Opinionpalooza: The Supreme Court End-of-Term Breakfast Table | Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick |...

Подписаться 238 тыс.

Просмотров 29 тыс.

50% 1

What just happened??? Despite going into June clear-eyed and well informed about the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority, the number of huge cases before it, and the alarming stakes in so many of those cases…we are, nonetheless, shocked. The October 2023 term came to a shuddering end on Monday July 1st and Dahlia Lithwick, Mark Joseph Stern, Steve Vladeck and Mary Anne Franks are here to help parse some monumental decisions, some smaller cases with big ramifications, and what we can understand about the Justices who made those decisions for the rest of us, and the Justices who dissented.
This is part of Opinionpalooza, Slate’s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court this June. We kicked things off this year by explaining How Originalism Ate the Law. The best way to support our work is by joining Slate Plus. (If you are already a member, consider a donation or merch!)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Note: Captions are auto-generated by RU-vid.
Follow Amicus on RU-vid: • The Trump Indictment |...
Subscribe to Slate: / slate
Learn more: slate.com/podcasts/amicus
Follow Slate on Social:
Host Dahlia Lithwick on Twitter: / dahlialithwick
Slate on Twitter - / slate
Slate Podcasts on Twitter - / slatepodcasts
Slate on Facebook: / slate
Slate on Instagram: / slate

Опубликовано:

5 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 80

@narkelnaru2710 24 дня назад

Mary Anne Franks' pearls of wisdom at 58:59 sum up everything that needs to be said.

@joangravitz3280 26 дней назад

Barrett is "reasonable " only when it doesn't matter

@dontworrybout2664 26 дней назад

Lol if you don’t think we’re being reasonable keep pushing. You will see what unreasonable is through the back of the tracks.

@lynxminx4 24 дня назад

She understands how all of this is going to read in 100 years and is hedging for her legacy.

@joangravitz3280 24 дня назад

@@lynxminx4 why? Robert's doesn't care about his

@lynxminx4 24 дня назад

@@joangravitz3280 Apparently not

@puffsky9650 26 дней назад

Term limits for all of Congress, as well, would really help humanity.

@robyndally5061 26 дней назад

The court’s ruling to give a corrupt executive an out by not considering motive feels very much like the out in the use of deadly force that you feared for your life. But at least for the murderer’s motive, if not the president is considered in a criminal case.

@dontworrybout2664 26 дней назад

That’s not what happened mid wit.

@marjoriebreslin2995 26 дней назад

You don't know what you're talking about

@sandramorning8901 26 дней назад

Presidents have always had immunity. If they didn't Obama would be in jail and so would Biden.

@OldManse09 26 дней назад

This is not law anymore! Do you remember the warnings about legislating from the bench?

@letsRegulateSociopaths 26 дней назад

Every accusation is a confession

@user-wb7ss9ji3y 26 дней назад

Roberts was always cagey. Look at his actions and opinions in their entirety. You will see his agenda. Not pretty.

@trevino37 26 дней назад

As he said, He thinks that half the country's opinion should matter while implying that the other half of the country's opinion should not matter.....Well, here is a wake up call- half the country likes Trump and that should matter as well.

@TommyStahr 25 дней назад

2Thess2:11 have your opinions, that doesn’t change the truth.

@lynxminx4 24 дня назад

No one has ever implied it didn't matter. But just because you like someone doesn't mean you get to dismantle the government and create a new fascist country with the guy you like as dictator.

@matthewkardys6514 26 дней назад

Hay your dun with the lies .🇺🇸☝️

@marjoriebreslin2995 26 дней назад

I think these people are crying😂

@TommyStahr 25 дней назад

@marjoriebreslin2995 @matthewkardys6614 you're going to be crying as soon as Trump burns us all down. 2Thess2:11

@marjoriebreslin2995 25 дней назад

@TommyStahr Four years of trump and we had gas prices that were $1.83. Low inflation And there were no wars started under trump. Joe, we had high gas prices record high inflation in Afghanistan. Departure that killed 13 Marines and left billions of dollars worth of military equipment. Ukraine could have used Russia shooting down our unmanned drone. China flying a spy balloon over the united states and joe showering with his daughter when she was a teenager.

@marjoriebreslin2995 25 дней назад

@@TommyStahr Joe showering with his daughter Ashley when she was a teenager hunter, a drug addict. Ed coke head and why is that was their sexual abuse in the house. Is that why you're so in love with Joe? Because it reminds you of your father

@rossmann611 26 дней назад

extremely grateful for you people as i sit out here on the fringes wondering what the hell is happening. i feel less alone..

@markg.7865 26 дней назад

Not only has MAGA taken over the GOP, it has also taken over the Supreme Court. They have just paved the way now for a MAGA king.

@rossmann611 26 дней назад

especially appreciate the gravitas of dr. mary ann franks. i listen rapt .

@tyrone1544 26 дней назад

You are all alone lady. You self-hating, psychopaths have been dead wrong about EVERYTHING for the last 10 years and you’re still running your sick, twisted, mouths. Piss off lady, you tramps have ZERO CREDIBILITY with anything today.

@joecancer6013 26 дней назад

😅😂You found a bunch of lonely car Ladies to vibe with. Trump Won this election

@guywilliams3108 26 дней назад

Well court did allow the fringe groups that called them selves the leaders of there fields, then we find out they had an agenda and they were the the leaders in there field.

@guywilliams3108 26 дней назад

Weren't the leaders in there fields

@MehriNassiri 26 дней назад

عالی ❤

@Conway773 26 дней назад

This may not be a fashionable opinion but I think this ruling also implies the immunity the justices feel they warrant over their ethics rules. They and they alone can make the rules and now with this immunity ruling we will be forever at the mercy of their interpretations over every incident that tries to bring an executive action under scrutiny. They are the true kings and queens. Without any input from the other branches they can write and rewrite rules whenever they want. Grid yourself for endless legal wrangling and just more stress for the average Americans who just want to live their lives with safety, privacy and freedom.

@letsRegulateSociopaths 26 дней назад

Pretty funny (not) when the US Constitution provides NO POWERS for the supreme Court to overturn ANY LAWS.

@marjoriebreslin2995 26 дней назад

You failed in civics class

@Conway773 26 дней назад

@@marjoriebreslin2995 Really? but I do understand the three branches of government and this SCOTUS ruling just scuttled that idea.

@sandramorning8901 26 дней назад

This ruling does not give them total immunity. If it's against the Constitution they still can be held accountable. Presidents have always had immunity. If not Obama would have been in prison for droning Americans in Afghanistan.

@michaelharding675 26 дней назад

Supreme refers to perks

@punishedsnake6141 25 дней назад

KAREN CAST: This week on Karencast we will be complaining about Jan 6 YET AGAIN. HAHAHAHAHA😂😂😂

@TommyStahr 25 дней назад

Whatever happened to the Golden Rule? 2Thess2:11 is here

@deeproff1294 26 дней назад

❤

@stevenelson2641 26 дней назад

Missus here: Chevron Deference decision... "Expertise doesn't matter and the experts know nothing" when the court decides it is fine to hold an airplane engine on with 2 bolts instead of the 5 previously deemed necessary??!! Think about it... (thank you Joyce Vance for that point).

@markg.7865 26 дней назад

Not to worry, I'm sure Neil Gorsuch will know all about airline safety engineering....😢😢.

@matthewkardys6514 26 дней назад

You are a dum ass.🇺🇸☝️

@joecancer6013 26 дней назад

D.I.E. hires are what you need to worry about

@joangravitz3280 26 дней назад

How can it be even worse than we thought? We are doomed

@captainmerca341 26 дней назад

Trump 2024💪🇺🇸🦅

@TommyStahr 25 дней назад

2Thess2:11 is here. You believe in hate and lies. Jesus is coming, you will be left behind.

@captainmerca341 24 дня назад

@@TommyStahr....?

@deekallio6956 26 дней назад

Would like to hear a brief account of the "history of the rule of law" starting with the magna carta, u.s. constitution and the supreme court's idea of originalism. Which apparently has now all been thrown out...

@marjoriebreslin2995 26 дней назад

The greatest strength of the democratic party is stupid people

@mrready2race 26 дней назад

What I biased , wrong view on something….

@AC-re9ee 26 дней назад

Trump 2024🎉🎉🎉🎉

@fedbia2003 26 дней назад

More liberals crying about how originalism is bad for the country.

@johnpelter 25 дней назад

And I’m just over here wondering what the hell you guys think will actually come from any of this…apart from being able to shit on crying libs because they’re crying, of course.

@fedbia2003 25 дней назад

@@johnpelter Originalism? Nothing. That's just how all laws should be interpreted. Once you move away from that you're moving away from what the people intended at the time. But it's logical to assume that 9 people should never be left to those decisions. Most things need to go through legislature. Not just hoping a handful of rulers decide not to change precedent. Get things codified or stfu.

@T61APL89 24 дня назад

Originally, Washington stepped down as president in spite of the monarchy he fought against. Originally there wasn't any white people on this continent, maybe being original makes more sense in 1925 then 2025.

@lynxminx4 24 дня назад

@@fedbia2003 If you actually believed this, the behavior of this Supreme Court would alarm you. SCOTUS has been all over the board with 'originalism'- using it to argue that privacy rights shouldn't exist, but discarding it in respect to newly instituted executive powers. The conservative justices are hypocrites making things up as they go- 'originalism' is simply a convenient argument when arguing against what they oppose. You do realize the new powers they've awarded the president never previously existed and are not enumerated in the Constitution- that in fact the Constitution suggests presidential power should be checked rather than unchecked. Right?