Тёмный
No video :(

Only 16% of Pilots Had a Chance to Survive this Plane 

Dark Skies
Подписаться 629 тыс.
Просмотров 84 тыс.
50% 1

It was a bold leap into uncharted territory for aviation design. The Halifax’s blueprints scrapped the traditional two-engine configuration of British bombers in favor of four powerful Rolls-Royce Merlin engines. This dramatic shift aimed to give the new aircraft unparalleled range, speed, altitude, and, most importantly, payload capacity.
The ambitious Handley Page prototype took to the skies for the first time on September 25, 1939, just in time for the opening stages of World War 2.
With very few four-engine bombers available and the Avro Lancaster still in development, the Halifax quickly became a pillar of Britain’s Bomber Command. However, it proved to be a disaster.
She was slow, vulnerable, and flew at lower altitudes than expected. Most concerning of all, she was a flying coffin. As this four-engine bomber became the backbone of British bombing operations, the survival rate of her crews plummeted.
Out of every 100 airmen aboard a bomber, 45 were lost, six were seriously wounded, and eight became prisoners of war. Halifax airmen had a mere 16 percent chance of surviving a tour. The situation was so dire that Canadian Pilot Murray Peden noted: (QUOTE) “On a single night, Bomber Command suffered more losses than did Fighter Command during the entire Battle of Britain.”
Yet, with no alternative and no intention of letting the Germans win the war, the flow of volunteers for Halifax never faltered. Brave men like Captain John Emilius “Johnny” Fauquier, against all odds and despite all of the bomber’s flaws, would rewrite history aboard the Halifax.
---
Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

Опубликовано:

 

28 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 281   
@jeffslade1892
@jeffslade1892 2 месяца назад
Britain was not lagging behind in aircraft design, in fact leading the development of 4-engine heavy bombers. For most of WW2 Germany persisted in flying twin engine medium-light bombers. The USA was two years late coming to Europe giving them time to catch up. Even so, the B-17 should only be considered as a medium bomber able to carry little more than the Mosquito. The Halibag was quite aerobatic, able to roll and loop if it had to.
@Dave85626
@Dave85626 2 месяца назад
The b17 just looked so lovely though
@lastguy8613
@lastguy8613 2 месяца назад
Yeah still waiting for that German 4 engine heavy bomber he mentioned. And the Condor dosnt count
@gregmuon
@gregmuon 2 месяца назад
No, not at all, but the max bomb load was not as different as people think. Apples to apples, it was 14,000 lbs vs 12,800 lbs (B-17G).
@Alphachanel
@Alphachanel 2 месяца назад
@@lastguy8613 Technically there was the HE177 which did see service, four engines in two nacelles driving a single propeller each. It did have a tendency to overheat and catch fire and was considered to be as nearly, if not more so, deadly to its crew as to those it was trying to bomb.
@jeffslade1892
@jeffslade1892 2 месяца назад
@@gregmuon The B-17G payload was between 4,000-lb to 8,000-lb to Germany and back. The factor is fuel for range. Each gun load was around the weight of a man. For comparison the Lancaster could carry the 12,000-lb Tallboy to Peenemunde, or (modified) the 22,000-lb Grand Slam. The Lanc also had direction finder, radar and proximity radar, which weighed about a ton. The Mossie 4,000-lb.
@MrEricmopar
@MrEricmopar 2 месяца назад
The Halifax actually had a far lower fatality rate than the Lancaster... about 29% of Halifax crews were able to bail out, while only 11% of Lancaster crews were able to bail out, so which plane is the actual flying coffin when hit.
@user-tg3kw8ck4x
@user-tg3kw8ck4x 2 месяца назад
все🤣
@seanmalloy7249
@seanmalloy7249 2 месяца назад
Not to mention the brutal mathematics of survival - if a tour was 25 missions, and you had a 93% chance of surviving each mission, you only have a 16% chance of surviving to complete a tour. It doesn't require an 'awful' aircraft to make the survival rate that low, just the inexorable constraints of random chance.
@MrEricmopar
@MrEricmopar 2 месяца назад
@@seanmalloy7249 Yeah, and how do you think the crews felt, when later into the war, they increased missions required to 30 or 35!
@screwdriver222
@screwdriver222 Месяц назад
The Lancaster had the smallest escape hatches of RAF heavy bombers and Lancaster aircrew would have the highest losses.
@lancerevell5979
@lancerevell5979 2 месяца назад
Half the video clips show entirely different aircraft - B-17, Wellington, Lancaster, Mosquito, even German bombers. The technical and continuity errors here are atrocious.
@channelsixtyeight068_
@channelsixtyeight068_ 2 месяца назад
I there was a Stirling thrown in for good measure. 01:23
@brianartillery
@brianartillery 2 месяца назад
I've given up complaining - I just turn the sound down, and enjoy watching the old aircraft clips - the most annoying thing is that some clips sourced are very rare, but they seldom mate up smoothly with the commentary.
@CaptainQuark9
@CaptainQuark9 2 месяца назад
@@channelsixtyeight068_ AND a Manchester, of all things!
@user-xq2zn8bu9q
@user-xq2zn8bu9q 2 месяца назад
I know, it's brilliant. It's one of the reason's I watch & ❤ Dark Skies video's. 😁
@channelsixtyeight068_
@channelsixtyeight068_ 2 месяца назад
@@CaptainQuark9 Pah... what's two less engines and a completely different manufacture got to do with it. No one will know.
@stuarthannay3370
@stuarthannay3370 2 месяца назад
My Dad never said a bad word about the Halifax, he survived a full tour in 78 Squadron as a mid upper gunner.
@brackers2007
@brackers2007 2 месяца назад
Snap, we’ll kind of? My grandfather serviced nearly 2 tours in 78 Squadron. When did your dad fly and do you know the call sign of his plane? I ask as I’m trying to piece together some history.
@ravenclaw8975
@ravenclaw8975 2 месяца назад
You're Dad was a very brave man! You are proud of him and all of us on here should be as well!
@stuarthannay3370
@stuarthannay3370 2 месяца назад
@@ravenclaw8975 oh we are, he did 46 missions in total. 30 in 78 Squadron and 16 in 156 Squadron (a Pathfinder unit with Lancasters).
@markgower7163
@markgower7163 2 месяца назад
I could only cope with a couple of minutes of this youtube, because of the factual / historical inaccuracies. (I usually steer clear of Dark Skies youtubes for the reasons mentioned, but I have considerable interest in the Halifax) No mention of the Stirling in those couple of minutes -- the first British four engine heavy; it flew lower on operations than either the Halifax or Lancaster. The crews of the latter two were quietly encouraged if they were on a raid that included Stirlings, because they would catch far more of the flak. Statistically -- if a Lancaster or Halifax were hit and going down, more crews from the latter survived -- the escape hatches were easier to get to, it would seem, and many would say it was better built. My father was an Air Gunner on Halifax BIII, 77 squadron from February 45 onward ; he and his crew firmly believed the aircraft was the equal of the Lanc. If the flawed Manchester is considered to be part of Lancaster development, its history is not quite so golden. All in all, Dark Skies runs true to form again. Unwatchable.
@bassetdad437
@bassetdad437 2 месяца назад
I did see a Stirling and a bit later a B-17, Dark Skies uses a shotgun approach, show enough clips of bombers and somewhere you will find what you're looking for.
@gumpyoldbugger6944
@gumpyoldbugger6944 2 месяца назад
I gave up at the 3 minute mark.......these guys are right wankers....no idea why I am still subbed.
@ThePhoenix198
@ThePhoenix198 2 месяца назад
@@bassetdad437 Pretty certain there was a Bf-110 in there somewhere, too. But as you say, they use a shotgun approach and after 1m 25 secs here I am, in the comments.
@CiciOzkup-rg8ld
@CiciOzkup-rg8ld 2 месяца назад
DUMB PROPA....
@jamesleonard7439
@jamesleonard7439 2 месяца назад
I'm not a fan of this channel , i myself only lasted a couple of mins. I recommend Greggs planes, trains, and automobiles.
@captaccordion
@captaccordion 2 месяца назад
Wow! This channel is notorious for mismatching the images and dialogue, but this one is pretty exceptional. In the first 90 seconds, as we hear about the Merlin engined Halifax, we get footage of mostly radial engined Halifaxes, one or two Merlin engined ones, a Short Stirling, an Avro Manchester, a Lockheed Hudson, a Boeing B17, and a couple of others I couldn't pick. Way to go! Later on, we naturally get more of the same with the addition of Mosquitos and a prewar German bomber, and when the dialogue tells us of the introduction of the radial engined Halifax, what do we see? A Merlin engined one!
@Frieghtliner1975
@Frieghtliner1975 2 месяца назад
So… you can do better ? Wonderful !! I look forward to your videos.
@brunozeigerts6379
@brunozeigerts6379 2 месяца назад
Including a Ju86... something I don't recall ever seeing footage of. (had a model of it)
@davidpugh796
@davidpugh796 Месяц назад
Yet, these are still some of my favorite videos
@williamkennedy5492
@williamkennedy5492 2 месяца назад
A good friend of mine did three tours on Bombers and also flew special ops with Stirlings , His Halifax was shot up over Germany, he told the crew to bail out but they elected to stay with the aircraft, On touchdown the gear gave out and the aircraft cartwheeled down the runway, he survived his crew were all killed in the crash. He kept the clock from the crash, 6 months later after recovering he was back on ops with Lancs, Such very very brave men , Some interesting aircraft shown .
@josega6338
@josega6338 Месяц назад
What a pity these british airmen were brave, but fought in a criminal war against mankind
@andypandy9013
@andypandy9013 2 месяца назад
My Great Uncle Jack was an RAFVR Pilot before the war. During the war he flew a full "Tour" of 30 missions as a Halifax pilot, was sent to Canada to train new pilots, returned then flew another one and a half tours before returning to Canada as a trainer again. He never had anything but praise for the Halifax so, I suspect, would have been shocked at you describing it as a "Flying coffin".
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 2 месяца назад
The term Flying Coffin was actually mentioned in official reports written within Bomber Command as regards the early service life of the aircraft!!! The early Merlin powered ones had some really nasty vices, like going out of control if they lost an outer engine.
@davewolfy2906
@davewolfy2906 2 месяца назад
This video, is an utter mess.
@curiousuranus810
@curiousuranus810 2 месяца назад
Apart from the lack of footage, it's also a little unfair to compare the 1939 MkI Halifax to the 1942 Lancaster - Yorkshire apples and Lancashire oranges.
@davewolfy2906
@davewolfy2906 2 месяца назад
There are NO oranges in Lancashire! Born there, seen there, done there. As for Yorkshire apples .......
@ronhall9039
@ronhall9039 2 месяца назад
@@davewolfy2906 In Roman times they grew grapes in York... but I digress.
@curiousuranus810
@curiousuranus810 2 месяца назад
@@davewolfy2906 There are oranges in lancs, but as you know, you don't want them anywhere near your mouth.
@davewolfy2906
@davewolfy2906 2 месяца назад
@@ronhall9039 the Romans brought apples and rabbits to these islands. Are you making some comment about anti- global warming?
@davewolfy2906
@davewolfy2906 2 месяца назад
@@curiousuranus810 mmmmmm! Interesting stuff comment
@andybryson3887
@andybryson3887 2 месяца назад
Some of the Halifax clips shown seem to have radial engines, not the Merlin as described in the video. Indeed, as per Wikipedia, the standard power plant for the Halifax was 4 × Bristol Hercules XVI 14-cylinder air-cooled radial engines
@ThePhoenix198
@ThePhoenix198 2 месяца назад
The early marks of Halifax (BI and BII) were powered by Merlin engines. The Bristol Hercules powered Halifax BIII weren't introduced until January 1944.
@tonyunderwood9678
@tonyunderwood9678 2 месяца назад
likewise, I've seen a few photos of Lancs fitted with radials.
@greenthing99100
@greenthing99100 2 месяца назад
A fine assortment of aircraft, just a shame so few of them were actually Halifax in the correct chronological order... Bizarre.
@Frieghtliner1975
@Frieghtliner1975 2 месяца назад
In fairness… smart phone recordings are hard to come by from the 1940s.
@richardcook6980
@richardcook6980 2 месяца назад
I totally agree there is plenty of footage of Halifaxes, it makes me wonder who compiles these videos
@alanmoss3603
@alanmoss3603 2 месяца назад
Rather than show the wrong aircraft in these videos just show photos between clips. We want to see the actual planes described - not 'stand-ins!'
@none941
@none941 2 месяца назад
Quality is not a hallmark of this channel!
@user-og1ux8nr3i
@user-og1ux8nr3i 2 месяца назад
Then don’t watch
@nathangoshawk
@nathangoshawk 2 месяца назад
​@@user-og1ux8nr3iwith an entertainment channel I totally agree but a supposed history channel that is just a stream of incorrect information, criticism is justified.
@ThePhoenix198
@ThePhoenix198 2 месяца назад
@@user-og1ux8nr3i Are you married to one of the production team? Otherwise, why defend such dross?
@user-og1ux8nr3i
@user-og1ux8nr3i 2 месяца назад
@@ThePhoenix198 -- I enjoy the channel. It’s not perfect and neither am I
@Buzzkill-wn7tf
@Buzzkill-wn7tf 2 месяца назад
Have not finished watching yet but gotta say, used to golf with 3 gents from the RCAF who were air vets. Spit mech, Lancaster gunner and a Halifax pilot. Once I got to know them after many early morning rounds (walking--what legends at their age), stories were shared. The Halifax pilot was shot down twice over enemy territory, captured once (briefly) and managed to get back in the cockpit for some final missions. Unbelievable guys and so damn modest. Thanks to Canadian service!
@hamishosborn8384
@hamishosborn8384 2 месяца назад
This commentary is inaccurate. The Hallibag was like most aircraft needing further development. Aircrew generally liked the Halifax and the fact it continued to serve till the end of the war was testament to its ability. Yes the Lancaster superseded the Halifax but it started off as the Manchester which was a poor aircraft but developed into the shining sword. My uncle flew Halifax and loved the aeroplane, whilst my father flew Lancaster and swore by it. Bomber Command list 56,000 aircrew the highest rate of attrition of any allied service. They were boys who became men overnight, their youth put aside to stand against the greatest evil of the 20th century.
@geordiedog1749
@geordiedog1749 2 месяца назад
My neighbour was a Halifax navigator. He liked it. He was also shot down mind. Bailed out over Holland. Got taken in by a friendly family but their neighbours grassed them up. He was made a pow and the Dutch who helped him were shot. The family who betrayed him had their house burnt down repeatedly after the war.
@jasonkebic741
@jasonkebic741 2 месяца назад
Odd you mention that the Halifax lead from 2 engine bombers to 4 engine bombers. But the Sterling bomber predates the Halifax and is a 4 engine bomber. The Halifax was built to the same specs as the Manchester twin engine bomber that would later gain 2 extra engines and become the Lancaster.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 2 месяца назад
The Stirling was designed as a Bomber / Transport to a total different specification to that which the Halifax / Manchester was designed to meet. It was a much bigger aircraft.
@daystatesniper01
@daystatesniper01 2 месяца назад
RAF Lisset still has some buildings etc' still standing , the wind turbines that now occupy the site are all named after the named Halifaxes that flew from there , also visit the Yorkshire air museum at Elvington near York , here they have a Halifax built from parts etc' done up as Friday the 13th
@plantfeeder6677
@plantfeeder6677 2 месяца назад
Hopefully those wind turbines will be gone in ten years when we realize what an abject mistake green energy is. Otherwise we're toast as a people.
@hamishosborn8384
@hamishosborn8384 2 месяца назад
The rear section of the RAF Elvington Halifax was found having been used as a chicken Hut on a Scottish island for forty odd years after it had crashed. That aircraft was previously flown by Sq Ldr Stan Gooch DFC who I had the pleasure of knowing when I was growing up. Stan went on to fly for BOAC on Yorks then Commet and finally Boeing 707's on the international long haul routes. Stan always spoke very highly of the Halifax and was more than a little irritated at the aircraft being repeatedly canned by those who never flew it and yet set themselves up as some sort of expert voice.
@johnearle1
@johnearle1 2 месяца назад
The Halifax actually was a more adaptable design than the Lancaster. It was like Chris Rea, it got lost in the shuffle.
@ronhall9039
@ronhall9039 2 месяца назад
Chris Rea is not lost - loved in the North East. I get your drift though.
@johnearle1
@johnearle1 2 месяца назад
@@ronhall9039 The Chris Rea quip was from Gavin and Stacey when Bryn heard Coming Home For Christmas and said “turn it up, I love Chris Rea. He always gets lost in the shuffle.
@ronhall9039
@ronhall9039 2 месяца назад
@@johnearle1 Cheers mate - I missed the context there.👍
@phippsa3
@phippsa3 2 месяца назад
Little short of Halifax footage
@ThePhoenix198
@ThePhoenix198 2 месяца назад
... to put it mildly!
@Paganitzu
@Paganitzu 2 месяца назад
Amelia Earhart agrees
@channelsixtyeight068_
@channelsixtyeight068_ 2 месяца назад
A catastrophic blow to the H2S radar project were the loss of EMI engineers Alan Dower Blumlein and Geoffrey Hensby. All on board Halifax V9977 were killed when an engine fire burnt through the wing. The cause was a rocker-arm nut on an exhaust valve unscrewing. The layout of the cockpit was such that the crew could not reach for the fire extinguishers that could have put out the fire and saved their lives. The only working prototype of the H2S was on board and it was extensively damaged.
@CiciOzkup-rg8ld
@CiciOzkup-rg8ld 2 месяца назад
NAZI SPY SABOTAGE....
@robredz
@robredz 2 месяца назад
Alan Dower Blumlein was an early experimenter with stereo sounds some of those recordings still exist, and really should be restored and released.
@channelsixtyeight068_
@channelsixtyeight068_ 2 месяца назад
@@robredz ADB was an electrical engineer who started with the Gramophone Company and then at the newly created EMI. Invented stereo in 1927 and high definition TV in the early 1930s. He was at Bletchly Park for the development of the H2S radar at the same time as Alan Turing. There's no record of them having met.
@robredz
@robredz 2 месяца назад
@@channelsixtyeight068_ Would be amazing to hear those experimental stereo recordings.
@channelsixtyeight068_
@channelsixtyeight068_ 2 месяца назад
@@robredz They were either him or another engineer walking from one side of the lab to the other to demonstrate the stereo image. What prompted him to start experimenting was attending a theatre with his wife and complaining about the sound quality. I'm only going by memory.
@colinmartin2921
@colinmartin2921 2 месяца назад
The biggest problem for British heavy bombers was the low service ceiling, because the British never had access to turbo superchargers which allow higher altitudes to be reached.
@timhancock6626
@timhancock6626 2 месяца назад
Rolls Royce Merlin engines were pretty well all supercharged, so I don't understand your comment.
@richardbeattie7259
@richardbeattie7259 2 месяца назад
No mention of the fact that the B17 was a much older design first flying in 1935. It had a large crew of gunners but without any powered gun turrets and carried a modest load of fairly small bombs. The Halifax was a perfectly good bomber once they fixed the tail fins but was outclassed by the superb Lancaster which could carry the Tall Boy and Grand Slam bombs. Neither the B17 nor the Halifax could carry the 4,000 lb Cookie. The Dark Skies man gets his facts wrong, uses a random selection of photos and speaks as if he is being chased by a mad axeman.
@nickdanger3802
@nickdanger3802 2 месяца назад
"without any powered gun turrets" Source ? Avro 683 Avro Lancaster B.1 Special 32 Aircraft were adapted to take first the super-heavy (12,000 lb, nd) ‘Tallboy’ and then ‘Grand Slam’ bombs (first use March 1945, nd) and included up-rated engines (with paddle-bladed propellers to give more power) and the removal of gun turrets to reduce weight and give smoother lines. For the Tallboy, the bomb bay doors were bulged slightly whilst for the Grand Slam, they were removed completely and the area faired over. For some Tallboy raids the mid-upper turret was also removed. This modification was retained for the Grand Slam aircraft and the nose turret was also later removed. BAE Lancaster page
@ThePhoenix198
@ThePhoenix198 2 месяца назад
@@nickdanger3802 "without any powered gun turrets" obviously refers to the early B17A, B17B and B17D models, none of which had powered gun turrets. Source: Wikipedia, among others.
@macswad
@macswad 2 месяца назад
You actually show the RAF's first 4 engine bomber. It's called a Shorts Stirling Bomber
@thesnazzycomet
@thesnazzycomet 2 месяца назад
I think the Halifax Mk III onwards look very nice indeed
@rubberduck05
@rubberduck05 2 месяца назад
The 2 engine; Mosquito was one if not The best fighter bomber aircraft of the war
@zh84
@zh84 2 месяца назад
When the Germans finally managed to shoot one down, Goering himself went to visit the wreck. He shouted at the assembled Luftwaffe and aircraft industry dignitaries "Why can't you build me something like that?!"
@geordiedog1749
@geordiedog1749 2 месяца назад
I often wonder if Bomber Command had decided to go for thousands and thousands of Mossies instead of heavies they’d have been less shite?
@jonnyj00rgen
@jonnyj00rgen 2 месяца назад
would love to see Videos about the french fighter bombers like the mystere and etendart or historical and modern chinese planes like the Q 5 or J10. those categories are kind of blank spaces in my plane-knowledge
@highjump81a
@highjump81a 2 месяца назад
I think the author is confused and in error. The Hampden was the aircraft known as the 'Flying Coffin'. [They used to joke 'Take off speed 90kn, Cruising speed 90kn, stall speed 90kn']. My mother's boyfriend (not my dad) piloted a Hampden at the start of the war before moving on to the DH Mosquito. His Hampden squadron once lost a tail gunner to turbulence on landing approach, bounced out of his turret at 100' AGL.
@dmanduff9108
@dmanduff9108 2 месяца назад
Calling a cursed bomber Friday the 13th is one of the most metal things I've ever heard of in aviation 😂
@davey7452
@davey7452 2 месяца назад
Fun fact at end of WW2 the RAF used B 24 Liberators for long range reconnaisance but under lend lease it is property of the US government at wars end they either return it or pay for it the British returned it. To replace it they used the Halifax.
@user-vn5do3tl8d
@user-vn5do3tl8d 2 месяца назад
A good example can be found at RCAF Museum Trenton Ontario
@vbprogman
@vbprogman 2 месяца назад
The Short Sterling was the worst. lf they had listened to De Havilland when they suggested a light weight twin engine fast unarmed bomber early in the conflict, then thousands of young airmen might have survived the war.
@emaheiwa8174
@emaheiwa8174 2 месяца назад
It gave me my best matches on War Thunder, nothing but love ❤
@MaxKrumholz
@MaxKrumholz 2 месяца назад
USSR almost not manufactered Petlyakov Pe-8 - only 4 engine bomber in USSR - ONLY 93 was Created
@davidbeattie4294
@davidbeattie4294 Месяц назад
There is a restored Halifax, NA 337, on display in the air museum at CFB Trenton, in Trenton Ontario. It was recovered from the bottom of a lake in Norway to serve as a tribute to the sacrifice of Canadian airmen serving in 6 Group (RCAF) Bomber Command.
@peterfarrell520
@peterfarrell520 2 месяца назад
my best mates dad flew 2 tours in halifaxs and he loved them. prefered them over lans any day. once they got the motors they were designed for. flew for 462 and 466 squadrons r.a.a.f last tour was pathfinders. his crew all survived and he was awarded dfc and bar.
@aussie807
@aussie807 2 месяца назад
It was not considered that by the crews, my old friend Bruce Douglas Bancroft, a Halifax pilot, would take exception with your statements
@clivestirling5094
@clivestirling5094 Месяц назад
The HP Halifax, like the Lancaster, were originally designed to be 2 engine bombers. Powered by 2 of these RR 24 cly. Vulture engines.(2, V12 engines joined together).They were technically very complex and unreliable.The only RAF Heavy Bomber to go down on the drawing board from the start, with 4 engines, was my name sake, the Short Stirling Bomber. Having said that, out of every 10 heavy bombers built by the British during WWII , 4 were Halifaxes.
@BobSmith-ui4qu
@BobSmith-ui4qu 2 месяца назад
It’s nice to see the King and Queen footage.
@kevanhubbard9673
@kevanhubbard9673 2 месяца назад
Just realized how similar looking the Halifax is to the B 24 Liberator.
@karistasogare
@karistasogare 2 месяца назад
time stamp 1:26: that isnt a Halifax, it is a Short Stirling
@normmcrae1140
@normmcrae1140 2 месяца назад
There are currently 2 Flying Lancasters, and multiple non-flying ones, but NO Halifaxes were preserved. There is one currently restored in Canada - NA337 at the National Air Force Museum, and one in process of restoration for the Bomber Command Museum of Canada (Halifax 57). Neither will ever fly.
@gavincampbell2862
@gavincampbell2862 2 месяца назад
I doubt the one at Elvington, Yorkshire HR792 (a Halifax III) will ever fly either.
@ThePhoenix198
@ThePhoenix198 2 месяца назад
There's a rebuilt one at the Yorkshire Air Museum at the former site of RAF Elvington. It's a bit of a Frankenstein's monster assembled from a plethora of sources, including the wings from a Handley Page Hastings but is displayed in the livery of "Friday the 13th", a Halifax B III that flew 128 missions with 158 Squadron RAF. It is not, and never will be a flying exhibit.
@foxstrangler
@foxstrangler 2 месяца назад
There is also one in 'as recovered' condition in Hendon.
@philiphumphrey1548
@philiphumphrey1548 2 месяца назад
The Bristol Hercules engine was definitely better for the Halifax, but early production difficulties with that engine meant that Merlins had to be used instead. The same was true of the Bristol Beaufighter. Both planes saw a significant improvement in performance when they finally got the Hercules engine. The Hercules also had the advantage of not having vulnerable radiators and being significantly quieter than the Merlin.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 2 месяца назад
The Beaufighter started out with the Hercules.
@JSFGuy
@JSFGuy 2 месяца назад
Let's check it out.
@JohnSmith-bx8zb
@JohnSmith-bx8zb 2 месяца назад
Interring to note that the Halifax B 111 V1 had a top speed of over 300mph.
@Jones607
@Jones607 2 месяца назад
If you’re an aircraft spotter like myself, then you don’t mind seeing footage of different aircraft types. USAAFs B-24 Liberators also had a poor rate of attrition. “Friday 13th” Halifax Bomber still resides at the Yorkshire Air Museum. As I’ve had the privilege of seeing it on several occasions.
@kevinclarkson7036
@kevinclarkson7036 2 месяца назад
If you are going to produce more of these videos then spend some time sourcing clips of video that has some connection to the script. Almost ALL of the visual content has no connection with the narrative AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@JackDrinkn2DollarJim
@JackDrinkn2DollarJim 2 месяца назад
I'm surprised He didn't fit in a Vikers Vimey and a DH-4.
@georgianrooms
@georgianrooms 2 месяца назад
I live a few miles away from Lissett. It now has wind turbines on the site and the representatives of the RAF who attended the opening ceremony said it was nice to see propellers on the site again after so long. There is a wonderful memorial on site to the crews who were killed........
@plantfeeder6677
@plantfeeder6677 2 месяца назад
They're idiots. This "propeller"(wrong word of what they are)will be the misery of us all in the future if we don't stop this insanity now.
@tonyunderwood9678
@tonyunderwood9678 2 месяца назад
Credibility is beginning to become a bit lacking... PLEASE use correct footage or even still photos of the aircraft you're describing instead of inserting various clips of totally unrelated airplanes having nothing to do with the topic at hand. I appreciate the work being put into these Dark Skies videos, but substance needs to be observed.
@fredericksaxton3991
@fredericksaxton3991 2 месяца назад
I so wish you could rationalize the video images with your text. I still enjoyed this video though.
@archangelmichael1978
@archangelmichael1978 2 месяца назад
"A 16% chance of survival." The next time you want to talk shit about the Air Force, think about that. The flying coffin.
@user-gj8rt5gw2j
@user-gj8rt5gw2j 2 месяца назад
I think it's unfair to be so hard on the Halifax. YesLancaster was the allied bomber in the European theatre of war by far, but both the Halifax and Short Stirling went on be excellent aircraft at towing gliders in the second half of WW2.
@nigelterry9299
@nigelterry9299 2 месяца назад
Well, there's clips of 3 of my favourites. Wellington, Stirling, Mosquito.
@ravenclaw8975
@ravenclaw8975 2 месяца назад
A very good video. Some incongruity with the visuals, but well narrated lad. I'd just like to point out that I watched an interview with a German night-fighter pilot a few years back. He stated that the Halifax could be seen from miles away on clear nights, as the exhausts each side of the engine nacelles would spit fire, illuminating the plane when it was in flight and making it easy prey for the hunters. I salute all of the brave crews from all countries who flew the Halifax and those who perished, may they rest in peace.
@zetectic7968
@zetectic7968 2 месяца назад
Whatever the deficiencies of the Halifax the Short Stirling flew slower & lower thus was more vulnerable.
@fiery1962
@fiery1962 2 месяца назад
Short Stirling at 1:24. Would love an analysis of this flying compromise. The first of the Brit. heavies to see service in numbers and much larger than the Halifax or Lancaster.
@bungee7503
@bungee7503 2 месяца назад
“Out of a hundred men on a bomber”; the problem is overloading, not German fighters.
@pylon500
@pylon500 2 месяца назад
Oh dear, here we go again. Untold numbers of completely irrelevant aircraft portrayed, while the (droning) dialogue tries to make specific points about specific marks and models. Half of the aim of the video was to show the improvements made over the life of the aircraft, the main one being the change from Merlin engines to Centaurus engines, but just as the Centaurus is mentioned, two images of the Merlin powered version are shown... {facepalm).
@blakemcleroy4812
@blakemcleroy4812 2 месяца назад
First love your channel sir
@JSFGuy
@JSFGuy 2 месяца назад
First what?
@folksinger2100
@folksinger2100 2 месяца назад
No mention of the Halifax B 111 V1 that had a top speed of well over 300mph.
@lynnwood7205
@lynnwood7205 2 месяца назад
The aircraft assembler at 2:07, sometimes one wonders, did they ever see themselves in these film clips? And then, what became of them later?
@KevTheImpaler
@KevTheImpaler 2 месяца назад
The biggest advantage the Lancaster had over the Halifax was its bomb bay. I am not sure exactly why, I think because of a spar that ran down the length of the fuselage, but the bomb bay had to be compartmentalised. That meant it could not carry the heavier bombs like to Tall Boy and Grand Slam. I am not sure whether it could carry the 4000 lbs Cookie bombs.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 2 месяца назад
The biggest issue with all marks of Halifax was the depth of the Bomb Bay and how the doors opened. A 4000lb bomb could only be carried semi recessed in the Halifax, with a hole cut in the bomb bay doors where the bomb was located. Lancaster bomb bay was deeper as well as longer.
@docnelson2008
@docnelson2008 2 месяца назад
The Halifax suffered from drag and was underpowered; however the aircraft improved as the war progressed and was able to fly faster and higher although it never matched the Lancaster with regard to its bomb load. The survival statistics for all aircraft flying over Germany were frightening so many types could qualify as "flying coffins" , not just the Halifax.
@KevTheImpaler
@KevTheImpaler 2 месяца назад
That's a Stirling in one bit of footage. The Halifax had bigger escape hatches than the Lancaster. It had better thought out defensive guns if you ask me.
@playasurf1000
@playasurf1000 2 месяца назад
If anything it was the Germans that steered clear of designing 4 engine bombers.
@dritzzdarkwood4727
@dritzzdarkwood4727 2 месяца назад
Did they steal the background music around the 2:00 mark from the Invicta history YT channel????
@conoryates7595
@conoryates7595 2 месяца назад
What are the German planes at 5:02?
@typhoon2827
@typhoon2827 2 месяца назад
1:28 Stirling
@Rangera-ct1xu
@Rangera-ct1xu Месяц назад
oh, i forgot. what is with using the .303 machine guns thru the whole war. this weapon did very little damage to metal fighters. this choice was not caused by not having better weapons, they had .50 brownings (in american designs) and they also had 20mm cannons that were used in some other british aircraft. the use of the .303 should be considered criminal.
@user-dd9tc4zz8j
@user-dd9tc4zz8j 2 месяца назад
Just a comment. You can’t shorten ranks into a diminutive . For example, you refer to ‘captain’ so and so, when the correct and only proper address is Group Captain. Notwithstanding the RAF/RAAF do not have a captain rank, you’ve reduced his status by 3 ranks. Always refer to ranks by their full title, eg Flight Lieutenant, Wing Commander, Group Captain, Air Commodore etc, in full, out of respect and accuracy.
@matttownsend7119
@matttownsend7119 2 месяца назад
This channel has interesting information but it keeps having jarring disconnects in its imagery. At 7:44 the story makes a big point of a new version of the aircraft featuring radial engines, while showing a frontal pic of the aircraft with the inline merlin engines that were supposedly replaced. And the channel keeps on doing this in multiple videos that I've seen. Whatever passes for an edit process is inadequate.
@ooloncaluphid
@ooloncaluphid 2 месяца назад
I wonder if the video editor knows the difference between the Bristol Hercules and the RR Merlin. For the most part, the video shows Hercules-equipped planes when the Merlin is being talked about, and Merlin-equipped planes when the Hercules is being talked about.
@richmorg8196
@richmorg8196 2 месяца назад
You have shown pictures of the Stirling without mentioning the name
@albertawildcat3164
@albertawildcat3164 2 месяца назад
My Uncle survived 36 missions flying in Halifax's as a mid-upper gunner, in 458? Bison Squadron, RCAF
@Frieghtliner1975
@Frieghtliner1975 2 месяца назад
I think you misspoke. 75,000 sorties !? If that aircraft from the day it rolled off the line, did one sortie every day. She would still need an additional 120 years (from today) to complete those missions.
@abepotter9302
@abepotter9302 2 месяца назад
I wanted to hear a story about the plane on the cover with 2-1/2 (?) engines.
@BobSmith-ui4qu
@BobSmith-ui4qu 2 месяца назад
To all the complaining arm chair warriors, you do better! You put in the effort that the author does to put out content then you can complain. Good effort. Thanks for video.
@nigeldepledge3790
@nigeldepledge3790 2 месяца назад
At 1:28, you have a photo of an airman posing with what looks like a Grand Slam. The Halifax couldn't carry this 10-ton bomb. Was that really the most appropriate photo you could find?
@-lightningwill-6014
@-lightningwill-6014 2 месяца назад
i just turned 20 years old, if the government put this energy and funding back into our military and industry, without a doubt id join up the next day, i wouldnt miss the chance to be a part of that
@ThePhoenix198
@ThePhoenix198 2 месяца назад
Britain mobilised all its national resources for the second world war, spending over 40 percent of GDP on defence for five years, peaking at 52 percent of GDP in 1945. Currently the UK spends a bit over 2% of its GDP on defence. For comparison purposes, about 11.1% of GDP is spent on the NHS, and a similar amount on welfare. Are you really sure you want to go back to 40% of GDP being spent on defence, especially as that effectively bankrupted the UK. Not to mention the minor issue of 454,000 war dead, 70,000 of whom were civilians ...
@user-jw3vy3kf5f
@user-jw3vy3kf5f 2 месяца назад
For a moment I thought I was looking at a B24 Liberator
@cedhome7945
@cedhome7945 2 месяца назад
Who does the resurch on these videos? Was the info read from a 1960s comic book ....
@BobSmith-ui4qu
@BobSmith-ui4qu 2 месяца назад
Once the video gets to the 4 minute mark there are lots of Halifax film.
@NickRatnieks
@NickRatnieks 2 месяца назад
We get a glimpse of Lord Halifax with Winston Churchill at 6:42. He officiated at the naming ceremony of the type and quoted an old English proverb " From Hull, Hell and Halifax, Good Lord deliver us!"
@paulkendall6069
@paulkendall6069 2 месяца назад
It's a shame only a Lancaster was preserved for the Battle of Britain memorial flight as a Halifax Wellington & Mosquito would have been nice too and maybe add fighters Typhoon and Tempest.
@_od_7825
@_od_7825 2 месяца назад
How did he ‘re-write history’? Was it a really long flight? Maybe you could do titles about foreign, ie non-US aircraft, without the hyperbole filled click bait titles. The clips of anything but the Halifax again is just typical Dark Skies. It had a greater range and bombload than the B-17, are you suggesting that it was inadequate as a strategic bomber? 100 airmen in a bomber, only 45 would survive? How many crew do you think they carried? Again 158th squadron. There’s no such thing. 158 squadron. The RAF isn’t/wasn’t the USAAF.
@farsaijohn9544
@farsaijohn9544 2 месяца назад
Looks a lot like a b24, just thinner, 😮.jf.
@bigantplowright5711
@bigantplowright5711 2 месяца назад
Nowhere near as bad as the Stirling!
@dazhigh9208
@dazhigh9208 2 месяца назад
A small note but the halifax's shown in video are not Merlin engines. they look like bristol pegusus ?
@dazhigh9208
@dazhigh9208 2 месяца назад
looks like 50/50 mix of engines.
@UncleJoeLITE
@UncleJoeLITE Месяц назад
"Flying coffin"? This is a pig's breakfast of mis-matched facts.
@1959tr3s
@1959tr3s 2 месяца назад
Merlin engines? Don't you ever do research? A merlin is an interesting line engine. The Halifax has radials. Just look at the photos!
@justink1075
@justink1075 2 месяца назад
See wiki article on Halifax rear gunner Norman Williams RAAF. Now there’s a bloke who could shoot.
@xfire7
@xfire7 2 месяца назад
All that remains of Friday the thirteenth is its nose art at R.A.F. Cosford .
@shumyinghon
@shumyinghon 2 месяца назад
shouldn't they be armed with 12,7mm machine guns?
@dude126
@dude126 2 месяца назад
The days of early development do not survive later year scrutiny. Hindsight is the tool of the uneducated.
@Rangera-ct1xu
@Rangera-ct1xu Месяц назад
all british bombers had the same flaws. no belly turret, a long bomb bay only one bomb thick, slow top speed, restricted to altitudes of less than 24,000 feet, and instabilities that prevented more than a few pilots were unable to escape a shot down plane. lastly, you had a higher probability of survival in the 8th AF daylight bombing raids.
@dennisdavis1506
@dennisdavis1506 2 месяца назад
Good stor.
@monza1002000
@monza1002000 2 месяца назад
What four engine bombers were the Germans working on? What four engine bombers, other than the B17 were the Americans working on?
@robertluther8057
@robertluther8057 2 месяца назад
Agree whole-heartedly with mr gower regarding the quality of this channel and watched it only because of the plane involved. Pretty sorry video.
@Eddewardeke
@Eddewardeke 2 месяца назад
What Merlin? In the beginning of the movie I see radial engines. As usual, interesting stories, and mismatching images. And then, at 7.36 it is mentioned that the Merlins were replacd by Hercules radials.... Merlins in the images. Please, you who make these interesting documentaries, take a lot more care of your images!
@jaymorris3468
@jaymorris3468 2 месяца назад
This vid needs to be redone, In both visuals and info. Wrong info, cmon know, its not difficult.
Далее
The Almost Perfect Aircraft Defeated Only by Time
12:46
How Two German Pilots did the Unthinkable
20:03
Просмотров 586 тыс.
New Dyna Skin is OP🥵🔥 | Brawl Stars
00:16
Просмотров 375 тыс.
what will you choose? #tiktok
00:14
Просмотров 6 млн
Last King Tiger Attack West - March 1945
10:36
Просмотров 335 тыс.
The Single Most Important Thing a Helicopter Ever Did
11:17
The Enemy Plane The US Refused to Destroy
15:50
Просмотров 272 тыс.
Crash site detective: What happened to Halifax NP711?
31:55
The Scariest Airplane Ever Built
13:09
Просмотров 178 тыс.
Entire Bomber Squadron Slaughtered in 20 Minutes?
23:56
New Dyna Skin is OP🥵🔥 | Brawl Stars
00:16
Просмотров 375 тыс.