Oregon State vs Stanford THRILLING Ending | 2022 College Football 

Sadly not gonna be much of that anymore

A win is a win 😅 lol I swear people complain some how

Yes go beavs.

I've been watching yall all season and I keep becoming more of a bev fan lol

@@justingolden21 I've been watching for 15 years, some good, some bad, but it's worth it. I go to almost all of the home games and it is well worth it.

They were within 1 possession, why would they give up?

@@shivtim at one point it was 24-10

@@Talon2727 Do most teams give up when they're down by 14 in the third? Especially teams with a high powered passing offense?

Not exactly well done. More like " that'll do pig, that'll do"

Bro that stadium was dead wym

@@martingee9127 I don’t mean for the people at the games. I mean for us at home. Having binged football from noon on. Just to see wild endings to a game you really don’t care about at 12 am.

@@fatpowerful The game between Hawai’i and San Diego State also had a really good finish even though the game slogged for the first three quarters.

Lots of things more electric. The PAC has been garbage the past 5 years. Looks like finally this year they're a bit better (though I'm not buying into USC who squeaked out a win against Oregon St even though the OSU QB had 4 interceptions). But it is nice to have some football on that late because why the hell not.

@@jhaz89 I’d say 4 teams in the top 25 is more than a bit better dude. You are so original shitting on the PAC 12 like everyone else does. We legit have 3 teams that are for sure top 15 but should be top 10. Oregon, UCLA, and USC are the real deal this year.

I know. It apparently shocked that second defender so much that he forgot that he was supposed to try to tackle the receiver... ;-)

It didn't hurt using the DBs facemask as leverage to do so. 3:09 pause on the video.

They're a much better team than their record shows. They've been hamstringed by bad QB play but otherwise they're quite solid.

​@@Titronnica Struggling to barely beat Stanford is unacceptable & that means they're not a good team at all whatsoever! Not even a top 25 team in college 🏈💯💯💯

@@vegetaking1272 they are certainly not exceptional but 4 and 2 is better than 1 and 4. Stanford is a putrid train wreck.

@@vegetaking1272 dude they nearly beat usc they must be somewhat feisty.

and giving us fricken heart attacks lol

its college football..no one cares

Your pain is my happiness, GO BEAVS!!!

That was rg3??? He was so funny the whole game

Agreed! He was terrific.

He’s got some good ones already, not as good as “there’s an orgi in the end zone”

long story short, long snapper tore open his hand forcing them to go for 2 on their last 3 drives.

I don’t understand. You aren’t running out the clock. Go for 2 to be up 3 possibly.

@@pitmclord if oregon state was to turn the ball over like a pick 6 or fumble that goes for a touchdown, then they are down 1.

Indeed, laid on thick

Just like they drew it up in Minneapolis

@@logandihel Hah-Hah! That is what I was thinking of too. Very good.

Yeah

Is this RG3 right?

@@ramuelcruzada3207 I believe so. His commentary has been awesome.

tbh i did not think about that but you are 100% correct

I think he might be on the hot seat and risk being fired

Surrender Cobra pose

Prevents the opponent from blocking it and / or returning the ball for a two point go ahead score.

I think going for the two point to get up by 3 would of been the best move. But I do see what @dclark142002 is saying. Worked out for the Beavers. I think I would of tried to get up by 3 though. Stanford still had 2 timeouts and weird shit happens when it's Pac-12 after dark.

Yeah I understand it, just haven't ever seen it

Great point! In re-watching this a couple times, I feel bad for him because he made a big mistake. If he stayed behind while the other defender went for the ball, he could have positioned himself to make the tackle. To be fair, I never played the game (I'm not even knowledgeable enough to be an armchair athlete) and have no idea what it's like to be in those situations in the moment, so I can't fault him for it. But as you say, I imagine he might replay this moment in his mind thinking he could have made a stop there.

As a saints fan. How have you not seen the Minneapolis miracle?

It looked like the defenders expected him to run out of bounds and stop the clock.

It was past their bedtimes.

I think that by the time their minds registered that he had the ball, it was too late

A TO on a 2 point conversion could have resulted in 2 points for Stan and the Beavs would have lost in heart breaking fashion. A blocked PAT if returned would have giving Stan the tying point, it was a great coaching decision by JS.

No??

Yup

How

yet the refs missed 2 pis on touch down passes for osu so it evens out

They need to go back to dungeons and dragons. 😅

HAHA I was totally thinking the same thing, oh well we lost, lets go back to coding hahaha

No one has answered but the OSU long snapper got injured and for some reason they had no backup. I've seen some other teams kneel it so the opponent doesn't even have a chance of getting a return score

I assume not to risk a possible 2-point return which would give Stanford the lead. Actually kinda smart when you think about it.

Hmmm i thought the same thing 🧐🤨🤔

@@Landonio but wouldn’t going for 2 make more sense? Just curious

@@Landonio ehhhh, you could at least run it so you get a field goal lead

@@user-ng5my1jt8q Their point is if the unthinkable happened (bad snap, fumble, INT), Stanford could have returned it for 2 points and the lead. I'm not sure I'd defend the position, the odds of a 2 time-out, 13 second field goal drive have to be higher than a 2 point conversion going the other way but there is some logic in the decision.

Yes completely agree.

Stanford still had 2 timeouts also. If it wasn't an interception in the last few seconds of could of been a big yardage pickup, call timeout, and kick a field goal. I'm not a coach but I kind of think that was a lapse in coaching.

Editing...

because, they almost lost but then they won

2nd String QB

@@Legiey lmao

My thoughts exactly…

Because a fumble or interception could result in Stanford getting 2 points? That's all I got.

A TO on a 2 point conversion could have resulted in 2 points for Stan and the Beavs would have lost in heart breaking fashion. A blocked PAT if returned would have giving Stan the tying point, it was a great coaching decision by JS.

I wondered that too, but the commentators pointed out that Oregon State had some injury problems with their long snapper/center and were being cautious (though that would only apply to a PAT, which they had no reason to attempt, so I'm not sure how relevant it is). As others pointed out, I think they were avoiding a costly mistake like a pick six on a botched two point conversion play.

They wanted to eliminate the chance that Stanford could score 2 points on the try.

@@terryfox9344 A TO on a 2 point conversion could have resulted in 2 points for Stan and the Beavs would have lost in heart breaking fashion. A blocked PAT if returned would have giving Stan the tying point, it was a great coaching decision by JS.

@@terryfox9344 makes sense

I guess they didn't want to risk the extra point being blocked...

Don't want a fumble or blocked PAT the other way.

@@rollercoasterfweak I'd say they probably should have gone for 2 and just tried to run it up the gut and told the RB to be clenching onto that ball with both arms. In that case it's very unlikely there would be a fumble recovery taken back 97 yards, but then you'd at least have a chance at going up by 3. I've seen crazier things happen than a team getting the ball back with 13 seconds and getting into field goal range. That's time for two mid range passes that could get potentially get them into field goal range. I'd say if there was less than 10 seconds then it would be more reasonable to just kneel the PAT because there wouldn't be time for two mid range passes. So it was a reasonable decision but probably not ideal.

A TO on a 2 point conversion could have resulted in 2 points for Stan and the Beavs would have lost in heart breaking fashion. A blocked PAT if returned would have giving Stan the tying point, it was a great coaching decision by JS.

@@MrYatesj1 I understand but you have to play the odds. Stanford had 2 TOs, they’re more likely to get into FG range with 2 long completions than your offense turning the ball over and having it run back 98 yards

Coach explained that the long snapper was out with a cut hand. Hard to believe they didn’t have anyone else who could make that snap.