Omega Speedmaster - The only watch you need? 

The best Omega ever! I love the new version of the bracelet

Yep. Agree 100%. I sold my 114060, 2531.80 bond smp, SMPc, BB58 blue, and many other affordables/micro brands. The Speedmaster (especially the 2022+) is 100% worth it and will not leave my collection. I don't know what it is, I think the combination of the history and iconic symbol, beautiful movement, and legibility and functionality is unmatched. It looks elegant, while still looking like a purpose built device. It's not pretentious on the front, yet looking at the back is the beautiful 3861 movement (and you can see with the sapphire caseback).

Tiny piece of feedback: Armstrong left his Speedmaster in the Lunar Lander module. Aldrin was wearing the first Speedmaster on the moon

Great choice, the speedmaster is iconic for a reason.

Great presentation ! I can relate as a Speedy FOIS , edition owner.

The one watch collection for me would involve some dressier chrono with a multitude of straps and bracelets in order to make it sportier or dressier, my Breitling Datora or my Portugieser Hand-Wound Monopusher, watches that completely change personality depending on if there's leather or fabric around it.

Buzz Aldrin was first to wear a Speedmaster on the Moon. Neil Armstrong’s Speedmaster was left on the lunar module as a backup to a broken timer.

It was omega, rolex, longines and Hamilton who responded to NASA's call for a space watch. Brietling never replied.

Sorry, but Neil never wore his watch on the surface of the Moon, it was Buzz. Neil’s Speedy was left inside LEM, next to a malfunction gauge (timer).

@minute 3:57: when Neil Armstrong made his one small step on the moon, he did NOT wear his Speedmaster watch. As a Speedmaster expert you are, you should know that little detail :-) Only Buzz Aldrin wore his watch on his space suit. The clock of Neil Armstrong was somewhere back in the cockpit of the Eagle landing module. He left it there, as the clock in the Eagle module had a failure. So the Speedmaster of Buzz Aldrin was the first one on the moon. And the Speedmaster is not the only watch certified by NASA for manned space flights. On normal missions without having to wear a space suit, they are also allowed to wear the Speedmaster X-33 modell, or any private watch. Only for EVAs, the Speedmaster Professional is still today the only permitted watch by NASA standards.

For me, if I can only have one watch it would be my Submariner 124060. After l picked up my Sub from my AD in Oct 2021, it has become my go to watch. Before that, l bought a Speedmaster 1863 which I loved for most things people love about this watch however, it was getting less wrist time so sold it on.

Good review. and you have nice jacket

Which one are you wearing in the video ? Which one you prefer hesalite or sapphire ?😊

Your suit is badass. Where did you get it?

Amstrong didn't wear the watch on the moon. He left if on the lander. Buzz Aldrin (2nd man on the moon) wore the first "Moon Watch".

Aside from diving, I think the Speedmaster can be a GADA watch.

Absolutely agree. Love my 1861... in my opinion better than the new version... for me anyway

It's not waterproof enough for swimming. Something with 100m+ is wiser. Lovely watch though!

Great review. What’s your view of the Speedmaster 321 “Ed White”…do you think it’s worth the price and the ultimate Speedmaster for the person only owning one Omega? Cheers

Aldrin was the one who had the speedy on his wrist on the moon. Not Armstrong.

Congrats with your Speedy mate! First, to let u know that Neil Armstrong didn't wore this watch on the Moon, in fact it was Buzz Aldrin! Second, Alongside with Omega, Rolex and the Breitling, Bulova was the referance point of the space missions by NASA as well, which you didn't mention though! Third, if i could EVER have a chance to get a Rolex Sub by AD retail price, that would be my "ONE & ONLY" watch for sure. The quality of the case, timelessness of the design, refined looks and the feelings of comfort on the wrist are not comparible with any Omega including the Speedy.. I would even say, Rolex made a huge mistake by Sub's price strategy, as Submariner deserves at least double its retail price in real by its quality! Sub's built quality is par with any Patek or AP though! If Rolex could make alteration on the Sub's retail price by 25.000 USD, there wouldn't be this much hype and waiting lists around the world, and the watch could be positioned alongside with Patek and AP, or any other high horology brands in where it already deserves to be! So Submariner it is the watch for men to cater all our needs if we were able to find and buy one... Cheers

I dont really want to spend 7 K on it . But I realize I dont have a choice . The left part of my brain is kicking my arse for it

Love the speedy like everyone else, but Omega’s turned it into somewhat of a gimmick with all the various editions and Snoopy etc. - make it smaller/thinner, keep it simple, keep production low but not artificially, improve quality / add a few more high end touches…I’d be a buyer, but until then, any steel Rolex will beat it for me

If you can tell me where to buy a Rolex Daytona for $14,000, I'll buy two!

Next thing you know you wake up with a missing kidney!!! Hilarious 😂

I bought the 3861, not very happy with the finishing. It didn’t bother me until I got 126610 and felt how silky the Rolex finishing was. Now the omega feels downright cheap and scratchy

i cant believe that useless music is on this video. i kept pausing the video thinking it was coming from another video

Not if you want a swim 🤨

So much vocal fry I had to mute, sorry.

Hyu⁸

These telegram bots are everywhere in watch channels 🙄

Only one watch will def be a sub

Its a victim of its own success

the only good Omega.

There are only 2 luxury watches on earth you should own: Rolex Oyster and/or Omega Speedmaster. All the rest is blabla, bragbrag, totally useless.