Hi Jason, keep up the good work! Love your stuff on all-in as well. Would be nice to have Molly or someone equivalent back though! The duo was extra fun to watch.
The only problem I have with Jason is just like on All in he just keeps on speaking over people. He would ask Sunny a question and after Sunny says like 10 words then Jason is speaking over him and keeps talking.
The first step generated by AI at 52:16 is not the first step you would use in that use case ... their create a zap with AI has about a 20% success rate in my exp and actually adds time to my workflow vs just choosing the correct trigger to start!
100% correct. I found trying to automate ANYTHING using "Ai" is just a huge waste of time. You can't even create a prescripted list for chat gpt to use as a response library to a question without chat gpt adding some confusing filler text of its own. It's useless for anything SERIOUS. It's basically just a gimmick when trying to use as an automation assistant or as an all around assistant. You're better off just using zapier and creating your own outcomes. You cannot rely on chat gpt for anything other than being an encyclopedia.
Think about chatGPT Builder ingesting every new GPT produced is simply more data for AI to get smarter. Psychologically this could be a way to acquire data and more data and more data and more flops and more flops eventually bringing AGI closer. 😮
I really thing GPT Store is terrible for dev. They say they will share the revenu based on how much people use your GPT. Kind of like a Spotify. If you didn't know, here is how it works they make a big pool of all the money they make and base on the utilisations they split tjhe revenu afterwards. Which means if you're the Drake of the GPT, you make a lot of money but if you serve a specific industry, that is probably smaller you don't make money. They are not considering the fact that some database are actually closed and not accessible to users without payement. Why would a tech company connect that closed database to Gpt store in exchange for a very small amount of profit. I refuse to use GPT for my company from now on
Well I will say this The major problem I see happening is the censorship with chat GPT and open AI where I'm not saying adult content or nothing like that I'm just saying the inability and some of the potential pandering to a group or something on the political lines Now I think though the launch of this will inspire the open source community which is already using hugging face which hugging face has its limitations with its UI I think a lot of open source people will look at this and say you know we need to launch an open source store that allows you to launch and create agents based on an LLM a large language model just is open AI does because the problem would open AI is that if you're 18 years old or you can verify and you want to build something on their store they treat you like a child And a major he hypocrisy with all these large language models Microsoft Google is that how come I can search for a film I can search for a film on the browser yet I can't have the AI generate an image based on that film. Then the other hypocrisy aspect is how come your advertising for example an action film where there armed yet you can't generate an image like that when you could search for it on the browser and search engine I think this will inspire to open source community to go even further and I think the race is on especially since open AI isn't developing anything that could run on your computer locally
Im sorry but using chat GPT as an "assistant" for ANYTHING is garbage. Its a gimmick at best. This thing is a huge waste of time if youre trying to use it for anything serious when it comes to automations or trying to use as an assistant. It needs to just stay in its lane as a really good and advanced encyclopedia for everything.
