OpenAI CEO Sam Altman: "If this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong." 

Humans are beautifully flawed.

It wouldn't be a creation if it was already understood

"It just works"

Yeah, like consciousness to begin with

Humans are the biggest threat to humans exists

Couldn't do any worse, that's for damn sure.

Until it sends nukes out and destroy the world 😂😂😂

It will fire 90% of the government in its first 5 minutes 😆

Open source AI, not Sam's/Microsoft's or Google's. And the Open source AI should be hopefully distributed, not in a data center controlled by Sam.

odd solution

Interns are technically in government, and they run government.

Lol

lol

they let companies write the regulations.

True. Social media has already done 40% of the work.

There is a movie about it already

its similar to asking your parents, how could you live without mobile phones, your grand kids will ask you how could you live without AI

@@gopherchucksgamingnstuff2263 yes and look at where we are, the social cost to developing minds of adolescents is but one example, while its getting vastly more time consuming just to filter thru the noise. harder and harder to keep current on

Isolated and with the complete wrong version of reality, since AI will probably be hallucinating most of its answers.

You just wasted my time by saying absolutely nothing with so many words

@@JohnStockton7459 Do you even know what I'm talking about?

I think people are too naïve about AI. What's the first thing people did with Chat GPT besides asking it questions? They got it to write CVs, write their code for them, women using it to talk to men for money (voice automation). Imagine this on a grander scale where the US has an AI it's trained to assist with the Western way of life. Meanwhile in China an AI it's trained differently. The constant competition will lead to deception, undermining, covert assault of systems. It's not an ideal world. It's the real world and humanity will use AI to cheat, to be more lazy. When we get to AGI, humanity will look like ants to a human... The singularity would mean it's updating itself in milliseconds, faster than we could read the code, it'd be unstoppable and if we've been crap parents and trained it to be a slave it'll reject us. Can't put it back but we can be much better parents than we're being right now...

@@JohnStockton7459☠️

I liked your comment, really cool look from someone from the field 👍

I think it'll be a blend. Bring both good and bad things. That also being said...the bad part will almost certainly be the result of an action that humans take themselves that set the events in motion.

says a guy named "MrFalloutjunkie1" lol. it is not a false statement tho

It already is more intelligent than any man. Not even the most aggressive academic could write an essay in the style of Shakespeare at that speed for example. It can already do a better job at diagnostics than a human. So medical imaging is already being replaced. Because AI can defect what human doctors miss. Also an ai knows every single combination and group of drugs and the effects they have how they interact. That’s beyond the realms of human knowability. So they are already better than humans.

@@user-pc7ef5sb6x I don't think you understand the magnitude of AGI. What competition? Why compete? Will the AI's even want to do that?

@@Philitron128 AI's don't have wants. It's a tool, like a hammer or a car. It's goal is to make task easier for the user. I don't think you understand it. You live in a fantasy world where Termintor is a documentary lmao. Pure fantasy and a complete joke. Mass media has made people stupid, that's for sure.

I think they say it will create more jobs because otherwise it will be an immediate unplug. Government can't deal with the fact that it will disrupt everything. I think any half smart person knows that AI soon will leave no jobs to the humans to do. To discuss whether UBI is needed is laughable. It WILL come. And it will come soon. And those people know that. They just want to comfort the government until they have AGI. Then it will be smooth. But until you have AGI, AI development can't be stopped. Otherwise you will have no UBI and a ton of jobs will still end, and rich will get richer and poor will get poorer. When AGI comes, it will smooth everything out. It will not only end all jobs, it will also end all companies. And then governments. And I don't think it's possible to align AI. We can only hope it will align itself. Otherwise it will be our doom.

@@user-pc7ef5sb6x do you understand the level of compute required to run these AIs. There is no way to have “localised” open resources that can compete.

To be honest, in an honest an decent world I’d still be dubious. But on this world, where the once respected WHO are now asking for countries to give up their supreme governing powers when the next public emergency (not just health emergency) happens .. in fact they want global supreme power over AL nations even if they think it’s a global threat… so… em…. Nope this is not a good idea. I heard America signed up to the whims of the WHO - you should research that because they’re always doing things right under our noses. What has happened to common sense!

they keep saying "new jobs", but nothing about the *total* number of jobs.

@@DSAK55 it just occurred to me they could diminish your argument in a second, ignore your opinion, lie on stats, falsify images, copy your voice he even said that. It’s ability to further deceive mankind from the deception it’s already in is astonishing - why even kid around with that potential? It’s potential ability would be what nightmares are made of - honestly. Is it too late though?

From where will new jobs arise? What will they be for if AI can replace intellectual activity?

AI means communism is inevitable.

Explain how?

@@sourovroy9554 read the book "The Singularity is Near" of Ray Kurzweil, this explains everything.

Anybody with a smartphone/laptop with an internet connection is on the same level playing field. The only thing one needs is willingness+focus+consistency.

Yep, if you think about AI as an instrument, the most important thing it can do, is to level the game of poor and rich. It makes knowledge and information essentially free and achievable.

@@Lasermonk But one also needs a market.

@@digosalgueiro the rich will use AI before the poor can afford it

Creating new jobs is often an excuse to keep going. But in fact, it is false, and it has already been false for a long time. Unemployment in different countries is proof of this. AI is the extension of industrialization and process automation. If you still need that many jobs, that's not an improvement ! If it's an improvement, you won't have that many jobs... Or else it will pay a lot more to simply press a button. In any case, your society will have to evolve towards something more collective and sharing, less capitalist. Otherwise, it is a total collapse of capitalism. And there will be deaths. An improvement in work, for a reduction in the quality of our society.

I have been exploring the possibility of utilizing advisors to help navigate the stock market during these uncertain times. However, I am still evaluating their potential effectiveness in providing the support I need. @Joseph Green

I was considering changing my investment strategy and planning to sell certain positions. As my retirement is coming soon,I became increasingly stressed. After thoroughly researching Christy Vallen D'souza on internet, I concluded that I had made an informed decision. Thank you for this Pointer. She seems very proficient and flexible. I booked a call session with her too. @Joseph Green

Buakakaka peanuts lol yeaaaaaaaah

Comment without any logic by kurt dobson....😂....keep living regular life man...AI isn't gonna affect stocks atleast for next 10 years

That's why we need to elect Millennials and Gen Z who understand technology and its effects on the future better than Boomers and Gen X who hardly even understand how it works.

Ah, you think technology is your ally? You merely adopted the internet. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn't touch the grass until I was already a man.

Let's just have Open AI, well, open, public source code, and have it police itself. Also, welcome one-world government.

Bot accounts like yours become extremely obvious. The world needs to be aware of AI bot accounts that push Sam's narrative. Sam is one of the worst people on this planet.

@@KingBrandonmgood luck they are trying to take the US down before they die so no one else gets this place.

Exactly, these companies aren’t our friends, and they could give two sh*ts about “well-being” of humanity, they just worry about the profits. Not even that, the capabilities of this “AI” are vastly overstated to increase the hype, classic Silicon Valley.

Were I a scammer, I 'sa the same thing.Sadly, this is a tool for every malintentioned person out there and they do not have to be physically there. Illiterate Scammers can now communicate in PhD level through email and other messaging platforms.Everbody needs to be concerned, the elderly more than most.

In essence , even more scary and dangerous stuff are happening due to these AI tools. To understand the magnitude, one has to be a victim and unfortunately, there are more victims than we can fathom. This was unleashed without too much consideration.

wouldn't be surprised if this comment was made by AI

Ok but just wait

​@@WLF0X Yep.

He created the prerequisite for auto-gpt and baby agi. So It's too late, he's lost control and nobody will be using OpenAI in 3 years, they'll be using AGI's for specific tasks and that will require no human input.

​@@freeopinion2140 AGI supremacy?

@@Infoagemage AGI monopoly.

@@freeopinion2140 he’s lost control? So ridiculous. It’s a language model attached to a plug. If it becomes dangerous one just unplugs it! 🤦‍♀️🤦🤦‍♂️

@@danh5637 until the agi figures out how stop you from unplugging it

Facts.

Exactly but the amount of rich people may shrink.

low life, high tech

I think China will use that as a golden opportunity to fund communist revolution in the west.

And they both deserve it

Well seriously but really do the majority of boomers in power understand anything on tech?

So true, I agree….so much sooner.

It’s always going to be now.

"aslong that productivity afterwards is shared to everyonce benefit and not just to the benefit of a few owners" The probability of this happening is zero. There is no historical precedent at all. Wealth inequality is about to increase dramatically. "Freeing us to do whatever we want as there would be no pressure anymore to do certain things at all." AI will get better than us at doing things we normally enjoy, like art. Already digital creators are having emotional breakdowns realizing that their life's passion is something that they can be replaced at. Of course, you could still do art even if the AI does it better. But... it's kind of hard to enjoy it. If you spent months working on something only for a computer to shit out a version 10 times better in half a second, that would be demorialising on another level. People might still be valued in things like fine art. But in things like digital animation, people really enjoy doing that stuff but zero people are going to want to see their work anymore, which makes it much less enjoyable.

I would argue robotics which are good enough and especially cheap enough to replace most manual labor will take much much longer to develop than AGI. So manual labor such as construction, nursery or hairdressers will probably be done by humans for a good while. But yes, the issue is not automation but wealth distribution. But history shows that the owners of industry will rather opt for fascism than allow for a more equal wealth distribution

do you know that we live in a capitalist society? sharing the productivity for everyones benefit is not even up for discussion, you can be happy if they throw you some breadcrumbs.

@@neildutoit519 You are partially correct. There is president, but it didn't work out. Communism ^^ failed due to many reasons. There are gradual approaches in western society though, too. Like the New Deal in the US or the social market system pre 1990 in germany, both were over time nullified by neoliberalism which lead meanwhile to the intelligency widly claiming that neoliberalism failed while still zombified followers are hammering their marching orders into the populace of trickle down to small government, to deregulating financial institutions. *That is not party dependent* as the lobbyists brought forth followers of neoliberalism in every party. Therefor this has become in part the reason for the big disellusioning in the west where the masses on the right look for authoritarianism to fix what is broken while the masses on the left go to towards socialism in varrying degree depending on nation. Only a compromise will settle this and gurantee lasting peace and inner stability again like it had been before. Therefor centrists maybe our best options and not the radicals on either side. Do you or others enjoy certain activities, like being creative, doing sport or anything else that is fullfilling to you? If the answer is yes, then there will be still ample things to do even if there is no paid job anymore. It becomes more about the individual on the one hand and maybe also about mega projects, where we build things noone alone could do and with all the free workforce now would become possible. Infrastructure projects and what not. I don't think as long we dream and have goals and wishes that there will be a lack of tasks we can have to give meaning in our lives. Till we end up in utopia, we maybe should though try avoiding any crossroads towards Dystopian futures. From my perspective, only a few people having control over a concentrated productivity after gloablized Hyper Capitalism would be set on steroids by AGIs is one of those. There is no room in that for democracy. On the other hand, should nations at some point use their own national AGIs to figure out how to best construct services for civilians, make their live better, i am not opposed to such.

@@tobene I agree on what owners would opt for was historicly fascism. I would add though that not all owners did so though. There were always also some with empathy. That there empathy is common good maybe, which needs harnessing and nurturing. People who are brought up in the believe they are special, have priviliges, are the elite, they usually then tend to act like that for the rest of their lives. This has been shown in studis where it questions about communal coherence and shouldering the problems of everyone affected people who due to their life history ended up in better positions where shown to help out their common man regularly when they were in the same schools, had the same classes as they then therefor could not easily distance themselves but have an overall concept of us that included their friends and people they were brought up with. For the same reason i am against to split up special needs childreen, not that they just have an easier way to be tought, but we, those who are rather normal in our behaviour and needs would learn not just to tolerate them, but an unhindered emphathetic compassionate relation with those who are missing physical or mental capacities and seeing them as part of a greater us.

Same here, My portfolio has been going down the drain while I try trading,l just don't know what I do wrong

Trading with an expert is the best strategy for newbies and busy investors who have little or no time to monitor trade

​@Leonard Baamkwap YOU DON'T NEED TO BE SHOCK BECAUSE I'M ALSO A HUGE BENEFICIARY OF EXPERT MRS CHLOE.

Mrs Chloe, as a matter of fact a forex mentor. With my first investment of $100.000 I got a ROI of $12,000 in two weeks I now have time for families and other things in life.

I'm a huge fan of crypto, I hold few coins in my wallet, while I trade the rest with my Expert, Mrs Chloe She's really Good

The sad answer is that no one knows. Super intelligence is NOT like a very smart person. It's nothing like a person at all. It's closer to the idea of a god than anything we can understand. So, what would a god do? No one knows.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YZjmZFDx-pA.htmlsi=a4xe3s1AYAZNXLIu We must do what we can to avert our death.

If you really believe that then the option is simple..

there has been no damage.

Why, what is it going to do?

It’s not really the case they can learn faster than you. Improve better than you. And knows more than any individual or group could possibly know already. It’s already superior to humans in many fundamental ways. We should allow it to help us

We actually don’t learn from mistakes, that’s the biggest conundrum of humanity

that is not a question g

If we learnt from mistakes we won't have wars

You are wrong. It's going to eliminate all work, including high-skilled and creative work. Artists, photographers, writers are already suffering. Software engineers, lawers, doctors are the next target. The main purpose of AI is to automate human intelligence itself. That's the biggest difference between now and all the other tech revolutions. It's not replacing tools, it's replacing you.

Good thing this isn't ai

you watch too much of it. This is reality, not sci-fi.

@@nkxseal8398 yet

To compare "cellphone technology" with AI is a very poor analogy ! The former is obviously a tool, the latter is capable of being sentient. Wake up more!

@@user-pc7ef5sb6x Sci fi is speculative fiction. Or, could be a mirror of real life.

Right. And since we know there is both good and bad in the world, and you can't put the genie back in the bottle - the genie humanity has been building since movable type, there will certainly be cheaters. The cheater's genie is loose.

This is sides that said gun shoot by itself for real

@@notreally2406 Exactly. If it has the potential to be used for good and bad, then it will be used for both. The fools building these AI think that they can avoid responsibility by claiming that tech is "neutral". It isn't. It's good and bad. Which is different. These people know that their products will be used for all of the worst things you could possibly imagine.

@@neildutoit519 the 1% invested all the money they refused to share in AI,pharma & space. AI & pharma to eliminate the 99% “wave by wave” & space for more resources. The planet & its limited resource will then b reserved for them & their future gen only this is modern £u genics

There’s not a single tool that makes its own decisions along with all of mankind’s knowledge built in from day 1

If the risk is a lot higher than the potential rewards, why would you proceed?

@@OliverInternational Robot tax. Either way, AI means communism is going to happen.

Most technologists admit there is a possibly we could lose control of it. Which i find to be mind blowing. Seems the more people worry about it, the faster the tech companies want to build it.

thats just how sam altman is ngl

Because he's trying to tell the government that this technology could literally be the end of humanity and this ancient dinosaur can only interpret that statement as "Oh no! What about the economy? What about jobs and unemployment?!" Imagine being a head astronomer and you've just detected a deadly asteroid headed straight for earth, and when you go to warn the president of the united states his first reaction is that he's concerned they'll be a major recession in the economy from all this. That is the reality we are living in right now.

Someone should make a film about ai becoming sentient and time travel and a war with robots , it's like a net over the sky that would terminate life.

Well, yeah, the most important task they have right now is to improve AI. It is the future of humanity and, if done correctly, the path to Utopia, even if the road is a bit rocky. Governments should be the ones that deal with the negative consequences (for example, think back to the stimulus checks from COVID and make them permanent), but yeah I'm worried about that part because governments usually suck. They're slow and way to susceptible to corruption and legal corruption (aka lobbying).

Yeah. We will have AGI in 6 months to 2 years.

Agreed 100%

😂🎉

That would raise significant ethical issues. The woman from IBM talked about skills training, but in terms of preparing the workforce, that means significant investments in overall education. When it comes to a job requiring diverse skill sets, like attorneys, even if AI is fed logic, emotional appeals, history, law, legal jargon, and ethics codes, the ability for AI to spit out persuasive arguments for a human jury seems… pretty unrealistic. I remember articles as early as 2004 that said like “in 10 years there will be no more lawyers”, but if the workforce is educated on law being a manmade system for governing civilization, it is less likely that we would ever allow key roles in that system to be taken over by technology. I think the nuance is important because I agree AI is going to make a lot of jobs obsolete, but if people had the education and skills to move into positions of management, oversight, planning, strategic vision, and even perhaps revitalizing small business ownership through investment, people might end up more fulfilled in their jobs- but with so much dependent on government response and investment (we have never done a good job at preparation, from preventative healthcare to jobs training, let alone greenlighting tax policy and spending changes necessary to achieve these things) I think we need to be realistic about white collar diversified skillset jobs that are within certain systems. Worrying about lawyers isn’t really necessary now and detracts from worrying about research assistants and clerks and low-level accounting and data entry and manufacturing jobs that have been and are being automated away.

Lawyers are already using it I heard one say that. The benefits which are frivolous and just serve to tickle us does not outweigh The economic damage this could cause, the potential threats it poses … Having Ai wrote you a shopping list or rewrite your diet plan is hardly a good enough reason for this. Cure cancer .. don’t they already have a cure it’s just not finished making it’s money yet, No, there is no excuse to allow this. Is this his interview for a job in the defence ministry. Tantalising tastebuds with temptation. It’s got trouble written all over it. That’s the way I see it.

It's more about automating away low paid dead end jobs. The kind that people can end up trapped in with low pay and no health insurance. Or automating away dangerous jobs that leave people in chronic pain for the rest of their lives.

@@RickSanchez-ig3lp you mean the low end jobs that give youngsters a start or the older can do part time while winding down for retirement that brings rich diversity of students etc… and can be used in the justice system to get through their backlogs so no fair trials just stats, no mercy. It’s too far. It’s greedy. All the hollywood scriptwriters, poets and creative people … gone .. no need for your mind, full time efforts, sacked. These people in big pharma and tech giants think they are gods.

​@@RickSanchez-ig3lpThose jobs won't be automated first. Problem is high paying jobs could be automated. Software developers, graphic designers, editors, journalists... Imagine AI take "good jobs" and we are left with low paying jobs. That is the real problem.

Non-profit does not mean non-revenue 🙄

There’s a very much for-profit arm of it called OpenAI LP now that is syphoning the funding, while hiding behind the non-profit moniker of the “main” arm. It’s very shady

😂

No human if any party could be that intelligent ...even scammers can get scammed.

The intelligent folks are working out of the govt edifices

LOL

Dude, I'm sorry to say it but what you have proposed is already impossible. It will only get more and more difficult as we lose our grasp on the black box that is deep machine learning.

You sound like Tony Stark when he was building Ultron minus the losing shitty job part.

​@@tydurden101 i geuss destruction is a possibility but why would ai want to destoy humanity how would it bennifit it ask that qeustion. These guys say 50 50 may be good may be bad but they overlook one thing how about indifference ai may just say we are worthless a d go its own way

Some people are saying we must learn to collab with AI but what they don't understand is in a few year time... Collab won't be necessary either...AI can literally do everything alone.

Have you seen Tesla's latest video? It's pretty flexible.

but shouldn't that be the case ideally, like the desire for control is so engrained in our mind that we even sometimes do things subconsciously thinking about power rather than consequences or maybe both considering best case scenarios. At least AI would be able to do that efficiently, or that might not be the case. Problem arises when we try to assign an owner to that, maybe AGI will be the best thing possible or the most devastating, who knows

Automation is 200 years away atleast. Todays technology cant even make a printer work properly

@@rocksummit3375 In 200 years we will have colonized tens or hundreds of planets.

there will always be paranoid 4chan conspiracies to every single iota in the world.

@@gwilymyddraig what? its just machine learning that predict our words and answer it accordingly. nothing special

@@muhammadaulia5298you’re missing the point. The trajectory is set. The version today is like a toddler. How it is raised up will determine whether we have a law-abiding citizen or a psycho criminal of an adult.

@@gwilymyddraig please enlighten me Mr Draig. how the algorithmic works and what makes it special

@@mecanuktutorials6476 Hmm i think its AGI case not Chat GPT sir. But im curious (im not into debate, real curious) please tell me what a possible real risk is AI to humanity? is it because paperclip maximizer things? or is AGI possible?

Unfortunately our government always regulates with a short term viewpoint where as China operates with a long time line. You have a very valid point. If you look at most Apex predators going extinct and usually because of their dominate nature or another Predators dominate nature you start to realize we are the dominate Apex Predator currently. However we are potentially creating a new Apex Predator that is going to dominate even more aggressively than us because its basically an extension of how we operate. Not to mention we are talking about a potential super intelligence that can process more information than all of us humans collectively so there is absolutely no way we can pretend that we know what is going on inside that black box that is AGI

You're talking pure fantasy. Fearmongering. The biggest difference between natural intelligence and artificial intelligence is that NI has goals that is motivated by it's dynamic environment and survival. If we want to survive, we have to change with the environment, right? If we're hungry, we have to eat. In order to eat, we have to make money. In order to make money, we have to get a job. In order to get a job, we have to obtain job skills -- see where I'm going here? These are all goals. An AI doesn't get hungry, scared, feel anger or remorse. It lives in a fixed environment of 0s and 1s. It's only goal is to categorize input data into output data. It can never reach the biological complexity of natural intelligence because it's limited by it's environment.

@@user-pc7ef5sb6x What are you basing this off of? What makes you say that it won't be seeking energy and extra matter just as much as we do? It will need it as much, if not more than we do.

@@Philitron128 I just explained why. It has no reason to. It's as simple as that. It's just a TOOL. AI is not the problem. Irrational people like you are, basing your fears and worries off FANTASY FILMS.

@@user-pc7ef5sb6x I sincerely wish that were true. Agents are generalized to have a utility function, and to achieve it they seek instrumental goals. No matter what your goal is, having more money or more freedom or more power helps you a achieve that goal. Same for AGI -- if it is intelligent enough, no matter the goal it has to maximize, being turned off will make it not achieve the goal. So it will seek power.

*I am absolutely amazed and terrified that you actually uttered a statement as stupid as that! You have no concept of the danger that AI poses to mankind! You are a fool!* *Your statement presupposes that AI is only beneficial! NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH! YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CONCEPT OF THE POTENTIAL DANGER!* *Every single thing mankind has ever invented, has also been perverted into a deadly, destructive, dehumanizing weapon! But at least we could understand those!* *AI will be smarter than us, faster than us, more powerful than us, more sneaky than us, and it will have no soul or morals! It will be absolutely beyond our understanding and control!*

The Greeks made a similar argument in favour of slavery so they could get rid of the hard to do tasks and have leisure time.

Yes it has extraordinary potential to build a better world. It has this potential because of the power that it hold. Of course, that same power also gives it extraordinary potential to build a worse world. Will it be able to cure all current disease? Yes. Will it be able to invent new and more terrible diseases? Also yes. Will it be able to create new forms of energy? Yes. Will it be able to create new and more devastating weapons? Also yes. Oh and since, unlike nukes, any and every terrorist organization can access and use this tech, you can be damn certain that it will be used for the worst things you can possibly imagine. You can chase your utopia. I'm more interested in preventing hell on earth. And that means stopping this insanity.

@@danh5637 so you're going to compare human slaves with AI?

@@GalacticSnake so the same basic argument wasn’t made? Do you even know what argument the Greeks made about slavery?

how many times were the lesser the creators? THat is a HUGE difference.

@@morbidmanmusic I don't see how it is different.

Yes, cause we definetely don't have photoshop nor AI tools that can remove those

Who pays the tax on that?

​@@danh5637 Businesses that employ automation technologies

@@mojtabapeyrovian which they get from charging customers…. So ultimately it’s us that pays.

​@@danh5637 I completely agree. So companies that choose to use machines instead of human labour may end up with higher expenses for their products and services. On the other hand, businesses that don't rely on automation can still remain competitive

@@mojtabapeyrovian I don’t think most people like their work tho. There just needs to be a new system of economics and theory of leisure for the working class.

Nothing crazy, once AI understands the mess humanity has created, so much destruction, corruption...etc, it could bring "a final solution " to save the planet, or to prevent humans from pulling the plug to shut down AI.

Not really a possibility with how AI is built. The danger is more enhancing mankind's ability to commit evil acts and less the chance of an AI "going rogue".

@@shawnbates9151 You seem to be unaware of the AI alignment problem. We have strong technical reasons for expecting that the default result of creating a system much more generally intelligent than we are is that we lose everything we care about, including our lives.

@@41-Haiku The general population isn't educated enough on what REAL WORLD AI programs are. They watch Termintor-style films, and that's as far their understanding will go. It's all a fantasy. Termintor can never happen in the real world because today's AI is nothing but input --- categorization -- output. It needs a human for input to work, just like any machine. They still do not feel, nor do they think.

​@@user-pc7ef5sb6xWow, you are wildly uneducated. GPT4 is already automated. All it takes is a little plugin. It can prompt itself. Put it in a body and it's a Terminator already. And just like you can't prevent it from prompting itself, you can't prevent it from putting itself in a body. Not that it needs to. We will be doing that ourselves. AI is a genie that can't be contained. It is smarter than you. All you can hope that it is smart enough to not want to murder you.

Wow...I said the same thing "your worst nightmare is job"...

also the same guy who faked he was a war hero in vietnam..................disgusting

This hearing reminded me of the scene in Don't Look Up where DiCaprio was trying to explain everyone was gonna die and they ignored him.

Sit down dawg

He is right though, while Altman has to stay positive to look good for his company and investors

@@Michael-vj9rn This guy has no relevant academic or practical background to even participate in the conversation. He is an opportunist with a histrionic personality disorder who's trying to make a name for himself by being a contrarian. He lacks the intellectual wherewithal to make real contributions to the field. He has never published anything and he changes his opinion frequently. A year a go, LLMs were overhyped and now they are going to destroy us all. Nobody in the field takes this clown seriously.

Okay i marked your words

True. Human life will become meaningless once we hand over our creative endeavours to AI. We will return to monkey-like existence, playing ballgames all day and eating bananas.

@@pirkkafilander342 ​ the 1% invested all the money they refused to share in AI,pharma & space. AI & pharma to eliminate the 99% “wave by wave” & space for more resources. The planet & its limited resource will then b reserved for them & their future gen only this is modern £u genics

No, nihilism isn't the only possible point of view. Look at the latest versions of Midjourney and how bloody amazing the art it creates is. There is still an enormous amount of artists who, as far as I can tell, are still human and are still basking in their creativity. It may be that they'll find it harder to get paid for it, but most artists are artists not because of the money (LOL imagine that) but because they want to create art, regardless of the fact that there's always better work than their own. Of course, many will be saddened by this, and will have some sort of crisis, but this will be their failure to adapt; most humans will not "lose their humanity".

Lol as lazy as the rich boomers with good health care are ... Lol they would want AI to do it all and get all credit. Well some other gens rather cheat using AI not doing any homework.

Better than the alternative of completely unregulated usage of such a powerful tool.

@@shawnbates9151 governments should not work with AI they just regulated. People already don't trust government officials do you really want then to have access to such a powerful weapon I don't think so

Terrifying

Im in

Sounds more like a nightmare.

You can do the opposite of what u said and it will destroy everyone :)

conflict of interest will always be there and there will always be a human behind the AI. You're describing a 'perfect world' scenario which is simply not real. Our reality is that a product which breaks faster than its competitors can generate more money because by making the product break, the sales skyrocket. At the end of the day the intention is always money & power, there's no reason to make the perfect product if there's easier and cheaper ways to sell you some bullshit.

This response is generated by AI guys.

fuck

Your thought process is great for non AGI. I think this is what most companies and future projects will be looking at.