OLED in every aspect

@@rockyj5047 so what was I wrong about? Do you even know how QD works?

​@@rockyj5047QD OLED is a type of OLED. The S95B or the A95K for instance have deep blacks like any other OLED TVs.

QDLED=QLED. Redundancy is redundant.

That’s sad, as I live on a village and don’t have optical fiber, to speed up the connection. The quality of movies from vod platforms literally sucks🥲

Dude I did the same thing. Upgraded from a 2000’s Sony Bravia to a brand new 55’ LG C2 Evo! Looks great and I’m happy I made the switch

How’s the burn in?

@@jackbaggaley8836 I haven't seen any. The TV goes to black pretty quick, like in 10-15 seconds of idle pausing or stopped video. Also has a pixel "cleaner" phase that resets any burn in.

Your opinion make sense, qled are generally easier to adapt to living rooms, as they are generally bright rooms in any house, but the new QD-OLED / MLA technology OLEDs, have to say really come close to brightness to top tier QLED making everyone question if QLED does still make sense at this point (if we don’t factor the burn in issue), microled will come might be the next big thing

Liked it so much, I bought the 75" version for my mom's living room. $840usd at MicroCenter

Thanks for Watching!!! ♉ Contact me for INTERACTION on CLAIMING via handle above. You have been selected among our lucky winners!

If you use an Apple TV / roku streaming device, can that web-os stuff be completely ignored? Or does it still get in the way when navigating menus?

@@jakej722 I only use the Apple TV so I never have to switch the input, and the Apple TV can control volume and power so I don’t even have the LG TV remote out because it’s pointless in my application.

I have Samsungs 55 inch ks9500. its edge lit with slight bleed on the right bottom screen but its a FANTASTIC tv. I am curious If I should go with an lg oled 65 inch or Samsungs new 8k tvs that are now center lit

@@em1ownerify Dont go 8k, it aint worth it now.

@@spartacuscreator ya but the 8k Samsung is almost future proofing yourself. When I bought my ka9500 2017 Samsung 4K was not really offered as much through app providers. Now they are and so are my gaming systems

@@em1ownerify Yes, YOUR gaming systems. Most of the gaming systems aren't even close and you're talking about 8K already. You think in 5 years 8K will push through if 4K even isn't that regular, ESPECIALLY in gaming.

@@em1ownerify Nah it’s honestly a waste of money. You would be paying way extra for a feature that can’t be utilized properly yet, and by the time it can be, there will be better TVs in the market that cost half the money of the one you bought. Happened to me back in 2014 when 4K TVs had just hit the market. But at the end of the day, do what makes you happy.

Does this play all video formats through usb port?

I bought the 65 and my only complaint was that I didn’t purchase the 77… well the 77 will arrive next Saturday. I’m freaking excited

@@user-oj8ss4zq3x how do you like it?

@@Dmahmoud17 it was definitely nice but I ended up returning it because my wife wanted a brighter tv so I ended up getting the qn 85b 85in. I know it has its short comings but overall its a great tv

LG doesn't make consumer Micro LED TV's. Samsung and LG are doing Mini LED LCD.

@@PSYCHOV3N0M fixed, thanks For the correction !

Yes they do? Qned - miniled It's actually the combination of three diffrent technologies Nano cell - quantum dot - and nano tech

And it’s also gonna be ridiculously expensive and out of consideration for most consumers

What’s the point of discussing TVs that are not yet in production?

@@justsaying993 $3,000 for a 55 inch and $4,000 for a 65 inch isn't "ridiculously expensive" considering the new tech involved. Most people expected it to be close to $8,000-$10,000. Also, the A95K isn't targeted at average consumers to begin with. The TV is aimed at Videophiles.

Samsung have a tendency to promise a lot over LG but is very hit or miss at delivering. The amount of Samsung 8K TVs returned to my store this year has been incredible to see. Based on that I would advice being very cautious when buying into Samsungs new QD-OLED TVs when they drop. Fingers crossed they can pull it off.

@@MR_K-RO why the returns?

Just ordered a G1. Looking forward to gaming on it, upgrading from a 2016 Sony xbr 4K tv

Good luck with the burn in 1-2 years down the line.

8K TV way to earlier

Smart decision. 8K is purely a marketing gimmick to get people to spend more money. There's virtually no 8K content right now anyway.

Hell yeah, I got the LG G1 EVO and my Xbox Series X and PS5 look great on it!

I'm torn between the LG OLED 4K, or LG MiniLED 4K.

You will only benefit from 120hz if you have Series X/S or PS5 games that have a 120fps mode. But whether you "see" it or not, it is an objective competitive advantage should you decide on a new TV in a few years.

Dude I'm having the same problem..... But that's just on destiny. Do you have that same problem with other games?

I mostly play destiny and find myself changing the settings way more then I should be

Play in Game Mode with minimal post-processing for games.

The difference between 60hz and 120hz is unable to be indistinguished. The difference is night and day. Either your TV isn't a 120hz, or your don't have 120fps enabled in your games. Or if those games don't have them optional. If you're playing 120fps on a 60hz display, you're gonna get screen tear (Stuttery/choppy display. Or bars slowly moving up your screen). If you build a PC, you'll never have to worry about any of it. Everything will run hundreds of FPS beyond 60/120fps. It's better in every possible way, even in price ironically. When it comes to 99.9% of console owners, they tend to not know anything past plugging in shapes to their according shape holes. It was mind boggling to me with the new 120fps on consoles, that almost NOBODY knew what Hertz was. Or that their consoles aren't actually capable of 4k120. This is all before 4k 120/144hz displays were even a thing (They were realized a while after PS5/SeriesX had already released) If you care for frame rate more than visuals (Quantity over quality), just go for a 1080p QLED display with 120+hz. Unless it's a 2D game (Probably possible with 2D games), you won't be playing games in 4k past 60fps. They'll be halved (1080p) to handle 120fps

we got an oled about 4 years ago, already have a burned in ' nicktoons ' at the bottem right. i really love how much better oled looks but the burn in change is terrible

@@tdesmit7662 i got a qled 50in tlc for £400 it was on sale

@@tdesmit7662 the new OLED's have a technology called "pixel shift" that completely got rid of burn in without a visual difference

@@nathankeel4308 thats bs man my C1 broke in 2 mnths

@@nathankeel4308 no they haven't lol that's jusr marketing bs your OLED can get a burn in at any point

You can switch the rooms the TVs are in 😆

What the heck is burn in ?

Same. I got a QLED over an OLED cause I hear it's generally not good for gaming due to burn in issues.

@@hitokiribattousai7703 how do you like it so far . I’m trying to get a 60 inch real soon .

@@richardwalker6004 so burn in is like u see a picture of a flower for a long time and after a long time when ur watching Netflix u see the flower photo under it, its very annoying i have it in my phone when i set my phone to a White screen i see my RU-vid start screen burnt in the screen. So its always there forever

@@Niick_18 thank you . I’m getting my 1st qled ever so I know it’s going to be a upgrade.

Never had that with any product, got plenty of oled screens in the house. Also, on newer oled products, there are built in safety procedures to prevent such a thing from happening

@@TimecraftGamingSjors the OLED I purchased in 2017 has the same exact features today. Pixel refreshing nonsense just makes the screen darker. Doesn't fix the retention. Doesn't fix the discoloration. You can keep buying that garbage all you want. No one is paying me to say this. I DC what you think. I know my experience with them

@4K 60FPS if oled didn't have those two issues I mentioned then nothing could beat the image quality. QLED would be second place

This is what I’m thinking, as much as the oled sounds better in certain ways I game far too much to risk burn in

It’s absolutely worth the price difference.

@@bobsucks9647 There is so little risk of burn-in. People make it sound much more prevalent than it is. It used to be a real issue. Now you have to absolutely abuse the TV to get it, unless you just get a bad panel, which can happen. OLEDs have several features now that help minimize the risk. My LG C2 has a setting that slightly shifts the image over time (which is impossible to notice unless you maybe do a time lapse video with a camera). It also runs a pixel refresh when the TV is turned off, after every 4 hours of accumulated watch time. Then there’s the logo dimmer. When the TV sees a logo sitting in the same spot, such as on a channel like Fox, it can dim it. As well as other features. Don’t let people scare you away. OLED is far better.

@@frostyone182 really depends on how much of a couch potato one is

You shouldn't look at the screen size ... better look at absolute width and height ... because current tvs almost have no bezels ... means a current 65" may (or will) have the same dimensions like your old 60" tv. Example: my 60" plasma has a width of 140 cm ... and the 65" LG C2 has 144 cm ... I wouldn't be surprised if your cabinet would allow for another 4 cm in width ;-) btw ... a 65" C2 is 88 cm in height including the stand (83 cm without stand ... in case of wall mounting in the cabinet is an option)

@@marcuscole8796 Yes I am very close for getting a newer design 65" TV into this cabinet. I have exactly 56.5 width to work with in the opening. Unfortunately I cannot shave down the cabinet. I have even checked width of concave screens. Thanks a lot for your comments! I was hoping this channel would comment on future plans from manufacturers of screens. There are many brands both only a few screen suppliers.

@@sonarvord That's bad news ... some tiny 0.2 inches are missing :-( Nevertheless a Samsung QN900A (with it's close to zero bezel) will just fit into it ... the 65QN900A has a width of 56.42 inches (height: 35.12) ... maybe this is an option although a very tight one.

I wouldn't let the cabinet limit you if you were you. Find a way to make a larger set work. Either get rid of the cabinet of figure out a way to mount a larger screen despite it

Buy a new cabinet

Because people have a bias for OLED. QLEDS are bright and can show highlights better. Highlights are more than just small stars or small areas of the screen. Highlights can be the brightness of the sun on the screen which a QLED represents better especially in hdr. Ever time reviewers talk about OLED they talk about black levels, but OLED are bad with brightness which makes colors and vividness in color saturation because they are dim.

Do you play with consoles or PC?

OLED is the worst display for gaming

@@cqllel5186 Why? I haven't had any problems when it came to burn in.

@@DedricSilva You haven't had any problems when it came to burn in *Yet

@@cqllel5186 its been 2 years since ive bought my lg cx oled and ive used it for gaming, movies, pc monitor and left it on all the time. No burn in. After a few months of owning an oled, you stop caring about burn in cause its so insignificant